Topic: Ancient Astronaught theory | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Something "BIG" happened 12,000 years ago. This is not a lot of time in terms of human existence, but it almost wiped out the human race. I posted this article on the "Global Warming Thread" but I'll post it here too.
Begin Quote: UNIVERSAL DEATH IN 10,000 B.C. Charles Darwin, the famous naturalist, was shocked by the extinction of species at the close of the Pleistocene. He writes: "The extinction of species has been involved in the most gratuitous mystery . . . no one can have marvelled more than I have at the extinction of species" (Darwin, 1859). He declared that for whole species to be destroyed in Southern Patagonia, in Brazil, in the mountain ranges of Peru, and in North America up to the Bering Straits, one must "shake the entire framework of the globe". Smilodon (Sabre-toothed) Tiger Watching them cut the huge block of muck-filled ice containing the mammoth remains on the recent "Discovery" TV special helped me realize: if a woolley mammoth standing out in the grasslands of central Asia were to suddenly die, for whatever reason, his body would simply rot and the scavangers would pick the bones clean. The only way for this to have happened would be for the mammoth to either fall in a lake or pond and drown or be swept into this mass of vegetation, insects and mud by a massive wave of water. Under which of these two scenarios would such an animal be quick-frozen? His hair and skin were still intact--even the food in its stomach! The bones of extinct Pleistocene mammals can be found almost anywhere: they lie bleaching in the sands of Florida; in the gravels of New Jersey; the dry terraces of western Texas; as well as protrude from the sticky ooze of the tar pits near Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles. These animals did not simply grow old and die natural deaths. "The young lie with the old, foal with dam and calf with cow. Whole herds of animals were apparently killed together, overcome by some common power." (Hibben, 1946) "The event was worldwide. The mammoths of Siberia became extinct about the same time as the giant rhinoceros of Europe; the mastodons of Alaska and the bison of Siberia ended simultaneously. The same is true of the Asian elephants and the American camels. The cause of these extinctions must be common to both hemispheres. If the coming of glacial conditions was gradual, it would not have caused the extinctions, because the various animals could have simply migrated to where conditions were better. What is seen here is total surprise, and uncontrolled violence." (Leonard, 1979) Even the Pleistocene geologist William R. Farrand of the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, who is opposed to catastrophism in any form, states: "Sudden death is indicated by the robust condition of the animals and their full stomachs . . . the animals were robust and healthy when they died" (Farrand, 1961). Neither in his article nor in his letters of rebuttal does Farrand ever face the reality of worldwide catastrophe represented by the millions of bones deposited all over this planet at the very end of the Pleistocene. Some geologists may be softening their traditional stand against axial tilts and other rotational variations which could be the cause of world catastrophies. Dr. J. R. Heirtzler of the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory observed that there has been "a revival of a 30-year-old theory that the glacial ages were caused by changes in the tilt of the earth's axis . . . there is clear evidence that large earthquakes occur at about the same time as certain changes in the earth's rotational motion." He goes on to say: "Whatever the mechanism of these changes, it is not hard to believe that similar changes in the earth's axial motion in times past could have caused major earthquake and mountain-building activity and could even have caused the magnetic field to flip" (Heirtzler, 1968). It has also been