Topic:
Research on Right to Carry
|
|
I heard it said by a policeman that the "Right to Free Speech" has resulted in more assault charges than all other factors combined. Does that mean Free Speech should be banned, restricted, and controlled? It should be noted that all or almost all of the instances where someone was about to be robbed or assaulted and pulled a gun, promptly ending the attempt, are not recorded. without the right of the people to carry no other right matters what option do the "people" have to protect the other rights if they unarmed NONE!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
my question is, how long are we permitted to 'sit in a car', parked looking for keys, reading a book, or anything else, without it being a chargable offense? I agree, we are in the age where 'just comply' is the best way to avoid situations,, though I don't agree there was any reason for the two to be confronted in the first place,, and why does someone not driving have to show an id? if they can just state their name? technically you do not have to carry papers (nazi germany referance) name and address is citizen name rank serial number equivalent |
|
|
|
The original topic of this thread pertains to what the government should or should not do. In the USA, federal, state and local governments are already helping people who cannot help themselves. Yep and we got off topic when people flamed me for giving some ideas. So lets continue with the original topic. Any Ideas on helping the helpless? or at least helping the government help the helpless? Help me help you? Help me help you helping me help you! gosh Server, Im falling in love the more I read,,lol first of all, I see the current caste system as modern slavery not in the sense of it being legal to whip, rape, hang, strip of name and identity and heritage,, ANYONE,,,,certainly but in this sense whereas slave OWNERS 'provided' their own food and board in RETURN for labor and work,,,,it was clear as the slave you were the laborer someone else owned in modern day the OWNERS no longer house the laborers in their own home or feed them from their own supplies,, BUT instead they throw CRUMBS (cash) their way from which they are to find their own room and board,,,,yet, because it is just crumbs, they cant afford to pay a 'tax' and as a non taxpayer, they are basically OWNED by the taxpayers because they are seen as merely 'takers' with no citizen rights that the taxpayers cant adjust to their own liking (monetary priorities) I believe the key to successful 'wealth distribution' is 'education' the wealthiest aren't out working hard for their money as they preach to others, they are allowing MONEY TO WORK FOR THEM what most impoverished people are born into or live amongst does not provide clear or simple access to the resources or networks that lead to that happening and instead are just trained up to be slave laborers to line the pockets of the OWNERS who will tell them what they can eat and if they can reproduce lift the access and make abundant resource and networks available for people to be in a 'taxpaying' bracket, and things would change drastically THIS IS IN FACT A LIFES GOAL OF MINE TO BE INVOLVED WITH,,,,, but then the more narcissistic wealthy and middle class (a SPECIFIC subgroup within the wealthy and middle classes and NOT the whole group) couldn't have so many too look down upon as less deserving and hard working,,, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A interesting view on slavery |
|
|
|
being poor is an attitude being broke is a condition one way to fix it is to know the difference between wants and needs |
|
|
|
We find, in this country, that separation of Church and State is a viable concept. An example of the lack of that might be Israel. iran or most muslim ruled countries would be a better example |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 09/05/14 11:14 AM
|
|
maybe the u s britain canada and australia should join forces and take over the middle east militarily
then maintain a major presence there let each faction have their lil ruling party but when they become abusive they get stepped on and stepped on hard |
|
|
|
why does she need security she does not want the "people" to have the ability to provide their own security why should they pay for hers |
|
|
|
its not that hard to understand at all most whites will not jump on the racist bandwagon and riot and loot some blacks automatically go straight to the racist mantra some blacks riot and loot to profit from the misfortune of the situation if a rife is formed between two groups of people they are distracted from what those in power are really doing to the unfortunate in both groups it is as simple as divide and rule if whites would riot and loot then that story would have got the same coverage this explains it better than i http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A |
|
|
|
what ever happened to the charge of inciting riot |
|
|
|
Topic:
Sunscreen causes cancer?
|
|
so does the sun but you cant sue the sun just a thought lol |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 08/23/14 11:42 AM
|
|
That is what they did... made the cost so high and never before ask for price ... but the point is ...do we get on board like other countries and pay to get the hostages out ... no matter what the cost an seems to me they new they asked to much and the terrorist wanted this execution to out rage the USA even more... I am not saying journalist should stop telling the news of whats going on in wars ... just seems like terrorist know this gets them $ most of the time by doing this ... I think there just should be a oath being a journalist in these wars its the chance you take and what you love to do ... should there be some kind of compensation to the family... if something happens to them ... yes ... just as if they are a soldier and die in the act of duty ... something ... I just hate the fact that terrorist can do this and make $ off of them ... and choose to kill them or not ... like i said no it is not that they deserve it but like you said it is a choice imo the proper thing to do would have been for obama to start bombing isis hourly this would last for 1 week if they do it again the bombing would last 2 weeks again 3 weeks and so on till it cost more than they want to pay the actions will not change pay ransom with bombs not cash I agree with you and I believe that the President ordered more bombs after ... pay ransom with bombs not cash... but still compensate the families if something happens to their loved ones ... or the co. that they work for do the compensations ... his death was not in vein may he rest in peace and was a great man doing what he went there for they all are very courageous ... it was to out rage American ... and that is what they did ...but agree all should agree pay ransom with bombs not cash no it is not up to any other than the murders to pay for murder to the families but heres the catch if some is supporting the group that commits the murder they should be held accountable as a accessorize to the murder example joe shmoe from anytown usa give donation to isis in this case they are charged in connection to the murder |
|
|
|
ok whatever the official charge, humans are still of some human value that should be respected imho i didnt say kill them i was holding to your standard of incarceration they could be given something to do in their area to make money to help the victims family if they do so then maybe they get a little better treatment 1st degree moves to second degree cell and 2nd degree moves to cell attached to an outside caged area |
|
|
|
That is what they did... made the cost so high and never before ask for price ... but the point is ...do we get on board like other countries and pay to get the hostages out ... no matter what the cost an seems to me they new they asked to much and the terrorist wanted this execution to out rage the USA even more... I am not saying journalist should stop telling the news of whats going on in wars ... just seems like terrorist know this gets them $ most of the time by doing this ... I think there just should be a oath being a journalist in these wars its the chance you take and what you love to do ... should there be some kind of compensation to the family... if something happens to them ... yes ... just as if they are a soldier and die in the act of duty ... something ... I just hate the fact that terrorist can do this and make $ off of them ... and choose to kill them or not ... like i said no it is not that they deserve it but like you said it is a choice imo the proper thing to do would have been for obama to start bombing isis hourly this would last for 1 week if they do it again the bombing would last 2 weeks again 3 weeks and so on till it cost more than they want to pay the actions will not change pay ransom with bombs not cash |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 08/23/14 11:08 AM
|
|
One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward when it struck him and caused a fatal injury, according to Dr. Michael M. Baden, the former chief medical examiner for the City of New York, who flew to Missouri on Sunday at the family’s request to conduct the separate autopsy. It was likely the last of bullets to hit him, he said.
