100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
|
Topic:
San Antonio
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 07/12/14 01:06 AM
|
|
one way to beat the summer heat... Guadalupe River Tubing 2014 Tube Season - OPEN 7 Days a Week! Hours: 9am to 7pm 
TubeHaus.com 12454 FM 306, Canyon Lake, TX 78133 Guadalupe River Tubing Since 1978 (830) 964-3011 http://tubehaus.com/ I was just there Memorial Weekend had a blast floated the river got smashed came home with the biggest black eye I have every had but had a great time...  
are you sure it wasn't an african/american eye lmbo  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Signed Up For DSL
|
|
i have come to think wheni move to tx i will be using public wi-fi as sat is all i can get where i will be n sat is to limited for the price it is not that big of a deal for me but it would be nice if time warner would go into that development 500 lots and some have 2-3 living units on them but guess thats not enough for anyone to invest in ???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
why can't we do that?
|
|
have you not heard it is not the 1900s any more women have had the right to make the first move for some time now |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 07/10/14 11:15 AM
|
|
I dont believe anyone in this thread has read Obamas book,,, unless you count finding snippets around the internet,, nor has Obama tried to ban 'all guns',,, then again, neither did Hitler if thats the comparison being attempted,,,, dont need to read his book his book carries no weight in the greater scheme of things i have read the constitution and its preceding document that fathered it the declaration of independence those are the written articles that carry weight in this country not some book written by a fly by the seat of the pants politician that cant obey his oath of office someone claimed to read the book,,,,,no one stated that it was required for anyone to read it as to the declaration of independence, no matter how often we wish to tie it to the constitution , it is still a SEPERATE document yes it is a separate document no one said it wasn't and the college books calculus 1 and calculus 2 are separate books and separate courses but you can not take two till can show you can do one lol,and? calculus is a topic that is all inclusive of different levels of studying the constitution is a DOCUMENT, quite diffrent from a TOPIC for study now, I can speak of what is true in calculus, as a subject, and point to any document about CALCULUS but I Cant teach from a Calc II book and then score a student off for not knowing what was in that CALC II assignment from the CALC II lesson, by claiming its in the CALC II book,, if its not in the book,,,, but if the student is not knowledgeable about what is in the 1st they will not understand the 2nd yes, but they  wont be able to claim its in the second if its NOT IN THE SECOND,,
in the continuation of a topic, one has to progressively retain information to grasp what follows the only thing that needs to be understood to understand the Constitution, is english nobecaus the same people that wrote the constitution signed the declaration of independence thus the spirit of the declaration is the foundation of the Constitution not at all I signed my insurance contract AFTER I signed my auto title but the 'spirit' of my auto title has nothing to do with my insurance contract seperate companies, seperate documents, seperate interests,,,lol whats on my auto title is not therefore automatically in my insurance contract,,, with out the original document (auto title) you would not need the second (insurance document) most likely your vin number will be on the insurance document pretty simple |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
those are good examples of turf war but only a few in an exhaustive list that can include also struggles between individuals,,,not having to do with gangs,,, once you have multiple members retaliating it becomes a gang note the third def -------------------------------------------------------------- gang noun : a group of criminals : a group of young people who do illegal things together and who often fight against other gangs : a group of people who are friends and who do things together http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gang |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actually, I dont even think the constituiton needed to be written , if the declaration was the law of the land because 'life, liberty, and pursuit of happinesss', pretty much covers anything someone wants it to,,, imho,,, however, Im glad it was, since at the time of this everyone being created equal to rights of 'life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness' africans and women were not at all given 'equal' access to any of these things,,,,or treated 'equal' in these rights,,,, The original constitution (to include the Declaration of Independence) was ahead of it's time (and still is). Culture had not matured enough to appreciate the concept of being equal. Just as culture today has not yet grown to appreciate the responsibility of being independent. bravo absolutely it is being proven that your statement is true all the time unfortunately |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where the document reads CONGRESS SHALL< it refers to CONGRESS if its not expressly an authority of congress, or expressly forbidden to states it is not a matter of the constitution,,,but of 'the people'(state, city, whatever,,) tenth amendment The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people the constitution delegates NO POWER regarding religion