Its BIG as in HUGE business!

Its so HUGE you can even trade it on the new york stock exchange! Hey more prisoners more more return on the investments!

Type: Public, Traded as NYSE: CXW






The One Thing About Steven Avery's Case You Shouldn't Forget

Given the attention Making A Murderer has received, it's no wonder that Steven Avery's case is mesmerizing the masses. How could a man be charged of a crime, be convicted, and have DNA exonerate him, just to be charged and convicted for a totally different crime just over two years later? Given that Friday is the 9-year anniversary of his conviction, the one thing you shouldn't forget about Steven Avery's case is how common what happened to him during this first case actually is. According to the National Registry of Exonerations, last year, 149 people were exonerated in the United States, which is more than ever before — 58 (also a record) were exonerated of homicide specifically.
http://www.bustle.com/articles/147961-the-one-thing-about-steven-averys-case-you-shouldnt-forget






If that isnt bad enough here you have a guy with an iq of 75 writing his own appeal. He has the right cause but the wrong evidence in support of the cause, hence they will hand him his *** once again and he will be denied the ability to refile.

http://www.thewrap.com/making-a-murderer-steven-avery-files-new-appeal/






finally he hired a new attorney

Avery hired Kathleen Zellner as his attorney at the beginning of January

Steven Avery’s new attorney, Kathleen Zellner, plans to use “advanced luminol testing to exonerate Avery.”

The official Twitter page for Netflix’s “Making a Murderer,” which chronicles the trial and conviction of Avery in the murder of Teresa Halbach, disclosed the plans for the advanced testing.

According to the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, luminol testing is used to detect blood in large areas that can’t be seen during the visual examination. “Scientists can take advantage of the luminol reaction to locate potential blood evidence that would be undetectable through visual examination. The light, or luminescence, emitted in the luminol reaction is thought to result when an oxidizing agent, such as blood, catalyzes the oxidation of luminol by hydrogen peroxide in a basic solution.”

Also Read: 'Making a Murderer': Who Is Steven Avery's New Lawyer Kathleen Zellner?

Avery hired Zellner in January, who says there’s “new evidence” to present, and that she’s “confident” that Avery’s murder conviction will be overturned.

In a statement provided to TheWrap, Illinois-based attorney Zellner said, “We are continuing to examine every aspect of Mr. Avery’s case and all of his legal options. We are confident Mr. Avery’s conviction will be vacated when we present the new evidence and results of our work to the appropriate court.”

Wisconsin resident Avery is currently in prison for the murder of photographer Halbach. He continues to maintain his innocence, and the case has gained worldwide attention since the December premiere of the Netflix documentary series “Making a Murderer.”

Also Read: 'Making a Murderer' Prosecutor to Write Tell-All Book

Attorney Dean Strang, who represented Avery during his murder trial, told TheWrap in January that a “mass” of potential new evidence has emerged since the “Making a Murderer” premiere. Strang cited “leads, ideas [and] possibilities that have arrived in a mass from emails and calls since the film came out.”

Zellner’s firm specializes in reversing wrongful convictions. Her clients have included Joseph H. Burrows, who was sentenced to death for the murder of Illinois farmer William E. Dulin before being exonerated.

Zellner and the former prosecutor in Avery’s case, Ken Kratz, have not yet responded to TheWrap’s request for comment.






and that is only the beginning, it does not end with avery!

They also trapped brendan dassey a retarded 16 year old and sentenced him to life for a murder he did not commit.

This goes on at all levels of gubmint and mostly kept hush hush in the media about the gubmints involvement.

Whats the solution when they can pick people who go against them off one by one as they are doing and they can do the same to you!

America has the government (or lack of it) that it deserves.

Despite there are many cases like this that prove the point, I refrain from posting here for the most because of the juvenile cognitive dissonant approach and outright denial to government high crimes and conspiracy.

Since this one is PROVEN beyond juvenile political denial from those who simply cannot accept the negative side of the world around them I'll be happy to elaborate on only a few of literally volumes of points to add to the one you listed above.

