*
Bernie = Hardware Store Owner?
Bern there ; done that...
*yawns* Next!
*
"Bernie Sanders Should Remind You of a Ticked Off Hardware Store Owner"
Link:http://www.peterheck.com/peterheck/main1/view/38970/bernie_sanders_should_remind_you_of_a_ticked_off_hardware_store_owner
*
Vote For The Crook!

This is funny!

Not Happening.
The Internet Responds To Donald Trump’s Refusal To Debate Bernie Sanders With #ChickenTrump
https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChickenTrump?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
*
Based on the fact that the Democratic nominating process is totally rigged and Crooked Hillary Clinton and Deborah Wasserman Schultz will not allow Bernie Sanders to win, and now that I am the presumptive Republican nominee, it seems inappropriate that I would debate the second place finisher. Likewise, the networks want to make a killing on these events and are not proving to be too generous to charitable causes, in this case, women’s health issues. Therefore, as much as I want to debate Bernie Sanders – and it would be an easy payday – I will wait to debate the first place finisher in the Democratic Party, probably Crooked Hillary Clinton, or whoever it may be."
*


"It’s one of those “open door/closed door” type of statements, but folks online decided that this statement made one thing very clear about Donald Trump: he’s a chicken. So is Hillary Clinton, apparently, leading to the hashtags #ChickenTrump and #ChickenHillary. Some could likely attribute this to the #BernieBros movement, but the entire election is already dumb enough. #ChickenTrump is a tag that doesn’t need any help to stand and it has led to many folks putting their best ideas forward on Twitter:"[Link: https://twitter.com/hashtag/ChickenTrump?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw]

Hillary Clinton...?
*
How Likely Is A Hillary Clinton Indictment?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q08AplBtsUw
Published on May 6, 2016
Hillary Clinton is under investigation by the FBI for using a private email server, during her time as Secretary of State. How likely is it that the FBI will indict her? Cenk Uygur, John Iadarola, and Jimmy Dore, hosts of The Young Turks, break it down. Tell us what you think in the comment section below.

“Hillary Clinton has all but locked up the delegates needed to become the Democratic nominee for president — a fact many on both the right and the left are finding difficult to come to terms with. Perhaps that's why potential disaster scenarios seem to be surfacing with increasing frequency these days. With her rival, Bernie Sanders, all but mathematically eliminated after a string of bruising primary losses, chatter has gotten louder about Clinton potentially being indicted by the FBI over her use a private email server during her tenure at the State Department.

Republican mega-donor T. Boone Pickens insisted to Newsmax last week that Clinton would not be the Democratic nominee. "I don't think she's physically up to it, but that's not going to eliminate her," he said. "It'll be some other reason. I just don't think that she will ever hear the starter's gun." Asked if he believed "emailgate" would disqualify Clinton, Pickens said, "All of it. She has so many things." (Both Pickens and former House Speaker John Boehner have in recent days publicly floated scenarios in which Joe Biden swoops in at the DNC to wrest the nomination from Clinton's grip.)”

Read more here: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/...
*

Cohen: Hillary Clinton’s disregard for our security evident
Server didn’t protect
http://www.bostonherald.com/news/columnists/adriana_cohen/2016/05/cohen_hillary_clinton_s_disregard_for_our_security_evident
*
Fiscal Times: ‘Clinton Cash’ Documentary Is ‘Weapon That Could Knock Clinton Out’
http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/05/25/fiscal-times-clinton-cash-documentary-weapon-knock-clinton/
*

Anonymous - Message to Hillary Clinton
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OTMaIX_JPE4
*

