http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xiv8bu_marvin-gaye-i-heard-it-through-the-grapevine_people
Kerry blew all mid east support for Barry's new war.

McLame has plenty support he can offer Hussein.

I wouldn't be happy with one that only comes once a year.

Stupid liberals seem to always defend double standards.

oBozo trades 5 top Terrorists for one deadbeat deserter - Legal

Parents try to raise ransom to free son - illegal.

Makes perfect sense to idiots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJ-TLZcS0Es

Might be a good idea for them to exchange their dough when they enter and get travelers checks.

I never travel out of country with more than 100.00 on me.

Astounding Public Law

http://www.libertygunrights.com/PublicLaw87-297.html

This is not a conspiracy theory…. This is public law. You can do your own confirming research using the links and references provided.

Have you ever wondered why Congress wants to take away your firearms? Go to your local law library and ask the librarian to show you where the books for the United States Code are located. There are 35 books in the set and they are reddish-brown in color. Within Volume Nine you will find the answer in P.L. 87-297 (P.L. stands for Public Law).

Open Volume Nine. The page numbers are in the center near the middle binding. The section numbers are along the edges.

Turn to Page 651. There you will find Public Law 87-297 which calls for the United States to eliminate its armed forces. This law was signed for by the United States in 1961. John F. Kennedy signed it and every US President since then has worked to enact its provisions. The government knows you will not approve, which is why they want to take away your firearms. (This is Title 22 USC, section 2551).

Turn to page 652. Here you will find the definition of what the government means by “disarmament”. Disarmament calls for the elimination of America’s armed forces. It also calls for the elimination of weapons of all kinds. (This is Title 22 USC, section.2552a).

Remember, Barrack Obama was allegedly a ‘Constitutional Lecturer.”

Turn to page 654. Here you will find it stated as item (a) “control, reduction and elimination of “armed forces” and as item (d), “Elimination of Armed Forces.” What you need to know is that our armed forces are being eliminated and relinquished from national control, which in turn, wipes out our sovereignty as a nation. In two stages, we will have no more army, no more navy and no more air force.

In the third stage, we shall have “zero” military. Before Stage 1 closes, all citizen-owned guns are to be banned. (Title 22 USC, section 2571a)

Public Law 87-297 is further explained in the US State Department document entitled ‘Publication 7377. Your librarian can also furnish you a copy. Also ask the librarian to get you a copy of “The Blue Print for the Peace Race’. It is a 35-page booklet printed by the United States
Arms Control and Disarmament Agency as Publication No. 4 – General Series 3 – Revised May of 1962. Publication No. 4 is the unabridged version of State Department document 7277. (Your tax dollar funds a disarmament agency, you ask?).

Both of these booklets explain how our military is to be reduced to 2.1 million men. China and Russia are to be reduced to that number also. At this point, we are in Stage 1, at which time are to transfer (on a permanent basis) one-half of our armed forces to be merged with the Russian and Chinese armies.

In Stage II, the remaining one-half of our armed forces is turned over to the United Nations Security Council. The person in charge of the merged armies must, by agreement, always be a Russian. The world’s smaller nations must turn over 100-percent of their armies to the Under Secretary of the UN Security Council in Stage II. President George Bush Sr. and Admiral William J. Crowe referred to this process as being “in transition”.

Turn to page 655. On this page in Volume Nine of the United States Code, read “Policy Formation”. The directives there (written in 1963 to pacify objectors) are supposedly to restrain anyone from disarmament, reducing or limiting our armaments, or taking guns away from the people unless it is pursuant to the treaty-making power of the President, or if it is authorized in further legislation by the Congress (Title 22, section 2473).

Every couple of years the US House of Representatives votes to appropriate funds for this ongoing program. Since P.L. 87-297 was first signed into law in 1961, there have been 18 updates to it (all bad), with no deletions of the previous policies. The Congress knows that the plan includes policing of the United States by foreign troops. The Congress is allowing our military bases to be closed down, except for those that will be used by the new world army.
You will find that plan in Publication 7277 and in ‘Blueprint for the Peace Race’.

If the US President and Congress can call a ‘Constitutional Convention’, we will find ourselves with two constitutions, Communist in structure, which in one will state in Article VIII, Section12, “No person shall bear arms or possess lethal weapons except the police and members of the armed forces.”

The Congress has praised these documents and is on record in US Senate hearings seeking ways to install these regulations. Ask your librarian for ‘Revision of the United Nations Charter – Hearings Before Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee, Feb, 2-20, 1950 US Government Printing Office.’ Nothing has changed since. They are still viable. The ultimate goal to be reached in Stage III of the disarmament process is to “proceed to a point where no state (nation) would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force.”

Anyone who doubts that what has been presented here is correct, visit a law library and follow the references included herein. While you are at it, look up Public Law 101-216. US State Department Publication 7277 is available on the web at http://www.kobres.com/disarm.html and in electronic form as file PUB_7277.ZIP

Loma Wharton, Co-Chair, www.liberators2004.orgV

V.A.C.A.T.E. – Valiantly Affirming Constitutional Authority Through Education


Something To Ponder

The odds of winning the Florida Lottery are 1 in 22,957,480.

The odds of winning the Powerball is 1 in 175,223,510

The odds of winning Mega Millions are 1 in 258,890,850.

The odds of a disk drive failing in any given month are roughly one in 36. The odds of two different drives failing in the same month are roughly 1 in 16 squared, or 1 in about 1,300. The odds of three drives failing in the same month are 36 cubed, or 1 in 46,656.

The odds of seven different drives failing in the same month (like what happened at the IRS when they received a letter asking about emails targeting conservatives and pro-Israeli groups) is 37 to the 7th power = 1 in 78,664,154,096 (that’s over 78 billion). In other words, the odds are greater that you will win the Florida Lottery 342 times, than having those seven IRS hard drives crash in the same month.

When I email, I tell them to reverse the charges.

^^^^^^^^^^^
Now this thread could find itself in the joke section.

US Senate votes No on UN Agenda gun control/names of traitors


U.S. Senate votes No on U.N. Agenda gun control / names of traitors

HOORAY a 53-46 vote


Whew! ... But who would have thought this would garnish so many YEA votes. One would think it not possible in AMERICA!

If you have not seen this yet, I know you will want to and also forward it.

HOORAY a 53-46 vote.

The U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11. It: "CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries".

By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.

This is that brief, glorious moment in history...when everyone stands around...reloading.

Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy us? Well, let their names become known ! See below .. If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 "legislators" vote against them.

In a 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads: "To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms. The ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.

Astonishingly, 46 out of our 100 United States Senators were willing to give away our Constitutional rights to a foreign power.

Here are the 46 senators who voted to give your rights to the U.N.

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
What? No Republicans????

Folks: This needs to go viral. These Senators voted to let the UN take OUR guns. They need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.

46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

Liberals would want tax payers to pay her to have more kids.

Thanks

This has been happening for thousands of years there.

No stopping it. Just containment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGZpWOMGJCM



Some reason, ya have to copy and paste the url.

whacka, whacka, whacka, ahhhh'

It might be just me but, I see the earth spinning like a top in very slow motion.

A top always sways and rotates.

Another example why weed shouldn't be legal.

A hand in the bush beats hell out of a bird in the hand.

Here's the thread on that.

http://mingle2.com/topic/410889

DNA.
Yeah, I'm aware few have heard of it beings it's a new concept.

That global warming heats up this hole here to near 115. Finally, climate change kicked in a little and cooled us down to a freezing 70 today.