100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
|
|
There may be some truth in what you say but you seem to be missing the point that it is the women who are collecting most of the checks from the taxpayer for having the children. And after taking responsibility for raising the children, they are not instilling the morals, work ethics, and need for education required by the children they bore. Aside from the infamous Octomom, who gained notoriety FOR her abuses of The System, how are these poor, welfare-supported moms able to afford the artificial insemination that removes the men-who-impregnated-them's obligation for child support, child rearing, AND "instilling the morals, work ethics, and need for education required by the children they (helped to) bore"? 
That what I addressed. The sperm donor, if they can prove who da baby daddy is, should either be awarded custody, if he is employed or in a position to maintain said child. If he can't support the kid and his ho, he should be nutted so he can't impregnate others. The irresponsible breeders need to be stopped. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I once knew of a woman (back in the 90s) who was a well-paid, highly respected third-party property manager. Part of her duties were to leave her office, drive to vacant homes (some renting for as much as $3,000/month at the time) and show them to prospective renters. On one of these showings, she was ambushed by a "prospective renter" and brutally raped and beaten. While her body healed just fine, she found she was psychologically incapable of leaving her office TO show properties, again, and was awarded disability. To the best of my knowledge, she's still receiving it. "Legitimately" "can't work"...she got a doctor's note to prove it and everything. She doesn't even HAVE to look for an Administrative Assistant job IN a property management office, where she's not required to leave it for showings. Doesn't even have to accept employment as counter-help at McDonald's, if (since?) she doesn't want (have?) to. I'm sure there are many, MANY other similar stories, nation-wide. Lines get blurry when we decide everything's cut-and-dried, huh? *Funny* how that happens. 
Yes, there are many legitimately disabled. No, I wouldn't even think they haven't earned that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 09/14/14 08:37 AM
|
|
yes but people who 'wont work', have not Refusing to or not taking what's available should be grounds for termination of freebies. Actually, they are only free to the ones who refuse to work. Laboring contributors carry the burden. Me. If I don't tap her, I don't feed her. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seniors earned it. The disabled can't. Big freakin' difference between can't and WON"T, no? yep . but who is gonna determine what that difference is? not someone who believes people should accept any job offered them,, or else they don't 'want to work' not someone who thinks not finding work and not 'wanting to work' are the same thing,,,that's for sure,,,   
The disabled and seniors have already been determined. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seniors earned it.
The disabled can't. Big freakin' difference between can't and WON"T, no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sun 09/14/14 08:18 AM
|
|
Cracked out mom.
Idea. End the welfare for non-contributors. Offer tax breaks and financial incentives to get spayed and neutered. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to dissect a pic or video to see if there's a green screen?
These folks getting wasted, could possibly be being wasted. Just not by the alleged enemy. Staged beheadings? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To fix a problem, the root has to be dug out.
Problem is, too many people. Throw more money at the problem only encourages more irresponsible behavior. Only stupid liberals would come up with the idea of taking other peoples money and give it to folks who don't want jobs, gang bangers, professional ghetto rat factories,etc. Someone washing dishes needing assistance, great, they earned it. Someone sitting on their butts claiming they won't take any job they feel is beneath them, kick 'em to da coib. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/13/14 07:52 PM
|
|
Unless I missed reading about the woman getting whacked, they must be using her for sexual tension relief.
ISIS Video Claims To Show Beheading Of British Aid Worker David Haines The Huffington Post | By Charlotte Alfred Posted: 09/13/2014 6:19 Islamic State militants released a video on social media on Saturday they said showed the beheading of British aid worker David Haines. In the video produced by ISIS' media wing and posted on Twitter, a masked militant with a British-sounding accent addresses U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, before appearing to behead Haines. (Warning: disturbing image below) A 44-year-old father of two from Scotland, Haines was abducted in Syria last year while working for the French aid agency ACTED. He appeared in a video earlier this month showing the beheading of American journalist Steven Sotloff, just weeks after the group sparked worldwide revulsion by beheading U.S. reporter James Foley. Following the pattern of the previous videos, the clip begins with news footage of Cameron discussing his policy towards the militant group, before showing Haines kneeling in the sand, wearing an orange jumpsuit, as he makes a statement. The militant warns Britain will be dragged into "another bloody and unwinnable war" for helping to arm the Kurdish Peshmerga force battling the group in Iraq. The man later threatens another hostage, who also appears in the video, saying he is British national Alan Henning. According to Syrians who wrote on Twitter that they recognized the man, Henning is an also aid worker captured while working in Syria. david haines 
The British government's Foreign Office said it was working urgently to verify the video, the Associated Press reported. "If true, this is another disgusting murder," the Foreign Office said in a statement. "We are offering the family every support possible. They ask to be left alone at this time." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
How do you keep a man happy?
|
|
Rub my feet and fetch me beer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/13/14 06:17 PM
|
|
What sense does it make for women to pump out more kids than they can provide for.
