1. No wars? There were still wars when Trump was president. He didn't pull us out of Afghanistan--left that to Biden to complete.
2. Understanding of business? The "businessman" just borrowed hundreds of $millions and then shirked repaying.
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-king-debt-3-215410793.html
3. Trump isn't respected by world leaders. Just appreciated by dictators like Kim and Putin, who enjoy access to classified docs that Trump gives them. He's not winning friends among NATO allies.
4. Trump was energetic, tweeting at all hours in the morning, but he had Dr. Ronnie to give him all those pills.
http://www.newsweek.com/ronny-jackson-under-fire-white-house-medical-unit-prescriptions-donald-trump-1864873
5. Trump's kids seemed productive. They productively stole $millions from their charities, ostensively for cancer and veterans, etc., and Barron productively swindled $millions in a crypto-currency scam with the Pharma Bro. So there's that.

The best way to save America is to keep clear of the Trumps going forward. Tax cuts for the rich and Project 2025 won't solve any real problems.

Could've been a Nikki Haley voter.

If by incompetent, you mean leading an administration that defeats the naysayers on the Right promising economic collapse, then I'm all for that type of "incompetence." Especially after watching four years of Trump pretending he knew what he was doing while breaking laws left and right and upsetting the markets regularly with weird 4AM tweets.

The ruling does nothing for Biden beyond taking the attention away from the first debate. Biden hasn't broken any laws. I defy you to identify which law you think Biden broke, that he could be charged with. "Dereliction of duty" only applies when someone is duly ordered to do something and they don't, and thanks to the separation of powers, even Congress cannot order a president, so you've got no standing to charge Biden with dereliction of duty. If Congress passed the laws to secure the border, it'd be secured, already. And those other offenses you think are punishable, aren't. Complaining about the SCOTUS is just free speech. Obama authorizing military strikes against combatants in a war zone doesn't have to consider their citizenship. I don't know where you get these silly ideas.

OK, I'm not a lady, but objectively, your profile needs work. The main photo is only good because it shows you out with a dog. Cute. But doesn't show your face well. The 2nd photo is a selfie with your eyes closed. Like you're stoned. That probably doesn't help.

Take a few minutes and type into the text blurb field describing yourself and what kind of person you seek. Brevity is good, but make it readable. What do you like. What's an ideal first date, or where might local women find you on most days?

Fill in the headline--replace "Hi.." with something like "Guy with dog seeking similar woman". Have fun with it.

Anyway, you look like a fit, young man, and many women don't even seem to read the profiles, so you'll probably do alright either way. But for the incomplete profile with photos that could be a lot better, I'd only rate it 3/10. Keep at it.

Good luck!

You could take another shot at filling out the text blurb and maybe upload some photos where you're looking into the camera lens in better light. The photo you have could be better, and you don't really say what kind of person you seek, unless it's anyone who can accept you having "fun and great laughs."

But you seem like a good guy, so you'll probably be alright. Don't give up.

It's a start. You have some good photos. You filled in your marital status, religion, and the stopped. Maybe get back to work on that.

I think the main photo should show your face more clearly. Like zoomed in on your face. Like the 3rd photo, but without the mirrored sunglasses. Otherwise, sitting in the sun on the beach looks good, too.

Take some time to fill in the text blurb with a description of yourself and what kind of person you seek. Brevity is good, but there's no rational limit to the amount of text you want to write.

Lots of women don't even seem to read the text, so you may do alright, regardless. But for the profile with very little information, beyond some good photos, I'd rate it only 4/10. Keep at it.

Good luck!

It's probably not something with your profile if you're getting catfished. You getting catfished is just table stakes when you're on an online dating site, and it's not that you're not real, but the person catfishing you isn't. Not much you can do to prevent that. Just don't let the "women" take the conversation to another site before you get to know them. Nobody can help you if you get taken to another site.

Otherwise, you've got a good profile with lots of good photos. Kinda surprised you didn't upload a shot of you and a fish you caught. I guess you're too self-aware to be so stereotypical. Good for you! The shots with the doggie don't hurt. Maybe you could post a photo of yourself dressed up a bit, but it's OK if you're really just the t-shirt & jeans kind of guy. Honesty in advertising, right?

The only thing that bugs me about your text blurb is that you have run-on sentences, where it looks like you forgot to put a period between them. Maybe fix that.

Still a really good profile. Good job!

Okay, then Iron Dome isn't for the US. We don't have an adversary within artillery range. Iron Dome is for defense against relatively short-range systems. The US Army has counter-battery fire systems and can deploy it quickly to most any place on Earth, if needed, but more importantly, we let our dissidents petition the government so they needn't fire home-made missiles into our cities to get attention.

More like Democrats aren't afraid of all the immigrants because they know that overall, they add to the economy and are good people. Trump's rhetoric has you cowering and buying guns to cope with the "caravans" of "illegals" coming to kidnap your children. Buddy, it's not that bad. Also, undocumented immigrants have a long way to go to get citizenship and the right to vote, and even when some do, they're not a monolith of liberalism. Hispanics occupy all parts of the political spectrum.

