Topic: Jen Saki , busted over crack pipe! | |
---|---|
We knew it was only a matter of time that Jen Saki ( White House press secretary) would be caught lying about the contents of the safe drug kits being handed out in drug infested areas of liberal run cites. After her stating in ‘no way were crack pipes included in these kits’ . well thanks to a real news reporter that did the footwork to get to the truth he acquired a few of these kits and yes they actually did have not only crack pipes but the had meth. pipes included as well. For all these democrats that keep ranting about Trump always lying now we see it’s only a ploy to detract from the constant lies coming from this White House. BTW if you have trouble finding baby formula, go to the border cause that’s where Biden and co. are shipping pallets of it. Feed illegals and starve Americans. Great policy Joe.
|
|
|
|
I heard the jensaki's replacement was asked about the baby formula situation, in a press interview. She stated that she and biden were working 24/7, "Seven days a week on this problem."
(First indication of not knowing what's going on) Another asked her who the head of the committee was that was dealing with this situation. She gave a classic reply-"Iduhknow. But I'll ask." (Second indication of a typical biden appointee. Not knowing which end is up) |
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides.
But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. |
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides. But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. I agree, she was very good at deflecting responsibility and blaming others, and perpetuating falsehoods. She will go far in her new job as a liberal propagandist at CNN. |
|
|
|
I watch news on both sides. of a circle |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist?
|
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides. But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. I agree, she was very good at deflecting responsibility and blaming others, and perpetuating falsehoods. She will go far in her new job as a liberal propagandist at CNN. Psaki isn't going to CNN........she's going to MSNBC. Facts matter and while I think she is more interested with the Democrat Party agenda than facts it's no excuse for not stating facts about her. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Smartazzjohn
on
Sun 05/15/22 10:31 AM
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? A federal $30 million grant program was used provide funds to nonprofits and local governments to help make drug use safer for addicts. The Department of Health and Human Services, are funds for ‘smoking kits/supplies". Psaki from the podium said "crack pipes" weren't included in the "safe smoking kits". When it was found though investigative reporting that kits distributed by nonprofits DID contain "crack pipes". After the reporting was found to be credible the Biden White House basically went into damage. The Biden Administration is both denying the crack pipes would be included in the “safe smoking kits,” while also admitting they don’t really know what’s in them. The information isn't hard to find, you just have to have the desire to find the information. |
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides. But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. This! Best ever, I will miss her! |
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides. But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. This! Best ever, I will miss her! |
|
|
|
Not sure about the crack pipe incident. I must have missed that, and I watch news on both sides. But I think Jen Psaki was one of the best press secretaries we've ever had. Whether you agree with her politics or not, she's incredibly intelligent and quick on her feet. And (with a handful of exceptions) she USUALLY kept it classy. I found her to be a very refreshing change after the ones from last administration. None of them have been perfect, and they've all had their moments where they were not at their best. But I think Jen Psaki and Dana Perino (under Bush) have been the best press secretaries I can remember. I agree, she was very good at deflecting responsibility and blaming others, and perpetuating falsehoods. She will go far in her new job as a liberal propagandist at CNN. Psaki isn't going to CNN........she's going to MSNBC. Facts matter and while I think she is more interested with the Democrat Party agenda than facts it's no excuse for not stating facts about her. Oops my bad, cnn, msnbc one in the same. Liberal leaning news outlet. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bart
on
Sun 05/15/22 01:01 PM
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bart
on
Sun 05/15/22 12:55 PM
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bart
on
Sun 05/15/22 02:02 PM
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. So a business going rogue and putting something in the safe smoking kits that it’s not supposed to makes Jen Psaki a liar? Ok. got it. |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. So a business going rogue and putting something in the safe smoking kits that it’s not supposed to makes Jen Psaki a liar? Ok. got it. Apparently you don’t’ got it’. Her own denial of the facts makes her a liar. How can you not see that. |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. So a business going rogue and putting something in the safe smoking kits that it’s not supposed to makes Jen Psaki a liar? Ok. got it. It's "non-profit" organizations, NOT "rogue" COMPANIES, who are putting together the "safe smoking kits". While "safe smoking kits" are NOT all the same and NOT all of them have "crack pipes" there are SOME that do have them. If the Federal Government is going to claim that the "safe smoking kits" THEY fund with grands don't contain "crack pipes" the funding should be cut off to "non-profit" organizations that do include crack pipes in their kits, which HAS been PROVEN. |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bart
on
Mon 05/16/22 09:12 AM
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. So a business going rogue and putting something in the safe smoking kits that it’s not supposed to makes Jen Psaki a liar? Ok. got it. It's "non-profit" organizations, NOT "rogue" COMPANIES, who are putting together the "safe smoking kits". While "safe smoking kits" are NOT all the same and NOT all of them have "crack pipes" there are SOME that do have them. If the Federal Government is going to claim that the "safe smoking kits" THEY fund with grands don't contain "crack pipes" the funding should be cut off to "non-profit" organizations that do include crack pipes in their kits, which HAS been PROVEN. Or how about them doing their homework and actually know what they are funding instead of sitting back and throwing money at something and hoping it works. That is one thing that is common with democrats. They will not do their homework and understand what effect their policies will have down the road. |
|
|
|
So did this real news reporter just buy the kit(s)? Did they question the shop providing them if they received the funding from the government for the kits? If yes, did they report them for selling the pipes which is prohibited with the funding or are they just looking to be an alarmist? First off she denied there being crack pipes in the kits. After the reporter acquired one of these kits.The next day she was questioned about the kits the government sent out contained crack pipes her response was the government didn’t use tax payer $$ for the pipes. Investigation still on going to find out where the funds came from. She won’t be responsible for the lie because she doesn’t work for the White House any more. And she was correct, federal dollars are not to include crack pipes. Then who paid?.. Hunter? . Maybe he got a cut rate deal from his supplier.. They weren’t free I’m sure. So a business going rogue and putting something in the safe smoking kits that it’s not supposed to makes Jen Psaki a liar? Ok. got it. It's "non-profit" organizations, NOT "rogue" COMPANIES, who are putting together the "safe smoking kits". While "safe smoking kits" are NOT all the same and NOT all of them have "crack pipes" there are SOME that do have them. If the Federal Government is going to claim that the "safe smoking kits" THEY fund with grands don't contain "crack pipes" the funding should be cut off to "non-profit" organizations that do include crack pipes in their kits, which HAS been PROVEN. I never said “rogue” companies, I said companies going rogue, as in, doing something on their own. And I totally agree that funding should be cut in those cases. |
|
|