Mr. Brown, 18, was also shot four times in the right arm, he said, adding that all the bullets were fired into his front. Continue reading the main story The bullets did not appear to have been shot from very close range because no gunpowder was present on his body. However, that determination could change if it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Brown’s clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access. ...... http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html?_r=0 -------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------- One of the bullets entered the top of Mr. Brown’s skull, suggesting his head was bent forward every one i have seen running their head is leaning forward just a thought |
|
|
|
I also think that 'some' go with the intent of HOPING to be captured...of course preferably by a less radical group, but they purposelessly don't take precautions to prevent it from happening. Now you may think i'm full of it for saying this, But consider what 'some' people do who are released, they write a book, they are on this talk show, or that talk show, telling 'THEIR' story...and of course becoming famous and rich off of it. I'd say before we start bombing, we should at curtail these types of individuals by saying something along the lines of 'can't profit, or gain fame, from any hostage situations' of course it'd have to be more that that, but that is the general idea. they make a choice they go in harms way if people think they should not profit from it is wrong (you dont have to buy their publications) if you choose to get in your car and drive somewhere and before you get there you are in an accident should you be barred from profiting from the accident after all you chose to get in the car and go and more are killed or maimed in motor vehicles than any other method yes they made a choice but when people stop making those choices how will will get open reports from those areas i stand by my last post make the cost so high that they wont wanna pay it You're right I don't have to buy their publications,(and I don't), but the way are current media is set-up you are most guaranteed to get famous for getting captured over-seas, American's are not the only ones that understand this, I'm not Naive enough to think that there are those working WITH some "Terrorist" for the pure purpose of gaining free frame, by way of our news don't exist. Some stories I believe, others I think are completely full of crap, but both are given the same coverage, same media frenzy, and free advertising for whatever book they may have written. So consider the above, and revisit your post. You have a journalist many of which have connections all over, with different types of groups, say they are one of the few who do it, not for sake of 'bringing a story' but as an intentional scam, people are greedy, inherently so, I don't think bombing a bunch of innocent people should be the 'go-to' action, it may come to that, but other things should be done first. who said bomb innocent people i am sure they know where their camps are they are in the middle of an invasion if there are those that choose to be in their camps they are not innocent other things were done first how long were there peacekeepers there most of which were american so no i still hold to my post make their actions cost so much that they choose different actions |
|
|
|
Topic:
ever met a famous person?
|
|
spent an evening with Rob Schneider once my son was djing his daughters birthday party and we sat around talking a bit while we let the kids enjoy the party |
|
|
|
Topic:
Considering
|
|
the obese one of the groups you need not be politically correct with |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Sat 08/23/14 10:35 AM
|
|
I also think that 'some' go with the intent of HOPING to be captured...of course preferably by a less radical group, but they purposelessly don't take precautions to prevent it from happening. Now you may think i'm full of it for saying this, But consider what 'some' people do who are released, they write a book, they are on this talk show, or that talk show, telling 'THEIR' story...and of course becoming famous and rich off of it. I'd say before we start bombing, we should at curtail these types of individuals by saying something along the lines of 'can't profit, or gain fame, from any hostage situations' of course it'd have to be more that that, but that is the general idea. they make a choice they go in harms way if people think they should not profit from it is wrong (you dont have to buy their publications) if you choose to get in your car and drive somewhere and before you get there you are in an accident should you be barred from profiting from the accident after all you chose to get in the car and go and more are killed or maimed in motor vehicles than any other method yes they made a choice but when people stop making those choices how will will get open reports from those areas i stand by my last post make the cost so high that they wont wanna pay it |
|
|
|
Topic:
Criminal Treatment
|
|
homeless people do it on a daily basis thus it is possible thus they need not commit a crime to eat |
|
|
|
I actually said INCARCERATION and/or REPARATION reparation does not always refer to money,, a life cant be 'paid' for, but the economic impact of that loss can be financially assessed,,, as life insurance companies do all the time,,, I am not for blanketly placing all 'murder' under one big umbrella to excuse inhumane treatment of others NOTHING brings back that dead person, including subjecting their killer to inhumane treatment,,, because of what they can no longer do and i did not blanket murder under one umbrella i specifically listed 1st & 2nd degree murder plus bearing false witness |
|
|