https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oliCVn7Ic68

I watched this and instantly jumped right on here to post this!

Yes, I am the biggest Gotham fan. This is the final season I am sad to say!

I wouldn't just get evicted, I would get killed!! lol But that would be hella cool.

Update, I know James now. Hes a really cool guy. He helped me with a charity event. We will be seeing him back in the BB house again!

Everyone who runs for President and especially the ones who win are narcissists.

They have. Look at President's Lincoln and JFK... Also look at the members of Congress they have tried to kill and other elected officials.

The Democrats motto, "Support us or get clipped!"

Over half the country didn't like Obama and your point is?

Not for a Democrat. You can be dead and still vote....

Because the President has MANY options to handle such a situation.

Really? What ambassador has been killed under Trump? What embassy was over run by militants? What Fort Hood style terrorist attack has happened in the US? NONE.

When was the last time there was a lynching or cross burning? Remember the Democrats founded the KKK.

I don't remember the Republican party calling for violence against Obama.....

In May 2011, Vice President Joe Biden was in the White House Situation Room, joining President Barack Obama and his top national security officials for a crucial meeting. The question on the table: whether to order a dangerous Special Forces raid to take out Osama bin Laden.

Intelligence experts believed they had located bin Laden in a Pakistan compound, but they weren’t certain, and the risks of failure were high. After most officials present urged Obama to go for it, the president turned to Biden: “Joe, what do you think?” he asked, according to an account Biden gave months later.

“Mr. President, my suggestion is don’t go,” Biden said.
Obama, of course, ignored his deputy’s advice and dispatched Navy SEAL Team 6 to kill the Al Qaeda leader. It was a historic triumph for America — not to mention a political bonanza for a president facing reelection, perhaps the most consequential decision of Obama’s presidency.
And Joe Biden was on the wrong side of it.

Biden’s bin Laden call may haunt him as he considers taking on Hillary Clinton for the 2016 Democratic nomination, in a fight that will hinge in part on who’s better equipped to be commander in chief. As Clinton likes to remind audiences, she advised Obama to take the gamble. “I respected [Biden’s] concerns about the risk of a raid,” she wrote in her 2014 memoir, “Hard Choices,” “but I came to the conclusion that the intelligence was convincing and that the risks were outweighed by the benefits of success.”

“She can very easily point to the bin Laden operation,” says a former Obama White House official. “The value in it is that it’s so simple and so easy to understand: I was for it, and you were against it.”

A student of foreign policy since the 1970s, Biden prides himself on his judgment about world affairs. That makes him particularly sensitive to criticism that he’s flubbed several big calls on world affairs over the years. Biden has been “wrong on nearly every major foreign policy and national security issue over the past four decades,” Obama’s first defense secretary, Robert Gates, declared last year.

While stung by such talk, Biden also considers it unfair — particularly after recent events in places like Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan have arguably matched his predictions.

“He took a lot of heat,” says a former Biden aide. “But I think the last two years have certainly left him feeling vindicated.”
Biden may see an edge over Clinton among liberal Democratic primary voters. During their tenure in the Obama administration, he frequently took a more dovish line than his ex-colleague. The two split over the 2011 U.S. withdrawal from Iraq, troop levels in Afghanistan, arming Syria’s rebels, and bombing Libya. In each case, Clinton backed the stronger military option while Biden counseled caution and a lighter U.S. footprint abroad.

Libya could be particularly awkward for Clinton. As secretary of state she threw her weight behind the 2011 U.S. and European air campaign to depose Muammar Qadhafi. Biden opposed that intervention, which even Obama has suggested was ill-advised now that the north African country has fallen to anarchy and terrorism.

Biden also feels that he was right to warn early in Obama’s presidency that the U.S. should trim its ambitions in Afghanistan. In the fall of 2009, Clinton sided with the military’s call for another 30,000 troops, while Biden argued for a much lighter presence. Special Forces and armed drones could keep Al Qaeda at bay, he said, arguing that grander ambitions of rebuilding the country were unrealistic. Obama sided with Clinton’s view, but experts are mixed at best on whether doubling down on the country — at a high cost in lives and money — had much impact.

