Semantics? Really?

It wasn't "a business going rogue" (your EXACT words originally), "companies going rogue" or "rogue companies" (my words). It WASN'T companies or a business at all......it was non-profit organizations putting the kits together, and that was the point I was making.

I KNOW what my EXACT words were and you made a point to say non-profit. So, yeah, semanatics? REALLY?

You were critical of ME saying "rogue companies" because I didn't use YOUR original phrasing while YOU didn't use your original phrasing in your criticism.

I have long had a theory that those who accuse others are guilty of their own accusations. Case in point made to justify my theory.

Hmmmm, I see clarifying my original statement, you see criticism.

There is somewhere between little and no difference between a "company going rogue", a business going rogue" or a "rogue company". Why did you even say anything about my terminology if NOT to be critical? You were being defensive of your incorrect statement rather than correcting your statement.

Semantics made it incorrect for you to criticize me to begin with. I stand by what I said. And I’m done beating this horse.

I corrected you incorrectly blaming a business or company rather than a non-profit organization. You deflected from that FACT trying to use semantics as a defense. It didn't work.
It's NOT personal with me and in case you didn't notice I corrected Bart on this same thread when he said Psaki was going to CNN because FACTS are important.
Unlike you Bart admitted he was incorrect and didn't get defensive.

No matter whether you are a Democrat, a Republican or an actual independent like myself the FACTS don't change and they ALWAYS matter.

End of report.

Rogue was the important part, nit-picking company, business, non-profit. Unnecessary.

No, the important part was INCORRECTLY saying WHO was responsible.

It's NOT nit picking to point out the FACT that it WASN'T a company or business, it's important. It's important because non-profits get government grants and that is the issue.

You continue to deflect from the issue in a futile attempt to justify saying it was a business which was incorrect. Rogue wasn't the important part....who was responsible is the important part.

Evidently you find facts unnecessary.

Straight from the grant proposal.
Eligibility
Eligible applicants are States; local, Tribal, and territorial governments; Tribal organizations; non-profit community-based organizations; and primary and behavioral health organizations