Chronically unemployed, unemployable or those who can work but, choose the welfare ho role. Another thing, Income Tax payers and property owners should be the only ones allowed to participate in voting. Also, all vets. They earned that right. I suggested monetary incentives for voluntary sterilization. If a woman irresponsibly reproduces and if, that's if, the father can be determined and won;t take or maintain the kid and her, sterilize hin ta boot. Harsh? Not as harsh as the tax paying workers have it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When will the cannookers join in the war agin the Islams?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/13/14 12:30 PM
|
|
Anyone working and receiving assistance is a contributor.
The chronically unemployed collecting/mooching need weeded out. Help lighten the load off the tax payer. Some politicians must be reading my posts and stealing my ideas. Long time ago, I suggested sterilizing those who irresponsibly pump out hood rats they can't/won't support and dug test them ta boot. Especially those who live in gated communities, sitting on a computer all day refusing to get a job. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hussein just started another war we can't possibly win.
Defend the warmonger. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The topic is, he's gonna make war.
When? Who knows. He claims, HE is gonna take down the Islams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/13/14 08:31 AM
|
|
So, you support dealing with terrorist or no? Funny! Because if you replace Liberal with Republican. It actually makes sense. 
Are you asking if I support dealing with terrorists or terrorism? Actually, my question was; Do you support dealing with terrorists like Hussein did? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Sat 09/13/14 08:14 AM
|
|
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/fbi-president-obama-is-a-domestic-terrorist FBI Inadvertently Classifies President Obama As a Domestic Terrorist Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. � 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism": "International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics: Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.* "Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics: Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. 18 U.S.C. � 2332b defines the term "federal crime of terrorism" as an offense that: Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including � 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and � 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.). * FISA defines "international terrorism" in a nearly identical way, replacing "primarily" outside the U.S. with "totally" outside the U.S. 50 U.S.C. � 1801(c). Source: FBI.gov Awesome info! You know by this definition, the police of Ferguson are domestic terrorist. Many of the leaders of the Tea-party movement are domestic terrorist. Oh and news reporters are clearly in violation of section (i). And business men that buy their favor in the government. I wonder why none of these people are being arrested and sent to Guantanamo bay! Oh wait I know! I know! maybe because the law itself is flawed and if say the pres was arrested or anyone else, there would be a supreme court decision on the law, and the law itself would be struck down and All (By this I mean every single person in Guantanamo bay that we have locked up for being a terrorist) would be set free. EVERYONE! I don't think you want that do you? Who said he wuz gonna' shet down Gitmo? Again, So, if it's against the law to deal with terrorists, why isn't Hussein in jail? He just traded 5. Yep. That's right. Five top level terrorists for one deserter. Wow you don't pay attention do you! Asked and Answered! You have all the information that you need! Do I really have to repeat my self? So, you support dealing with terrorist or no? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In May, 2001, Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorist group Abu Sayyaf kidnapped Martin and Gracia Burnham, a Christian missionary couple living in the Philippines. While Bush was out in the Rose Garden making his tough-sounding speech, his administration was negotiating a ransom payment to retrieve them. They arranged an indirect payment of $300,000 to the terrorist network in exchange for the couple Quote from http://aattp.org I am sure that there are many more cases that Governments negotiate under the radar of the public eye. Great info. However, this article is happening under Husseins admin. He traded five top terrorists for one measly deserter. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.redflagnews.com/headlines/fbi-president-obama-is-a-domestic-terrorist FBI Inadvertently Classifies President Obama As a Domestic Terrorist Definitions of Terrorism in the U.S. Code 18 U.S.C. � 2331 defines "international terrorism" and "domestic terrorism" for purposes of Chapter 113B of the Code, entitled "Terrorism": "International terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics: Involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear to be intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and Occur primarily outside the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S., or transcend national boundaries in terms of the means by which they are accomplished, the persons they appear intended to intimidate or coerce, or the locale in which their perpetrators operate or seek asylum.* "Domestic terrorism" means activities with the following three characteristics: Involve acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law; Appear intended (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination. or kidnapping; and Occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. 18 U.S.C. � 2332b defines the term "federal crime of terrorism" as an offense that: Is calculated to influence or affect the conduct of government by intimidation or coercion, or to retaliate against government conduct; and Is a violation of one of several listed statutes, including � 930(c) (relating to killing or attempted killing during an attack on a federal facility with a dangerous weapon); and � 1114 (relating to killing or attempted killing of officers and employees of the U.S.). * FISA defines "international terrorism" in a nearly identical way, replacing "primarily" outside the U.S. with "totally" outside the U.S. 50 U.S.C. � 1801(c). Source: FBI.gov Awesome info! You know by this definition, the police of Ferguson are domestic terrorist. Many of the leaders of the Tea-party movement are domestic terrorist. Oh and news reporters are clearly in violation of section (i). And business men that buy their favor in the government. I wonder why none of these people are being arrested and sent to Guantanamo bay! Oh wait I know! I know! maybe because the law itself is flawed and if say the pres was arrested or anyone else, there would be a supreme court decision on the law, and the law itself would be struck down and All (By this I mean every single person in Guantanamo bay that we have locked up for being a terrorist) would be set free. EVERYONE! I don't think you want that do you? Who said he wuz gonna' shet down Gitmo? Again, So, if it's against the law to deal with terrorists, why isn't Hussein in jail? He just traded 5. Yep. That's right. Five top level terrorists for one deserter. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