Biden might also point to his proposal, floated when he was a senator in 2007, for a “soft partition” of Iraq into three semi-autonomous regions — each one majority Shiite, Sunni or Kurdish — under the control of a weak central government. Many foreign policy experts scoffed at the idea back then.

Today, Baghdad’s inability to unite and control the country has bred new talk in Washington that a unified Iraq may be unsalvageable after all. That has led Biden to say, as one aide put it: “You all mocked me, and look who’s laughing now.”

Iraq is far from a neat issue for Biden, however. Obama assigned him the Iraq account at the start of his presidency, and Biden managed the country’s internal politics as the U.S. withdrew its troops — a withdrawal that Biden supported. (Clinton pushed for keeping a modest military presence in the country.)

The rise of the Islamic State and the return of more than 3,000 U.S. troops to the country over the past year will make it hard for Biden to boast on that front.

“He went along with our departure too easily,” says Michael O’Hanlon, an Iraq expert at the Brookings Institution, who also faulted Biden for strongly backing Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who turned out to be a sectarian strongman.

Fortunately for Biden, Clinton has her own vulnerabilities on Iraq. She supported the Iraq War, as did Biden. (Clinton and Biden both opposed George W. Bush’s troop surge.) And Clinton played little role as the country’s politics frayed — visiting Baghdad only once in her four-year tenure as secretary of state.

While no one has a spotless track record on complex foreign issues, some Biden backers argued, the vice president’s experience is unrivaled.
“The in-depth knowledge of international relations, and his personal acquaintance with leading world figures is just of a different magnitude of anybody else,” says Michael Haltzel, a senior foreign policy adviser to Biden when he chaired the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “Nobody bats a thousand.”

Biden himself cited the depth of his experience when he ran against Clinton and Obama in the 2008 primaries, pointing back as far as a 1979 delegation of senators he led to Russia to help negotiate the START nuclear arms control agreement.

While Clinton “was meeting socially with the prime minister of a country,” Biden said at the time, “I was sitting down and negotiating with them. I know my experience is considerably deeper and more relevant.”

That will be a tougher argument to sustain now that Clinton has logged four years as America’s top diplomat. And several sources questioned whether foreign policy really would be central to a Biden-Clinton battle.
“I think his argument is more likely to be that all his life he’s been fighting for the middle class, and here’s what he wants to do now,” said Robert Shrum, a former top consultant to several Democratic presidential candidates.

Both Biden and Clinton might also be wary of rehashing administration foreign policy debates in a way that could pit them against Obama’s policies.

Obama “will absolutely be collateral damage if they start attacking each other,” says the former White House official. “It won’t be a huge problem for him, but it will certainly be annoying.”

Also unclear is how much Democratic voters might hold Biden’s bin Laden decision against him. Backing the raid was hardly a no-brainer: Most Obama officials were equivocal about the decision, which they considered a calculated risk. Gates, for one, initially advised against it.

By various accounts, Biden was worried about the political fallout to Obama if the raid failed, as well as blowback from Pakistan, a nominal U.S. ally infuriated by the unannounced incursion of U.S. troops across its border.

“He was not against killing bin Laden in principle,” added Shrum. “He wasn’t sure the raid would work. Nor was the president when he ordered it.”

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/joe-biden-bin-laden-raid-defense-hillary-clinton-2016-campaign-121779

Documented fact that Biden was against it, everyone involved including Biden stated he said no but make up what you want.

We've already had two assassination attacks. One against Congressman Scalise and one against Senator Paul. All because the Looney Left is fueling the hatred and anger.

Yup, I read that and the bomb was a working bomb! What's worse is the guy is only looking at a maximum of ten years and he is showing NO remorse!

Don't forget Booker and Ellison. Hypocrites and serial abusers.

Following the bitterly partisan, acrimonious confirmation battle over Associate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., warned in an interview on Tuesday that heated political rhetoric has the potential to turn deadly.

