someone sent me this...not a bad idea...if I do say so myself...

Like a lot of folks in this state, I have a job. I work, they pay me. I
pay my taxes and the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit. In
order to get that paycheck, I am required to pass a random urine test
with which I have no problem. What I do have a problem with is the
distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because
I have to pass one to earn it for them? Please understand, I have no
problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other
hand, ! have a problem with helping someone sitting on their ass, doing
drugs, while I work. . .Can you imagine how much money the state would
save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance
check?

wonder how many kids would go hungry because of that

maybe that's why they don't require a urine test...

What I think your talking about is a small percent of people getting help.

There's already a very long thread on this

oh...okay...didn't see it... ...now we're even... aaaaaaaaaaCHOOOO !!...allergies you know...lol

A man and a woman are sitting beside each other in the first class section of the plane. The woman sneezes, takes a tissue, gently wipes her nose and shudders quite violently in her seat. The man isn't sure why she is shuddering and goes back to reading.

A few minutes pass. The woman sneezes again. She takes a tissue, gently wipes her nose and shudders quite violently in her seat. The man is becoming more and more curious about the shuddering. A few more minutes pass. The woman sneezes yet again. She takes a tissue, gently wipes her nose and shudders violently again.

Curiosity finally gets the best of the man. He turns to the woman and says, "Three times you've sneezed and three times you've taken a tissue and wiped your nose then shuddered violently!"

The woman replies, "I'm sorry if I disturbed you. I have a rare condition and when I sneeze, I have an orgasm."

The man, now feeling a little embarrassed but even more curious says,"I've never heard of that before. What are you taking for it?? The woman looks at him and says, .........."Pepper"

lol....well...the only reason my ex had an orgasm...is so she'd have something to moan about...

Like how to make a hormone. Don't pay her

lol...on oldie but goodie...one more...three hookers walking down the street...what do you call the one in the middle ?...the center piece...lol

Funny, funny, funny, guys!

Urine tests are use to determine that the person who is being paid to do the job is "capable" of doing the job. It's useless in determining need for assistance...free will and all! Plus, I thought the Conservative view was against regulation? Is regulation ok for the poor, but not ok for the wealthy?

For the record, I don't believe anyone should be drug tested. The only thing it does is absolve those is charge of the responsibility of identifying problems while they are happening.

I thought the Conservative view was against regulation?...in this case...it's regulation for the non-producers...

Speaking of urine... $154M and it's not working. NASA need to have their mission changed to develop alt-energy...

"HOUSTON – Astronauts tinkered Sunday with a troublesome piece of equipment designed to help convert urine and sweat into drinkable water, which is vital to allowing the international space station crew to double to six.

Station commander Michael Fincke and space shuttle Endeavour astronaut Donald Pettit changed how a centrifuge is mounted in a urine processor, which is part of the newly delivered $154 million water recovery system. The centrifuge is a spinning device that helps separate the water from urine.

It was on rubber grommets to reduce vibrations, and Mission Control asked Fincke to remove them and just bolt the piece down."

...so that makes regulation ok? Is it not still a violation of ones right to privacy? Who determines who's non-productive? My friend who just got laid off her job? She's worked all her life, but she's not working now. Is that non-productive? You require one, you have to require all. That's the rules!

it is wrong for you to be tested

but it is work safty issue

they do not have a work safety issue

wrong to test them as well

and you gonna pay for it

another 10 bucks out of everyones check for special drug regulation tax might almost be enough

Ok, that was different!

Sounds kinda like accusing the poor of a crime. And even if the parents do drugs, the kids will still need to get food from somewhere. And does this mean the rich can do drugs?

Legalize weed, and only test for crack, cocaine, heroin, meth, etc...

Your right Thats the reason why.Even children of drug addicts need food and shelter.