Previous 1 3 4 5
Topic: obama is a fun fun man.....lol
catwoman96's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:18 AM
The Obama administration. They lie with reckless abandon. But Obama flashes his trademark smile and no one cares, especially the media.

You won’t hear about the lying on ABC, CBS or NBC. Or read it in The Washington Post or New York Times either. Last year, the news media threw considerable influence behind President Pinocchio. Now journalism is in such financial distress, they’d be hard-pressed to fact check his cereal box. Besides it’s a sin of Washington etiquette to call a deliberate political misstatements “lies.” Only the uncouth call them actual lies.

We are one month in to a marathon game of liar’s poker and the American public is playing the losing hand. It’s not as if the Obama folks are stupid. They aren’t. They aren’t even compulsive or pathological. They are simply of a breed apart from ordinary humans — they’re politicians.

And it’s funny because that was the one thing they claimed they weren’t. The one big “change” from previous Washington creatures. But it’s no change at all. They lie about Iraq. They lie about guns. They lie about the economy. They lie about the size of government. Then they lie about lying.

Welcome to the Pinocchio administration : Obama is the only one pulling strings on the media. The rest of us in the audience watch fascinated.

Remember the Barack Obama who proposed pulling our troops out of Iraq by the end of 2008? “The days of our open-ended commitment must come to a close,” he told the Senate, according to a Jan. 31, 2007, Washington Post article. Now, according to the Associated Press, the open-ended commitment has been replaced with “as many as 50,000 troops to remain behind to train Iraqi forces and protect U.S. interests.” Even anti-war lefties think he lied. They are right –- for once.

Remember that guy Obama who supported gun rights? He’s just a faint memory. A year ago, in an interview with Politico, Obama was reminded that supported gun ownership:

“You said recently, ‘I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.’ But you support the D.C. handgun ban, and you’ve said that it’s constitutional. How do you reconcile those two positions?”

Even then he hemmed and hawed, concluding:

“We can have a reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respects the Second Amendment and people’s traditions.”

“Reasonable, thoughtful” are words unknown to Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder already has tried to link the Mexican narco-wars to U.S. gun sales and go after supposed “assault weapons.”

Obama’s record on government and the economy is actually worse. He and his surrogates keep maintaining that his budget won’t hurt the pockets of 95 percent of Americans who will get a tax cut.

They lie. The lead editorial in the Feb. 27 Wall Street Journal showed by just how much. Using 2006 tax records, The Wall Street Journal showed how a tax hike won’t begin to pay the 2010 budget of the $4 trillion. Even if the government were to confiscate (aka steal) every penny made by those who earn $250,000 and above, it would only meet one-third of the goal.

To pay for that whole $4 trillion budget, the government would have to pilfer “every taxable ‘dime’ of everyone earning more than $75,000.” That would just barely meet the goal, but those are 2006 numbers when the economy was good. In 2010, we’d need to go even lower.

A tax cut for 95 percent? Not hardly. The government will give money with one hand and take it back and loads more with the other –- lying to us the whole time.





Drivinmenutz's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:21 AM
frustrated flowerforyou

no photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:22 AM

The Obama administration. They lie with reckless abandon. But Obama flashes his trademark smile and no one cares, especially the media.

You won’t hear about the lying on ABC, CBS or NBC. Or read it in The Washington Post or New York Times either. Last year, the news media threw considerable influence behind President Pinocchio. Now journalism is in such financial distress, they’d be hard-pressed to fact check his cereal box. Besides it’s a sin of Washington etiquette to call a deliberate political misstatements “lies.” Only the uncouth call them actual lies.

We are one month in to a marathon game of liar’s poker and the American public is playing the losing hand. It’s not as if the Obama folks are stupid. They aren’t. They aren’t even compulsive or pathological. They are simply of a breed apart from ordinary humans — they’re politicians.

And it’s funny because that was the one thing they claimed they weren’t. The one big “change” from previous Washington creatures. But it’s no change at all. They lie about Iraq. They lie about guns. They lie about the economy. They lie about the size of government. Then they lie about lying.

Welcome to the Pinocchio administration : Obama is the only one pulling strings on the media. The rest of us in the audience watch fascinated.

Remember the Barack Obama who proposed pulling our troops out of Iraq by the end of 2008? “The days of our open-ended commitment must come to a close,” he told the Senate, according to a Jan. 31, 2007, Washington Post article. Now, according to the Associated Press, the open-ended commitment has been replaced with “as many as 50,000 troops to remain behind to train Iraqi forces and protect U.S. interests.” Even anti-war lefties think he lied. They are right –- for once.

