Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: Poor inmate
Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 08:39 PM
absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry Theres a lesson here. If you don't want to lose weight,don't kill people.Simple He took another life,why should he be fed in the first place? You are forgetting that a conviction of a felony, and incarceration is a punishment. Not selling lady's speed stick in the canteen, refusing to serve more than one hot meal a day, suing for the playboy channel, suing for access to the dmv records, put his ^ss in a chain gang.......maricopa county AZ.....criminals are treated as criminals ,not...better than we are......most jails in the US treat the crooks better than single mothers or fathers, and people on welfare. tired of looking rob but i rest the issue at this time that is unfair. What you are posting were in direct response to a post from another topic, at least mine were. Mine were in response to dragoness saying even convicted people retain their rights. They were not about this guy, but a different topic

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 08:43 PM
no rob it is all related cry foul if you wish but no bail out for you lmao

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 08:44 PM
All he has to do is get him a job in there and buy commissary like all the other inmates do. They can buy junk food if they have money on their books. I doubt anything will come of it anyway. Inmates can file suits for whatever they want but that does not mean it will go through in the court system. really? Even if they lose it still costs taxpayer dollars to address the frivilous suits they file AS much as it puts a bad taste in your mouth, they have rights too. People file frivolous lawsuits all the time, not just inmates. EVERYONE has their right to their day in court. and once convicted of a frivilous suit they should be barred from further filings, and have to repay every penny to the citizens they spent before they should be allowed to spend one dollar in the prison canteen. should the govt have to pay all fees if they lose a lawsuit then cause they cause a lot of unneeded lawsuits as well absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry here you go rob in full and by the way what does that absolutely refer to

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 08:46 PM
put his ^ss in a chain gang.......maricopa county AZ.....criminals are treated as criminals ,not...better than we are......most jails in the US treat the crooks better than single mothers or fathers, and people on welfare.... truer words have never been spoken. Prison used to be a thing to fear, now they recruit people off the streets to be incarcerated to improve their gang numbers in prison. Make jails and prison something to be feared again oh and what of this post rob yours is the second post you are agreeing he should be put on the chain gang

Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 08:46 PM
All he has to do is get him a job in there and buy commissary like all the other inmates do. They can buy junk food if they have money on their books. I doubt anything will come of it anyway. Inmates can file suits for whatever they want but that does not mean it will go through in the court system. really? Even if they lose it still costs taxpayer dollars to address the frivilous suits they file AS much as it puts a bad taste in your mouth, they have rights too. People file frivolous lawsuits all the time, not just inmates. EVERYONE has their right to their day in court. and once convicted of a frivilous suit they should be barred from further filings, and have to repay every penny to the citizens they spent before they should be allowed to spend one dollar in the prison canteen. should the govt have to pay all fees if they lose a lawsuit then cause they cause a lot of unneeded lawsuits as well absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry here you go rob in full and by the way what does that absolutely refer to it refers to an inmate losing all rights, as they should. And a inmate is in a correctional facility, i.e. prison, not a jail. So I stand by what was said

Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 08:47 PM
put his ^ss in a chain gang.......maricopa county AZ.....criminals are treated as criminals ,not...better than we are......most jails in the US treat the crooks better than single mothers or fathers, and people on welfare.... truer words have never been spoken. Prison used to be a thing to fear, now they recruit people off the streets to be incarcerated to improve their gang numbers in prison. Make jails and prison something to be feared again oh and what of this post rob yours is the second post you are agreeing he should be put on the chain gang he should. All persons if they cannot pay their lodging should be required to work for it. I have said that multiple times to you in this thread

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 08:51 PM
All he has to do is get him a job in there and buy commissary like all the other inmates do. They can buy junk food if they have money on their books. I doubt anything will come of it anyway. Inmates can file suits for whatever they want but that does not mean it will go through in the court system. really? Even if they lose it still costs taxpayer dollars to address the frivilous suits they file AS much as it puts a bad taste in your mouth, they have rights too. People file frivolous lawsuits all the time, not just inmates. EVERYONE has their right to their day in court. and once convicted of a frivilous suit they should be barred from further filings, and have to repay every penny to the citizens they spent before they should be allowed to spend one dollar in the prison canteen. should the govt have to pay all fees if they lose a lawsuit then cause they cause a lot of unneeded lawsuits as well absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry here you go rob in full and by the way what does that absolutely refer to it refers to an inmate losing all rights, as they should. And a inmate is in a correctional facility, i.e. prison, not a jail. So I stand by what was said a county jail is a penal institution

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 08:56 PM
so if you are falsely convicted you should lose your RIGHT to appeal interesting very interesting

Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 08:57 PM
All he has to do is get him a job in there and buy commissary like all the other inmates do. They can buy junk food if they have money on their books. I doubt anything will come of it anyway. Inmates can file suits for whatever they want but that does not mean it will go through in the court system. really? Even if they lose it still costs taxpayer dollars to address the frivilous suits they file AS much as it puts a bad taste in your mouth, they have rights too. People file frivolous lawsuits all the time, not just inmates. EVERYONE has their right to their day in court. and once convicted of a frivilous suit they should be barred from further filings, and have to repay every penny to the citizens they spent before they should be allowed to spend one dollar in the prison canteen. should the govt have to pay all fees if they lose a lawsuit then cause they cause a lot of unneeded lawsuits as well absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry here you go rob in full and by the way what does that absolutely refer to it refers to an inmate losing all rights, as they should. And a inmate is in a correctional facility, i.e. prison, not a jail. So I stand by what was said a county jail is a penal institution so I apologize for my incorrect terminology, convict me, lol

