Secret Service agents: Hillary is a nightmare to work with
By Deroy Murdock

“Good morning, ma’am,” a member of the uniformed Secret Service once greeted Hillary Clinton.

“F— off,” she replied.

That exchange is one among many that active and retired Secret Service agents shared with Ronald Kessler, author of “First Family Detail,” a compelling look at the intrepid personnel who shield America’s presidents and their families — and those whom they guard.

Kessler writes flatteringly and critically about people in both parties. Regarding the Clintons, Kessler presents Chelsea as a model protectee who respected and appreciated her agents. He describes Bill as a difficult chief executive but an easygoing ex-president. And Kessler exposes Hillary as an epically abusive Arctic monster.

“When in public, Hillary smiles and acts graciously,” Kessler explains. “As soon as the cameras are gone, her angry personality, nastiness, and imperiousness become evident.”

He adds: “Hillary Clinton can make Richard Nixon look like Mahatma Gandhi.”

Kessler was an investigative reporter with the Wall Street Journal and Washington Post and has penned 19 other books. Among much more in “First Family Detail,” he reports:

 “Hillary was very rude to agents, and she didn’t appear to like law enforcement or the military,” former Secret Service agent Lloyd Bulman recalls. “She wouldn’t go over and meet military people or police officers, as most protectees do. She was just really rude to almost everybody. She’d act like she didn’t want you around, like you were beneath her.”

“Hillary didn’t like the military aides wearing their uniforms around the White House,” one former agent remembers. “She asked if they would wear business suits instead. The uniform’s a sign of pride, and they’re proud to wear their uniform. I know that the military was actually really offended by it.”

Former agent Jeff Crane says, “Hillary would cuss at Secret Service drivers for going over bumps.” Another former member of her detail recollects, “Hillary never talked to us . . . Most all members of first families would talk to us and smile. She never did that.”

“We spent years with her,” yet another Secret Service agent notes. “She never said thank you.”

Within the White House, Hillary had a “standing rule that no one spoke to her when she was going from one location to another,” says former FBI agent Coy Copeland. “In fact, anyone who would see her coming would just step into the first available office.”

One former Secret Service agent states, “If Hillary was walking down a hall, you were supposed to hide behind drapes used as partitions.”

Hillary one day ran into a White House electrician who was changing a light bulb in the upstairs family quarters. She screamed at him, because she had demanded that all repairs be performed while the Clintons were outside the Executive Mansion.

“She caught the guy on a ladder doing the light bulb,” says Franette McCulloch, who served at that time as assistant White House pastry chef. “He was a basket case.”

White House usher Christopher B. Emery unwisely called back Barbara Bush after she phoned him for computer troubleshooting. Emery helped the former first lady twice. Consequently, Kessler reports, Hillary sacked him. The father of four stayed jobless for a year.
While running for US Senate, Hillary stopped at an upstate New York 4-H Club. As one Secret Service agent says, Hillary saw farmers and cows and then erupted. “She turned to a staffer and said, ‘What the f - - - did we come here for? There’s no money here.’ ”

Secret Service “agents consider being assigned to her detail a form of punishment,” Kessler concludes. “In fact, agents say being on Hillary Clinton’s detail is the worst duty assignment in the Secret Service.”

After studying the Secret Service and its relationships with dozens of presidents, vice presidents and their families, Ronald Kessler’s astonishment at Hillary Clinton’s inhumanity should reverberate in every American’s head.

As he told me: “No one would hire such a person to work at a McDonald’s, and yet she is being considered for president of The United States.

Hillary Clinton also likes to show off her supposed sense of humor in public, but is she really funny? These clips speak for themselves.

http://nypost.com/2015/10/02/secret-service-agents-hillary-is-a-nightmare-to-work-with/

Anyone in the Secret Service who leaks information, including their personal feelings, about someone they are directed to protect,

is by definition, incompetent, a liar, and deserving of being fired.

It is part of their job description NOT to say anything like this, so anyone who does, should be told to their face that they are either lying about being in the Service, or totally lacking in personal honor, and entirely undeserving of any professional respect.

