Topic: Angels with "swords"?
Krimsa's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:45 AM
Thats what I said. They are not always depicted with wings.However in medieval art they are.

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:45 AM
Edited by tribo on Thu 12/04/08 11:00 AM
hmmm? then it seems strange to me if this is the case that if the book is true that there would be no mention of angels in other civilizations that were before the monotheistic beliefs. if angels were supposedly known from the first days of creating man then would not A&E have passed on this info to those who became other civilizations? why did not the Sumerians or others know of the existence and write of these beings if they were handed down by word from the earliest times? surely A&E would have mentioned them to their children if that were the case? having seen the one that guarded the gates of Eden with a fiery sword, long before mankind made swords. the talk of swords in the book leads one to have to contemplate historically when we as humans first came up with these weapons, was that about the time of moses or before? interesting subject this angels with swords and chariots and bows and arrows which would have been the ultimate weapons of those early days. you would thing a god that knew of future weapons would have used future weapons NO? why stick with ancient weapons when he could have outfitted them with M-16 and rocket launchers and machine guns. strange this all knowing god seems so limited to have to use the most common ancient war items to fight with huh?

of course i guess it makes no difference since angels cant be killed even with atomic bombs anyway. thus my point - why the need for any weapons what so ever?
for cutting seat bolts in cars? doesn't make sense Deb - they could have just as easily pulled you from the car unscathed without any weapons at all.

Krimsa's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:46 AM
God could "make us " love him, but then he'd have a bunch of zombies, it would not be true love. Love comes from the heart of free thinking, free willed entities, we were created in his likeness, we have choices, some make bad choices


By that logic, he should also respect non-believers.

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:49 AM




2nd question, why would a loving god want to have or use weapons? why would there be any weapons/chariots/spears or any other "weapons" in heaven? Could not god wipe them all out with a word, or banish them from this universe? This talk of angels seems to me to be nothing but bull, if he can't control his own creations and needs to do battle with them, what does that say about his so called "omnipotence? explain if you can please.


By Jove I think Tribo's Got it

you finally understand the point I was trying to make in that other thread....why would a God have the "need" for weapons, angels fighting, chariots or humans...

the fact that a supposely omnipotent God would create anything would in fact prove that it wasn't omnipotent ...and not a God


well no your question was why does god have a "need" to create, mine is why does he have a need to "make war" with his own creation?

the only thing i can see is since he is not capable of creating something as perfect as he is he had no choice but to create inferior things. if he could create things as perfect as he is then he wouldn't be "the god" anymore but just one of many. he's a jealous god, don't like competition.thus - angels and mankind - but as to "need" i think it was not need but boredom or desire etc.. but really i dont care, he did not care enough to ask me if i wanted to participate and i dont care to conform to his rules. enuff said.


God could "make us " love him, but then he'd have a bunch of zombies, it would not be true love. Love comes from the heart of free thinking, free willed entities, we were created in his likeness, we have choices, some make bad choices


no he could not make us love him to "make" anyone do something against there will would not be love. no one would love god if it was an act of having to or being made to.

SharpShooter10's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:50 AM

God could "make us " love him, but then he'd have a bunch of zombies, it would not be true love. Love comes from the heart of free thinking, free willed entities, we were created in his likeness, we have choices, some make bad choices


By that logic, he should also respect non-believers.
it is their choice and a choice he allows by giving free will.

SharpShooter10's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:51 AM





2nd question, why would a loving god want to have or use weapons? why would there be any weapons/chariots/spears or any other "weapons" in heaven? Could not god wipe them all out with a word, or banish them from this universe? This talk of angels seems to me to be nothing but bull, if he can't control his own creations and needs to do battle with them, what does that say about his so called "omnipotence? explain if you can please.


By Jove I think Tribo's Got it

you finally understand the point I was trying to make in that other thread....why would a God have the "need" for weapons, angels fighting, chariots or humans...

the fact that a supposely omnipotent God would create anything would in fact prove that it wasn't omnipotent ...and not a God


well no your question was why does god have a "need" to create, mine is why does he have a need to "make war" with his own creation?

the only thing i can see is since he is not capable of creating something as perfect as he is he had no choice but to create inferior things. if he could create things as perfect as he is then he wouldn't be "the god" anymore but just one of many. he's a jealous god, don't like competition.thus - angels and mankind - but as to "need" i think it was not need but boredom or desire etc.. but really i dont care, he did not care enough to ask me if i wanted to participate and i dont care to conform to his rules. enuff said.