Anytime investigations, like avery, attorney general fine, murrah, waco, 911, tonkin, our latest depression/financial debacle, and so forth, are wrought with more negligence than fact where nothing adds up the gubmint is square in the middle of it.

Despite the fact that had anyone bothered to read a statute 1 that the states duty is to protect the state, a piece of paper, (which they do very well), 'the people', just because the name has been illegitimately used in the various constitutions, have the misguided perception it is the states duty to protect them. Well its not. (see the Deshaney case case and others) The state has the duty to protect itself not you EXCEPT where its convenient to state agenda.



For the avery case; first he was setup and wrongfully convicted of rape he did not commit, forced to serve 18years before being exonerated.

Manitowoc was on the hook for a 34 million settlement to avery that would have caused a national shake down of the judicial/legal industry.

Halbach was allegedly murdered immediately after lenk and colburn depositions were taken. [we dont even know for sure she is really dead]

Halbachs rav4 was conveniently parked on the farthest seldom used side of the lot where someone could drive the field unnoticed then covered up so averys wouldnt notice it. (bone yards customarily put vehicles where people have been mashed so bad they cannot be removed in the back of the yards due to the smell)

Nonetheless the rav 4 was covered up and no one would have been capable of seeing it driven in from the house.

We are to believe that despite the averys had a car crusher and could destroy the car so it was completely unrecognizable that instead they would park it on the far end of the lot out of site from the house.

We are to believe according to the state that avery would burn the body not only in his back yard but also in barrels and also transported it to a gravel pit a mile away from the house and burn some of it there, despite they had an incinerator.

We are to believe that the only dna found on the key was averys despite no dna was found from halbach on the key.

We are to believe that the sample of blood taken from avery and held by the state despite being tampered with and having a torn seal and needle puncture hole in it was not the blood found smeared on the rav4.

The prosecution used dramatized exaggerated inflammatory language to the press and news media to publicly convict him.

Manitowok was not allowed to be involved in the investigation due to conflict of interest, but they were anyway.

The fbi presented a false implication edta.

Averys gf called and talked with him for 10+ minutes during the time he allegedly did this murder.

There was no evidence what so ever of halbract being in averys trailer despite the prosecution trumpeted over the media that he shackled her anc cut her throat and stabbed her on the bed.

They claim a .22 cal 'slug' went all the way through her head and landed under the compressor in the garage based on 'casings' laying around the garage that tested to be fired through that gun.

Dna on the slug was tested so it cannot be retested and was contaminated by in the lab which should have been thrown out but it was used anyway.

a couple seen avery in town at the same time he was claimed to have murdered this gal.

The appelate court simply dodged the appeal. (Prison industry is HUGE money)

Finally a juror was quoted to say not only did they have a couple ringers but that they were in fear of their lives...."If they can do that to him they can do that to me"

Yes conspiracies happen all the time in America and those who would scream tin foil theorist without hard evidence proving the contrary are complicit in its promotion.


There is no end to the problems with this case. Same MO as jfk, okc, waco, 911, etc etc etc......

The above proves nothing more than welfare for the scientific community which provides us with more of the same politicized science we have been getting for the last 100 years.

They proved they can measure 'something' but there is no evidence it was gravity.

I keep this 17000 volt transformer that I picked up when I was a kid for show (off) and tell for a science project (jacobs ladder) when I was in the 5th grade. I still have it because I get the biggest charge out of giving people the wire and letting them play with the arc to try to see the longest arc they can produce. I do this to prove a point. Like the movie the entity where you can see something invisible impressing upon the womans skin this works the same way. Everyone bar none have dropped the wire when they thought they got a shock when in fact they did not. Breaking the arc often times produces an invisible force that can be physically felt as an instantaneous pressure upon their hand. Like someone throwing a cup of water at it. Now this force can be felt several inches away. (Very strange feeling btw) That said I can buy that they proved that the 'ether' or 'aether' exists, (which einstein renamed to 'fabric' while denying ether exists) but not a gravity wave of all the ridiculous theories. Its all about wordsmithing games and endlessly milking the taxpayers.