I had heard about the way she treat the secret service agents before but I fond this article kind of surprising.




I didn't think she was that nice.

Oh horse$hit...if it was about Bush , you'd have a hard-on....

Secret Service Agents Call Hillary Clinton a 'Nightmare'
http://youtu.be/3-98HnpGybE/
01:35 WHDT - May 2, 2016


Book Discussion on The First Family Detail Ronald Kessler talked about his book, The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents, in which he discusses what Secret Service agents have revealed about our presidents over the years and talks about scandals involving the agency. He spoke at Barnes and Noble Booksellers in Washington, D.C.

http://www.c-span.org/video/?321989-1/book-discussion-first-family-detail/ * C Span *
01:40:05

Umm...someone's feelinga aren't classified, stating your opinions on a subject is not 'leaking information' did tou ever work in intelligence? ...I'm guessing no....

Hmmm...something seems a little off with that.

I know!


This made me laugh:

Doesn't that just reaffirm heterosexuality?
Reminds me of buying jewelry for a girlfriend and during her examination of the packaging asks "do you think my box smells funny?"
And of the time I was at the grocery store deli (brand new for a small town) with a family member, where the chicken was just coming out of the fryer, and he asks the worker "how big are your breasts today?"

http://vid.me/IDQE

I disagree.
Keep in mind that those who spoke about Hillary's behavior were those who used to protect her.
There is no indication that Hillary's current protectors spoke to the book's author.

no, liberals don't think ANYONE should have any opinions but themselves... seems thats been proven over and over..

Just throw a bucket of water on Hillary. Problem solved.

*
The hacktivist collective known as "Anonymous" calls out Hillary Clinton for her various crimes, lies, and corrupt dealings.
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAeah1mATDw

"It is time Mrs. Clinton be held accountable for her crimes against the Untied States and humanity.
From destroying evidence to leaving Americans to die in Benghazi, her time is running out..."
*
"Anonymous" - Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal
Link :https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2K5v5bm0Q
*
Hannity: Chris Stevens' Body dragged through the streets
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxrcFRO-ViA
*
In the "Hillary Clinton: A Career Criminal"; Hillary is filmed telling a reporter when she was questioned about Chris Steven's death, something like, "I know he's dead,so he's dead! What does it matter now?!?"
*
Hillary Clinton's Super PAC, Taking a Page from Vladimir Putin, Spends $1 Million on Online Trolls
Link: http://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2016/04/hillary-clintons-super-pac-taking-a-page-from-vlad.html
*
“Correct the Record” is a pro-Clinton super PAC founded and run by a man named David Brock—a former conservative hit man whose greatest hits include the vicious defaming of sexual assault victim Anita Hill when she threatened to subvert the Supreme Court appointment of conservative justice Clarence Thomas. Just for fun, here’s Brock on himself from a 2001 “confession” designed to promote his tell-all, come-to-Jesus book: Describing an article he wrote for The American Spectator, a conservative magazine, in 1992, which became the basis for his book on Ms. Hill, he said he did everything he could to ‘’ruin Hill’s credibility,’’ using ‘’virtually every derogatory and often contradictory allegation I had collected on Hill into the vituperative mix.’‘
‘’I demonized Democratic senators, their staffs, and Hill’s feminist supporters without ever interviewing any of them,’’ he continued. Nice guy..."

Yesterday, Correct the Record announced they’d be taking it a step further. A new initiative called “Barrier Breakers 2016” will use $1 million (for now) to “help Clinton supporters push back on online harassment and thank superdelegates.”
This is a comical definition that does its best to hide the true purpose: Paying online trolls to support Hillary and antagonize Bernie and his supporters in an attempt to level the playing field. More language from the statement:
In response to these attacks on supporters and superdelegates, Correct The Record is launching the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force. While Hillary Clinton fights to break down barriers and bring America together, the Barrier Breakers 2016 digital task force will serve as a resource for supporters looking for positive content and push-back to share with their online progressive communities, as well as thanking prominent supporters and committed superdelegates on social media.