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 09:10 PM
All he has to do is get him a job in there and buy commissary like all the other inmates do. They can buy junk food if they have money on their books. I doubt anything will come of it anyway. Inmates can file suits for whatever they want but that does not mean it will go through in the court system. really? Even if they lose it still costs taxpayer dollars to address the frivilous suits they file AS much as it puts a bad taste in your mouth, they have rights too. People file frivolous lawsuits all the time, not just inmates. EVERYONE has their right to their day in court. and once convicted of a frivilous suit they should be barred from further filings, and have to repay every penny to the citizens they spent before they should be allowed to spend one dollar in the prison canteen. should the govt have to pay all fees if they lose a lawsuit then cause they cause a lot of unneeded lawsuits as well absolutely. A person should lose their constitution rights when serving time in a penal institution, sorry here you go rob in full and by the way what does that absolutely refer to it refers to an inmate losing all rights, as they should. And a inmate is in a correctional facility, i.e. prison, not a jail. So I stand by what was said a county jail is a penal institution so I apologize for my incorrect terminology, convict me, lol are you pleading guilty lmao you lose your rights

yellowrose10 Joined Tue 12/11/07 Posts: 52804	Thu 05/01/08 09:27 PM
still playing catch up...but my 2 cents is...prisons are better than what alot of honest, hard working people have do they really sue for the playboy channel???? lol

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 09:30 PM
this started out about the rights of an unconvicted man awaiting trial that is suing because he is losing over 20 pounds a month

Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 09:31 PM
still playing catch up...but my 2 cents is...prisons are better than what alot of honest, hard working people have do they really sue for the playboy channel???? lol I can provide you with copies of some of the lawsuits when I worked at the prison

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 09:35 PM
still playing catch up...but my 2 cents is...prisons are better than what alot of honest, hard working people have do they really sue for the playboy channel???? lol I can provide you with copies of some of the lawsuits when I worked at the prison that explains a lot

yellowrose10 Joined Tue 12/11/07 Posts: 52804	Thu 05/01/08 09:40 PM
rob....i don't doubt it...just saying wow adj...he needs to go to trial or let go but jails and prison don't cater to someone's eating habits. if he was made sick because of drastic weight loss...then they need to treat it. but from what i got from it...he just wasn't happy because he couldn't eat like he used to hey..i have an uncle in prison (never want to see him) but i know he has it so easy as long as they are on "good behavior" i used to work for the police dept and lots of cop friends and families...maybe if the jails were harder as well...it wouldn't seem like more of a motel and people might change

Single_Rob Joined Mon 02/04/08 Posts: 8233	Thu 05/01/08 09:42 PM
still playing catch up...but my 2 cents is...prisons are better than what alot of honest, hard working people have do they really sue for the playboy channel???? lol I can provide you with copies of some of the lawsuits when I worked at the prison that explains a lot 161 suits in 19 months

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 09:45 PM
rob....i don't doubt it...just saying wow adj...he needs to go to trial or let go but jails and prison don't cater to someone's eating habits. if he was made sick because of drastic weight loss...then they need to treat it. but from what i got from it...he just wasn't happy because he couldn't eat like he used to hey..i have an uncle in prison (never want to see him) but i know he has it so easy as long as they are on "good behavior" i used to work for the police dept and lots of cop friends and families...maybe if the jails were harder as well...it wouldn't seem like more of a motel and people might change well those convicted should get harsh treatment (and keep some rights but not all) but those awaiting trial is a differnt game completly

yellowrose10 Joined Tue 12/11/07 Posts: 52804	Thu 05/01/08 09:51 PM
adj...true. but the jails can't cater to everyone waiting trial is my point. maybe this is best for him health wise???? i believe they design meals based on nutrional basis...not who likes what to eat or 2nds etc how can you possibly cater to everyone waiting trial. i hadn't seen his chrages or the evidence...but maybe if it's not too serious they can have him wear ankle monitor...or a house arrest somewhere and his family can bring him what he wants??? don't know the solution but i now everyone can't be catered to

Fanta46 Joined Sat 11/11/06 Posts: 29361	Thu 05/01/08 09:53 PM Edited by Fanta46 on Thu 05/01/08 09:56 PM
adj...true. but the jails can't cater to everyone waiting trial is my point. maybe this is best for him health wise???? i believe they design meals based on nutrional basis...not who likes what to eat or 2nds etc how can you possibly cater to everyone waiting trial. i hadn't seen his chrages or the evidence...but maybe if it's not too serious they can have him wear ankle monitor...or a house arrest somewhere and his family can bring him what he wants??? don't know the solution but i now everyone can't be catered to The chubby boy is accused of murder!

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Thu 05/01/08 09:54 PM Edited by adj4u on Thu 05/01/08 09:58 PM
adj...true. but the jails can't cater to everyone waiting trial is my point. maybe this is best for him health wise???? i believe they design meals based on nutrional basis...not who likes what to eat or 2nds etc how can you possibly cater to everyone waiting trial. i hadn't seen his chrages or the evidence...but maybe if it's not too serious they can have him wear ankle monitor...or a house arrest somewhere and his family can bring him what he wants??? don't know the solution but i now everyone can't be catered to The fat boy is accused of murder! accused of not guilty of never said he should be catered to never said he should get more to eat i did say loss of over 20 pounds a month may be a health endangerment and should be examined thus his right to the lawsuit if he feels that they are not concerned with the possibly effects of this on his health then he has a right to get a review by the courts