Remember that guy Obama who supported gun rights? He’s just a faint memory. A year ago, in an interview with Politico, Obama was reminded that supported gun ownership:

“You said recently, ‘I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.’ But you support the D.C. handgun ban, and you’ve said that it’s constitutional. How do you reconcile those two positions?”

Even then he hemmed and hawed, concluding:

“We can have a reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respects the Second Amendment and people’s traditions.”

“Reasonable, thoughtful” are words unknown to Attorney General Eric Holder. Holder already has tried to link the Mexican narco-wars to U.S. gun sales and go after supposed “assault weapons.”

Obama’s record on government and the economy is actually worse. He and his surrogates keep maintaining that his budget won’t hurt the pockets of 95 percent of Americans who will get a tax cut.

They lie. The lead editorial in the Feb. 27 Wall Street Journal showed by just how much. Using 2006 tax records, The Wall Street Journal showed how a tax hike won’t begin to pay the 2010 budget of the $4 trillion. Even if the government were to confiscate (aka steal) every penny made by those who earn $250,000 and above, it would only meet one-third of the goal.

To pay for that whole $4 trillion budget, the government would have to pilfer “every taxable ‘dime’ of everyone earning more than $75,000.” That would just barely meet the goal, but those are 2006 numbers when the economy was good. In 2010, we’d need to go even lower.

A tax cut for 95 percent? Not hardly. The government will give money with one hand and take it back and loads more with the other –- lying to us the whole time.

WHAT A CLOWN.................




Kristi31's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:24 AM
Is that what your cats are telling you?

willing2's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:31 AM
I make a prediction. The Politicians are going to vote themselves another hefty raise and bonuses soon.

writer_gurl's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:32 AM
:banana: :banana: :banana: :banana: slaphead

catwoman96's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:35 AM

Is that what your cats are telling you?


dont insult. my cats have nothing to do with this. they are immune to Obamas pretty smile and false words

Kristi31's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:37 AM
touche...I'm sorry.

~Kristi

catwoman96's photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:44 AM

I make a prediction. The Politicians are going to vote themselves another hefty raise and bonuses soon.


well they certainly arent going to decrease their overinflated salaries and pensions.
more mone...Im sure they get that by pleasing the people they need to please...pass a little bill here and there..

i would call this their 'job perks'

no photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:53 AM

I make a prediction. The Politicians are going to vote themselves another hefty raise and bonuses soon.



surprised WOW! How'd you do that... It's uncanny how accurate you are!


http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20090304/pl_mcclatchy/3181135

:laughing:

no photo
Thu 03/05/09 07:56 AM

Obama is a good speaker i will grant him that and he can pronounce nuclear proliferation which in my mind puts him miles ahead of the last crooked idiot we had in office,but i will give him time before i pass any kind of judgement,i think he has alot of good ideas and he wants to get this country heading in a direction it should have sought years ago,especially about green energy,and his attempts to get us out of the money wasting war,but i think he also sees where the government waste alot of tax dollars,especially when it comes to contractor overrides ..i say give him time and we will see..i think he has some good ideas ...jmo

Winx's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:02 AM
Did you write that Cat?

Obama isn't taking away the guns.

think2deep's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:02 AM


Obama is a good speaker i will grant him that and he can pronounce nuclear proliferation which in my mind puts him miles ahead of the last crooked idiot we had in office,but i will give him time before i pass any kind of judgement,i think he has alot of good ideas and he wants to get this country heading in a direction it should have sought years ago,especially about green energy,and his attempts to get us out of the money wasting war,but i think he also sees where the government waste alot of tax dollars,especially when it comes to contractor overrides ..i say give him time and we will see..i think he has some good ideas ...jmo


i wasn't going to chime in anymore but i got to on this one.

please explain in detail how he is going to do this, i want to hear it in your own words so i know you aren't just parroting the news anchors and radio hosts.


