Community > Posts By > Giocamo

 
Giocamo's photo
Tue 08/04/09 02:19 PM
like Rush says...if you think healthcare is expensive now...then...wait til it's free !...:smile:

Giocamo's photo
Tue 08/04/09 02:17 PM

Utube as a reliable source of news is beyond laughable anyway.

Healthcare has been an issue in this country for a long time and National Healthcare has been a desire of this country since people realized they could die without healthcare.

It would be nice if we could prove we are the greatest nation in world by caring for our underprivledged in this country.


those clips are straight from the horses ***!!...

Giocamo's photo
Tue 08/04/09 10:05 AM
Edited by Giocamo on Tue 08/04/09 10:21 AM
:smile:


here's the house version of the Healthcare Bill...please read pages 16, 29, 42, 58, 59, 72, 195 and 203...

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf
:smile: Is the birth certificate in there?:smile:


Mirror...do you work for the Obama administration ?...you have perfected the art of " changing the subject "...when you're presented with the facts...or...your feet are held to the fire...read the bill so you can engage...with the facts...in an intelligent arguement against...single payer healthcare...:smile:

Giocamo's photo
Tue 08/04/09 09:52 AM
here's the house version of the Healthcare Bill...please read pages 16, 29, 42, 58, 59, 72, 195 and 203...

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

Giocamo's photo
Tue 08/04/09 07:57 AM
Edited by Giocamo on Tue 08/04/09 07:58 AM
let's see what Obama really thinks...If you have a 1:40...I think you can draw your own conclusion...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk

Giocamo's photo
Mon 08/03/09 05:24 PM
nope...just an American...:smile: ...

Giocamo's photo
Mon 08/03/09 04:49 PM
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105764


BORN IN THE USA?
Is this really smoking gun of Obama's Kenyan birth?
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: August 02, 2009
11:55 am Eastern

© 2009 WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama's eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.


This document purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth for Barack Obama, allegedly born in Mombasa, Kenya, in 1961


The document lists Obama's parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.


Document enlarged to show detail alleges Barack Obama was born at Coast General Hospital in Mombasa on Aug. 4, 1961


No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964.

WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.


An enlarged view of the bottom of the document



Last week, a counterfeit document purporting to be Obama's Kenyan birth certificate made the rounds of the Internet, but was quickly determined to be fraudulent. The new document released by Taitz bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax.

One of the issues Taitz must deal with will be the authentication of the document. Critics immediately jumped on the Feb. 17, 1964, date for the document, explaining that the "republic" of Kenya wasn't assembled until in December of that year.

Media Matters wrote, "Sorry, WorldNetDaily: Kenya wasn't a republic until Dec. 1964."

But Kenya's official independence was in 1963, and any number of labels could have been applied to government documents during that time period.

At Ameriborn Constitution News, the researcher noted that the independence process for the nation actually started taking as early as 1957, when there were the first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council.

"Kenya became an Independent Republic, December 12, 1963, which gives more [credibility] that this is a true document," the website stated.

The 1963 independence is corroborated by several other information sources, including the online African History.

Even the People Daily news agency cited, on Dec. 12, 2005, the "42nd independence anniversary" in Nairobi. "The country gained independence from Britain on Dec. 12, 1963," the report said.

An online copy of the Kenya Constitution, "adopted in 1963, amended in 1999," states: "CHAPTER I - THE REPUBLIC OF KENYA, Article 1, Kenya is a sovereign Republic. Article 1A, The Republic of Kenya shall be a multiparty democratic state…"

It was in November 1964 when the region voluntarily became a one-party state, according to an online source.

The region including Mombasa originally was dealt with as a separate independence movement, but it almost immediately became part of Kenya when the sultan of Zanzibar ceded the "coastal strip" to Kenya, according to sources.

Taitz told WND that the document came from an anonymous source who doesn't want his name known because "he's afraid for his life."

Taitz's motion, filed yesterday in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, requests the purported evidence of Obama's birth – both the alleged birth certificate and foreign records not yet obtained – be preserved from destruction, asks for permission to legally request documents from Kenya and seeks a subpoena for deposition from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

"I filed the motion with the court asking for expedited discovery, which would allow me to start subpoenas and depositions even before Obama and the government responds," Taitz told WND. "I am asking the judge to give me the power to subpoena the documents from the Kenyan embassy and to require a deposition from Hillary Clinton so they will be forced to authenticate [the birth certificate].