Are Venezuela or Cuba good examples of why Bernie Sanders would not be good for America?
Link: https://www.quora.com/Are-Venezuela-or-Cuba-good-examples-of-why-Bernie-Sanders-would-not-be-good-for-America
*
A friend of mine pointed out that because of their socialism, the people are not happy, and just recently, with a 74% voter turnout, elected a different leader who will go the opposite direction with the country. Is this true? Can this be compared to America and Bernie Sanders?
*
A mixed economy, often confusingly called democratic socialism, can be well implemented or poorly implemented. Venezuela is among the worst implementations. A move toward capital "S" socialism going back to 1998 illustrates the corruption and lust for power inherent in the Marxian economic model. See Greece for another example.
This is not unlike the corruption and greed that is attracted by unregulated or poorly regulated capitalism. The United States illustrates a poorly implemented mixed economy in which the votes of elected representatives a routinely exchanged for campaign contributions and other favors. The impact on the economy is seen in the form of a shrinking middle class, rampant corporate welfare, and increased reliance on consumers in other countries. The latter drives trade agreements that favor corporate profits at the expense of worker compensation on both sides of the deal.
Venezuela has virtually nothing in common with the strong mixed economies that Bernie Sanders points to a good models. Those being the Nordic countries and The Netherlands, among others. In those countries you see well regulated capitalism mixed with transparency in government, where social programs, policies and projects are managed. The latter are paid for by taxes generated by a strong economy, driven by high wages which results in a population with disposable income available to spend on wants rather than necessities. This is not to say there is zero greed in the private sector or zero corruption in the public sector. Those factors exist, but they are rare compared to places like Venezuela and the United States.
Bernie Sanders is proposing a move toward well regulated capitalism and transparent government. That's just what America needs to get it back on track as a well implemented mixed economy. Learn more and take appropriate action. Where does Bernie Sanders stand on the issues?
For one thing, that brand of socialism in Venezuela is quite a bit different than the Democratic socialism of Bernie Sanders. In Venezuela, things seem to be much more dictatorial and lopsided. I found it interesting article that does a lot to explain the brand of socialism that Senator Bernie Sanders prescribes to. Here is the link:

Bernie Sanders' Brand of Socialism -- More Karl Marx or FDR? - TheStreet
https://www.thestreet.com/story/13326547/1/bernie-sanders-brand-of-socialism-more-karl-marx-or-fdr.html
*
Also, you have to consider that Venezuela, despite the fact that they have a large amount of oil, the average person in Venezuela is much more poverty-stricken than the United States. Comparing the Democratic socialism of Bernie Sanders to the socialism in Venezuela is like comparing apples to oranges. Conditions in Venezuela are much different than the United States. Here is another article I found that explains what is going on in Venezuela.
Socialism Crumbles In Venezuela, But Democrats Think It’s a Great Idea | Power Line
However, if conditions in the United States keeps degenerating the way they currently are, I am rather fearful that in 5 to 10 years, conditions here in the United States could be just as bad as they are in Venezuela. As far as I'm concerned, electing Senator Bernie Sanders as president will go a long way in making things better in this country.
*
Carlos Matias La Borde, Half Venezuelan
7.5k Views
Venezuela is a good example of why a dictatorship and stupid leaders with too much power doing dumb stuff doesn't work. It has nothing to do with socialism. Chavez played around with Venezuela like it was Candy Land.
He was always doing random, stupid nonsense. Like "our currency sucks, so I'm making a new one, instead of the bolivar, it's called the strong bolivar, and it's worth 4 to a dollar". Then when that started to decline like crazy, he was like "it's illegal to accept less than 4 bolivars to their dollar equivalent". Because he doesn't get economics.
So then overnight, the black market scalps every single plane ticket and starts selling them on the down low, marked way up. So it was actually impossible to leave the country without going through the black market.
The insane "socialist" government that his administration ran was complete rubbish. The government just seized all sorts of buildings arbitrarily to house the homeless or poor, rather than coming up with a sustainable way to improve the economy, create more jobs or build state housing.
When I was there some years ago, next door to my uncle's house some people were building a large mall. The government just grabbed it a few years later, still in the middle of construction and passed it off to the homeless. This kind of thing ensured that they got voters, and destroyed the economy and the "free" market.
Some cousins had invested in a few Venezuelan companies, out of the blue, they get seized, all of the stock holders get nothing.Then people wonder why no one invests there, and why the economy is rubbish. It did stuff like this over and over and over again. People invest and start a business, government steals it. Eventually people stopped investing and the economy tanked even harder.The government was a freaking joke. And they had so much oil that we could fill up a tank for 50 cents, and the subway cost 2.5 cents. Literally.
That's not an example of socialism. It's an example of an incredibly unstable government with far too much power ruled by the equivalent of a toddler jacked up on Adderall. Thank God the opposition finally took the Senate at least...

