Community > Posts By > CKeef

 
CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 02:42 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 02:46 PM
Speaking of which, Castle (I believe) is in the entire 5part series Suicide Kings, brand new, only seen the first two.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 02:39 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 02:48 PM
Followed by issue 55

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 02:36 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 02:43 PM

what was the Punisher/Deadpool pic from?! i have the same pic on my laptop, and i have always wondered what comic that was from!


a buddy of mine had that Wolverine/Punisher tpb, very badass story


Deadpool issue 54 (COVER)

Castle is in quite a bit a 'Pool comics, obviously probably not even a quarter of the time, but shows up now and again to try to take him out (or vice versa)

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 02:16 PM

Not really.laugh Rambling is a pure form of thinking.


It's the least I could do my good man.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 02:12 PM

Oh okay. Well, I never got that from looking at your pics.

Isn't the kitty adorable? I want one too, but I'm allergic.grumble


:cry: No kittens? Allergic? sad

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:59 PM

Where do we draw the line on what we feel is a positive change for us or us trying to make ourselves what our SO wanted us to be instead of what we are.


Guess I deviated a bit there huh.... :laughing:

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:56 PM
Great showdown...


Great matchup...

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:51 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 01:57 PM

you missed the whole florida thing? dude, the whole movie took place in Tampa! (i'm talking about the one that came out in 2004, not the one that came out in 2008)


Haha, i know, it's been that long since I've seen it. I am 20 now, so i was about 14-15, at 16 my baby was conceived and life took a sharp turn down a rough path. Only the great movies kept my attention to such detail after so much :laughing:

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:44 PM

U should never change for someone else.U shoud always just be yourself.If they can't except u for who u are then they aren't the right person for u.Besides u should always just love your self.:heart: :heart:


I believe the only time a person should speak of changing another is for the benefit of the changee, not the changer. If I offer views and pathways, I do it for their sake. A personal agenda behind an influence of another's life is unacceptable to me. Any change should be done for yourself, but if you change something because of the influence of another... that is not always bad. It could be a good thing for you, which in turn would be a good thing for them. This is not always a separated so its somewhat presumptive and hastily done so to think that another is the reason why. What is good for one can also be good for many, and a good change for yourself can be great for others and sometimes not possible without them there to help, care and support you. I know I would certainly change aspects about myself for those I care about, because to increase the happiness and health of another's life is a great and powerful change for me as well.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:38 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 01:39 PM

I think there's something to be said for flexibility and compromise.

[They] try to change me into someone I simply cannot be -- we're not talking "working on a bad habit" here, we're talking about absolute, radical anathema.

Truth be told, well put

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:36 PM
Oh yes! I remember, thanks to Ladylid.

My beliefs would be meaningless and unacceptable if I did not practice it myself. For me, showing others the way of change within myself is only the first part, though very important. It helps to see somebody rise up to the challenge for it can inspire and give proof to those who doubt. But the real hard part is doing this for others in a way that is non-intrusive and remains caring about that person more than a personal opinion. To share beliefs and differences with another without saying 'this is right/this is wrong' is extraordinarily difficult... not just for the one speaking, but for the one receiving. It is far too common for people to take things personally when they are not, and the lack of attempt for communication and understanding can make this all but impossible, especially if one does feel insulted, betrayed or attacked by such vision.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:31 PM
I think the biggest one for most people is faith/belief. Whether it be religion or morals, I believe this affects people's judgement and ability to see other possibilities the most. For me, I desire education on a worldly level, and refuse to limit myself to 'one and only one way.' Religion? Not a big fan, although there is greatness to learn from it, but too often solidified into people in a manner that leaves no room for other interpretation or other realities. I believe in my heart - whether it be God, Buddha, or the spirits of people now past - this resides. I will readily embrace change and differences as long as it does not cross the line my heart says should never be, such as hurting & using people, violence outside of severe protection-purposes, dishonesty, etc.

I think a lot of people are indeed so focused on their image and what is thought about them, they feel the need to defend who they are now and see anything else as an attack or a forceful demand of change, instead of a door opening or just simple opinion. There definitely is a need to be individual, yet so many are very quick to conform even if they are not truly believing.

If somebody does not cross my lines of integrity, honor, love and justice, I need no change even if I would wish it. It is our differences that makes the world go 'round, but also realize that without the understanding and will to look at change, review it and consider the possibility of acceptance and ability to embrace something outside of our own personal experiences. If somebody is not willing to look at these things or try something new for those that matter (whether they are in your life or just the good people of Earth), there is no desire for that person.

.....there was something else.... but my brain doth fart.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:13 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 01:14 PM

hell, the movie with Tom Jane even managed to screw up his origin, and his was as basic as you could get! his wife and kids were killed in a mob hit when they were picnicing in central park in NYC. i hated that they put it in Florida too, terrible.

and when they had Frank going around and making the 'bad guys' off each other and mistrust each other just isnt Punisher's style. Frank just kicks the damned door in and starts blasting away with his trusty M60. plain and simple no? yet they had to go ahead and screw that up too.

thank god for Warzone


How curious, I must have missed the whole Florida thing, but thinking about it, I definitely am seeing so much more now that is just sad about it. I did like it as a movie, but did not appreciate it as the Punisher.

