100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: questions that believers are afraid to answer - part 2 | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Just ignore him. He is being irrational just to get people to argue with him. I am sure that most everyone else that speaks the english language knew what you were saying. He just likes to misuse words are argue with logical fallacies to try to irritate people. It gives me something to do when I am bored though. 
just ignore me?...see "Chazster" now you are acting like a teenager...it you don't want to debate then don't but don't try to tell others what to do ..this is a forum where issues are discuss and debated if you don't wish to do that then stop coming in this thread .. Actually, ignoring someone who is trying to irritate you is a mature thing to do. Apparently you didnt read the whole statement because I said arguing in this gives me something to do when I am bored. It was implied to ignore you when you are being irrational just for the sake of irritation. no "Chazster".. the mature thing to do when someone is supposely irritating you is to find the best possible way not to be irritiated by them and the immature thing to do is blame them for your irritation when it is you yourself that is supposely bored and looking to be irritated ...all I'm saying is to debated the issues and leave out the bashing ...a mature person could .... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him. He is being irrational just to get people to argue with him. I am sure that most everyone else that speaks the english language knew what you were saying. He just likes to misuse words are argue with logical fallacies to try to irritate people. It gives me something to do when I am bored though.
just ignore me?...see "Chazster" now you are acting like a teenager...it you don't want to debate then don't but don't try to tell others what to do ..this is a forum where issues are discuss and debated if you don't wish to do that then stop coming in this thread .. Actually, ignoring someone who is trying to irritate you is a mature thing to do. Apparently you didnt read the whole statement because I said arguing in this gives me something to do when I am bored. It was implied to ignore you when you are being irrational just for the sake of irritation. I appreciate the advice chazster. I really do but I like funches and messing with him is fun. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being irritated. Its not really a debate if one persons argument doesnt make since. Also, sometimes the best way to not be irritated is by ignoring someone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him. He is being irrational just to get people to argue with him. I am sure that most everyone else that speaks the english language knew what you were saying. He just likes to misuse words are argue with logical fallacies to try to irritate people. It gives me something to do when I am bored though.
just ignore me?...see "Chazster" now you are acting like a teenager...it you don't want to debate then don't but don't try to tell others what to do ..this is a forum where issues are discuss and debated if you don't wish to do that then stop coming in this thread .. Actually, ignoring someone who is trying to irritate you is a mature thing to do. Apparently you didnt read the whole statement because I said arguing in this gives me something to do when I am bored. It was implied to ignore you when you are being irrational just for the sake of irritation. I appreciate the advice chazster. I really do but I like funches and messing with him is fun. Thats perfectly fine. I just wanted to make sure he wasnt irritating you. I take these things in a humorous manner and wasn't sure how you were. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just ignore him. He is being irrational just to get people to argue with him. I am sure that most everyone else that speaks the english language knew what you were saying. He just likes to misuse words are argue with logical fallacies to try to irritate people. It gives me something to do when I am bored though.
just ignore me?...see "Chazster" now you are acting like a teenager...it you don't want to debate then don't but don't try to tell others what to do ..this is a forum where issues are discuss and debated if you don't wish to do that then stop coming in this thread .. Actually, ignoring someone who is trying to irritate you is a mature thing to do. Apparently you didnt read the whole statement because I said arguing in this gives me something to do when I am bored. It was implied to ignore you when you are being irrational just for the sake of irritation. I appreciate the advice chazster. I really do but I like funches and messing with him is fun. Thats perfectly fine. I just wanted to make sure he wasnt irritating you. I take these things in a humorous manner and wasn't sure how you were. I know I appreciate you looking out for me. It can be a little much for some. Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was wrong for me to do that to express my point and I apologize. I honestly know you are not that cold or cruel. 
I personally thought your original reply was actually funny. I don't think you were trying to break anyones heart. 
If you can't take the heat...get out of the kitchen right? Again I apologize. no need to apologizes "imageorgiagirl"...to me it just sounds like you want to talk about your father and may still be grieving over his passing ...I like to hear about him if you have the need to talk to someone ..but I also would want to hear some good memories you have about him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It was wrong for me to do that to express my point and I apologize. I honestly know you are not that cold or cruel.
