100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > Quikstepper
|
|
|
Awesome...isn't God good???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Thought this was cool
|
|
LOL...so true!
 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Hey
|
|
Hi Trav~~~
Glad you found your way over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
IMG and other stuff
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Sun 11/16/08 06:19 AM
|
|
thanks Thomas... for sending the link... Too bad I can't save it to my email here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
IMG and other stuff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
IMG and other stuff
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Sun 11/16/08 06:13 AM
|
|
hmm.... the tag use to be img... hmmm...
let's see... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
IMG and other stuff
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Sat 11/15/08 07:26 AM
|
|
I was wondering if there is a link to find out how to add images & change the html for posting?
I don't seem to be able to get an image up... 
See...for some reason the img is not showing... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hi all...
They made a link for Christian chat. I always thought it would be nice to have a place to go and share & explore God & the life He brings to us. Including what we glean from him & the world around us. Is anyone going to come over? Just wondering...
QS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Political Opposites....
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Thu 11/13/08 05:12 AM
|
|
It's not working for me Lyyndy... what tag are people using...I entered the tag for img & it didn't show the image. Sorry... try again GF...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Possibly VERY Explosive
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Thu 11/13/08 04:48 AM
|
|
Yes well govt. was suppose to be the watchdog, not take over or take advantage to grab more money. Like when they take over toll roads...or what they did to SSI.
I understand that Russian people carry their money in their coats because the govt. so FREELY confiscates wherever they find money. they don't wear those heavy coats in the summer for nuttin'! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
Ok...I stated my reasons for my position. It's no use trying to go further when so many just want to battle.
Talk about being hateful? Battle alone I'm done... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Political Opposites....
|
|
I am trying really hard to stick with topics & not be sarcastic but I just can't seem to help myself when people use the cop out excuses to avoid the facts.
It's not personal though...why should it be? I don't know these people. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
WOW! You people are so hateful...talk about being intolerant. People in glass houses...just like yu'all say when it's your sacred cow... people don't need to explain why they feel the way they do. That goes for you too. You can believe what you want but don't expect people to get on any old bandwagon. This is not about the church...this is about decriminalizing behavior that's criminal. There are reasons why those laws are there but that's what happens when people become desensitized to various behaviors..those behaviors contribute to the destruction of the family unit. I find that intolerable. Instead of perpetuating destructive behaviors we need to educate people, especially children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Wed 11/12/08 08:10 PM
|
|
Heh Sodomy is against the law. Maybe you should up-date your legal research. Please look here for the legal description of sodomy. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/sodomy I would provide the description here but I am sure some posters would be hot on the report button if I did. Should I ask which of you have never engaged in sodomy? If you haven't or won't please don't ask me to bed! Supreme Court strikes down Texas sodomy law Ruling establishes new legal ground in privacy, experts say Tuesday, November 18, 2003 Posted: 11:00 AM EST (1600 GMT) Ruling establishes new legal ground in privacy, experts say CNN's Wolf Blitzer reports on the 6-3 U.S. Supreme Court vote that underscores a right to privacy in sexual behavior (June 26) WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Supreme Court Thursday struck down a Texas state law banning private consensual sex between adults of the same sex in a decision gay rights groups hailed as historic. The 6-3 decision by the court reverses course from a ruling 17 years ago that states could punish homosexuals for what such laws historically called deviant sex. Legal analysts said the ruling enshrines for the first time a broad constitutional right to sexual privacy, and its impact would reach beyond Texas and 12 other states with similar sodomy laws applied against the gay and lesbian community, and into mainstream America. "The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the court's majority. "The state cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime." As recently as 1960, every state had an anti-sodomy law, according to The Associated Press. In 37 states, the statutes have been repealed by lawmakers or blocked by state courts, the AP reported. Of the 13 states with sodomy laws, four -- Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma and Missouri -- prohibit oral and anal sex between same-sex couples. The other nine ban consensual sodomy for everyone: Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Utah and Virginia. Thursday's ruling apparently invalidates those laws, as well. CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin said the decision appeared to strike down most laws governing private sexual conduct, but he said laws governing marriage would be unaffected. (Full story) Laws that might be most vulnerable would be ones that govern fornication and adultery, said Diana Hassel, associate professor of law at Roger Williams University. And while Hassel said "only a handful" of states remain still have such laws, Thursday's Supreme Court ruling establishes a benchmark in privacy that had not existed. Hassel said the ruling, based on due process arguments rather than equal protection laws, would push out new areas in privacy. "This is going to carve out protection for private sexual behavior," Hassel said. "As long as it's between consenting adults, this ruling would appear to cover it." That's what happens when judges start legislating from the bench. they assist in breaking laws that have been on the books forever. That's irresponsible to break laws that protect the public. I call it govt. tyranny. Sexual behaviors are not rights. Geez... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
Maybe that's because some things are not "rights." A lot like the right not to judge? Go on, keep insisting that others are haters, "loonie libs", and the like. But, one day you'll be faced with a decision you won't want to make. And it will based on being morally correct according to your faith or an intelligent statement concerning actual people you might know. I pity you. LOL...I was exposed to things before they were politically correect dear heart. I wouldn't expose myself to people who wouldn't concern themselves with my feelings. No one should have to comprimise themselves to friends. Most people I know of all flavors respect that...people of GOOD faith that is. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
WOW! You people are so hateful...talk about being intolerant. People in glass houses...just like yu'all say when it's your sacred cow... people don't need to explain why they feel the way they do. That goes for you too. You can believe what you want but don't expect people to get on any old bandwagon. Seems to me there are a few fence straddlers. They have every right to be upset with the decisions the majority made for them. You'd be upset too if you were in their place, so try to empathize with them a little. I understand where you're coming from, but I also think that people SHOULD have the right to choose for themselves. They already do choose for themselves. That's not the problem. When they want to govt. sanction instead of recognizing they are law breakers then that's the problem. So do others...have a right to live without being exposed to other people's destructive behaviors & abnormalities. I posted this in another place. I think the sexual revolution was the destruction of the family. Instead of inviting more destructive behaviors we need to educate people of things that are tearing families apart. From divorce to infidelity to all sorts of sexual practices that people think don't harm anyone. These things are not good & should never be forced on anyone as some norm. They are not. Homosexuality is one of those behaviors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
For What Did They Die?
Edited by
Quikstepper
on
Wed 11/12/08 07:58 PM
|
|
More vietnam crapola is the only waste of time there is. Because of people who hide their heads in the sand is why they died in vain. That's the only vain thing about all this.
I have a suggestion..you all go to the mid east & wave the white flag to those terrorists you sympathize with & watch what happens. They will probly line you up & torture you till you're dead. Then they'll rape your women before they put the burkas on them. Give peace a chance you say? LOL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
Maybe that's because some things are not "rights."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
WOW! You people are so hateful...talk about being intolerant. People in glass houses...just like yu'all say when it's your sacred cow... people don't need to explain why they feel the way they do. That goes for you too. You can believe what you want but don't expect people to get on any old bandwagon. Seems to me there are a few fence straddlers. They have every right to be upset with the decisions the majority made for them. You'd be upset too if you were in their place, so try to empathize with them a little. I understand where you're coming from, but I also think that people SHOULD have the right to choose for themselves. They already do choose for themselves. That's not the problem. When they want to govt. sanction instead of recognizing they are law breakers then that's the problem. They had government sanction in some parts of your country. And then it got taken away. That's awfully unfair to their right to choose, don't you think so? Sodomy is against the law & should stay that way. When push comes to shove that is. Since they are the ones doing the pushing I think then they are the problem. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Spoiled Brats....
|
|
WOW! You people are so hateful...talk about being intolerant. People in glass houses...just like yu'all say when it's your sacred cow... people don't need to explain why they feel the way they do. That goes for you too. You can believe what you want but don't expect people to get on any old bandwagon. Seems to me there are a few fence straddlers. They have every right to be upset with the decisions the majority made for them. You'd be upset too if you were in their place, so try to empathize with them a little. I understand where you're coming from, but I also think that people SHOULD have the right to choose for themselves. They already do choose for themselves. That's not the problem. When they want to govt. sanction instead of recognizing they are law breakers then that's the problem. So do others...have a right to live without being exposed to other people's destructive behaviors & abnormalities. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