It has absolutely nothing to do with Bernie Sanders.

Hell, the votes of "The Living" aren't able to be correctly registered & tabulated so perhaps there's something to be said for voting -DEAD?

My Advice To Those Students?
"You Really Really Really Don't want To Do That!" Lmao!

Wayback in the wayback machine, I attended a small university in The US [New College, Sarasota, Florida/ Link : https://www.ncf.edu/about/history/] that patterned its grading system after the undergraduate programs of Oxford and Cambridge Universities in the UK. The expectations of the instructors & work load were incredibly intense & much more demanding than any school I'd ever attended in which a standard grading system was employed. In order to be prepared for the "weekly-discussion-topic" where one was grilled, questioned by the instructor & fellow students which required one to read uncountable books/publications[take notes, ect] in addition to the numerous textbooks assigned for the class. Weekly written essays were also required by many of the instructors to check for student understanding in addition to the discussions & the mountains of compulsory
readings. Undergraduate degrees were awarded in a 3 year time frame after the successful presentation of a detailed thesis on a specific area of study. It was no wonder to me [& other fellow students] that this tiny University had one of the highest percentages of suicides of all the Universities in the country!
*
Assessment
Students at both Oxford and Cambridge are assessed informally throughout their course by producing work for their tutors/supervisors for tutorials/supervisions which usually take place weekly. Formal assessment is almost entirely based on examinations although in the final year of many courses one examination paper can be replaced with a dissertation.
At Oxford the final degree classification result is usually based on the examinations taken at the end of the final year. Cambridge students, in contrast, are assessed through examinations in more than one year of their course.
What is Cambridge University's grading system?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-Cambridge-Universitys-grading-system

"Demisexual"? Dafug! lmao! I had to look it up as I've never heard of it. I guess the general definition would pertain to my own sexuality as I'm over the urge to merge for no other reason save horniness;}

One doesn't become "Interesting"; one either "Is" or "Is Not". I think the term might refer to the authenticity of an individual.
"Real" is so rare these days.

"AT TIMES, DISCRETION IS THE BETTER PART OF VALOR..."

Donald Trump-supporting tow truck driver says God told him to
abandon a disabled Bernie supporter
BY Shaun King
NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-trump-fan-tow-truck-driver-abandoned-disabled-bernie-voter-article-1.2627346

"This, ladies and gentlemen, is Donald Trump's America.

On Monday, a disabled woman's car broke down 45 minutes away from her home after she was in an accident in Asheville, North Carolina. When her family mechanic could not come to get her, he called a local tow truck driver — who also happens to be an evangelical Christian who voted for Donald Trump. What happened next defies common decency, the basic tenets of Christianity and good business practice.

Ken Shupe arrived on the scene to tow Cassy McWade's car and even began the process of hooking her car up to be towed. It was then that he noticed that she had a Bernie Sanders bumper sticker on her car.

TRUMP AND RYAN SET TO MEET WITH HELP FROM RNC CHAIRMAN
Tow truck driver Kenneth Shupe from North Carolina refused to tow the car of Cassy McWade because she supports Bernie Sanders and he is a Trump supporter.

