Topic: Creation Versus Evolution | |
---|---|
Edited by
SharpShooter10
on
Sat 10/11/08 08:59 AM
|
|
hmmmm, most of which is not real science! If one is happy and content with their beliefs and mindsets on the Who, What, Whys and Wheres of things, then more power to you/them/us. Rejoice and be happy in your beliefs, whatever they are. Share and discuss with all who want to do so, Respect each others beliefs, for it is theirs and you are not required to follow. Never condemn one who does not see as you do, but pray/strive/hope that you continue to learn and can share your knowledge with others in a positive way. And if a Christian, that Gods will be done, not yours, We can plant a seed, only God can make it grow |
|
|
|
I would only add,
"also dont ask that people pray who dont pray." |
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. |
|
|
|
I would only add, "also dont ask that people pray who dont pray." |
|
|
|
I would only add, "also dont ask that people pray who dont pray." |
|
|
|
I would rather get back to the topic honestly and enough of this crap brought on by Ark. He does this every morning.
|
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. |
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. You guys certainly dont need to speak as if I cant see you. If you feel the need to discuss such foolishness, take it private or something. Show some decorum. |
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. What a heap of condescending crap! Two people who ASSUME they know the whole ballgame before the plays.... and then decide if another poster is evil/satanic or not...just because she chooses not to buy into the whole religious propaganda crap!!! Disgusting! |
|
|
|
wow, all that cause I said I didn't believe someone was trying to help satan, geez, lighten up
|
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. You guys certainly dont need to speak as if I cant see you. If you feel the need to discuss such foolishness, take it private or something. Show some decorum. |
|
|
|
I think its better dropped. This is what Ark does. He starts arguments. Just ignore it.
|
|
|
|
The same thing as anyone else who has contributed to this interesting thread (excluding yourself). Make my points, argue and debate the issues set forth by Sharp. What a heap of condescending crap! Two people who ASSUME they know the whole ballgame before the plays.... and then decide if another poster is evil/satanic or not...just because she chooses not to buy into the whole religious propaganda crap!!! Disgusting! |
|
|
|
I think its better dropped. This is what Ark does. He starts arguments. Just ignore it. Hope your having a good evenin |
|
|
|
Jess was speaking up and that was very nice of her but I feel the fault lies on Ark and not you. I am going to get the topic back on track. That is crap you posted Sharp. I am addressing Lucy next. When was this written, the 1950s??
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Krimsa
on
Sat 10/11/08 04:57 PM
|
|
LUCY
Here are some links to actually show what this thing looks like. http://www.sacred-destinations.com/ethiopia/images/addis/resized/lucy2-cc-giustino.jpg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Lucy_(Frankfurt_am_Main).jpg The two above are Lucy. This is a chimp. http://www.fallingpixel.com/products/5486/mains/Chimpanzee-skeleton1.jpg Australopithicus afarensis is a recently discovered Hominid species which lived in north east Africa, in the Hadar region of Ethiopia). Until 1995, this species was the earliest known member of the Hominid family. Australopithicus afarensis lived from approximately 4 to 2.7 million years ago along the northern Rift valley of east Africa, and perhaps even earlier. Fragments of more than 300 individuals of Australopithicus afarensis have been discovered so far, including a remarkably complete skeleton of an adult female (nick- named "Lucy") shown above and to the right. "Lucy" was found in 1974 near Hadar in Ethiopia. Her skeleton has provided a wealth of information about the ancestral line of human beings, some of it quite surprising. The illustration on the right shows "Lucy" in comparison with a modern human female. She was only about 3 feet, 8 inches tall. Males were somewhat taller and twice as robust. A. afarensis is classified as an ape, not a human. It is a Hominid--that is, an ape closely related to human beings. In terms of overall body size, brain size and skull shape, "Lucy" resembles a chimpanzee. However, A. afarensis has some surprisingly human characteristics. For example, the way the hip joint and pelvis articulate indicates that "Lucy" walked upright like a human, not like a chimp . This means that upright posture and bi-pedalism preceded the development of what we would recognize as human beings and human intelligence. At near left is a reconstruction of Lucy's full skeleton. Until 1994, A. afarensis was the earliest Hominid species yet discovered. At that time, remains of another species, tentatively called Australopithicus anamensis, was discovered in the Lake Turkana region of east Africa and appears contemporary with afarensis, dating to approximately 4.2 million years ago. A. anamensis is also an erect, bi-pedal species, and its discovery pushes direct evidence of our distinctive Hominid form of locomotion back to over 4 million years ago. The first studies of this species are still in progress and more information will be forthcoming. There is evidence that, contrary to previous assumptions, these early Hominids had developed bi-pedalism prior to the disappearance of woodlands and forests in eastern Africa--that is, our Hominid ancestors were by chance "pre-adapted" to the conditions of drier, more open country that came to prevail in eastern Africa later on. Even more interesting is a discovery in 1995 in Ethiopia, at Aramis, just south of Hadar, of a creature possibly ancestral to A. afarensis. Its teeth and other bones are even more chimp-like than "Lucy's" (A. afarensis). The species name for this creature is ramidus, after an Ethiopian word meaning "root." From the surviving bones, it is not possible to tell if ramidus was bi-pedal and therefore a Hominid australopithicine. It is still being intensively studied. Some scholars have proposed a new genus name, Ardipithicus, on the assumption that it was not bi-pedal. It appears that A. ramidus (whether properly named Ardipithicus or Australopithicus), lived in a forest environment. The last several years have thus produced several dramatic finds which are likely to modify our view of Hominid evolution significantly when their implications are more fully understood. Also, I have another point of contention with your article. In describing Lucy they act like oh my god! All they have is a mosaic of bones, we cant possibly piece this together. Oh for pete's sake. Ever heard of a matriculating skeleton? These people are not very sophisticated who post this nonsense. There is a significant lack of critical thinking skills demonstrated. |
|
|
|
Talk abotu crap! know thyself first, then look around at the rest of the world!
|
|
|
|
So Im not allowed to look for the origins of humans (or any life) on earth. What if I am curious about these things? What if I studied them in school. Actually many of the biological sciences are interrelated. I dont expect you to have much interest in these things though.
|
|
|
|
So Im not allowed to look for the origins of humans (or any life) on earth. What if I am curious about these things? What if I studied them in school. Actually many of the biological sciences are interrelated. I dont expect you to have much interest in these things though. |
|
|
|
Thank you. I will do that. Hopefully I wont be stoned for it either.
|
|
|