God could "make us " love him, but then he'd have a bunch of zombies, it would not be true love. Love comes from the heart of free thinking, free willed entities, we were created in his likeness, we have choices, some make bad choices


no he could not make us love him to "make" anyone do something against there will would not be love. no one would love god if it was an act of having to or being made to.
Tribo drinker I thought that was kinda what I was saying

Krimsa's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:56 AM
I look at it this way. If god is an ass and everything the Christians say is actually true, then he's probably very angry and jealous and pissed off a good portion of the time. In this case, he would be very hard pressed to understand why someone refused to believe in him.

That scenario seems unlikely.

On the other hand, he might be very sympathetic to someone that decided to hold out and look him in the eye and tell him this sounds suspicious. All we had to go on was a stupid, contradictory book while on earth.

He might be very understanding of that position.

A compassionate, intelligent being would be.

That's why I tend not to worry either way.

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 10:56 AM






2nd question, why would a loving god want to have or use weapons? why would there be any weapons/chariots/spears or any other "weapons" in heaven? Could not god wipe them all out with a word, or banish them from this universe? This talk of angels seems to me to be nothing but bull, if he can't control his own creations and needs to do battle with them, what does that say about his so called "omnipotence? explain if you can please.


By Jove I think Tribo's Got it

you finally understand the point I was trying to make in that other thread....why would a God have the "need" for weapons, angels fighting, chariots or humans...

the fact that a supposely omnipotent God would create anything would in fact prove that it wasn't omnipotent ...and not a God


well no your question was why does god have a "need" to create, mine is why does he have a need to "make war" with his own creation?

the only thing i can see is since he is not capable of creating something as perfect as he is he had no choice but to create inferior things. if he could create things as perfect as he is then he wouldn't be "the god" anymore but just one of many. he's a jealous god, don't like competition.thus - angels and mankind - but as to "need" i think it was not need but boredom or desire etc.. but really i dont care, he did not care enough to ask me if i wanted to participate and i dont care to conform to his rules. enuff said.


God could "make us " love him, but then he'd have a bunch of zombies, it would not be true love. Love comes from the heart of free thinking, free willed entities, we were created in his likeness, we have choices, some make bad choices


no he could not make us love him to "make" anyone do something against there will would not be love. no one would love god if it was an act of having to or being made to.
Tribo drinker I thought that was kinda what I was saying


NO!!! it was pretty much what you were saying - tongue2

no photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:20 AM
Edited by smiless on Thu 12/04/08 11:26 AM
Here is a interesting article on angels. I still believe that angels were invented by the minds who lived way beyond 6000 years ago if not longer and was just carried over to Christianity later.

Here is a interesting article to read about the topic.

http://www.feedback.nildram.co.uk/richardebbs/essays/angels.htm

no photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:26 AM
Edited by smiless on Thu 12/04/08 11:30 AM
I also now think back from my fantasy writings on a character I use to write about who was a Valkyrie. A human with wings. The Valkyrie if I remember correctly is the origin of Norse Mythology. I would share this story but it is in German.


----------- my reference I used to use to create my fantasy creatures in my epic novels.laugh

The Aesir Family :

The Aesir family of Gods were the chief gods of Norse Mythology...Odin, king of the gods. His two black ravens, Huginn (Thought) and Muninn (Memory), flew forth daily to gather tidings of events all over the world. As god of war, Odin held court in Valhalla, where all brave warriors went after death in battle.

The Valkyries, were warrior maidens who attended Odin, ruler of the gods. The Valkyries rode through the air in brilliant armor, directed battles, distributed death lots among the warriors, and conducted the souls of slain heroes to Valhalla, the great hall of Odin. The name "Valkyrie or Valkyr" in itself is a metaphor, as it was supposed to create great heroes and warriors. All of the V-head ramblings, for the most part, tie in with Norse mythology. Or at least I can see how they would. "The flesh of fallen angels" is probably some reference to Valkyrie.


tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:32 AM

I also now think back from my fantasy writings on a character I use to write about who was a Valkyrie. A human with wings. The Valkyrie if I remember correctly is the origin of Norse Mythology. I would share this story but it is in German.


