My suggestions

1. Stop portraying yourself as smart. It is intimidating to most guys, even ones who are intellegent themselves.

2. Lower your standards. Trust me, there ARE guys who would gladly be with you, Im sure MANY of them. The simple fact is, you probably would not consider these guys. At your age, there is roughly, on a global scale, one guy for one girl, although, males are incarcerated at a much higher rate then women, so the numbers are skewed a bit. However, I can name ten single guys off the top of my head, who would probably pay a girl to give them any attention.

1. Get a good job, flash the fruits of that job. Big house, big car, etc. Girls love this more then anything.

2. Adopt an anti social personality, and treat her and everything like you couldnt care less. Purchase a motorcycle and get a tattoo and that image should be complete.


Im sorry to have to tell you this, but nothing else is going to work for you. Most girls have some perception of their "value" on the market, and even if you had the balls to approach her, likely 50 guys a day do, and youd have to seperate yourself from them, or make her perceive you as a more valuable prize then the others. This is step one.

Step two, if you do happen to get your hooks in her, take the advice of Drivinmenutz, he seems to have a pretty good grasp on how you handle a woman, although I would have to disagree with complimenting her even a couple times. Under no circumstance should you EVER act like you actually "like" her. That is the fastest way to make her move on. I would suggest no compliments, no flowers, and I would also suggest being very critical of her flaws. She will stay around much longer, in fact, may even become hopelessly drawn to you if she is forced to continously work for your approval.

Regardless of what biology might suggest, women love a challenge far more then men. In most mens book, they would gladly skip all the dating and "work" of the relationship just to get to the fruit of it. With women, the "work" of the relationship usually IS their fruit. If you cut that out, often they find no reason whatsoever to stick around.

Friendship is worthless. Friendship is normally a parasitic symbiosis between a weak willed individual (also known as a door mat) and a stronger willed individual (also known as a sponge or user). The dynamic of a relationship exists solely for the benefit of the stronger willed individual, and will be discarded when a better host is found, or the status of the parasite becomes challenged (also known as "being stabbed in the back" or "sold out").

My advice would be to keep people at no more then a casual aquaintance level, and only to a level that is mutually beneficial, such as "stimulating chat".

To be fair, there is no "definition" of average, so the term is left completely up to ones own self perception. Knowing many overweight people, few ever will admit they are simply obese, and continue to actually believe they are not "that" bad.

To further draw this out, considering the average American right now IS obese, it is probably logical to define obese as "average", even though it might not be what healthy weight individuals may consider "average".

Actually, this lesson here is applicable to meeting people in real life as well. Its just as easy to be on your best behavior while in the dating process, as it is through email and on the phone.

The true test is living with someone, and that can remain the only test, and I fully recommend LIVING with a person for atleast a year or two before ever becoming completely commited.

Women love workaholics and the fruits of monetary success......and then they also love to ***** when they get no attention as a result of it.

To be fair, I think it would all depend on what you define love as, and that has a different and unique definition to almost all people.

However, it is safe to say that majority of people, regardless of what their definition of "love" is, would probably agree with this statement.

I think this has more to do with who you are attracted to rather then the male species. You keep going for the aloof overly masculine anti social alpha male, and you get exactly that. You cant complain when all he wants is sex and seems to have no "feelings".

On the contrary, Im sure, like almost all women, you will spend huge amounts of time on a man who shows you limited interest, and will frequently ignore the guy who calls every day, leaves notes, sends flowers, etc.

This is hardwired in the female pysche.

Some women will substitute perceived status as an equivalent exchange for cash value. Often this manifest itself in the forms of drug dealers, jobless biker guys, ex convicts/current convicts, or overly masculine anti social alpha males. This is generally common amongst women who either have a very low self esteem, or havent quite moved from "girlhood", and women frequently take in to their thirties to grow up. All women will eventually be looking for financial value though, it just depends on how long it takes them.