"I fear that there's going to be an assassination," Paul told a Kentucky radio show. "I really worry that somebody is going to be killed, and that those who are ratcheting up the conversation ... they have to realize they bear some responsibility if this elevates to violence."

Paul's comments came the same day former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton declared that Democrats "cannot be civil" with Republicans any longer.

Paul's wife, Kelley, revealed in a Breitbart News interview on Friday that she sleeps with a "loaded gun by my bed," has updated her home's security system and has "deadbolts all around my house." Kelley also wrote an op-ed published by CNN in which she called on Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., to tone down his rhetoric; in June, Booker suggested his supporters “get up in the face of congresspeople.”

The Kentucky senator reiterated his wife's criticism on Tuesday. "When people like Cory Booker say get up in their face ... What he doesn't realize is that for every 1,000 persons who want to get up in your face, one of them is going to be unstable enough to commit violence," Paul said.

Last week, Paul was chased and verbally harassed by anti-Kavanaugh activists at Washington's Reagan National Airport. And last fall, Paul was attacked and beaten in his yard in Kentucky by his neighbor -- an episode that a Kentucky Democrat joked about earlier this year.

Paul was attending the congressional baseball practice last summer when a gunman opened fire, hitting House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., in the hip and injuring two Capitol police officers and an aide. The episode was very nearly a "massacre," lawmakers said.

"When I was at the ballfield and Steve Scalise was nearly killed, the guy shooting up the ballfield, and shooting I think five or six people, he was yelling, 'This is for health care,'" Paul told host Leland Conway on Tuesday. "When I was attacked in my yard and had six of my ribs broken, and pneumonia, lung contusion, all that -- these are people that are unstable, we don't want to encourage them."

REPUBLICAN SENATOR RECEIVES GRAPHIC TEXT MESSAGE OF BEHEADING, SEES PERSONAL INFORMATION LEAKED AFTER 'YES' VOTE ON KAVANAUGH
The uncorroborated sexual assault accusations against Kavanaguh, Paul said, didn't justify keeping him off the Supreme Court, much less the partisan rancor surrounding his confirmation. (Paul, who was initially skeptical about Kavanaugh's constitutional views on privacy, ultimately became one of the 51 senators who supported his confirmation.)

"We don't want this to be the standard, that anyone can accuse anybody of anything," he continued. "That would sort of be the standard they had in Venice in the 15th century, when people would put their complaints into the mouth of the lion .... And you'd put your complaint in, and people would lose their head over that."

Paul then echoed President Trump's comments at a ceremonial swearing-in for Kavanaugh in the East Room on Monday evening, as well as dramatic remarks by Maine moderate Republican Sen. Susan Collins last week. The president apologized to Kavanaugh "on behalf of our nation" and, before thanking Collins, emphasized that "in our country, a man or a woman must always be presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty."

"You are presumed to be innocent," Paul agreed. "I just feel really sorry for Kavanaugh and his wife and his children for having to go through that."
Hundreds of protesters have been arrested by Capitol Police in the past three weeks, with some briefly staying in jail. Kavanaugh, his family, his accusers and lawmakers all received death threats.

Protests outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, the first day Kavanaugh publicly sat on the bench for oral arguments, were relatively sparse. On Saturday, when Kavanaugh was formally sworn in, demonstrators outside banged on the Supreme Court's doors and attempted to claw their way inside.

And a teacher in Minnesota announced she had resigned this week after asking on Twitter, "So whose gonna take one for the team and kill Kavanaugh?" Supreme Court justices receive protection from the Supreme Court Police and the U.S. Marshals Service while in Washington, D.C., although they must ordinarily request protection on domestic or international trips outside that metropolitan area.

On Tuesday, President Trump suggested some of the demonstraters in the nation's capital were paid to protest, and were angry primarily because "they haven't gotten their checks." Some of the anti-Kavanaugh protesters who accosted senators on Capitol Hill have ties to liberal billionaire George Soros.

A 27-year-old Democratic congressional intern was arrested last week and accused of posting the personal information of at least one Republican senator during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Kavanaugh. The intern, who has since been fired, was denied bail on Tuesday.