----------- my reference I used to use to create my fantasy creatures in my epic novels.laugh

The Aesir Family :

The Aesir family of Gods were the chief gods of Norse Mythology...Odin, king of the gods. His two black ravens, Huginn (Thought) and Muninn (Memory), flew forth daily to gather tidings of events all over the world. As god of war, Odin held court in Valhalla, where all brave warriors went after death in battle.

The Valkyries, were warrior maidens who attended Odin, ruler of the gods. The Valkyries rode through the air in brilliant armor, directed battles, distributed death lots among the warriors, and conducted the souls of slain heroes to Valhalla, the great hall of Odin. The name "Valkyrie or Valkyr" in itself is a metaphor, as it was supposed to create great heroes and warriors. All of the V-head ramblings, for the most part, tie in with Norse mythology. Or at least I can see how they would. "The flesh of fallen angels" is probably some reference to Valkyrie.




was norse mythology before or after monothistic mythology? dates please tongue2

no photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:36 AM
Edited by smiless on Thu 12/04/08 11:41 AM
Doesn't Mono mean one so it would be before. Norse, Greek, and Ancient Egyptian (except for one Pharoah) believe in many gods at once so they where obviously before monotheistic religions.

I just wanted to say that the thought of angels didn't start with Judaism, Muslim, or Christianity first, which are monotheistic religions.

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:45 AM

Doesn't Mono mean one so it would be before. Norse, Greek, and Ancient Egyptian (except for one Pharoah) believe in many gods at once so they where obviously before monotheistic religions.

I just wanted to say that the thought of angels didn't start with Judaism, Muslim, or Christianity first, which are monotheistic religions.


dates please - when did the norse people originate any idea? was it before the egyptians? after? dates are important here to know for sure? - flowerforyou

Krimsa's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:45 AM
Edited by Krimsa on Thu 12/04/08 11:47 AM
Freya — Goddess of Love and Fertility. She ruled Odin’s Valkyries and is reputed to have taught him women’s blood magic. Together with her consort-brother Frey she was ruler of the Vanir, ancient matrifocal nature deities who preexisted Norse patriarchy. In this re-creation of a 6th century Swedish bronze image she is shown smiling, encircled by her great necklace Brisingamen . Goddess of the moon, of love, and of childbirth, she gave her name to Friday.

Tribo Valkyries are somewhat angel like but different.



I had to use a different photo than the one they are speaking of.

SharpShooter10's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:52 AM
Tribo drinker

(( Krimsa ))flowerforyou

smiless drinker


Hope you all have a great day

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:52 AM
The norse civilization was born in the South of the Scandinavian Peninsula, the land of the fjords, lit by the boreal sun and swept acros by the winds of long and cold winters. The formation of this people began around the 10th century BC, and the iron age started rather late on these lands, about the >>>>>5th century BC.<<<<< The first certain proofs of a norse culture date from the time when these people began crafting iron objects. The first representations of the gods Odin and Thor, as well as the first runic inscriptions also date back to this period.



so if it was te 5th Century BC as to the developement of the mythologies, then it does not supercede the angels of monothestic thought. correct?

no photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:53 AM
Oh wow Norse myth started somewhere in 200 AD for sure. A very long time before Christianity.


tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:53 AM

Tribo drinker

(( Krimsa ))flowerforyou

smiless drinker


Hope you all have a great day


thnx Tom, yu to. waving :thumbsup:

no photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:54 AM
Edited by smiless on Thu 12/04/08 11:59 AM

The norse civilization was born in the South of the Scandinavian Peninsula, the land of the fjords, lit by the boreal sun and swept acros by the winds of long and cold winters. The formation of this people began around the 10th century BC, and the iron age started rather late on these lands, about the >>>>>5th century BC.<<<<< The first certain proofs of a norse culture date from the time when these people began crafting iron objects. The first representations of the gods Odin and Thor, as well as the first runic inscriptions also date back to this period.



so if it was te 5th Century BC as to the developement of the mythologies, then it does not supercede the angels of monothestic thought. correct?



hmmm I an confused. If you say it is 5th Century BC then that is before christ. So they had thought of angels way before Christianity started.
Although you could be right and it is a pre-christian belief system.

but I still think it goes even further back! Try Sumerian Mythology!

tribo's photo
Thu 12/04/08 11:55 AM

Oh wow Norse myth started somewhere in 200 AD for sure. A very long time before Christianity.




200 AD?? a long time before "christianity"???


are you drinking early today - laugh

that sounds like an "ale" reply - tongue2