speed of light is not constant
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T0d7o8X2-E

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/2322/teslas-theory-of-gravity

How is science suppressed even today? From a physics site:





Aether concept

It is important to undertand that Tesla's Aether concept is not analogous to classical aether theories. Tesla's aether was in fact a medium, or 'perfect fluid' that wets everything in which we are immersed, acting as an 'independent carrier'. It behaves as a solid to light (high frequency) and is transparent to matter, while it's effects, according to Tesla, can be felt through inertia.


"The primary substance, thrown into infinitesimal whirls of prodigious velocity, becomes gross matter; the force subsiding, the motion ceases and matter disappears, reverting to the primary substance".
Nikola Tesla - New York American - July 6, 1930


"According to an adopted theory, every ponderable atom is differentiated from a tenuous (fragile, vague) fluid, filling all space merely by spinning motion, as a whirl of water in a calm lake. By being set in movement this fluid, the ether, becomes gross matter. Its movement arrested (halted), the primary substance reverts to its normal state. It appears, then, possible for man through harnessed energy of the medium and suitable agencies for starting and stopping ether whirls to cause matter to form and disappear. At his command, almost without effort on his part, old worlds would vanish and new ones would spring into being. He could alter the size of this planet, control its seasons, adjust its distance from the sun, guide it on its eternal journey along any path he might choose, through the depths of the universe. He could make planets collide and produce his suns and stars, his heat and light; he could originate life in all its infinite forms. To cause at will the birth and death of matter would be man's grandest deed, which would give him the mastery of physical creation, make him fulfill his ultimate destiny."
Nikola Tesla - New York Times - April 21, 1908


http://www.metaresearch.org/cosmology/speed_of_gravity.asp

Photons that travel in free space slower than the speed of light
http://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3987


The make/break of only a few watts of arc can cause you to be physically pushed, what evidence did ligo provide to prove that the most probable conclusion is not the case here?

the purpose of setting a game like this up and giving it to kids is the same as its always been, it gets them familiar with the idea, then its easy to shove it on to them before they figure out what hit them, only to be shock when they are 70 and realize that the banksters were extorting and transporting 10 trillion bucks on a 1 gig zippy stick and wish one of their parents would have been smart enough to warn them.

Each to their own, but not everyone uses youtube to watch people smell their farts in a jug.

M.I.T.-Walter Lewin- Non-Conservative Fields
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqjl-qRy71w

Yep, then they will pull the terrorism or some other related card and claim the right to execute you without a trial and the mindless knee jerk american herd of cows will stand by looking on dumfounded while waiving their flag saying "that'll teach em" and then plant another martyr of freedom.

I would add that its not free of money in and of itself, but free of 'rented money' and its associated structure.

What contract with the people have the US or britain or any government ever kept? They break them before the ink is dry.

there are people (not many mind you) that are alive today who remember sitting tight to the radio listening to the sales campaign and ss was sold as an 'insurance' policy. It is anything but, the gov can legally terminate the program at any time and not pay anyone a dime. People never read the actual legislation, days many people barely knew how to read much less understand gov legalese. People who never had birth certificates magically had them produced. (not hand written, in type of course) These bait and switch routines by gov have been going on since the beginning of time.

Now today they wave the legalese in front of us, NOT the sales pitches, and the old timers leave this world betrayed. "to soon old, to late smart"

Well..........
Unfortunately thats only the tip of the iceberg. I already got one good snoot full of "Facts are Facts", and putting this it into perspective academically is a much larger scope that requires far more research and background than the previous quaint little discussion on Germany. So after a moments reflection on the matter I think it best for me to pass the baton to this guy who splainz it quite succinctly:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsL6mKxtOlQ

yw

Its the part of the 'HISTORY LESSON' that you left out !

I like to be thorough!

and whispers are a deafening scream!