Also speaking in a radio interview on Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he was proud of his Republican colleagues for standing up to what he called "mob tactics" during the Kavanaugh confirmation battle.

McConnell also said that he would have no problem appointing a conservative justice in the run-up to the 2020 presidential election if Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg were to retire from the bench. He distinguished that hypothetical from the situation with failed Obama nominee Merrick Garland in 2016 because at that time, different parties controlled the White House and the Senate.

"It will depend largely if the Senate is in Republican hands or Democratic hands," McConnell said, saying it is exceedingly rare for a lame-duck president whose party does not control the Senate to nominate a Supreme Court justice.

The GOP is currently favored to retain control of the Senate after November's midterm elections, buoyed in part by a newly energized base after the Kavanaugh fight.

"This has been like a shot of adrenaline to Republican voters who probably were not as interested or energized in an off-year election with the president not on the ballot," McConnell said. "I think they overplayed their hand. I think the tactics turned off people and turned on our base."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/rand-paul-warns-of-assassination-after-kavanaugh-confirmation-i-really-worry-someone-is-going-to-be-killed

The Democrats new motto, support us or you get clipped.

Just over a year ago, House Majority Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., returned to Congress after being shot by a crazed gunman during a congressional Republican baseball practice. His ordeal marked a low in our nation’s political discourse – one that blew past hostile rhetoric into outright violence.

On Sunday former Attorney General Eric Holder doubled down on what has become the left’s new normal. Speaking at a campaign event in Georgia, he said of Republicans: “When they go low, we kick ‘em. That’s what this new Democratic Party is about.”

Holder’s audience, unfortunately, was receptive, chanting “fight” instead of challenging him on his damaging rhetoric.

On Tuesday, Hillary Clinton said in a CNN interview that “you cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about.” Speaking as a bitter and sore loser, she said a prerequisite to civility would be Democrats winning back majorities in Congress this year.

Time and again, those on the left have shown the American people that they do not intend to reverse course and close the ever-widening divide between Americans. Their hatred for President Trump has caused them to dig in their heels, dehumanize Republicans and encourage harassment against those who disagree with them. In doing so, they have brought about the death of civility.

The people who were shot on that baseball field in 2017 witnessed this firsthand. So did Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who was assaulted from behind last November by a neighbor who broke his ribs and damaged his lungs.
Senseless acts like these will likely continue, which makes it more important than ever for Democrats to forcefully condemn the culture their own rhetoric has created.

Instead, the top ranks of the Democratic Party continue to sow division.
In June, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., told supporters to harass Trump administration officials and “tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

In July, Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. – presumably a future presidential candidate –encouraged activists to “get up in the face of some congresspeople.”

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders was driven out of a restaurant for her political beliefs. So was Kirstjen Nielsen, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Most recently, it was Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas.

And then there was the all-out character assassination campaign against Supreme Court nominee and now-Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The campaign was waged by Senate Democrats, their media allies and angry mobs intent on destroying a good man’s life.

When their campaign failed, liberal mobs resorted to pounding on the doors of the Supreme Court and continuing their disruptive tantrums.
As Republicans, we believe in treating every American with respect and dignity. We believe political differences are not an excuse for bad behavior.

We do not “kick” those with whom we disagree. Instead, we work hard to win elections and support President Trump’s agenda – one that reflects the same respect for opportunity and liberty for all.

During the Sunday campaign event, Holder encouraged Democratic activists “to be as tough as they (Republicans) are, to be as dedicated as they are, to be as committed as they are.”

Holder is right about one thing – Republicans are indeed tough, dedicated and committed.

We are tough in the face of adversity. We are dedicated to making life better for the American people. We are committed to lifting up every single community.

The results since President Trump took office speak for themselves: record low unemployment, the largest set of tax cuts in a generation, rapid deregulation and unprecedented economic growth.

The Republican Party will continue to fight for what matters most: a brighter future for our nation. And we will do so undeterred by attacks from the left. That is how we win.

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/rnc-chairwoman-ronna-mcdaniel-eric-holders-call-to-kick-republicans-must-not-become-the-lefts-new-normal