"I'm forcing the issue, where Obama will have to respond," she said.

"Before, they said, 'You don't have anything backing your claims,'" Taitz explained. "Now I have something. In fact, I have posted on the Internet more than Obama has. My birth certificate actually has signatures."

Join the petition campaign to demand President Obama resolve the question by revealing his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

Taitz's most celebrated case involved a military officer, Maj. Stefan Cook, whose order to deploy to Afghanistan was revoked when he challenged Obama's eligibility to hold office. That case has now been refiled in federal court in Florida, raising the specter of a class-action claim among members of the military that their orders aren't valid because of questions surrounding Obama's constitutional eligibility.

Taitz told WND she plans to file additional paperwork with the Florida court tomorrow, adding the alleged Kenyan birth certificate to Maj. Cook's case.

(Story continues below)




The suit seeks damages and a declaratory judgment. Named as defendants are Simtech, Cook's former civilian employer, and several officials, including Col. Louis B. Wingate and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.

WND previously reported a judge in Georgia dismissed Cook's case when the government suddenly revoked his orders to report to Fort Benning for deployment to Afghanistan.

WND reported when the case originally was filed that Cook's concern was that without proof that there is a legitimate commander in chief, the entire U.S. Army becomes "merely a corps of chattel slaves under the illegitimate control of a private citizen."

Cook told WND: "As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a 'natural-born citizen,' he is not eligible to be commander in chief."

The new complaint says it seeks Cook's reinstatement with his civilian employer, Simtech Inc., as well as protection from the Department of Defense and president "from further retaliation for plaintiff's challenge to the president's constitutional authority."

See the movie Obama does not want you to see: Own the DVD that probes this unprecedented presidential eligibility mystery!

WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Complicating the situation is Obama's decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.

WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.


Giocamo's photo
Mon 08/03/09 03:20 PM
Conservative...

Giocamo's photo
Sun 08/02/09 09:38 PM
Edited by Giocamo on Sun 08/02/09 09:41 PM
All in the Family
Sopranos
Leave it to Beaver
Andy Griffith
Dragnet...the acting was so bad...it was good...
Barney Miller
Brady Bunch...yes I said it !!...gulp !!
Munsters
Mary Tyler Moore

Giocamo's photo
Sun 08/02/09 02:00 PM
heres the link...read it and weep...although I should warn you...it's written in lawyer speak...

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

Giocamo's photo
Sun 08/02/09 01:49 PM

I see now the new fearmongering attempt coming from the Republicans is that if National Health care gets approved people will lose their health care. slaphead

Gotta love it!!!!


it's true...it's right in the house version...if you change jobs...get a new job...get fired...whatever...and this bill is passed and in place for 1 year...employers will no longer be able to admit " new "...participants in their healthcare plans...they will be randomly enrolled in the government plan...it's right on page 16...

Giocamo's photo
Sat 08/01/09 10:35 AM
for me...

#1) Angels With Dirty Faces...James Cagney
#2) Crime School...Humphrey Bogart
#3) White Heat...James Cagney
#4) Hombre...Paul Newman
#5) Public Enemy...James Cagney
#6) Cool Hand Luke...Paul Newman
#7) The Sting...Paul Newman
#8) Man of a Thousand Faces...James Cagney
#9) Patton...George C. Scott
#10)A Bronx Tale...Robert DeNiro
#11)Horsefeathers...The Marx Brothers
#12)The Wizard of Oz...

Giocamo's photo
Sat 08/01/09 09:31 AM
Edited by Giocamo on Sat 08/01/09 10:05 AM
well...I'm not quite sure his poll numbers are going down...no pun intended...lol...because of hate...I think the American people are rejecting his policies...plain and simple...I think there are quite a few people out their...that voted for him...and feel duped...they sure as hell didn't vote for " Knee Cap and Trade "..." Government run Healthcare "..." Nationalizing Banks "..." Taking over the car industry "..." $787 billion spending bill "..." running up more debt the George Washington to George Bush "...not in this country...it's like watching Juan Peron...

Giocamo's photo
Sat 08/01/09 09:01 AM
by Johan Goldberg...

