Community > Posts By > HotRodDeluxe
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 11:58 PM
|
|
no man yet has been perfect but JESUS Elvis was perfect too...At least in 2000 years they'll be saying he was. I wonder if the story of his death will change. 'He ascended into Sun Records with Johnny Cash by his side', instead of being found face down on a carpet with his pants around his ankles. Will people be standing up for their 'Elvis-given rights'? "It is written in the book of Col. Tom Parker!" |
|
|
|
God has not given 'rights'
True, rights have been either won through protest, public disorder, and revolution, or awarded by the state owing to pressure from various groups. |
|
|
|
http://inthereddest.com/?p=1888 quoted for emphasis : 'We have laws, such as those prohibiting drunk driving, for a reason; they protect society. The real “entitlement” culture that’s harming America isn’t that of food stamps or Social Security, but that of far-right that supports the belief that individual citizens should have nearly unlimited liberty, regardless of the consequences to other individuals or the rest of society. If the “right” you believe you’re “entitled” to causes more harm for society as a whole than it does good, or poses a direct threat to the freedom and pursuit of happiness of other people, then you are in fact not entitled to that right. Where that line is drawn between personal liberty and the general welfare is a fair and interesting conversation, but some things are just obvious.' of course, the statement about things being 'obvious' is one I disagree with,, its a very subjecvtive perspective to determine what is 'obvious' Idealism vs Realism, eh? |
|
|
|
NK's Sabre rattling continues....
....stay tuned for the next instalment. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 09:21 PM
|
|
I smell Rob Menard's twisted logic at work in this thread. Or Clifford Dean, perhaps. http://youtu.be/aoUwUCAdr8E Meh...They're only human so it stands to reason there would be something twisted about them. One cannot discount the influence of Moose Heads and Pot upon ol' Fezboy's distorted reasoning. Since you are bringing him up in the first place, it would appear that he's even better known than I thought he was... He's only famous for his Footle idiocy, which, incidentally, resembles some of the specious legal naiveté evinced in this thread. I suppose for some, recycling old scams is better than getting a job, and there's no shortage of idiots to support his lifestyle. I guess I should point out that your Freudian slip is showing. I may not like your insecure, insincere, uneducated, inane and irrelevent opinion, ventured to compensate for feelings of intellectual inferiority, but I'll fight to the death for your right to express it. In short, I thought you were capable of laying out better bait than that...I'm kinda disappointed. Your projections are misdirected, for I was referring to the puerile 'slave' accusation, being that it is one of Menard's favourite insults to those who don't agree with his bucolic interpretations of the law. Please have some inkling of what is going on before shooting off your bill. Having said that, it is typical that you've nothing of an intellectual nature to contribute, other than ignorant ad hominem. Rant on, Daffy. I stand in awe at your godlike intellectual superiority effendi. I am duly humbled. I would attempt a pitiful retort in a futile attempt to go down fighting, but obviously the battle of wits has ended and I have lost...badly (besides, I don't have a dictionary handy to look up all those big words you used). My apologies for ever even attempting a response to your brilliant insights. I won't ever make that near-fatal mistake again. You are free to say whatever you like without worrying that I will respond at all. And besides, we wouldn't wanna see the thread wrecked by a stupid flame war. Apology accepted. I too, apologise, as I didn't realise that Menard and his 'Freeloaders on the Bum' enjoyed your support. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 08:50 PM
|
|
I smell Rob Menard's twisted logic at work in this thread. Or Clifford Dean, perhaps. http://youtu.be/aoUwUCAdr8E Meh...They're only human so it stands to reason there would be something twisted about them. One cannot discount the influence of Moose Heads and Pot upon ol' Fezboy's distorted reasoning. Since you are bringing him up in the first place, it would appear that he's even better known than I thought he was... He's only famous for his Footle idiocy, which, incidentally, resembles some of the specious legal naiveté evinced in this thread. I suppose for some, recycling old scams is better than getting a job, and there's no shortage of idiots to support his lifestyle. I guess I should point out that your Freudian slip is showing. I may not like your insecure, insincere, uneducated, inane and irrelevent opinion, ventured to compensate for feelings of intellectual inferiority, but I'll fight to the death for your right to express it. In short, I thought you were capable of laying out better bait than that...I'm kinda disappointed. Your projections are misdirected, for I was referring to the puerile 'slave' accusation, being that it is one of Menard's favourite insults to those who don't agree with his bucolic interpretations of the law. Please have some inkling of what is going on before shooting off your bill. Having said that, it is typical that you've nothing of an intellectual nature to contribute, other than ignorant ad hominem. Rant on, Daffy. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 07:06 PM
|
|
I smell Rob Menard's twisted logic at work in this thread. Or Clifford Dean, perhaps. http://youtu.be/aoUwUCAdr8E Meh...They're only human so it stands to reason there would be something twisted about them. One cannot discount the influence of Moose Heads and Pot upon ol' Fezboy's distorted reasoning. Since you are bringing him up in the first place, it would appear that he's even better known than I thought he was... He's only famous for his Footle idiocy, which, incidentally, resembles some of the specious legal naiveté evinced in this thread. I suppose for some, recycling old scams is better than getting a job, and there's no shortage of idiots to support his lifestyle. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 04:21 PM
|
|
I smell Rob Menard's twisted logic at work in this thread. Or Clifford Dean, perhaps. http://youtu.be/aoUwUCAdr8E Meh...They're only human so it stands to reason there would be something twisted about them. One cannot discount the influence of Moose Heads and Pot upon ol' Fezboy's distorted reasoning. |
|
|
|
Topic:
The Walking Dead
|
|
I was thinking I picked it up on the walking dead fan website...I do know from the trailers on the AMC walking dead website, it shows the group packing things up, as if they plan on leaving the prison. Or preparing for the possibility of being driven out by the Governor and his 'army'. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/31/13 01:28 AM
|
|
I smell Rob Menard's twisted logic at work in this thread. Or Clifford Dean, perhaps.
