Topic: Obama is Destroying the Economy | |
---|---|
![]() and my 2 cents....yes..the economy was not doing to hot under Bush...but BHO isn't making it any better Awful mild on Bush ain't ya, he was worse than not doing so hot. ![]() I don't like everything I am hearing but the problem is that I have to sort through the bs to get to any real information. not at all. I'm fully aware of the president AND congresses hand in everything. and I wasn't harsh on BHO either in that post. I didn't have much problem with BHO before but I do see a lot that I'm losing respect for him and all in the short time he has been in office. |
|
|
|
and my 2 cents....yes..the economy was not doing to hot under Bush...but BHO isn't making it any better I don't know yet, too soon to tell. Our economy turned into a run away freight train under the last 8 years of administration. Nothing is going to change it quickly. All the candidates during the campaigns we're telling people they could "fix" the economy but only the dumbest candidate could actually believe it could actually be done in a term or two. I see some signs that the economy may have slowed it's downward run, don't know if it's enough, don't know if it has anything to do with Obama or if it's just bottoming out of it's own accord. Only time will give us any real perspective and nothing will ever be able to absolutely prove what caused our economy to recover if it recovers. Actually the economy has been going down since Clinton's 2nd term and accelerated by 9/11 and the oil pinch. Bush slowed it dramatically, but Obama put it into a nose dive, the ensuing crash should be interesting. You been having those bad dreams again? |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. |
|
|
|
Edited by
DaveyB
on
Wed 06/10/09 02:11 PM
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Largely agree, Mirror. And would like add to that the "they're all crooks" and the "all politicians suck" crowd are largely just avoiding any serious thought about who they should vote for or what policies they should support. An easy cop out. Less stress on the gray matter. For the record, I am a life long Democrat in the moderate to liberal range. I suppose I could take offense at that. But I'll just assume it comes from lack of knowledge. Most of those I've seen who call themselves independent spend far more effort than what I see on the average voter. I know I spend considerably more time in making my decisions than most any one else I know in all my votes, I have to I don't have a party leader telling me how to vote. Picking a side simply means you get to vote whatever your party tells you to and not worry about using your brain. I'd say just exactly the opposite of what you suggest is true, and it's why we are in such a fix. |
|
|
|
Edited by
DaveyB
on
Wed 06/10/09 02:18 PM
|
|
and my 2 cents....yes..the economy was not doing to hot under Bush...but BHO isn't making it any better I don't know yet, too soon to tell. Our economy turned into a run away freight train under the last 8 years of administration. Nothing is going to change it quickly. All the candidates during the campaigns we're telling people they could "fix" the economy but only the dumbest candidate could actually believe it could actually be done in a term or two. I see some signs that the economy may have slowed it's downward run, don't know if it's enough, don't know if it has anything to do with Obama or if it's just bottoming out of it's own accord. Only time will give us any real perspective and nothing will ever be able to absolutely prove what caused our economy to recover if it recovers. Actually the economy has been going down since Clinton's 2nd term and accelerated by 9/11 and the oil pinch. Bush slowed it dramatically, but Obama put it into a nose dive, the ensuing crash should be interesting. You been having those bad dreams again? ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fortunately not, we have quite a few teams they just are being bullied off the field by some very dishonest players. Fortunately that too is changing though much too slowly. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fortunately not, we have quite a few teams they just are being bullied off the field by some very dishonest players. Fortunately that too is changing though much too slowly. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Rush is an idiot.
Can't believe there are so many who would even listen to half of what he says and agree. ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
DaveyB
on
Wed 06/10/09 02:28 PM
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If either party actually stuck to the ideals and ideologies they profess I might agree at least in principle. But the simple facts are neither party does that. For both of those parties it's about getting re-elected and remaining in power. period. Sad fact is because of the way our political system is setup it will always be that way to some degree. So unless we vote with our own minds and do our best to choose which ever candidate is most likely to do the best job, regardless of party affiliation, we will continue to get this cyclic BS back and forth between ultra-liberal and ultra-conservative that doesn't do anyone any good. |
|
|
|
The economy has been destroyed before Obama got in office. Whether or not he is fixing it or breaking it, I don't know. We'll see it by the end of the year.