In one of my favorite episodes of "Star Trek," Captain Kirk is mistaken for a god by inhabitants of a planet of Native Americans (it's a long story). The illusion works for Kirk until a jealous shaman cuts Kirk's hand, revealing that the divine being is just a man after all. "Behold! A god who bleeds!" the shaman mocks, exposing Kirk as a fraud to the rest of the tribe.

It may sound like a stretch -- and, let's be fair, it is -- but I keep thinking of that episode when I look Barack Obama's poll numbers these days.

He's bleeding on every front. The latest Pew survey shows that only 38 percent of Americans approve of his handling of the economy. In the latest Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll, fewer than half of respondents (48 percent) say Obama can be trusted to keep his word. Gallup has his approval rating at a new low of 52 percent, and Rasmussen has it below 50 percent for the first time.

On almost every domestic issue, polls show that support for Obama and his agenda is plummeting, and that the Democratic Party's advantages over Republicans on the economy, taxes, the deficit and health care have been erased or severely reduced.

All presidents go through rough patches, and Obama's no exception. Odds are his poll numbers will get better -- and worse -- in the years to come. All of this is typical.

But this misses a crucial point: Obama isn't supposed to be a typical politician. He was supposed to be The One. He was supposed to change Washington. Transcend race. Fix souls. Bake 12-minute brownies in seven minutes.

Oprah promised Obama would help us "evolve to a higher plane." Deepak Chopra said Obama's presidency represented "a quantum leap in American consciousness." Last month, Newsweek editor Evan Thomas proclaimed that Obama stood "above the country, above -- above the world, he's sort of God."

Well, now he's the god who bleeds, and once you're the god who bleeds, it's hard to get the divinity back in the tube, as it were.

Obama undoubtedly has major accomplishments ahead of him, but in a real way the Obama presidency is over. His messianic hopey-changiness has been exposed for what it was, and what it could only be: a rich cocktail of pie-eyed idealism, campaign sloganeering and profound arrogance.

As president, he's tried to apply the postpartisan gloss of his campaign rhetoric to the hyperpartisan dross of his agenda. And he's fooling fewer people every day.

Indeed, the one unifying theme of his presidency so far has been Obama's relentless campaigning for a job he already has. That makes sense because that's really all Obama knows how to do. He's had no significant experience crafting major legislation. He has next to no experience governing at all.

But he's great at giving speeches, holding town halls and chitchatting with reporters. So that's largely what he does as president. The problem is that campaigning is different than governing. The former requires convincing promises about what you will do; the latter requires convincing arguments for what you are doing. He's good at the former, not so good at the latter. Or as columnist Michael Barone puts it, he's good at aura, bad at argument.

It's revealing that liberals suddenly want Obama to spare the god and use the rod. Specifically, as Dick Polman notes in the Philadelphia Inquirer, they want Obama to channel Lyndon Johnson (whom no one confused for a quantum leap in our consciousness). Liberal historian Doris Kearns Goodwin says she wants BHO to go LBJ: "to take charge, to draw lines, to pressure, to threaten, to cajole." Liberal activist Dean Baker says Obama should "get the list of every hardball nasty political ploy" that Johnson ever deployed.

As Polman rightly notes, this is crazy talk for the simple reason that Obama has nothing like LBJ's experience, skill set, or treasure trove of chits and political IOUs. Obama can no more decide to become LBJ than Carrot Top can decide to become Laurence Olivier.

Now, just as critics predicted, Obama needs on-the-job training to become a president, because he's a god no more.

Giocamo's photo
Fri 07/31/09 08:11 PM
nessuno commento !...:smile: ...although...I think the " Green Eyed Lady "...nailed it...ummmmm...no pun intended...happy

Giocamo's photo
Thu 07/30/09 09:10 PM
heres the whole bill...for starters...read page 16...its in lawyer speak...but...it basicly says that you will no longer have access to employer / private healthcare...if this bill is law for 1 year and you change or lose your job...after that date...you will be forced into the goverment option...

http://docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

Giocamo's photo
Thu 07/30/09 08:27 PM


1) 85% of people are happy with their healthcare...
2) In the bill it says...that if you lose your job, or start a new one, you'll no longer be able to get healthcare through your employer, but with be forced to accept a goverment plan...
3) In the bill it says...If you do not have health insurance...when it comes time to file your income taxes...you'll have to prove to the IRS that you're covered, and if you're not...you'll be fined $2500.00 and randomly enrolled in a government plan...
4) In the bill it says...If you live an " unhealthy "...lifestyle [ determined by the government ]...that your premiums will reflect that in your cost...
5) If you think a goverment inspector...coming to your house and taking an inventory of your fridge and pantry...to determine if you're eating and living a healthy lifestyle is a good thing...then by all means move to Great Britain...where they already do this and Obama wants to incorporate this " invasion of privacy "...into our country and into our homes...
6)In the bill it says ...that after a certain age...every 5 years...there will be goverment " Death "...counseling...I kid you not...as they decide who is and isn't worth the cost of medicine and treatment...


