Topic: Poor inmate | |
---|---|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 05/01/08 09:59 PM
|
|
adj...true. but the jails can't cater to everyone waiting trial is my point. maybe this is best for him health wise???? i believe they design meals based on nutrional basis...not who likes what to eat or 2nds etc how can you possibly cater to everyone waiting trial. i hadn't seen his chrages or the evidence...but maybe if it's not too serious they can have him wear ankle monitor...or a house arrest somewhere and his family can bring him what he wants??? don't know the solution but i now everyone can't be catered to The fat boy is accused of murder! accused of not guilty of never said he should be catered to never said he should get more to eat i did say loss of over 20 pounds a month may be a health endangerment and should be examined thus his right to the lawsuit if he feels that they are not concerned with the possibly effects of this on his health then he has a right to get a review by the courts |
|
|
|
adj...true. but the jails can't cater to everyone waiting trial is my point. maybe this is best for him health wise???? i believe they design meals based on nutrional basis...not who likes what to eat or 2nds etc how can you possibly cater to everyone waiting trial. i hadn't seen his chrages or the evidence...but maybe if it's not too serious they can have him wear ankle monitor...or a house arrest somewhere and his family can bring him what he wants??? don't know the solution but i now everyone can't be catered to The fat boy is accused of murder! accused of not guilty of never said he should be catered to never said he should get more to eat i did say loss of over 20 pounds a month may be a health endangerment and should be examined thus his right to the lawsuit if he feels that they are not concerned with the possibly effects of this on his health then he has a right to get a review by the courts |
|
|
|
You dont have to sale it to me. I think we are teetering on the edge when we forget that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.
Damn near communistic.. |
|
|
|
well I did say about a health concern because I know for a fact what drastic weight lose can do....which is why I gave suggestions of other options.
now if he is accused of murder, torture, etc and overwhelming evidence against him...then a house arrest type thing...I wouldn't agree with. if it's like multiple DUI's...more minor things but could send him to prison...then house arrest might be an option. i know they have doctors they can take him too. a man is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law... i didn't say anyone but me used the term cater...that was my word. i was referring to if he is just complaining because it's not his style of eating. health issues are different as for what fanta said lol...i just caught it (still on meds) there are innocent people convicted of murder. but I wouldn't like him just under house arrest...that was just a suggestion for minor ones. AND DON'T YOU USE THE ! AT ME MISTER lol |
|
|
|
gimme a break here....i'm on meds lol and i'm slow |
|
|
|
gimme a break here....i'm on meds lol and i'm slow lmao me to lol |
|
|
|
East coast time zone here.
G-night y'all I hope you're ok rose Symbelene, no hard feelings! Lindy, get dressed..... |
|
|
|
put his ^ss in a chain gang.......maricopa county AZ.....criminals are treated as criminals ,not...better than we are......most jails in the US treat the crooks better than single mothers or fathers, and people on welfare.... oh and what of this post rob yours is the second post you are agreeing he should be put on the chain gang i guess this should be thrown out (held against their will and forced to perform services for being held against their will) Definitions of slavery on the Web: * bondage: the state of being under the control of another person * the practice of owning slaves * work done under harsh conditions for little or no pay wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn ----- (Merriam-Webster Online) "1: submission to a dominating influence; 2 a: the state of a person who is chattel of another; b: the practice of slaveholding. dawn-drupal.science.oregonstate.edu/glossary --------------- Amendment 13 - Slavery Abolished. Ratified 12/6/1865. History 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. --------------- has not been convicted yet so it is slavery |
|
|
|
put his ^ss in a chain gang.......maricopa county AZ.....criminals are treated as criminals ,not...better than we are......most jails in the US treat the crooks better than single mothers or fathers, and people on welfare.... oh and what of this post rob yours is the second post you are agreeing he should be put on the chain gang i guess this should be thrown out (held against their will and forced to perform services for being held against their will) Definitions of slavery on the Web: * bondage: the state of being under the control of another person * the practice of owning slaves * work done under harsh conditions for little or no pay wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn ----- (Merriam-Webster Online) "1: submission to a dominating influence; 2 a: the state of a person who is chattel of another; b: the practice of slaveholding. dawn-drupal.science.oregonstate.edu/glossary --------------- Amendment 13 - Slavery Abolished. Ratified 12/6/1865. History 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. --------------- has not been convicted yet so it is slavery |
|
|
|
he did not take the services given to him
they are being forced on him no theft there |
|
|
|
he did not take the services given to him they are being forced on him no theft there |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 05/03/08 08:39 AM
|
|
i never said that
once he is convicted the rules change as of op he committed no crime ------------- truth is interesting thought so this is irrelevant cause it is after a different argument funny how that works i guess that means you lost this argument so you have to resort to an old one |
|
|
|
i never said that once he is convicted the rules change as of op he committed no crime |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 05/03/08 08:54 AM
|
|
i never said that neither
the constitution does speedy trial is in there somewhere is it not |
|
|
|
i never said that neither the constitution does speedy trial is in there somewhere is it not |
|
|
|
i never said that neither the constitution does speedy trial is in there somewhere is it not those are civil cases that is a different court system |
|
|
|
i never said that neither the constitution does speedy trial is in there somewhere is it not those are civil cases that is a different court system |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 05/03/08 09:23 AM
|
|
well then i guess they should either increase the size
or legalize a lot of victim less crimes not take away the rights of the person that is like telling nascar they have to change the rules to let someone become involved that is unable to at this time |
|
|
|
well then i guess they should either increase the size or legalize a lot of victim less crimes not take away the rights of the person that is like telling nascar they have to change the rules to let someone become involved that is unable to at this time |
|
|