to the US, nor does it prohibit power to the STATES, so the powers regarding religion are reserved to the 'people' it comes in to play in the bill of rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the best way to deter crime is make the punishment hurt make them earn there keep get rid of the air conditioning and workout rooms and tv make them work together to survive if put shock collars on them so if they are out of line or try to be violent they hit the ground from the shock convicted of 3 violent crimes you are done forever make the first sentence hard and fast if another crime committed mark it harder and slower and like i said another one and you are done public televised execution punish criminals and quit showing their evil acts on tv and never speak their name in a public forum they are city name and number example chicago criminal 132 did such and such not the city they are born in but city or town crime is committed thus no fame for being evil and no discrimination to innocent family members |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exactly, another phrase that can be found NOWHERE In the US constitituion instead , paraphrased rather safely from ,,, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof CONGRESS ( A very specific political designation) must not respect religion nor prohibit others from exercising theirs,,, CONGRESS should stay out of religious matters,,,, the latter two are more paraphrasing and INTERPRETING what is in the constitution Edited by msharmony on Tue 07/08/14 06:35 PM which means govt funds should not be spent to support a religion and govt officials have no right to stop any one from practicing their religion no matter where they practice it actually that phrase is taken out of context from a writing of Jefferson http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/987191/posts I only slightly disagree, as the government is bigger than just the congress, but yeah, I think it means the CONGRESS (as the legislative branch of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT) cannot make LAWS regarding religion, pro or con,,,, being a state in the union means you must support and abide by the constitution thus the bill of rights must be observed by all govt jurisdictions from the smallest town to the total country many precedents enforce that go back to the civil rights movement to see some of them thus local police must give Miranda rights the 5th amendment being one police must get search warrant to search without cause |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Tue 07/08/14 06:53 PM
|
|
and perhaps there should be a mental check before issuing guns as obviously, seeking medical assistance is not MANDATORY in this country those who sought help should be in the books as potential danger and those who may not have sought help should be checked that they arent a potential danger,,, no because that opens the door to corruption and blocking lawful possession just like when they had tests in the south to see if you could vote any on can be a potential danger but you cant show prejudice on a maybe but an already proven danger is different you could say the same thing about motor vehicles after all more die from motor vehicles than anything else in history |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
exactly, another phrase that can be found NOWHERE In the US constitituion instead , paraphrased rather safely from ,,, Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof CONGRESS ( A very specific political designation) must not respect religion nor prohibit others from exercising theirs,,, CONGRESS should stay out of religious matters,,,, the latter two are more paraphrasing and INTERPRETING what is in the constitution Edited by msharmony on Tue 07/08/14 06:35 PM which means govt funds should not be spent to support a religion and govt officials have no right to stop any one from practicing their religion no matter where they practice it actually that phrase is taken out of context from a writing of Jefferson http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/987191/posts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe anyone in this thread has read Obamas book,,, unless you count finding snippets around the internet,, nor has Obama tried to ban 'all guns',,, then again, neither did Hitler if thats the comparison being attempted,,,, dont need to read his book his book carries no weight in the greater scheme of things i have read the constitution and its preceding document that fathered it the declaration of independence those are the written articles that carry weight in this country not some book written by a fly by the seat of the pants politician that cant obey his oath of office someone claimed to read the book,,,,,no one stated that it was required for anyone to read it as to the declaration of independence, no matter how often we wish to tie it to the constitution , it is still a SEPERATE document yes it is a separate document no one said it wasn't and the college books calculus 1 and calculus 2 are separate books and separate courses but you can not take two till can show you can do one lol,and? calculus is a topic that is all inclusive of different levels of studying the constitution is a DOCUMENT, quite diffrent from a TOPIC for study now, I can speak of what is true in calculus, as a subject, and point to any document about CALCULUS but I Cant teach from a Calc II book and then score a student off for not knowing what was in that CALC II assignment from the CALC II lesson, by claiming its in the CALC II book,, if its not in the book,,,, but if the student is not knowledgeable about what is in the 1st they will not understand the 2nd yes, but they wont be able to claim its in the second if its NOT IN THE SECOND,,