Please link to the source of this information please?


it's in the bill...google it and read it...

Giocamo's photo
Thu 07/30/09 03:14 PM
Edited by Giocamo on Thu 07/30/09 03:16 PM
1) 85% of people are happy with their healthcare...
2) In the bill it says...that if you lose your job, or start a new one, you'll no longer be able to get healthcare through your employer, but with be forced to accept a goverment plan...
3) In the bill it says...If you do not have health insurance...when it comes time to file your income taxes...you'll have to prove to the IRS that you're covered, and if you're not...you'll be fined $2500.00 and randomly enrolled in a government plan...
4) In the bill it says...If you live an " unhealthy "...lifestyle [ determined by the government ]...that your premiums will reflect that in your cost...
5) If you think a goverment inspector...coming to your house and taking an inventory of your fridge and pantry...to determine if you're eating and living a healthy lifestyle is a good thing...then by all means move to Great Britain...where they already do this and Obama wants to incorporate this " invasion of privacy "...into our country and into our homes...
6)In the bill it says ...that after a certain age...every 5 years...there will be goverment " Death "...counseling...I kid you not...as they decide who is and isn't worth the cost of medicine and treatment...

Giocamo's photo
Thu 07/30/09 09:36 AM











:smile: Nazis are not right wingers?huhHitler wanted to restore "traditional German values" :smile:



huh Are you saying that Nazi idealogy is not far rightwing idealogy?huh


It depends what you call "right wing".

Hitler could really get together with Stalin their only difference was about whether or not just own the capital (communism) or just control (dictate) the capital (things that make money, like factory and tools) but giving the illusion of private property.

Today's what is "left wing" and "right wing" is really all mixed up. I would not call any of these parties (republicans/democrats) right wing anyhow..they are both left wingers. The only real true "right wing" are the libertarians, like Ron Paul.


Stalin was about as socialistic as Hitler was liberal. :laughing:

Libertarians are libertarians. The Libertarian PARTY is right-wing, however. Also, the Dems/Repubs are both moderate right-wing parties and as a socialist, I can tell you Obama is no socialist. Most of us don't even consider him a leftist (I consider him a left-leaning centralist myself).


Funny - I told people on here the same thing before the election. He leans towards the center.


He leans towards the center.
laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh laugh

Giocamo's photo
Sun 07/26/09 09:12 AM
Edited by Giocamo on Sun 07/26/09 09:17 AM
heres one...

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_illegals_healthcare/2009/07/19/237484.html

heres another...

The widely claimed number of uninsured Americans is dishonest and misleading. A study released by the Employment Policies Institute (EPI) on June 23, 2009 shows that 43 percent of the claimed 47 million uninsured Americans can afford medical insurance and elect to remain “voluntarily uninsured.”

At least 18 million of the uninsured are under the age of 35 and earn more than enough to purchase health insurance that would cost less than $100 per month. Many of the uninsured qualify for health care coverage through SCHIP, Medicaid or other existing government programs but for whatever reason, about 11 million simply refuse to take advantage of these taxpayer-funded programs. About 2 million of the remaining Americans receive health care as inmates in our prison system since they use jail, penitentiary or prison mailing addresses. Many of the remaining uninsured would never obtain insurance even if it were offered; they are illegal residents, prostitutes and drug addicts. All of these residents currently receive good medical care in emergency rooms or free clinics.

The actual number of Americans who desire and cannot obtain health insurance is estimated to be about 8 million. By law, emergency rooms must provide health care to patients; not differentiating between legal or illegal and these patients receive the same high quality health care as those who have insurance. Being without health insurance does not mean being without health care.

and another...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/06/26/how_to_lie_with_statistics_--_again_97189.html