The focus of the “digital task force” of paid trolls will be predictable: Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, and everywhere else people may come across political messaging.
The aim is clear—muddy the waters, and limit the potential of online progressive activism, which has raised millions of dollars for Bernie Sanders and undoubtedly recruited thousands of voters to his cause. One common reaction to the news is shock—the idea that this is “unprecedented” in American politics. That may be true, but there’s a clear model here, and it comes straight from Russia.If you haven’t yet read Adrian Chen’s wonderful New York Times Magazine feature “The Agency,” I recommend that you do so now. It’s an incredible look at the “Internet Research Agency,” which employs “hundreds of Russians to post pro-Kremlin propaganda online under fake identities, including on Twitter, in order to create the illusion of a massive army of supporters; it has often been called a “troll farm.””

Some of these employees spent their time posting in comments sections, while others went so far as to start their own blogs on seemingly non-political subjects, only to weave political messages into their content when they had an audience. But this wasn’t just about convincing Internet users to support the Kremlin’s positions. It was also about turning the Internet into a political wasteland, so that if anyone sought information that might be against Kremlin policy, they’d encounter a confusing morass and feel immediately discouraged. Chen met with a liberal campaign manager named Leonid Volkov who emphasized this point:
“The point is to spoil it, to create the atmosphere of hate, to make it so stinky that normal people won’t want to touch it,” Volkov said, when we met in the office of Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation. “You have to remember the Internet population of Russia is just over 50 percent. The rest are yet to join, and when they join it’s very important what is their first impression.” The Internet still remains the one medium where the opposition can reliably get its message out. But their message is now surrounded by so much garbage from trolls that readers can become resistant before the message even gets to them. During the protests, a favorite tactic of the opposition was making anti-Putin hashtags trend on Twitter. Today, waves of trolls and bots regularly promote pro-Putin hashtags. What once was an exhilarating act of popular defiance now feels empty. “It kind of discredited the idea of political hashtags,” says Ilya Klishin, the web editor for the independent television station TV Rain who, in 2011, created the Facebook page for the antigovernment protests.

This is exactly what’s happening with David Brock’s “Barrier Breakers 2016.” In fact, I’d be surprised if the Internet Research Agency, and perhaps Chen’s article, wasn’t a direct inspiration. This is not about providing a “a presence and space online where Clinton supporters can organize and engage with one another,” and anyone who believes that message has been fooled. This is about attacking the ability of Clinton’s enemies to organize themselves online. As Chen wrote of the Russian troll factory, “its target is nothing less than the utility of the Internet as a democratic space.”
*

*

Wizard of OZ Witch's Castle: http://youtu.be/Jtie6r27JeU/
00:03:00
Wicked Witch's Guards

Witch's Crew - The Wizard Of Oz:

http://youtu.be/ZE_jGNB0WFw/
00:01:33
Attack Of The Flying Monkeys

Cersi knows...

I fashion Hillary more as a hyena than a lioness....

Hilary needs to be stamping license plates.

You sure you don't work for the Govt? Look it doesn't matter. There's a reason Wild Bill bopped Monica Lewinski. Hillery was done with that jazz and was probably happy someone else was going eye to eye with Slick Willy's willie.

The secret service guys who write these books are usually retired. No blood no foul. It really is no surprise to anybody but folks who were born after 1993.

Retired or not, they show no sense of honor for their sworn duty. You may think that it ends with retirement, but I assure you it does not.

As for Clinton, I really can't get excited about this one way or another, even if it's true. I grew up in the era of the Nixon tapes, with racial slurs, anti-Semitic slurs and so on being normal speech patterns of the high and mighty. Trump has certainly made it clear he isn't going to show any decorum whatsoever if he wins the highest office.

So again, though I am always seriously annoyed with people who betray their sworn trust, as these alleged Secret Service gossip mongers have demonstrated, cursing at someone by a politician is no longer something to make a decision on. It can't be, because they ALL do it.

YES THEY ALL DO IT !!!

So