Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Post Reply

Topic: Lock Her Up, Lock Her Up.
Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Mon 02/14/22 04:26 PM Edited by Bart on Mon 02/14/22 04:29 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗

Mortman Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 1734	Mon 02/14/22 09:18 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 Maybe but Durham is a political appointee of a political appointee, and even his "report" has few details as to what he's got, and it appears that he's making up crimes. So despite the title of this thread, it's very unlikely that Hillary Clinton can be charged for unsupported charges on imaginary crimes from a political hack making partisan noise to appease Trump. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a39080236/durham-report-donald-trump-worse-than-watergate/

Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Tue 02/15/22 04:47 AM Edited by Bart on Tue 02/15/22 04:48 AM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 Maybe but Durham is a political appointee of a political appointee, and even his "report" has few details as to what he's got, and it appears that he's making up crimes. So despite the title of this thread, it's very unlikely that Hillary Clinton can be charged for unsupported charges on imaginary crimes from a political hack making partisan noise to appease Trump. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a39080236/durham-report-donald-trump-worse-than-watergate/ Making up crimes? No , that is what Obama and Clinton did. But I’m not worried cause when WE vote these corrupt democrats out and elect people of principal back into our government than you will see many of these political hacks facing serious charges.

Richard Joined Thu 08/12/21 Posts: 562	Tue 02/15/22 09:52 AM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 Maybe but Durham is a political appointee of a political appointee, and even his "report" has few details as to what he's got, and it appears that he's making up crimes. So despite the title of this thread, it's very unlikely that Hillary Clinton can be charged for unsupported charges on imaginary crimes from a political hack making partisan noise to appease Trump. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a39080236/durham-report-donald-trump-worse-than-watergate/ Making up crimes? No , that is what Obama and Clinton did. But I’m not worried cause when WE vote these corrupt democrats out and elect people of principal back into our government than you will see many of these political hacks facing serious charges. this is why idens pushing to nationalize election law under DC's control. so it will be easier to control state election out comes. which was is the exact reason, voting law was given to the states in the first place. it is also the purpose of the second ammendment. to provide controls against our government from becoming a dicttorship,.

Redrider1500 Joined Wed 04/25/18 Posts: 865	Tue 02/15/22 05:34 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something.

Mortman Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 1734	Tue 02/15/22 09:32 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 Maybe but Durham is a political appointee of a political appointee, and even his "report" has few details as to what he's got, and it appears that he's making up crimes. So despite the title of this thread, it's very unlikely that Hillary Clinton can be charged for unsupported charges on imaginary crimes from a political hack making partisan noise to appease Trump. https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/politics/a39080236/durham-report-donald-trump-worse-than-watergate/ Making up crimes? No , that is what Obama and Clinton did. But I’m not worried cause when WE vote these corrupt democrats out and elect people of principal back into our government than you will see many of these political hacks facing serious charges. Sure, but they've got nothing on Hillary. She and Bill have been in the spotlight for decades, so it's unlikely you'll find anything there. When she ran for President, she released decades of tax returns, and when subpoenaed by Congress, appeared as directed and sat to testify for eleven hours, which is a whole lot more transparent than Trump's criminal organizations. But yes, here's to the next Republican elected being a principled person!

Mortman Joined Tue 05/01/12 Posts: 1734	Tue 02/15/22 09:41 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy.

Bastet127 Joined Wed 06/12/19 Posts: 967	Wed 02/16/22 04:46 AM Edited by Bastet127 on Wed 02/16/22 04:47 AM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread.

Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Wed 02/16/22 05:29 AM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread. No crickets . We’re just letting you libs blather on about how there is no proof. John Durham is a savvy investigator. He knows how the deep state works to protect the democrats from the corruption that has taken over their party. Of course the dems are gonna act like their is no evidence while they tried to criminalize Trump with fake accusations. This is how these low life scumbags live every second of their life… so I hope Durham will wait till we have reputable representatives in office before revealing all the criminal acts taken and covered up by these scandalous democrats. It may not be immediately but heads will roll.

