Community > Posts By > MonkeyBite
What are you talking about didnt we just finish lol Mmm, you did.. Won't let the guy finish sheesh. xD lolol |
|
|
|
Talking 'durty' >:] oh? laundry or..? |
|
|
|
Wheres my douglass at?? lol ill pretend for now :P Okay until he gets here lol violation! ooooo im tellin Bro code!! Woot! haha didnt know that still existed |
|
|
|
Wheres my douglass at?? lol ill pretend for now :P Okay until he gets here lol violation! ooooo im tellin |
|
|
|
Remember the reality Jack. Was she happy with that other guy? I never asked her. no shes destined for jack all else is irrelevant |
|
|
|
Wheres my douglass at?? lol ill pretend for now :P |
|
|
|
oooo pillow talk
|
|
|
|
wats wrong with douglass? doogie houser, michael keaton, michael douglass all awesome
|
|
|
|
mmm kardashians
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the forums MonkeyBite. Are you basing this on bushido's claims? that i was and ty Thank you for joining in. no problem just checkin things out |
|
|
|
But knowing the difference is the only way you can understand a 'lie'... If you have not felt the depths you can not know the darkness and so aid one to life. If you know only light you can not see the darkness (nor understand one who is in it). If you know only the darkness the light is blinding and so you can not understand one who is in it (for you can not see them clearly) but to be honest there is no "requirement" for u to have any knowledge of what a lie "is"; becuz u only speak "truth", thus "lying" would be alien to u same goes for the opposite on the same stone if all u know is darkness, the "light" is alien, and would need explanations as to what it is; however, by your own example "only know the darkness" strengthens my own words, if you only know "this" than "that" must first be defined eg you know darkness first off, first hand, the light is unknown becuz u've never done/experienced it you stated u r but also know not ur opposite to be one u do not need to know the other to be what u r |
|
|
|
Welcome to the forums MonkeyBite. Are you basing this on bushido's claims? that i was and ty |
|
|
|
um no they ain't
i provided the difference between a ghost and a spirit |
|
|
|
A whole lot of things could result in amputation - like a splinter in your finger. Remember, we are talking about pre-antibiotics time! But who (except me) knows if the amputation had anything to do with disease or accident!? yes true, however, one arm dude saved doc from whatev it was so unless these splinters were fired at him lol |
|
|
|
funchism - 0
monkeyism - 1 |
|
|
|
What more need be said? is that rhetorical? |
|
|
|
so jack
whens ur lady comin on? when r those two comin on? i wanna see some couples in |
|
|
|
Topic:
guys vs girls - part 50
|
|
.317
|
|
|
|
do they have lions in paris? lol
wtf existed in the early 1900's that could result in losing a limb, but also permit someone else the ability to save u from doing, hmm |
|
|
|
Topic:
Recovery from religion...
|
|
You're proving my point, if we all have to in the end worship God the same way to be saved, the relationship cannot be personal. Nothing you say will make it so, it still can't be. not all worship the same way, not all believe the same way and not all will be "saved" the same way every individual "dates" someone else so by ur words, none of these relationships are "personal"? or am i misunderstandin? |
|
|