Yeah, I guess I should defer to your superior knowledge about anti-ballistic missile defense because you know all about it. Amiright?

Defending against nukes isn't easy.
http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/missile-defense

No need to make personal insults. That's how threads get locked. And while we all should be careful going out in our society, I was not judging Jocelyn Nungaray but just including facts from the articles I read. A minor drinking beer is bad but I never said she got what she deserved. And it's not clear that any president could've prevented that situation. It's not like Trump got the number of border crossings to zero and people have their own reasons for the friends they keep. Nobody is above the law and if the guys caught are convicted, I hope for appropriate sentences.

It's an OK profile. Could use a little work. The photo is poorly lighted, with the sun almost behind you and the shadow so dark, it's hard to see most of your face, and you left the text blurb area unfilled.

It seems you put your brief text blurb information in the headline, and you left the "Hi.." at the beginning. But you did select some interests and all the biographical information, which is better than lots of other profiles around. Good job! For better results, lose the "Hi.." and replace it with a better description of yourself and what you seek.

A better photo might be where your face is better shown, and not so dark and shadowy. But the photo you've got, With the harsh sunlight and the Hawaiian shirt, evokes a lazy, hot afternoon, and could be nice, with cold drinks, so good job!

Anyway, you seem like a good guy with honorable intentions and it doesn't hurt to have been a doctor, so you should be alright. But for the profile that still needs some work, I rate it only 8/10.

Good luck!

He kinda looks like Simon Cowell

Seems like a good start. You filled in the biographical information, but left the headline and text blurb as the default "Hi.." Lame.

The photos are a bit puzzling. The main photo has a good smile. The 2nd looks almost like a cartoon and blurry. The 3rd looks like you're ten years older with the long hair and tattoos, and depressing. Maybe upload different photos that are recent, clear and well-lighted. Wearing nice clothes and a smile couldn't hurt. A good clear photo could better show off your ink, too.

Then take a few minutes to write up a text blurb about yourself and what you're looking for. You could include mention of interests to attract like-minded women. Come up with a short headline to stand out in search results, too.

Anyway, the photos aren't awful--you seem like a good-looking guy, and lots of people don't seem to even read the text, so you'll probably do alright. But for the profile that looks incomplete with out-of-date photos, I'd only rate it 5/10. Keep at it.

Good luck!

I think you meant "conceited" and not "conceded." You've got some good, clear photos, along with the weird ones, but overall, it's an OK profile. Could be better.

Your blurb doesn't say much about you. You wrote Hi...I live in Clearwater florida but I'm currently staying in missouri to help my dad with medical problems.

It says what you're doing, and I guess we could get from that that you're a good, caring son, and you value family, but it could also be interpreted as your brothers and sisters couldn't be bothered and you had nothing better going on. Maybe you could take another try at describing yourself and the kind of person you seek. Maybe even saying exactly what you mean.

I like that most of the photos are clear and well-lit, but you're wearing that baseball hat, as if to hide a bald spot. If you're bald, it's Okay. Self-confidence is a good quality. You could do that. A better photo might be where you're wearing a fresh, clean shirt and maybe a smile or otherwise being charming without the hat.

Also, the "Hi.." that gets put into the headline and blurb sections can be replaced with something better. The headline could be a few words laying out your skills or best qualities, or maybe a main point you're trying to get across.

Anyway, you seem like a good-looking guy with a good heart, and many don't even read the text so much, so you should do alright. But for the profile with pictures and text that could be better, I'd rate it 7/10.

Good luck!

The "Iron Dome" is not effective against nukes. It's barely effective against Houthi rockets from Iran, so the US Navy shoots those things from out at sea. If we elect Trump, we can count on more of that kind of moronic reasoning and over-spending on unnecessary defense projects. Elect Trump, and maybe he can drive the Iranians to make more nukes, having already ripped up the de-escalation deal negotiated by the Obama Administration. Remember that Trump's the guy who wanted to nuke hurricanes.

So 12-year-old Jocelyn Nungaray snuck out of her home in Houston to drink beer with some guys that she met after 10pm, and was tragically killed and left in a creek last week, while the guys turned out to be recent immigrants.

You pick out stories of this girl last week, and some other person last month and maybe another from months back, allegedly killed by immigrants. Last year, there were 2,281 homicides just in Texas. You're convinced there's an immigrant crime wave because you're looking for crimes committed by immigrants. Do you see the problem?

All I'm saying is I haven't seen stories published anywhere, including this latest bit about children raped. I know Rep. Marjorie Greene kept screaming about Laken Riley during the State of the Union speech, but that's a crime from a while back, and she thinks we all need to keep remembering that one woman's name.

Forgive my suspicion, but you could just be making it up. You've been wrong before. I see it's not your thing to provide links or anything. You're writing like you secretly know how to command a Marine battalion, and we're supposed to just accept your claim of a violent undocumented immigrant crime wave. I say BS.

That probably came from either Medvedev or Peskov, as Putin has is lieutenants say the dangerous stuff. But with "mutually assured destruction" if UK gets hit, you know Russia will get it back in kind.

Also, considering Russia's current missile effectiveness, it's likely that half of Russia's nukes would never reach their target.