Topic: OBAMA to bankrupt the Coal Industry | |
---|---|
damn those coal miners!!
|
|
|
|
Why don't we sell some of this coal to the Chinese to pay off this huge debt?
|
|
|
|
How about Nuclear? Obama is not a big fan of this. I don't dig Nuclear.where ya gonna put the waste?I'd rather see things developed that impact the environment less. It's come a long way from the 70's when the U.S. started building ours. We haven't built any in years to apply this new technology to. Nuclear Power is a cleaner source of energy (except for the waste, which there is very little w/ the newest tech.) and it would create a sh!t ton of jobs. |
|
|
|
How about Nuclear? Obama is not a big fan of this. I don't dig Nuclear.where ya gonna put the waste?I'd rather see things developed that impact the environment less. It's come a long way from the 70's when the U.S. started building ours. We haven't built any in years to apply this new technology to. Nuclear Power is a cleaner source of energy (except for the waste, which there is very little w/ the newest tech.) and it would create a sh!t ton of jobs. I've made a lot of good money working outages and construction at Nuclear plants. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 11/02/08 04:51 PM
|
|
How about Nuclear? Obama is not a big fan of this. I don't dig Nuclear.where ya gonna put the waste?I'd rather see things developed that impact the environment less. It's come a long way from the 70's when the U.S. started building ours. We haven't built any in years to apply this new technology to. Nuclear Power is a cleaner source of energy (except for the waste, which there is very little w/ the newest tech.) and it would create a sh!t ton of jobs. I've made a lot of good money working outages and construction at Nuclear plants. |
|
|
|
How about Nuclear? Obama is not a big fan of this. I don't dig Nuclear.where ya gonna put the waste?I'd rather see things developed that impact the environment less. It's come a long way from the 70's when the U.S. started building ours. We haven't built any in years to apply this new technology to. Nuclear Power is a cleaner source of energy (except for the waste, which there is very little w/ the newest tech.) and it would create a sh!t ton of jobs. I've made a lot of good money working outages and construction at Nuclear plants. I glad we got that out of the way, you had me worried there for a second! ![]() |
|
|
|
I will AGREE with you on this one.France gets %75 of there electric from it and they don't glow in the dark.. Ooohhhh... The French do it? Doesn't that mean we should have a knee jerk reaction and start pushing "Freedom Fries" again? Remember those? That was our reaction to France's failure to support our misguided invasion of Iraq. |
|
|
|
I will AGREE with you on this one.France gets %75 of there electric from it and they don't glow in the dark.. Ooohhhh... The French do it? Doesn't that mean we should have a knee jerk reaction and start pushing "Freedom Fries" again? Remember those? That was our reaction to France's failure to support our misguided invasion of Iraq. |
|
|
|
Yay!! Down with coal!!! The jobs the coal miners lose will be replaced with jobs in green technology! Coal is out dated! The damage strip mining does to the landscape is unforgivable, and if you will recall, underground coal mines are unsafe and not properly regulated and pose a significant risk to the miners and their health. Nuclear power may help in the short term, but is not practical due to the problems with the waste, security risks, etc. Wind power, solar, and ideas we haven't even thought of yet are around the corner, as well as ways to make current technologies cleaner and safer. Development of these technologies will bring new jobs and save our economy as well as our environment!! Rejoice in the fact we will have a leader who supports all of these options, and who will protect our environment and help put America on the cutting edge of environmentally sound technology. America will lead the way for the rest of the world by setting the standard! Americans are known for their ingenious inventions! We are about to enter one of the most prosperous times in our history! This is exciting!! GO OBAMA!!
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Lynann
on
Mon 11/03/08 08:28 AM
|
|
Obama sat with The Chronicle editorial board Jan. 17 for the interview, and it has been available in its entirety on the newspaper's Web site since it took place in San Francisco during the Democratic primary season. In his wide-ranging session with the paper, the Democratic senator from Illinois spoke about his energy plan and an "aggressive" cap-and-trade policy, and spoke about coal technology.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/11/02/MNTL13SU6S.DTL This tape, contrary to Sarah's accusation, is not "just now surfacing" it has been available on the papers website since the interview was done. More boohoo crap from the liberal media is against me Sarah. Never mind that her accusation that the tape was suppressed is a big lie. It plays well to her hating fans. Obama wants to use economic incentives to get the coal burning industry to clean up it's act. We've all seen what industry and banking do when they not regulated and given incentives to conduct business ethically and cleanly. On the subject of coal. Americans have short memories it seems. Think back...remember several mining tragedies that occurred in the last eight years? They happened under the watch of the Bush administration that relaxed rules governing safety inspections of mines. |
|
|
|
Edited by
quiet_2008
on
Mon 11/03/08 08:33 AM
|
|
about half of the country's electricity comes from coal. There'll never be enough wind, solar or anything else to replace that
The United States has more coal than Saudi Arabia has oil There are a few pilot projects researching ways to clean the CO2 from the emissions. Current technology favors using the CO2 to inject down old wells to enhance production The United States also has more natural gas than Saudi has oil. THAT is what we should be using. There are 5.7 million natural gas cars in the world. The US has about 100,000. |
|
|
|
Coal is primative.
We put a man on the moon in 1969 and we are still burning coal? We should have put more $$$ into solar R & D. If we are so technologically advanced, let's act like it. |
|
|
|
Coal is primative. We put a man on the moon in 1969 and we are still burning coal? We should have put more $$$ into solar R & D. If we are so technologically advanced, let's act like it. the state of the art of solar power is only slightly more expensive than oil. It's a nice idea but the technology isn't there yet. Maybe in another twenty years... |
|
|