http://youtu.be/aoUwUCAdr8E |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Wed 03/27/13 12:46 AM
|
|
May I borrow this as an example for a class? ...Not if you're being graded on it...That would be cheating.
Let me clarify. It was as an example of hyperbole for a small group of Senior English students under my tutelage. I took the liberty of appropriating it anyway. Thank you. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Wed 03/27/13 12:47 AM
|
|
Well, all that aside, it is clear that the income tax revenue is not being allocated 'exclusively' to the national debt. You know as well as I do the state would cease to function if that were the case. Quite correct. If all income tax paid was interest on the national debt, there would be nothing left for bribes, bombs, drones & brutal cops to keep the disgruntled slaves in line. Good thing we can always borrow more money and make the slaves pay or we'd never get anything done. The infrastructure of society would wind up rotting and failing as ALL the tax money meant for it and other unimportant things like food, clothing, shelter & medical care for the slaves would be have to be reallocated for the "good stuff." It's so good to see that at least someone on here understands economics and the complexities of good governance. I hope these malcontents listen to you, or they might stop giving their government what it needs, thus causing it to cease to function, and where would they be then eh? There would be chaos in the streets with no police to keep them in line, no neat bombs for killing brown people, no drones (which saves a lot of money on a judicial system that might not rule in our favour), and no money for the bonuses, yachts, palaces & other incentives so desperately needed by the selfless financial geniuses who keep the wheels of corporate capitalism well oiled. The slaves would have to rely on their friends, neighbours and countrymen to provide them with the essential needs directly, and we all know that the lazy, greedy, self-serving riff-raff cares about nobody but themselves, so their friends, neighbours and countrymen would probably all starve to death without people like us to dole out their needs as we see fit. Obviously the lazy bums could go to work and support themselves without us to give them jobs, but we know they'll never do that. With no government teat to suck on, I'm sure they'd rather die than work. What's really needed in this age of austerity, cutbacks and too-small-to-make-a-difference bank bailouts isn't a revolution (obviously), it's a charity that can raise the necessary funds to support the ailing one percent. As voltaire once said, "Those who believe absurdities can be made to commit atrocities." and the slaves seem to believe all sorts of absurd conspiracy theories, like the ones that assert that their government might not be working in their best interest. We have to stamp out such crazy absurdities from the public mind before the ignorant villagers storm the castle with torches. An astounding example of hyperbole. Congratulations! May I borrow this as an example for a class? Now, back on Planet Earth: http://www.whitehouse.gov/2011-taxreceipt Can't you people ever look past your prejudice and investigate something for yourself? I went to that link and got as far as: "In his 2011 State of the Union Address, President Obama promised ..." then I couldn't stop laughing. Well, we all know why that is the case. I suppose this vacuous comment proves your point? |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Wesley Snipes He was arrested and was faced up to 16 years in prison. This is a man with enough funds to hire the best tax lawyers around. If income taxes were illegal, he wouldn't have paid. But, he did. Yes, he tried the 'Freeman on the Land' defence and it blew up in his face. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Mon 03/25/13 01:20 AM
|
|
Well, all that aside, it is clear that the income tax revenue is not being allocated 'exclusively' to the national debt. You know as well as I do the state would cease to function if that were the case. Quite correct. If all income tax paid was interest on the national debt, there would be nothing left for bribes, bombs, drones & brutal cops to keep the disgruntled slaves in line. Good thing we can always borrow more money and make the slaves pay or we'd never get anything done. The infrastructure of society would wind up rotting and failing as ALL the tax money meant for it and other unimportant things like food, clothing, shelter & medical care for the slaves would be have to be reallocated for the "good stuff." It's so good to see that at least someone on here understands economics and the complexities of good governance. I hope these malcontents listen to you, or they might stop giving their government what it needs, thus causing it to cease to function, and where would they be then eh? There would be chaos in the streets with no police to keep them in line, no neat bombs for killing brown people, no drones (which saves a lot of money on a judicial system that might not rule in our