Lesson number one grasshopper

Be very careful with any online relationships. They rarely work, and usually end up in bad feelings. Never ever "fall" for someone online in the course of three weeks. That is rediculous, and setting yourself up for disaster. Id say, write this one off, start over.

Lesson number two grasshopper

NEVER under any circumstances let a woman know that you "like" her first, and actually, for all practical purposes, you should actually stay aloof as long as possible. Women do not like anything that they feel has zero challenge to it. If you fall at her knees, shell use you as a door mat to get to someone who will kick her in the teeth. Learn this and live it. Nice guys finish last, in all cases.

Id have to agree with the premise of the lyric. I dont know exactly if you can categorically prescribe the precise demand of "cars" and "money", however, since women are gold diggers, they are ALWAYS looking for something of financial value out of a male. This doesnt neccessarily have any defined value or does it neccessarily have to be an exact object. However it is rare that women will ever be attracted to some combination of qualities that have no dollar value.

I also agree with the third verse in the lyric, in a general sense. Men will often go completely out of their way to get laid, the more attractive the woman, the more completely out of their way they will go. Laughing at jokes that arent funny is a simple representation of a bigger picture that often cost men large sums of cash and participating in other actions which they would normally never do.

A woman is not an authority on negative womens behavior. You do not ask someone who has been bankrupt 5 times for financial advice.

However, if you poll all males, and ask them if they believe women are inherently gold diggers, Im sure youd be very dissapointed with the answer.

Again, I do not condone abuse, and I do believe there should remain some divorce conditions, abuse, adultery would be the main things there.

OTher then that, yeah, I do believe that one should be "trapped" in an unhappy relationship. Most men, as evidenced by the divorce filers, will stay in a marriage until the end, while women, will leave at the drop of a dime.

I think, if women are so unhappy, so frequently, and are so willing to pull out the divorce card, maybe they should think more about who they are marrying first before exchanging spouses like leased automobiles. The civil courts are far too bogged down with no fault divorces, and there are far too many kids living in "alternate arrangements", because of this fact.

Not even close to 70% of divorces are because of physical abuse, Im willing to wager not even 10% are because of that.

The overwhelming leading cause of divorce is of the "no fault" variety, which basically means the wife got bored, found something better, became disenchanted with married life, or became disenchanted with the husbands income level.


Of course I am not opposed to divorce in cases of physical abuse, I am not advocate of that at all. However, I am NOT an advocate of the "Oh Im bored" divorce. I think no fault divorce should be completely removed from the books. Bored housewife or woman married to total loser should have thought a little more before saying I do instead of using the "divorce eraser".

Sounds like bitter apples to me. Nobody ever really likes hearing the truth. Walk in to a room of women and call them gold diggers, and 95% will get pissed, even though 98% of them would list "income" as a top three requirement in a potential mate if forced to take a survey attached to a polygraph test.

Pointing out the truth does not make me a "woman hater", simply a realist.

Hmmm, actually, if Im not mistaken, there is actually a place to fill out income and job on the profile. Further more, Im sure job and income, come up in any initial conversations.

Additionally, "attraction" has nothing to do with income or any of the sort, infact, emotional bonding, which is largely what happens on these types of sites, has nothing to do with income. However, serious relationships, are a completely different story.

I cant for the life of me understand why cheating exists.

If you dont respect someone enough to tell them you are thinking about going behind their back, why are you even bothering with a relationship in the first place.

Makes no sense to me.

Ironically, most women who cry about their husbands not spending time with them, would also cry if the cutback in work hours caused them to lose their Mercedes Soccer Mom mobile and 2500 sqft house in the 'burbs. Its really a no win situation there.

We are currently living in the "me" generation whom, if they are not immediatley satisfied, and completely satisfied, they will quickly dispose of anything that is causing them dissatisfaction.

Some would say, womens lib is the complete cause of this. I think there might be some truth. Women initiate something like 70% of divorces. I think maybe making it so easy for a woman to pack up and leave, was maybe counter productive to the divorce rate.