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Wed 06/10/09 02:34 PM
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() If either party actually stuck to the ideals and ideologies they profess I might agree at least in principle. But the simple facts are neither party does that. For both of those parties it's about getting re-elected and remaining in power. period. Sad fact is because of the way our political system is setup it will always be that way to some degree. So unless we vote with our own minds and do our best to choose which ever candidate is most likely to do the best job, regardless of party affiliation, we will continue to get this cyclic BS back and forth between ultra-liberal and ultra-conservative that doesn't do anyone any good. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I would rather vote for who I think is best suited and NOT what party they belong to. I don't care about the parties....but what that person will do for the country. I might vote dem one time then rep the other. I'm not blind and believe just because someone tells me something it must be so....regardless of who they are.
|
|
|
|
The economy has been destroyed before Obama got in office. Whether or not he is fixing it or breaking it, I don't know. We'll see it by the end of the year. I don't know if we'll even know it by then. So far they aren't spending the stimulus money at the speed they were suppose to if they don't spend it quickly it won't do much good and what little good it does do won't come till much later. So far they've only spent 54 billion of the stimulus money while that may sound like a lot of money to you and I, it's a drop in the bucket when talking about jump starting the US economy. |
|
|
|
The economy has been destroyed before Obama got in office. Whether or not he is fixing it or breaking it, I don't know. We'll see it by the end of the year. I don't know if we'll even know it by then. So far they aren't spending the stimulus money at the speed they were suppose to if they don't spend it quickly it won't do much good and what little good it does do won't come till much later. So far they've only spent 54 billion of the stimulus money while that may sound like a lot of money to you and I, it's a drop in the bucket when talking about jump starting the US economy. Right. Just like the economy going down hill was a long time coming so will the recovery be. The stimulus is suppose to help the recovery happen faster but it sure doesn't seem to be as easy as they thought it would be making people spend....lol |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() And if they actually followed the philosophy they profess that wouldn't be such a bad thing. I prefer mitigate my errors by basing my decision on intelligent thoughtful studying of the issues and persons I'm voting on. Your method has too high an error rate for me. |
|
|
|
Edited by
DaveyB
on
Wed 06/10/09 02:48 PM
|
|
The economy has been destroyed before Obama got in office. Whether or not he is fixing it or breaking it, I don't know. We'll see it by the end of the year. I don't know if we'll even know it by then. So far they aren't spending the stimulus money at the speed they were suppose to if they don't spend it quickly it won't do much good and what little good it does do won't come till much later. So far they've only spent 54 billion of the stimulus money while that may sound like a lot of money to you and I, it's a drop in the bucket when talking about jump starting the US economy. Right. Just like the economy going down hill was a long time coming so will the recovery be. The stimulus is suppose to help the recovery happen faster but it sure doesn't seem to be as easy as they thought it would be making people spend....lol Who would have thought congress wouldn't be able to spend money fast enough ![]() |
|
|
|
I would rather vote for who I think is best suited and NOT what party they belong to. I don't care about the parties....but what that person will do for the country. I might vote dem one time then rep the other. I'm not blind and believe just because someone tells me something it must be so....regardless of who they are. It would be rare for me to choose a republican, simply because they haven't changed much over the years since I have actually voted. They are still control freaks, even more so than democrats, who control just in another way. I liked Obama and I gave up watching all my favorite programs to keep up with both sides of the campaigns, and in the end I chose Obama. I have not lost any respect for him, why would I? He has done nothing to deserve my disrespect. Sure he might not do things the way I might expect him to, but then I never expect to get everything I want in one president. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Why in the world should I pick a side when both side are so obviously wrong? For the most part both are run by crooked politician hell bent only one thing, getting re-elected. You vote party line if you so choose, that is your right. But I prefer to vote for the best man no matter what party he belongs to dem, rep, green, independent, doesn't matter. If we as a people did more of that we'd probably have a better selection from which to choose from. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Fortunately not, we have quite a few teams they just are being bullied off the field by some very dishonest players. Fortunately that too is changing though much too slowly. ![]() ![]() ![]() I've heard the argument before... it's a cop out IMO. |
|
|