found that the end of the Pleistocene was attended by rampant volcanic activity (Hibben, 1946). More recently Prof. Stephen Jay Gould, professor of geology at Harvard University, after studying the geological and paleontological record intensively, has championed the cause for open-minded consideration of catastrophism and uniformitarianism. He concludes that both concepts are represented equally in the geological record (Gould, 1977). Galactic radiation is even being looked at as a possible cause. (Here one can't help but be reminded of Plato's reference to "the stream from heaven" which arrives on earth "after the usual interval"; Timaeus, 23.) Prof. Hibben appears to sum up the situation in a single statement: "The Pleistocene period ended in death. This was no ordinary extinction of a vague geological period which fizzled to an uncertain end. This death was catastrophic and all inclusive" (Hibben, 1946). So it seems the last Ice Age, the Pleistocene Epoch, the Upper Paleolithic Age, and the "reign of the gods" in Egyptian history all ended at about the same time. It appears to me that the evidence, when taken into full consideration, points to a worldwide catastrophe (from whatever cause) which occurred at the close of the Pleistocene Epoch. Can it be merely coincidence that this is the very date (circa. 10,000 B.C.) indicated by Plato for the floods and seismic disturbances which led to the sinking of Atlantis and the destruction of its empire? # TOP of Page BIBLIOGRAPHY Berlitz, Charles, "The Mystery of Atlantis," New York, 1969. Blake, Charles Carter, "Distribution of Mastodon in South America," Geologist, November 1861. Braghine, Col. Alexander Pavlovitch, "The Shadow of Atlantis," Dutton Press, New York, 1940. Farrand, William R., "Frozen Mammoths and Modern Geology," Science, Vol.133, No. 3455, March 17, 1961. Heirtzler, J. R., "Sea-floor spreading," Scientific American, Vol. 219, No. 6, December 1968. Gould, Stephen Jay, "Catastrophies and Steady State Earth," Natural History, Vol. LXXXIV, No. 2, February 1975. Gould, Stephen Jay, "Evolution's Erratic Pace," Natural History, Vol. LXXXVII, No. 5, May 1977. Hibben, Frank, "The Lost Americans," Thomas & Crowell Co., New York, 1946. LaViolette, P. A. "Evidence of high cosmic dust concentrations in Late Pleistocene polar ice (20,000-14,000 Years BP)." Meteoritics 20, 1985. Leonard, R. Cedric, Appendix A in "A Geological Study of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge," Special Paper No. 1, Cowen Publ., Bethany, 1979. Lippman, Harold E., "Frozen Mammoths," Physical Geology, New York, 1969. Martin, P. S. & Guilday, J. E., "Bestiary for Pleistocene Biologists," Pleistocene Extinction, Yale University, 1967. Nials, Fred L., "Geomorphic systems and stratigraphy in internally-drained watersheds of the northern Great Basin: Implications for archaeological studies," Sundance Archaeological Research Fund, Technical Paper, No. 5, University of Nevada, February 1999. Okladnikov, A. P., "Yakutia before its Incorporation into the Russian State," McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 1970. Patten, Donald W., "The Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch: A Study in Scientific History," Pacific Meridian Publ., Seattle, 1966. Pfizenmayer, E. W., "Siberian man and mammoth," Blackie & Sons, London, 1939. Sanderson, Ivan T., "Riddle of the Frozen Giants," Saturday Evening Post, No. 39, 16 January 1960. Simpson, George G., "Horses," Oxford University Press, New York, 1951. Vereshchagin, N. K., "Primitive Hunters and Pleistocene Extinction in the Soviet Union," Pleistocene Extinction (P. S. Martin & H. E. Wright, Jr., editors), New Haven, 1967. Vereshchagin, N. K., and G. F. Baryshnikov, "Paleoecology of the mammoth fauna in the Eurasian Arctic" in Paleoecology of Beringia, D. M. Hopkins, J. V. Matthews, C. E. Schweger, and S. B. Young (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1982. |
|
|
|
Here is a good (but long winded) collection of UFOs as seen by NASA.