"Something came over me, I think the Lord came to me, and he just said get in the truck and leave," said Shupe to local reporters. "And when I got in my truck, you know, I was so proud, because I felt like I finally drew a line in the sand and stood up for what I believed."

Yes, I give you full permission to put a pillow over your face and scream right now.

Ken Shupe believes God told him to leave a disabled woman stranded on the side of the road. Now, if by God, Shupe means he heard the voice of one Donald J. Trump speaking to him and telling him to leave, then I fully believe him. After all, it was Donald Trump who openly mocked the physical disability of a New York Times reporter last year and refused to apologize for it."

*****************************************

My personal thoughts on the matter are that I really don't give a small ratz-azz; the Dude["Shupe?"] is just friggin Nutz-A-Rama!
lol!



Politically, another "House Of Clinton" Presidency would be far more damaging than Trump in The Oval Office.



At least, Trump isn't already "Bought-&-Paid-For" like the "Darling Of The Big Banking Set"; The Corporately Owned & Operated Liar[HRC].
Gimme A Break!

PS: Actually Donald Trump would've FIRED this delusional moron["Shupe?"]. Trump & Co. have made overtures to Bernie Sanders Followers of late...unlike Clinton who has literally set her paid "Troll-Army" upon Sander's supporters.*sighs*

*
The hacktivist collective known as "Anonymous" calls out Hillary Clinton for her various crimes, lies, and corrupt dealings.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAeah1mATDw

"It is time Mrs. Clinton be held accountable for her crimes against the Untied States and humanity.
From destroying evidence to leaving Americans to die in Benghazi, her time is running out..."
*
"Anonymous" - Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal
Link :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2K5v5bm0Q
*
Hannity: Chris Stevens' Body dragged through the streets
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxrcFRO-ViA
*
In the "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal"; Hillary is filmed telling a reporter when she was questioned about Chris Steven's death, something like, "I know he's dead,so he's dead! What does it matter now?!?"
*
Hillary Clinton's Super PAC, Taking a Page from Vladimir Putin, Spends $1 Million on Online Trolls
Link: http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/04/hillary-clintons-super-pac-taking-a-page-from-vlad.html
*
“Correct the Record” is a pro-Clinton super PAC founded and run by a man named David Brock—a former conservative hit man whose greatest hits include the vicious defaming of sexual assault victim Anita Hill when she threatened to subvert the Supreme Court appointment of conservative justice Clarence Thomas. Just for fun, here’s Brock on himself from a 2001 “confession” designed to promote his tell-all, come-to-Jesus book: Describing an article he wrote for The American Spectator, a conservative magazine, in 1992, which became the basis for his book on Ms. Hill, he said he did everything he could to ‘’ruin Hill’s credibility,’’ using ‘’virtually every derogatory and often contradictory allegation I had collected on Hill into the vituperative mix.’‘
‘’I demonized Democratic senators, their staffs, and Hill’s feminist supporters without ever interviewing any of them,’’ he continued. Nice guy..."

Yesterday, Correct the Record announced they’d be taking it a step further. A new initiative called “Barrier Breakers 2016” will use $1 million (for now) to “help Clinton supporters push back on online harassment and thank superdelegates.”
This is a comical definition that does its best to hide the true purpose: Paying online trolls to support Hillary and antagonize Bernie and his supporters in an attempt to level the playing field. More language from the statement:
In response to these attacks on supporters and superdelegates, Correct The Record is launching the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force. While Hillary Clinton fights to break down barriers and bring America together, the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force will serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities, as well as thanking prominent supporters and committed superdelegates on social media.

