Her first three albums were some of the best music on the radio, then after that what happened? I think she got hit by a bus and then replaced by robots. Same with Metallica from 1990 to 2008.

Edit: Since I see you're from Indonesia, do you know DJ Ronny did a really awesome funkot remix of "Just Dance"?

Plug, Goldie, Transient Stellar, Photek, Squarepusher... since you mentioned ragga I'll also throw in Blackstar

I like his noisy style on Weld, Rust Never Sleeps, and Ragged Glory the most by far. The version of "Crime in the City" on Weld is great. I also like "****in' Up"

This guy has taste.

The country on the radio is by far the most offensive radio music imaginable. As for the old stuff, I guess Townes Van Zandt or John Prine. Some newer alt-country that's great is the newest Purple Mountains album; older than that but still new - Magnolia Electric Co., Lucinda Williams, Gillian Welch

Trance is too generic as a whole, but psytrance is pretty good I guess. As for techno, there's ambient techno, minimal techno, industrial techno, Detroit techno, much more to do with that style. Trance to me has been something I never could get into.

I already did succeed in life. Thanks for calling me a loser, though.

When you say "heavy metal" if you mean traditional heavy metal like Maiden & Priest style, then I'd go with Slough Feg. If you want to throw in progressive and power metal, I'd say Nevermore and Blind Guardian. Other types of metal (i.e. doom, black, death, thrash) there are countless bands to list, because those styles of music are actually still innovative these days.

You could explain the injury to your eye

1/10 you're from "Plant City" but I don't see any plants. Is there a rainforest?

hat makes it a 10/10

To me, God and "good" are the non-supernatural, non-alien, inherent forces of humanity to cooperate when given adequate resources. Satan and "evil" are the non-supernatural, non-alien, inherent forces of humanity to deceive and use force when there are no resources available. Primitive humans and the ancestors direct to them, and alongside them (Neanderthals etc.) were generally VERY peaceful as long as they had adequate food, shelter, companionship, and entertainment. But our brains are hard-wired to do evil things when resources are short, and we often get paranoid about that alleged shortening of resources.

Search "The Real Jesus Christ" on Youtube, if you're interested, read more books. Read actual theology and history done by actual professors, avoid conspiracy theory nonsense. The Bible was literally corrupted by white supremacist by the hands of Christ's traitor Paul, but Jesus himself had some great messages about forgiveness, understanding, suffering, overcoming ignorance, and eliminating poverty.

And you're a Filipina searching for white men on the Internet? Oof, good luck with that. I'm in the Phils now, and the type of men that go for women here are almost always scumbags. There are exceptions, but rare.

Before I start slam dunkin' on y'all, I want to point out that LAB GROWN MEAT and WORKING CLASS PEOPLE HOLDING CORPORATIONS ACCOUNTABLE is the most likely solution to this crisis. Meat is delicious and (usually) healthy, and can be more delicious and healthy when it's grown in a lab. It's just expensive to produce, but as time goes on, research will get it down to quite cheap. Also, learn to experiment with soybeans, quinoa, and lentils. ;)

Edit: Also, if you can't find legitimate, academic or scientific evidence of what I'm saying (not conspiracy theory blog posts) via Googling my phrases (I tried that for your guys' info) then feel free to ask for a source. I have access to academia.edu, JSTOR and other things. More than happy to pirate a PDF for you folks.

But, all in all, a lot of pseudoscientific nonsense here. I recommend you all do a basic read-up on SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT and stop listening to old dudes with poor lighting in their bedroom who don't know how to angle a webcam.



I can't speak for turkeys, but broiler chickens add edible meat to their body at a 4:1 ratio. Grass fed beef is (I believe) 17:1 and grain fed beef is 54:1.



Post your sources. Legitimate ones.



Certainly not at the rate that it has now. And even so, there are things we can do to control it.



In reality, there certainly is. In fact, that land being used to feed animals is much less efficient than just growing crops. And to say that you can't get things from meat in other sources? Nonsense. There are tons of vegan bodybuilders.