|
|
|
|
Something "BIG" happened 12,000 years ago. This is not a lot of time in terms of human existence, but it almost wiped out the human race. I posted this article on the "Global Warming Thread" but I'll post it here too. Begin Quote: UNIVERSAL DEATH IN 10,000 B.C. Charles Darwin, the famous naturalist, was shocked by the extinction of species at the close of the Pleistocene. He writes: "The extinction of species has been involved in the most gratuitous mystery . . . no one can have marvelled more than I have at the extinction of species" (Darwin, 1859). He declared that for whole species to be destroyed in Southern Patagonia, in Brazil, in the mountain ranges of Peru, and in North America up to the Bering Straits, one must "shake the entire framework of the globe". Smilodon (Sabre-toothed) Tiger Watching them cut the huge block of muck-filled ice containing the mammoth remains on the recent "Discovery" TV special helped me realize: if a woolley mammoth standing out in the grasslands of central Asia were to suddenly die, for whatever reason, his body would simply rot and the scavangers would pick the bones clean. The only way for this to have happened would be for the mammoth to either fall in a lake or pond and drown or be swept into this mass of vegetation, insects and mud by a massive wave of water. Under which of these two scenarios would such an animal be quick-frozen? His hair and skin were still intact--even the food in its stomach! The bones of extinct Pleistocene mammals can be found almost anywhere: they lie bleaching in the sands of Florida; in the gravels of New Jersey; the dry terraces of western Texas; as well as protrude from the sticky ooze of the tar pits near Wilshire Boulevard in Los Angeles. These animals did not simply grow old and die natural deaths. "The young lie with the old, foal with dam and calf with cow. Whole herds of animals were apparently killed together, overcome by some common power." (Hibben, 1946) "The event was worldwide. The mammoths of Siberia became extinct about the same time as the giant rhinoceros of Europe; the mastodons of Alaska and the bison of Siberia ended simultaneously. The same is true of the Asian elephants and the American camels. The cause of these extinctions must be common to both hemispheres. If the coming of glacial conditions was gradual, it would not have caused the extinctions, because the various animals could have simply migrated to where conditions were better. What is seen here is total surprise, and uncontrolled violence." (Leonard, 1979) Even the Pleistocene geologist William R. Farrand of the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, who is opposed to catastrophism in any form, states: "Sudden death is indicated by the robust condition of the animals and their full stomachs . . . the animals were robust and healthy when they died" (Farrand, 1961). Neither in his article nor in his letters of rebuttal does Farrand ever face the reality of worldwide catastrophe represented by the millions of bones deposited all over this planet at the very end of the Pleistocene. Some geologists may be softening their traditional stand against axial tilts and other rotational variations which could be the cause of world catastrophies. Dr. J. R. Heirtzler of the Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory observed that there has been "a revival of a 30-year-old theory that the glacial ages were caused by changes in the tilt of the earth's axis . . . there is clear evidence that large earthquakes occur at about the same time as certain changes in the earth's rotational motion." He goes on to say: "Whatever the mechanism of these changes, it is not hard to believe that similar changes in the earth's axial motion in times past could have caused major earthquake and mountain-building activity and could even have caused the magnetic field to flip" (Heirtzler, 1968). It has also been found that the end of the Pleistocene was attended by rampant volcanic activity (Hibben, 1946). More recently Prof. Stephen Jay Gould, professor of geology at Harvard University, after studying the geological and paleontological record intensively, has championed the cause for open-minded consideration of catastrophism and uniformitarianism. He concludes that both concepts are represented equally in the geological record (Gould, 1977). Galactic radiation is even being looked at as a possible cause. (Here one can't help but be reminded of Plato's reference to "the stream from heaven" which arrives on earth "after the usual interval"; Timaeus, 23.) Prof. Hibben appears to sum up the situation in a single statement: "The Pleistocene period ended in death. This was no ordinary extinction of a vague geological period which fizzled to an uncertain end. This death was catastrophic and all inclusive" (Hibben, 1946). So it seems the last Ice Age, the Pleistocene Epoch, the Upper Paleolithic Age, and the "reign of the gods" in Egyptian history all ended at about the same time. It appears to me that the evidence, when taken into full consideration, points to a worldwide catastrophe (from whatever cause) which occurred at the close of the Pleistocene Epoch. Can it be merely coincidence that this is the very date (circa. 