Now I included the wiki link, you can go on there and it will take you right on to the parliamentary records if you think I am jerkin your chain. That said is it really much of a stretch that 'just maybe' world war 2 isnt quite the way you were led to believe?

with that ALL drugs should be legal, the state was never granted the authority to prevent anyone from taking whatever the hell the please. Well except by themselves since they have their little closed door monopoly going (in the case of opiates)thank you mi6 and cia.

Im sorry man but all that made me laugh.

Aint nobody gonna mess with the cia's cash cow.






Seems you have your terrorists reversed! LOL







where you guys dig up so much bogus information beats me.

We went in to protect the poppy fields that were being destroyed by the taliban!
Watch the youtube if you want to hear the commanding officer say it! LOL

This is why the made the movie the matrix.



BLUE PILL / RED PILL

"You take the blue pill, the story ends.
You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe.

You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes."

Looks to me like they are planning for a full scale invasion. That is how its done. Military buildup. Certainly looks like a standing army to me. A standing army does not need to have a US Army emblem sewn on the uniform to be one.




WND EXCLUSIVE

U.S. suddenly alarmed over militarization of cops 'Andy Griffith and Barney Fife could be using grenade launchers and a tank'
Published: 08/19/2014 at 8:25 PM

At least one Bill of Rights watchdog who has been warning of the “militarization” of local law enforcement, particularly through the federal government’s surplus equipment program, believes the citywide lockdown after the Boston Marathon bombing and the armored vehicles and high-tech weaponry used to calm the violence in Ferguson, Missouri, shows the U.S. already has become a police state.

John Whitehead of the Rutherford Institute, who has sued police departments for SWAT tactics, writes “these are no longer warning signs of a steadily encroaching police state.”

“The police state has arrived,” he said.

“For those like myself who have studied emerging police states, the sight of a city placed under martial law – its citizens under house arrest (officials used the Orwellian phrase ‘shelter in place’ to describe the mandatory lock-down), military-style helicopters equipped with thermal imaging devices buzzing the skies, tanks and armored vehicles on the streets, and snipers perched on rooftops, while thousands of black-garbed police swarm the streets and SWAT teams carry out house-to-house searches – leaves us in a growing state of unease,” he wrote.





WND reports on the militarization local police date to within months of the news site’s launch in 1997, when founder and CEO Joseph Farah wrote about a training session for armed federal officers for the Environmental Protec

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/u-s-suddenly-alarmed-over-militarization-of-cops/#hzCqCk3azHqHyRbD.99





Looks to me like they took a giant crapola in their own beds by creating a standing army and brutalizing so many people in the 'line of duty' and now they get sleep in it. That was often said at Nuremberg if I remember correctly?


When they can afford all the law suits and to militarize our local police it seems someone or something is getting way to much money ya'll think

What if everyone woke up one day and found out that the majority of everything you believed as truth was nothing more than a pack of lies? Ever think of that?




Government has NO duty to protect you.

Ironically most everything people 'think' they know or 'believe in' is mostly BS and and the fruits of well organized false advertising.


Just review cases like Deshaney, gonzales, warren and so forth


http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3172&context=dlj

well then on this topic you are one step ahead of the crowd. they pissed off a lot of people, to the extent the IMF had to pump gold back into the market to stabilize it along and in conjunction with multitudes of suicides of course.

Not surprising it went unheeded because people simply know little to nothing about how thing are done in the big leagues much less the top level leagues. Hopefully you were one of the lucky ones who escaped the 'conspiracy theorist' and 'antisemite' pejorative slurring and name calling from the peanut gallery who do not know the difference between valid evidence in the case of CT, or zionist v Judaism in the case of antisemitism.

Meantime our wallets have been raped in support of the criminals, and the whole country put into deeper 'bond' slavery which is what it was called before they abolished the appropriate use of the 'label'.

That said I dont see a total 'collapse', nasty depression yea, which I would estimate is a bit over 50% past.


One of the biggest downsides of these suicides is that nothing ever gets onto court records hence no preventative laws will ever be made.