Winx's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:03 AM


Obama is a good speaker i will grant him that and he can pronounce nuclear proliferation which in my mind puts him miles ahead of the last crooked idiot we had in office,but i will give him time before i pass any kind of judgement,i think he has alot of good ideas and he wants to get this country heading in a direction it should have sought years ago,especially about green energy,and his attempts to get us out of the money wasting war,but i think he also sees where the government waste alot of tax dollars,especially when it comes to contractor overrides ..i say give him time and we will see..i think he has some good ideas ...jmo


I agree.

no photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:23 AM

personally i think he sees where alot of money is goingthat bis unnecessary..i.e the war in iraq,government wasting money with contractors by just awarding jobs to companies rather than closed bids,using green energy instead of relying on the old jurrasic methods of energy..no one said that things wont get worse before they get better as they often do ..but i'm at least going to give the guy more than a month before i burn him at the stake..
lets face it does anyone really have a sure fired formula for getting us out of this situation that was brought on by our past elected officials...


think2deep..dont care too much about news anchors or radio host i base my thoughts on what i think about the man and his ideas as i listen to him ..could care less about the drama brought on by the media

but this is a wait and see situation ..after all i can remember having heated discussions with people who thought bush was going to be a great president....i never liked him from the start just a gut feeling..and what do you know eight years later and i still dont like bush..glad he's gone

think2deep's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:49 AM


personally i think he sees where alot of money is goingthat bis unnecessary..i.e the war in iraq,government wasting money with contractors by just awarding jobs to companies rather than closed bids,using green energy instead of relying on the old jurrasic methods of energy..no one said that things wont get worse before they get better as they often do ..but i'm at least going to give the guy more than a month before i burn him at the stake..
lets face it does anyone really have a sure fired formula for getting us out of this situation that was brought on by our past elected officials...


think2deep..dont care too much about news anchors or radio host i base my thoughts on what i think about the man and his ideas as i listen to him ..could care less about the drama brought on by the media

but this is a wait and see situation ..after all i can remember having heated discussions with people who thought bush was going to be a great president....i never liked him from the start just a gut feeling..and what do you know eight years later and i still dont like bush..glad he's gone


i went through it too in bush's early years. i just couldn't understand why people put common sense on the backburner. to be honest with you, i'm not listening to his speeches because i found out he has the same speech writers that bush had. i just know that common sense and mathematics tell me that when you put more money into circulation ie..bailout bills or whatever you want to label them as... it will cause the value of our money to decrease to almost nothing. it really doesn't matter what the stated intentions of it are, it still leads to the same thing. he can tell everyone till he's blue in the face that this bailout is going to help everyone, but mathematics proves different. think of the money as water and think of us as being in a sandy desert kind of situation. when you have millions of gallons of water, you don't mind spilling some ergo.. gallons of water are a dime a dozen... if you only had that one gallon with nowhere else to get more, that gallon of water becomes precious to you, ergo...increases in value and you use small amounts of it...

the same goes with money, when you have two hundred thousand dollars, you don't mind buying a $1000 top of the line bicycle, but if you only have $1000 with no where to get more after it's gone, you're gonna be reluctant to buy any such bicycle. hence the PERCEIVED VALUE of money.

when the dollar is already down to being worth only 4 cents in 1913 standards, and you throw 3.5 trillion dollars at the money supply and make it look like we have a seemingly endless supply of this money, you decrease it's PERCEIVED VALUE. "we got more where that came from, don't worry, we'll just print up more". this is not going to make things better by a long shot, in fact, it's going to catapult us into a broke down economy even faster than we would have.


as far as the answer to fixing this, john f kennedy tried to get rid of the federal reserve so we wouldn't have to owe them all of this fake money back. he was killed a few months after he signed the executive order. in my opinion the people who own the currency did not want to lose it. interestingly, after he died, the silver certificates that he was distributing to replace the federal reserve notes, stopped being distributed and federal reserve notes continued on as the currency.

catwoman96's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:52 AM

Did you write that Cat?

Obama isn't taking away the guns.


i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it.

all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions...

dantaylor28's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:55 AM

The Obama administration. They lie with reckless abandon. But Obama flashes his trademark smile and no one cares, especially the media.

You won’t hear about the lying on ABC, CBS or NBC. Or read it in The Washington Post or New York Times either.








so we should listen to the toataly honest completly moral fox news right ? lol . and i suppose all the repulican presidents weve had have been toataly honest? yeah bush was a saint . lol . get real . they all lie . it's part of being a in politics. :tongue:

think2deep's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:56 AM
lack of money makes money valuable, money of plenty makes it less value.

dantaylor28's photo
Thu 03/05/09 08:56 AM


Did you write that Cat?

Obama isn't taking away the guns.


i didnt write it..but i cant find the link now from where i got it.

all media writings are from their persepective anyhow...and i believe he is trying to enforce more gun restrictions...



if you listen to him he wants to reinstate the ban on assault weapons and certain types of ammunition . these things are only good for one thing and it isnt self deffense .

Previous 1 3 4 5