10,000 B.C.) indicated by Plato for the floods and seismic disturbances which led to the sinking of Atlantis and the destruction of its empire? # TOP of Page BIBLIOGRAPHY Berlitz, Charles, "The Mystery of Atlantis," New York, 1969. Blake, Charles Carter, "Distribution of Mastodon in South America," Geologist, November 1861. Braghine, Col. Alexander Pavlovitch, "The Shadow of Atlantis," Dutton Press, New York, 1940. Farrand, William R., "Frozen Mammoths and Modern Geology," Science, Vol.133, No. 3455, March 17, 1961. Heirtzler, J. R., "Sea-floor spreading," Scientific American, Vol. 219, No. 6, December 1968. Gould, Stephen Jay, "Catastrophies and Steady State Earth," Natural History, Vol. LXXXIV, No. 2, February 1975. Gould, Stephen Jay, "Evolution's Erratic Pace," Natural History, Vol. LXXXVII, No. 5, May 1977. Hibben, Frank, "The Lost Americans," Thomas & Crowell Co., New York, 1946. LaViolette, P. A. "Evidence of high cosmic dust concentrations in Late Pleistocene polar ice (20,000-14,000 Years BP)." Meteoritics 20, 1985. Leonard, R. Cedric, Appendix A in "A Geological Study of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge," Special Paper No. 1, Cowen Publ., Bethany, 1979. Lippman, Harold E., "Frozen Mammoths," Physical Geology, New York, 1969. Martin, P. S. & Guilday, J. E., "Bestiary for Pleistocene Biologists," Pleistocene Extinction, Yale University, 1967. Nials, Fred L., "Geomorphic systems and stratigraphy in internally-drained watersheds of the northern Great Basin: Implications for archaeological studies," Sundance Archaeological Research Fund, Technical Paper, No. 5, University of Nevada, February 1999. Okladnikov, A. P., "Yakutia before its Incorporation into the Russian State," McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, 1970. Patten, Donald W., "The Biblical Flood and the Ice Epoch: A Study in Scientific History," Pacific Meridian Publ., Seattle, 1966. Pfizenmayer, E. W., "Siberian man and mammoth," Blackie & Sons, London, 1939. Sanderson, Ivan T., "Riddle of the Frozen Giants," Saturday Evening Post, No. 39, 16 January 1960. Simpson, George G., "Horses," Oxford University Press, New York, 1951. Vereshchagin, N. K., "Primitive Hunters and Pleistocene Extinction in the Soviet Union," Pleistocene Extinction (P. S. Martin & H. E. Wright, Jr., editors), New Haven, 1967. Vereshchagin, N. K., and G. F. Baryshnikov, "Paleoecology of the mammoth fauna in the Eurasian Arctic" in Paleoecology of Beringia, D. M. Hopkins, J. V. Matthews, C. E. Schweger, and S. B. Young (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1982. cool |
|
|
|
Edited by
metalwing
on
Thu 08/06/09 03:46 PM
|
|
As luck would have it I caught a History Channel spot on Nostradamus who describes the death of 12,000 years ago and explains why (this guy's idea anyway) it will happen in 2012. It matches Jane's "galactic plane" theory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0ht3Wg7NwQ&feature=related |
|
|
|
Here is a good (but long winded) collection of UFOs as seen by NASA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Dro2CTqEhI&NR=1 oops. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bludevalisbad
on
Fri 08/07/09 12:59 AM
|
|
I don't think there is a shred of credible evidence for aliens having already visited us. You have not looked then. The evidence is unshakable for at least a very advanced society having lived before the age of current human history. Whether you want to call them "aliens" would depend on where you think they came from, how they knew about the solar system, the planets, and how they flew through the air and built airports, what the ancient computer-like machine was with all gears they found under the sea that was dated older than b.c. How the pyramids were built, and how some ancient stones were cut and carved with machine-like precision that we don't even have the capability to do today. Some of the lame explanations for how these structures were built are laughable and idiotic. Most of it is simply ignored. The evidence is there and it is unshakable. You must be blind or just refuse to see it. You prefer to believe the lame explanations. What I wonder is why. The device you reference was recreated and it is a slightly more complex version of other machines made in ancient times . . . surely a marvel that an ancient civilization created it, yet requires no special technologies, only a revision of the level of math they understood. This is the best the alien community can do? Yup my statement stands, not a shred of credible evidence, just speculation and fallacy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mHe211mLV0&feature=PlayList&p=A948204939D1EB3D&index=0 A lecture held at a well known university. When doctors are lecturing about it, they mean bussiness. |