Suffice to say these guys know exactly what they are doing and have a nearly impenetrable strategy.

With that much power off'ing someone judges kennedys popes makes no difference, its childs play, and there is nothing government can do about it if they wish to live long enough to have gray hair.

Thats not the problem, someone 'else' most often calls them. The problem is the actions of the cops once called. They are taught to escalate everything, NOT de-escalate as SOP. Though they always lie in court [and judges simply overlook their commission of perjury as they do for most attorneys] that they tried to de-escalate a matter and were only doing their job. The proper procedure would have been to call for a warrant to legitimize the change in venue to a search. However the overlord courts simply rule against our rights any time it is possible when its statist v individual. judges also mix and match, first through synthesis the eliminate over the years the privacy of ones car, and they reason [through said synthesis] that since one has no privacy in the car neither do they in their home and as long as they do not cite anything that is not so far over the top insane that anyone with an iq over 20 can figure out, they claim its 'reasonable' as the core of their decision [despite its unconstitutional]. If a cop enters a home under one pretext that does not give them the authority (with certain narrow exceptions) to deviate from that pretext. [legitimately]

Simple, couple guys pull a few key family members off to the side and inform them that expediency is in the states best interest ending the statement with 'you know what I mean'.....you wanted to know what it takes thats all it takes if even that much.

Dont kid yourself, Russia's constitution pales ours, you would get to knock heads with snowden and really get an earful. Of course the Russians dont follow their constitution any better than we follow ours. Chances are you would know more details about this and many other incidents that you would ever find out here from the corporate mobocracy.

The real problem is that there are rogue groups operating under the veil of law and these groups can bring down ANYONE, president, even God if you run contrary and become a target of their interests.

Laughing yet?




Thats where it starts, which leads to:





Of course when you are dealing with a supreme court judge it better appear convincingly to the greater MSM following majority of american people like death by natural causes so its NOT looked into.

The progression starts with appearing like suicide natural whatever and evolves into outright open view assassination when nothing can be done about it, either from fear of retaliation at the higher levels or no opportunity to make a change at the lower levels short of war against the rogue elements who happen to be elements operating under the veil and cover of government, now that the rogue elements have merged under the immunity of government if you dissent and go against their interests you will lose because big brother listens very closely to dissenters whispers in the dark. "NSA the only part of government who truly listens."

Its the same MO anytime the government is involved. Its not as if we have a bad government its that it was infiltrated from its inception and our laws skewed just enough by rogue elements (operating under government 'outside' the process to achieve their PRIVATE interests) so at best we the people can do nothing about it but be spectators, short of going to war against the rogue elements who just happen to....oops work for the government good luck with that, good luck rooting them out..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTbgsoHDc24

That said, sure it really could be natural causes, however when shortcuts are taken, evidence is tampered with, everyday investigative procedures are botched, and a controversial stench follows, the odds quickly tip in the direction of foul play.


That said as far as I am aware it only takes one family member, which would be the executor of his will to stop the whole show. The propaganda that it takes thousands of people to pull these operations off is groundless. It only takes intimate knowledge of the system and often times only takes one or a small few people with authority to control the 'direction' of _______ whatever, the rest simply follow along. Of course there are all sorts of variants to that however that 'is' the process.

well the T v Ohio case if I remember correctly was a lame version of police insuring their safety, however, securing themselves from danger that rises to the level of 'imminent danger' is reasonable, but thats not the situation here,

This case takes it to a whole new level, (of unconstitutional thank you US supreme court) The test used is 'community caretaker’!1


http://www.aele.org/law/2011all01/2011-01MLJ101.pdf


What the courts are doing is protecting the officers under the guise that because the search resulted in producing guilty verdict for some crime they are justified in making rulings that violate the constitution and people simply accept it mostly because they do not see beyond their noses the blank check being given the gov for corruption.

case in point; If you look at the steven avery case people give government a free pass for far more heinous crimes mean while hanging each other.

Its not a bit surprising that scalia just happened to die with all these constitutional abominations on the books.