See my comment about adding another production of gas between ours. Besides, cows farting (lol, I'm immature) isn't necessarily the main issue; yes methane is a big deal but in general we're wasting a lot of the nutrients in our soil. And no, cow fertilizer doesn't replenish it as quickly as it's taken away.



You're correct! Corporations by and large do way more pollution than individuals. You don't have to go vegan. What you should due is lobby against large corporations. You sound smart, what else do you have to say on the issue?



Oof. A conspiracy so vast that it would have leaked with irrefutable evidence by now. No thanks, I'll stick to actual verifiable methods we have.



Glad you admit it's a twisted fantasy. But overfishing destroys the entire food chain, that's the main problem. It's very real. Tuna should be way, way more expensive than it is, considering the damage it does to the environment when you eat it. Farmed tuna is quite a bit better choice, but still not perfect.



You can Google "overpopulation myth" and find some fascinating modern evidence on how our crisis is way more political. We could theoretically hold up to 25 billion people on our planet. But yes, allowing women publicly subsidized access to birth control, and giving GOOD QUALITY, EMOTIONALLY CONNECTING SEX EDUCATION to our kids is a great solution.



I'm sorry, who are those people? Seems a strawman argument to me, but feel free to counter.



"Nut jobs" as in scientists? People who dedicate their lives to understanding biology and agriculture? But hey, great point about how deforestation is a huge issue.



I've yet to see a REAL SOURCE on this and I've been trying for more than a decade.



A lot of what's in your long post is certainly true, but nobody is debating any of that. At all. All we're saying is that in the last few hundred years, and especially the last decade, we're making way more of a negative impact on the planet than any other species has before.

I have no issue whatsoever with people flying multiple flags, or even just the flag of their heritage. I'm not so insecure and nationalistic that I get offended at the idea of other countries existing. But you know what is offensive? The Confederate flag. It's not even a country, it's a bunch of slave holders making excuses about "state's rights" (to have slaves lol). That Nigerian MMA fighter? Let him fly his flag. Mexican immigrants? Let them fly their flag. Filipinos? Irish-Americans? Bring it on. Those flags don't stand for hatred, but your phobia towards their culture sure does.

Women aren't necessarily dressing sexy for you. They're most likely doing it for themselves. And if they're trying to attract a partner, and it's not you, don't be bitter. Since this is a dating website, I assume most of us are single, and knowing that the men who think in this outdated, misogynistic way are perpetually single DOES NOT SURPRISE ME. There are tons of great arguments being made here, i.e. "She's not dressing like a slut, you're thinking like a rapist." and you reply with, "It's human nature to stare and comment (and possibly do more)!"

Wow, way to tell on yourself like that. Please don't represent yourself in court.

To find fellow furry diaper fetishists, of course. Same as the rest of us. The only difference is that I'm honest!

...

...

No, in all seriousness, meeting up with people from dating sites has been great. I've met tons of people on my travels. Found a couple girlfriends who, to this day, are still my friends despite a breakup. Gotten to know many fun things to do that tourists aren't typically aware of.

Well, when you live in the only country on the face of the Earth without divorce, it's safe to say women are going to cling to crummy guys. Oh, I know TONS of great, awesome, amazing Filipino guys. But they're all taken by awesome Filipina women. Sorry to disappoint.

If you drop these preconceived notions of "purity" and just do what you want, you'll find what you want. Trying to conform to silly outdated rules that you're (edit: your) ancestors put in place to control you... is only holding you back.

Most people (I assume you're Catholic) preach against premarital sex, contraceptives, and divorce - things which help people get to know those before a long term commitment, and get out of a bad situation they may find themselves in later on. So it's really not shocking that the pendulum swings the other way eventually and people just wanna get laid and escape afterwards. Oh, I live in the Philippines currently (until May) and let me tell you these "moral purities" Filipinas claim to have are VERY OFTEN NOT ACTUALLY THERE. Pure hypocrisy. Trying to find a woman here who I can hang out with, who doesn't spy on my bank account and social media, and freak out when I give my 48 year old friend, who owns a carinderia, a hug? Oh, yeah, good luck with that. But she'll surely jump on my lap and nibble on my ears, unprovoked, on the first date. :\

Not all women are like this. But this is my experience in the "pure" Philippines.