|
|
|
I don't think there is a shred of credible evidence for aliens having already visited us. You have not looked then. The evidence is unshakable for at least a very advanced society having lived before the age of current human history. Whether you want to call them "aliens" would depend on where you think they came from, how they knew about the solar system, the planets, and how they flew through the air and built airports, what the ancient computer-like machine was with all gears they found under the sea that was dated older than b.c. How the pyramids were built, and how some ancient stones were cut and carved with machine-like precision that we don't even have the capability to do today. Some of the lame explanations for how these structures were built are laughable and idiotic. Most of it is simply ignored. The evidence is there and it is unshakable. You must be blind or just refuse to see it. You prefer to believe the lame explanations. What I wonder is why. The device you reference was recreated and it is a slightly more complex version of other machines made in ancient times . . . surely a marvel that an ancient civilization created it, yet requires no special technologies, only a revision of the level of math they understood. This is the best the alien community can do? Yup my statement stands, not a shred of credible evidence, just speculation and fallacy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2mHe211mLV0&feature=PlayList&p=A948204939D1EB3D&index=0 A lecture held at a well known university. When doctors are lecturing about it, they mean bussiness. This guy on the video has actually collected some of the more obscure bits of information as well as the better known. His presentation is pretty much amateurish and some details are wrong but not a bad overall effort. The Jesus references are pretty far out in left field. |
|
|
|
Read Zachariah Sitchin's Twelth Planet series....
|
|
|
|
Read Zachariah Sitchin's Twelth Planet series.... Not a bad theory. There are some conflicts of course but a unique way of summarizing all the ancient writings. In the process of viewing the above the following vid "popped up". Great soundtrack. Strangest view of everything I have ever heard. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OgSn6Mq7lVk |
|
|
|
Read Zachariah Sitchin's Twelth Planet series.... |
|
|
|
A great show on the history channel about the ancient astronaut theory is on. There have been a lot of related shows on the History channel about aliens and ancient astronauts. I think someone is trying to prepare the world for the news. Aliens exist. JB |
|
|
|
A great show on the history channel about the ancient astronaut theory is on. There have been a lot of related shows on the History channel about aliens and ancient astronauts. I think someone is trying to prepare the world for the news. Aliens exist. JB |
|
|
|
the ancients can't have imagination and fairy tale stories? Its not automatically proven just because of a drawing on a wall. The baghdad lightbulb is quite the mystery though.
|
|
|
|
Hey, that looks like you!!
|
|
|
|
We come in pieces
see you in Roswell |
|
|
|
Edited by
wux
on
Sun 08/16/09 10:20 PM
|
|
So these ancient astronauts; they were theorists, were they not? What theories did this astronauts come up with that we still use to this day? I think they must have known about the laws of Archimedes, and the molecular theory. How many of them were thieves? And how many women in there?
How many ancient astronauts does it take to change a lightbulb? Well, the answer is 2,355. 2,354 ancient astronauts to draw up the background work of theoretically pre-determining how to change it, and one to put the theory into practice. Perhaps they had no hands, and that's why the ancient humans who met the ancient astronauts could not extract the idea out of the aliens how to make a wheel, how to create jet fuel to propel rockets, and how to create viagra in your own kitchen out of some green left overs in the Apricot Jam jar, and out of old soaps and drinking bottles. |
|
|