I personally thought your original reply was actually funny. I don't think you were trying to break anyones heart.
If you can't take the heat...get out of the kitchen right? Again I apologize. no need to apologizes "imageorgiagirl"...to me it just sounds like you want to talk about your father and may still be grieving over his passing ...I like to hear about him if you have the need to talk to someone ..but I also would want to hear some good memories you have about him Aaw! See what I mean...funches is really a great guy...I appreciate that very much funches! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa, Junior, you brought up Fantasy, not me.... "feisty wench" ...you brought up the a broken heart was Metaphorically and symbolically ....and when it comes to beliefs that falls within the realm of fantasy assumption and/or ignorant bliss ..that's why I said let Kat tell us which one it is since it pertains to her beliefs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one
according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being irritated. Its not really a debate if one persons argument doesnt make since. Also, sometimes the best way to not be irritated is by ignoring someone. sorry "Chazster" you are trying to debate religion in the disguise as being science and get angry when I don't do that...you're not the first christian in denial I have ran into |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being irritated. Its not really a debate if one persons argument doesnt make since. Also, sometimes the best way to not be irritated is by ignoring someone. sorry "Chazster" you are trying to debate religion in the disguise as being science and get angry when I don't do that...you're not the first christian in denial I have ran into actually I am not angry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation I explained how science cant explain it either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats perfectly fine. I just wanted to make sure he wasnt irritating you. I take these things in a humorous manner and wasn't sure how you were. geez "Chazster" maybe you should make sure you are not irritating others with all those millions of unproven scientific scientology theories you keep introducing into the debates.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No its based on physics. Matter can neither be created or destroyed (law of conservation of mass) Energy cannot be created or destroyed (first law of thermodynamics) With this laws then the matter and energy in the universe always existed hence something that was always there. Don't you know physics? Thus if you want to assume there is no God then by the laws of physics the matter and energy was just always there because it can not be created or destroyed. So where does it come from? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Chazster
on
Tue 01/29/08 04:42 PM
|
|
Thats perfectly fine. I just wanted to make sure he wasnt irritating you. I take these things in a humorous manner and wasn't sure how you were. geez "Chazster" maybe you should make sure you are not irritating others with all those millions of unproven scientific scientology theories you keep introducing into the debates.... how are any of my theories scientology, also what unproven theories do you mean? I dont believe aliens cause us to believe in religion. I am catholic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being irritated. Its not really a debate if one persons argument doesnt make since. Also, sometimes the best way to not be irritated is by ignoring someone. sorry "Chazster" you are trying to debate religion in the disguise as being science and get angry when I don't do that...you're not the first christian in denial I have ran into actually I am not angry. ok..I forgot....you're "perturbed" ..it sounds nicer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoa, Junior, you brought up Fantasy, not me.... "feisty wench" ...you brought up the a broken heart was Metaphorically and symbolically ....and when it comes to beliefs that falls within the realm of fantasy assumption and/or ignorant bliss ..that's why I said let Kat tell us which one it is since it pertains to her beliefs Enjoy your evening, funch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation I explained how science cant explain it either. again "Chazster" saying stuff and not explaining stuff...geez it's going to be hard to teach you |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wasn't being irritated. Its not really a debate if one persons argument doesnt make since. Also, sometimes the best way to not be irritated is by ignoring someone. sorry "Chazster" you are trying to debate religion in the disguise as being science and get angry when I don't do that...you're not the first christian in denial I have ran into actually I am not angry. ok..I forgot....you're "perturbed" ..it sounds nicer actually I am in a good mood. Of course how would you know since you are not me. but I am running late for class so i have to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
this thread is about questions that the religious will just close their minds to and refuse to answer or just afraid to answer because it will question their suppose faith or question that they just can't answer rationally ..here's the first one according to believers logic, God had to have created the universe because the universe couldn't have popped out of nothingness and create itself .....so therefore do the same logic apply to the creator if the answer is no then could you explain why with a rational explanation I explained how science cant explain it either. again "Chazster" saying stuff and not explaining stuff...geez it's going to be hard to teach you i did explain it in the next post.. i wanted to copy my old one. Patience is a virtue. |
|
|
|
|