Now if they'd only bring Moon Knight to screen... (well done of course)

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 01:01 PM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 01:02 PM
Tough tough stuff...

I think this saying is greatly flawed for it does not say in which direction they are out. Ofcourse, most people assume it means they are 'above them.' I've never told a person this statement before, I'd use more specific words. For me, the biggest issue is people being below the 'league' as you put. If somebody is not willing to learn, grow, compromise, sacrifice for important things and people, they are certainly down and out. I would never put somebody above though, and even saying below is not quite right. I dont like the idea of levels ... the whole hierarchy approach. Instead of a line, whether its viewed horizontally or vertically, I go with a circle. Self is in the middle, and there are varying rings and distances within these rings. It doesnt mean they are truly better or worse, but just on a different path. If somebody is super religious, they are way out of my spectrum... doesnt mean they are below me or bad in anyway, just not within a comfortable reality for my being.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 12:23 PM
When all else fails, Ren & Stimpy: HAPPY HAPPY! JOY JOY!

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 12:01 PM
The thing that sucks for me... I never liked pictures for the most part. I hated standing still, being told to smile and whatnot... felt like a robot. I need a reason to smile! Even if i take a picture of myself, it is so hard to actually give a real smile. I have to start making stupid faces and make myself laugh, but still it just isnt a real smile. I try! And I smile a lot, but I cant do the picture thing seriously. I have no interest in looking at pictures of myself so I have no interest of taking them of myself. I like pictures that people dont know are being taken... I used to walk through the halls of my highschool and meet people, say whatup, real fast whip out the camera and snap it before they knew it was there, and I got the best, most fun-loving pictures ever. If I had a lady, and she was in the picture with me, I'd be happy as ****. But I'd rather just have pictures of all the shapes I can make my face into.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 11:50 AM
Wow, some of you spend way to much time with anger in your hearts and not enough passion to make a difference. Just because somebody, including people on TV, say something does not make it true. It also does not make it untrue. By talking ****, you only show your lack of care to live in a better world. I like Obama, but I dont necessarily agree with everthing he has proposed or the Democrats. But he is a good man, and he speaks from the heart. The problem is President or not, there are other influences that prevent him from actually doing what he needs to, Repubs and Democs. Its because of people that fail to give a chance and help push for better things that causes this failure. It is the people that fail if he does.

He's not perfect, but all this BS about his birth certificate and that he ruined the economy..? Get a life, stop crying and make a ****ing difference in the world.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 11:18 AM


I get the same - "what do you like to do" or "what are you into?" My personal favorite is "what are you looking for out here?". I usually reply with something off the wall like "Well, I keep hunting for a purple rhinoceros but haven't managed to find one of those, so guess I'll settle for talking to you". Oddly enough, they rarely email me back *sigh*


HAH!!! That is a response I would actually respond BACK to.

That's hilarious.

But then again, I have never sent such a generic email for a first contact anyway.

Yet they still ignore me...lol


That seems ludicrous. I think people take things way too seriously... for me, thats why dating is hard. There's too much pressure to 'appear' decent and the idea to impress. People always ask, what do you do? Nothin wrong with that, but that is hardly who a person is. Too much focus on trying to find the qualities for a good partner, but are you finding qualities as a friend too? This cannot be seperated. I dont want to date anybody I cant laugh with and be able to talk to as a friend, intellectually and simple-minded.

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 10:58 AM
Edited by CKeef on Sat 07/25/09 10:59 AM

what's weird about your pics?


Well... I wouldnt say weird except for the ones I'm goofing off, making faces. People see the hat, the clothes, whatever else and think I'm a player or a typical guy.

Like I said above, I am lucky enough to have a few people take a chance and just talk to me (is that really even taking a chance??) and it was always the same. One said she wasnt sure if she wanted to talk to me because I looked like a player. Another said my words and image didnt match up. Once more declared she didnt believe I could actually be as nice as I am and had to be playing at something.

I used to know many scumbags and typical guys, and I know their secrets. I cant say women are wrong for being cautious or WHATEVER you wanna call it, but it amazes me how they let it define somebody before they even take the time to talk. I'm not expecting to meet somebody after one day, and certainly not looking for quick sex. It takes a decent amount of time to get to know somebody, and it can be so simple to do so without giving, losing or risking anything. Yet the minds of most are clouded, and I have little patience for ignorance and assumptive people.

P.S. That kitten is too much. I wanna kitten SO bad now

CKeef's photo
Sat 07/25/09 10:51 AM

Stevenson FINALLY after 3 people trying to do the role, got Frank Castle right! he was perfect in the role.


After reading more of his issues, I'd have to agree. I was rather pleased that the movie wasnt full of dialogue and pointless story plots. Its pretty ****ing simple. Bad men, one solution. Punishment.

It's not like they didnt talk about Castle's past... they gave enough insight on why things were the way they were portrayed. I dont need Castle himself telling minor characters his sob story or some dumb shitt

1 2 8 9 10 12 14 15 16 24 25