in the continuation of a topic, one has to progressively retain information to grasp what follows the only thing that needs to be understood to understand the Constitution, is english nobecaus the same people that wrote the constitution signed the declaration of independence thus the spirit of the declaration is the foundation of the Constitution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
than it needs to be better enforced yep dr who does not report mental illness should be held accountable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
you do not need a law to say you can do something you can do what eber you want until there is a law against it the bill of rights are laws prohibiting laws that prohibit various actions thus you have the right to do those things and have those things happen or other things not happen because of the bill of rights again, the thread is not about whether I 'can do something' the thread is about what is WRITTEN IN THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES you sure its not about whats NOT in the constitution its about whats NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION literally,,, like --------- separation of church and state |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Tue 07/08/14 06:29 PM
|
|
me to for l.o.c.i. mental illness and guns dont mix that law is already on the books |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe anyone in this thread has read Obamas book,,, unless you count finding snippets around the internet,, nor has Obama tried to ban 'all guns',,, then again, neither did Hitler if thats the comparison being attempted,,,, dont need to read his book his book carries no weight in the greater scheme of things i have read the constitution and its preceding document that fathered it the declaration of independence those are the written articles that carry weight in this country not some book written by a fly by the seat of the pants politician that cant obey his oath of office someone claimed to read the book,,,,,no one stated that it was required for anyone to read it as to the declaration of independence, no matter how often we wish to tie it to the constitution , it is still a SEPERATE document yes it is a separate document no one said it wasn't and the college books calculus 1 and calculus 2 are separate books and separate courses but you can not take two till can show you can do one lol,and? calculus is a topic that is all inclusive of different levels of studying the constitution is a DOCUMENT, quite diffrent from a TOPIC for study now, I can speak of what is true in calculus, as a subject, and point to any document about CALCULUS but I Cant teach from a Calc II book and then score a student off for not knowing what was in that CALC II assignment from the CALC II lesson, by claiming its in the CALC II book,, if its not in the book,,,, but if the student is not knowledgeable about what is in the 1st they will not understand the 2nd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really? here ya go police stations: http://www.cnn.com/2011/CRIME/01/23/michigan.shooting/ http://www.myfoxphilly.com/story/20438718/shots-fired-inside-gloucester-township-police-station yes, and I dont hear about nurseries being shot up,, so maybe that means everyone should carry a baby,,,,lol dont you watch law n order criminal intent baby wont help lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I doubt shooters CARE whether others can carry guns, the majority dont plan to live through it one way or another, many kill themselves, many shoot until they are killed. That someone might shoot them, is maybe not the deterrent gun advocates like to imagine it is. well i dont hear about any police stations getting shot up or any gun shops getting shot up or any gun clubs or target ranges so yes it is more of a deterrent than gun controllers want to admit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Tue 07/08/14 06:04 PM
|
|
you do not need a law to say you can do something you can do what eber you want until there is a law against it the bill of rights are laws prohibiting laws that prohibit various actions thus you have the right to do those things and have those things happen or other things not happen because of the bill of rights again, the thread is not about whether I 'can do something' the thread is about what is WRITTEN IN THE CONSITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES you sure its not about whats NOT in the constitution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe anyone in this thread has read Obamas book,,, unless you count finding snippets around the internet,, nor has Obama tried to ban 'all guns',,, then again, neither did Hitler if thats the comparison being attempted,,,, dont need to read his book his book carries no weight in the greater scheme of things i have read the constitution and its preceding document that fathered it the declaration of independence those are the written articles that carry weight in this country not some book written by a fly by the seat of the pants politician that cant obey his oath of office someone claimed to read the book,,,,,no one stated that it was required for anyone to read it as to the declaration of independence, no matter how often we wish to tie it to the constitution , it is still a SEPERATE document yes it is a separate document no one said it wasn't and the college books calculus 1 and calculus 2 are separate books and separate courses but you can not take two till can show you can do one |
|
|
|
|
Previous
