100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > creativesoul
|
|
|
Hundreds of claims... not a single argument.
Mindless twaddle. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have 2 conclusions that are prominent.
Soooo, either you're stupid or lying, I went with the latter... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sophistry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incomplete thought makes for incomplete statements. Got an argument?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Good.
Now, how does that work, on your view? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yup, all honorable, truthful words from myself...
Ahh. A truth claim. My favorite. Let's do some philosophy. What do you suppose makes any of them, some of them, or all of them true? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Creating Life
Edited by
creativesoul
on
Tue 04/10/12 09:18 PM
|
|
Indeed. How can we use this technology to make the most money?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All that and much more, but STILL no argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
creativesoul
on
Tue 04/10/12 09:10 PM
|
|
What? Do you mean act like you do? No thanks, I'm honorable...
I know why you refuse to define anything. It's is so that you may refute it later if you don't agree with something. I seriously doubt that you know what "good faith" means either... 
Yeah... honorable indeed... here's some of the 'honorable' responses. -- The honorable Pan wrote:
I hope you never have to serve jury duty. The honorable Pan wrote:
Would this be easier for ya if I just acknowledge that you could be lying? Or should I expect to be lied to? creative:Are you asking me to explain how I answered bushido without changing the context but you did not?
The honorable Pan wrote: LOL, no! I want you to explain how you knew what the unspecified context or situation was... The honorable Pan wrote:
How did I change the context and situation and you didn't? The honorable Pan wrote:
Here's on of those infamous sliding scale of requirements. So only you get to extrapolate huh? Only you have ESP and bushido telepathically revealed all those details he left out? Only you get to draw conclusions? Only you determine if the context was changed? Ahhooonly yoooooou? The honorable Pan wrote:
"bushido will continue to deny truth to save face..." Damn, I'm good! The honorable Pan wrote:
Awww, u hate being proven wrong, huh? The honorable Pan wrote:
Deal with it. Your thought experiment was only a simple child's game. The honorable Pan wrote:
Hey, if you want a pissing match, I can piss with more precision and futher than you in that too... ...It's quite funny that you expect people to assume things then cry like a baby... The honorable Pan wrote:
I think you will do anything, including lie, to save face... The honorable Pan wrote:
You cried like a baby when you thought I changed the context. The honorable Pan wrote:
I have 2 conclusions that are prominent. Soooo, either you're stupid or lying, I went with the latter... The honorable Pan wrote:
To require someone to make an assumption as to what you mean is a form of deception. Express your thoughts more clearly and there won't need to be any assumptions made. The honorable Pan wrote:
...your primary mode of communication is deception. The honorable Pan wrote:
The day you guys meet an honest person is the day you may understand how an honest person thinks... -- That oughta do. It's not everything, nor did I get halfway through the thread...
Honorable indeed... NOT! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Creating Life
|
|
The wink ought to have let you know, Jb, that that was tongue-in-cheek...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Creating Life
|
|
Something like that.
There are some crazy folk in this world, and many of them have enough capital to pursue such a thing, or others... all in the name of defense, though... not offense. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Creating Life
|
|
The ethical concerns are strong regarding such matters, and they're not all religious ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Site addition suggestion...
|
|
It may be nice to have an approval/disapproval rating system contained within each poster's individual reply, or attached to the member's profile so the reader could, if s/he chose, give the response or the poster a +1 or -1 rating. This could help the poster to be aware of whether or not their replies are considered helpful to the topic at hand, or it could be helpful for helping a member to be aware of how their responses are effecting/affecting other members. I've seen this on several other sites, sometimes they call it a "karma rating" which 'follows' the poster around, and other times it applies to specific responses only.
Just a thought... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To show me that you're here to do philosophy in good faith. Do you want that explained as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Still no argument.
I don't think that you have one. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You guys are still on about this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt. You've said enough. Says Jill, who thinks that the literal interpretation of "Are you alone?" is "Are you alone or am I here too". Says Pan who apparantly still doesn't understand that what 'Jill thinks' logically follows from his own claims. You'll have that with one who doesn't know what it takes for his own statement(s) to be true. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak and remove all doubt.
You've said enough. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Let's talk about judgment...
|
|
I suppose what I'm wondering is if all judgment is somehow the same in some way. Hi, I am going to try this again. I thought about what you said. I would say that judgement is somehow the same in some way. How? Judgement I see could be the same by process or main elements used to derive at an outcome. The main elements may be: see, judge, act and in that order as steps taken for an outcome, verdict, decision based one's judgement. For examples, one sees something, then it is judged based on what was seen against a reference source. Judgement would be the by the process used to come to a judgement. The process of "see, judge, act". For example: 1. See - to look at the circumstance, situation ...; 2. Judge - to check against a source i.e. scriptures, the law, knowledge through one's education/upbringing; 3. Act - the decision made or, outcome, action taken. Further to my thoughts on this is, when a "process" is used, it aids serve or to provide a better, or sound judgment. It seems that you're setting out what is required for the act of conscious judgment. That is, judgment that contains conscious deliberation, as set out in 2. Judgment is rendered after comparitive assessment. Am I following you? All types of judgment are the same in that:
1. There is an action outcome as a result of judgement. 2. There is a cause and effect from the action taken as a result of the judgement. 3. There is a change as a result of a judgment made in someone, in something. What do you think ... am I on track now to your topic, how did I do? This is more like what I'm after, however I think that you're focusing upon the 'other end', as it were. I mean, it seems that you're setting out the causal effects of judgment after it occurs. It's fine, I suppose, to develop that aspect. However, my interest lies more in what judgment consists in/of - much like how you began this response. |
|
|
|
|
Previous