The focus of the “digital task force” of paid trolls will be predictable: Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and everywhere else people may come across political messaging.
The aim is clear—muddy the waters, and limit the potential of online progressive activism, which has raised millions of dollars for Bernie Sanders and undoubtedly recruited thousands of voters to his cause. One common reaction to the news is shock—the idea that this is “unprecedented” in American politics. That may be true, but there’s a clear model here, and it comes straight from Russia.If you haven’t yet read Adrian Chen’s wonderful New York Times Magazine feature “The Agency,” I recommend that you do so now. It’s an incredible look at the “Internet Research Agency,” which employs “hundreds of Russians to post pro-Kremlin propaganda online under fake identities, including on Twitter, in order to create the illusion of a massive army of supporters; it has often been called a “troll farm.””

Some of these employees spent their time posting in comments sections, while others went so far as to start their own blogs on seemingly non-political subjects, only to weave political messages into their content when they had an audience. But this wasn’t just about convincing Internet users to support the Kremlin’s positions. It was also about turning the Internet into a political wasteland, so that if anyone sought information that might be against Kremlin policy, they’d encounter a confusing morass and feel immediately discouraged. Chen met with a liberal campaign manager named Leonid Volkov who emphasized this point:
“The point is to spoil it, to create the atmosphere of hate, to make it so stinky that normal people won’t want to touch it,” Volkov said, when we met in the office of Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation. “You have to remember the Internet population of Russia is just over 50 percent. The rest are yet to join, and when they join it’s very important what is their first impression.” The Internet still remains the one medium where the opposition can reliably get its message out. But their message is now surrounded by so much garbage from trolls that readers can become resistant before the message even gets to them. During the protests, a favorite tactic of the opposition was making anti-Putin hashtags trend on Twitter. Today, waves of trolls and bots regularly promote pro-Putin hashtags. What once was an exhilarating act of popular defiance now feels empty. “It kind of discredited the idea of political hashtags,” says Ilya Klishin, the web editor for the independent television station TV Rain who, in 2011, created the Facebook page for the antigovernment protests.

This is exactly what’s happening with David Brock’s “Barrier Breakers 2016.” In fact, I’d be surprised if the Internet Research Agency, and perhaps Chen’s article, wasn’t a direct inspiration. This is not about providing a “a presence and space online where Clinton supporters can organize and engage with one another,” and anyone who believes that message has been fooled. This is about attacking the ability of Clinton’s enemies to organize themselves online. As Chen wrote of the Russian troll factory, “its target is nothing less than the utility of the Internet as a democratic space.”
*

*

Great "Visuals"! This Actually made me, "LOL"!

S'more pathetic attempts to ~Flirt~



or,

Hmmmmmm... Perhaps Peggy, it's a question of semantics? I might have used the term, "take time-off-from" or "disappear from for an [undisclosed] amount of time" as opposed to, "Cutting Off All Connection". In that context, my the answer would be a resounding, "Yes!". The term, "Cutting-Off" to me is reserved for those who have breached trust, are deceptive , or have betrayed me. In essence if I have decided to "Cut" someone out of my life; chances are that they were the ones who had to have handed me the scissors.

*
Darlinks, No attempt to "deceive" about hiding-the bit*h, inside, here.

*
Who YOU Vote For?
Sorry I have reason to believe that it doesn't really matter...anymore.

The primary system in the US is not one which the voters get to choose, because the politically established elite have provided "The Choices".This year is yet another perfect example. I call the system "fraud" because it deceives voters into thinking that they're the ones choosing anything, when the reality is that they aren't. Hillary Clinton had a HUGE delegate lead of 400+ to about 20, all before even a single primary election vote is cast. This is from those "super delegates", members of the Democrat political establishment who pledged beforehand to back her. It would only take a minority of voters for Clinton to get the nomination. The establishment is firmly in control of things no matter what happens.

The system is rigged. It needs to be taken down, destroyed and redone before anyone should bother with it again or take it seriously.


*

*

I, so suck at "Flirting"-

Are women more emotional than men? Absolutely Not. Both genders have access to the full emotional range of human emotions. The only difference is that through gender/social-conditioning; it is more socially acceptable for women to "display" their emotions. Therefore women are better able to "display" emotion than men as they've had more practice in doing so.