favour), and no money for the bonuses, yachts, palaces & other incentives so desperately needed by the selfless financial geniuses who keep the wheels of corporate capitalism well oiled. The slaves would have to rely on their friends, neighbours and countrymen to provide them with the essential needs directly, and we all know that the lazy, greedy, self-serving riff-raff cares about nobody but themselves, so their friends, neighbours and countrymen would probably all starve to death without people like us to dole out their needs as we see fit. Obviously the lazy bums could go to work and support themselves without us to give them jobs, but we know they'll never do that. With no government teat to suck on, I'm sure they'd rather die than work. What's really needed in this age of austerity, cutbacks and too-small-to-make-a-difference bank bailouts isn't a revolution (obviously), it's a charity that can raise the necessary funds to support the ailing one percent. As voltaire once said, "Those who believe absurdities can be made to commit atrocities." and the slaves seem to believe all sorts of absurd conspiracy theories, like the ones that assert that their government might not be working in their best interest. We have to stamp out such crazy absurdities from the public mind before the ignorant villagers storm the castle with torches. An astounding example of hyperbole. Congratulations! May I borrow this as an example for a class? Now, back on Planet Earth: http://www.whitehouse.gov/2011-taxreceipt Can't you people ever look past your prejudice and investigate something for yourself? |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Yes and no...While it is true that all the taxes are gathered into a consolidated fund for disbursement according to the budget, I think it is much more than coincidence that in a "well-balanced" budget, the income tax collected corresponds closely to the interest payable on the national debt. Too much so for coincidence IMO. Well, all that aside, it is clear that the income tax revenue is not being allocated 'exclusively' to the national debt. You know as well as I do the state would cease to function if that were the case. You really think so? Or do you really think they even give two rats about anything beyond their own greed? You're wrong if you do, because they don't, they'd rather the state itself die, all they care about is power, nothing more or nothing less. I'll ask again, if all this money, income tax or otherwise goes to where they say it does, why is this country in such piss poor shape? They get so much damn money from taxes and license fees, etc etc, but they always need more, ever notice that? Ever ask yourself why? Time to wake up from your slumber.......all is not what it appears to be. Really? Time for you to come back to planet Earth. Of course states require more revenue per annum. The population increases require further investment in infrastructure, among other policy implementations. Clearly, basic economics are not your area. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
Edited by
HotRodDeluxe
on
Sun 03/24/13 05:38 PM
|
|
Yes and no...While it is true that all the taxes are gathered into a consolidated fund for disbursement according to the budget, I think it is much more than coincidence that in a "well-balanced" budget, the income tax collected corresponds closely to the interest payable on the national debt. Too much so for coincidence IMO. Well, all that aside, it is clear that the income tax revenue is not being allocated 'exclusively' to the national debt. You know as well as I do the state would cease to function if that were the case. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea. Our 'income tax' goes exclusively towards paying the interest on the national debt. If the country defaults on the national debt, then people should stop paying income tax. Exclusively? Utter nonsense followed by poor logic. Yes exclusively, it goes to the debt before being spent on anything else..... Well, that is hardly 'exclusive'. You people do understand the meaning I take it? Yes I do and when I said that I mean it goes to the debt, and then it's gone, it can't go anywhere else because it's spent before it can get there. That is obviously erroneous. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea. Our 'income tax' goes exclusively towards paying the interest on the national debt. If the country defaults on the national debt, then people should stop paying income tax. Exclusively? Utter nonsense followed by poor logic. Yes exclusively, it goes to the debt before being spent on anything else..... Well, that is hardly 'exclusive'. You people do understand the meaning I take it? |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea. Our 'income tax' goes exclusively towards paying the interest on the national debt. If the country defaults on the national debt, then people should stop paying income tax. Exclusively? Utter nonsense followed by poor logic. |
|
|
|
Topic:
INCOME TAX
|
|
Yes, don't pay tax and watch your country become mediaeval in no time. What a great idea.
|
|
|