Bastet127 Joined Wed 06/12/19 Posts: 967	Wed 02/16/22 08:04 AM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread. No crickets . We’re just letting you libs blather on about how there is no proof. John Durham is a savvy investigator. He knows how the deep state works to protect the democrats from the corruption that has taken over their party. Of course the dems are gonna act like their is no evidence while they tried to criminalize Trump with fake accusations. This is how these low life scumbags live every second of their life… so I hope Durham will wait till we have reputable representatives in office before revealing all the criminal acts taken and covered up by these scandalous democrats. It may not be immediately but heads will roll. You think political corruption only exists in one party?

Smartazzjohn Joined Sun 06/03/07 Posts: 4844	Wed 02/16/22 10:26 AM
I don't want Hillary to found guilty of any crime by Durham. If Hilary isn't guilty of any crimes she and her supporters should welcome Durham's investigation. What I don't like seeing is any investigation that works backwards where an allegation of a crime rather than evidence of a crime is what starts an investigation. I think Hillary is being smarter with the Durham investigation than Trump was with the Mueller investigation by remaining silent. I don't like Trump saying Hillary is guilty of something that hasn't been proven as much as I didn't like Hillary, the MSM, and especially Adam Schiff who multiple times at a podium and on MSM shows said he had evidence that proved Trump was guilty of conspiracy and collusion....EVIDENCE that Schiff NEVER made public. One thing that I have found is that too often those who accuse others are guilty of their own accusations.

Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Wed 02/16/22 05:03 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread. No crickets . We’re just letting you libs blather on about how there is no proof. John Durham is a savvy investigator. He knows how the deep state works to protect the democrats from the corruption that has taken over their party. Of course the dems are gonna act like their is no evidence while they tried to criminalize Trump with fake accusations. This is how these low life scumbags live every second of their life… so I hope Durham will wait till we have reputable representatives in office before revealing all the criminal acts taken and covered up by these scandalous democrats. It may not be immediately but heads will roll. You think political corruption only exists in one party? Absolutely not, but crap we see going on now is coming from the dems. They refuse to admit the obvious and that is the fact that most dems. hate Trump so much that anything he has accomplished or anything to do with Trump is bad for our democracy or against the law. As long as that attitude exists we will never be unified.

Bastet127 Joined Wed 06/12/19 Posts: 967	Wed 02/16/22 05:13 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread. No crickets . We’re just letting you libs blather on about how there is no proof. John Durham is a savvy investigator. He knows how the deep state works to protect the democrats from the corruption that has taken over their party. Of course the dems are gonna act like their is no evidence while they tried to criminalize Trump with fake accusations. This is how these low life scumbags live every second of their life… so I hope Durham will wait till we have reputable representatives in office before revealing all the criminal acts taken and covered up by these scandalous democrats. It may not be immediately but heads will roll. You think political corruption only exists in one party? Absolutely not, but crap we see going on now is coming from the dems. They refuse to admit the obvious and that is the fact that most dems. hate Trump so much that anything he has accomplished or anything to do with Trump is bad for our democracy or against the law. As long as that attitude exists we will never be unified. Fair enough!

Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Wed 02/16/22 05:26 PM
We may be hearing that cheer more and more now that special investigator John Durham has shed a little light on his investigations… he has filled evidence that basically says Clinton framed Trump. Her campaign in 2016 paid to have Trumps private server infiltrated and hacked. Durhams investigation has spread to many with dirty hands that perpetrated this conspiracy. This is no less than espionage and hopefully maybe a few of these so-called news reporters can be held responsible for four years of collusion by the democrats and their MSM buddies. To Mort and a few others , you may want to search new media outlets cause you won’t here about it on msnbc or cnn. Nothing but crickets 🦗 It would be nice if Durham found evidence. He may have, and is just playing close to the vest. What he needs is someone to roll over on the clinton's. Much in the same way as John Dean did during Watergate. I think the dems were trying to get Paul Manaforth to do the same. But, since he probably didn't know what was going on, he wouldn't lie to keep himself out of jail. Since the dems seem to be running scared, perhaps he's found something. Yes, an actual witness or any evidence would sure help Durham's case. All he's got now is an indictment where he says the guy lied about who he represented when reporting cybersecurity concerns to the FBI. Looks so week, I bet it gets dismissed before it goes to trial. Amusingly, Trump apparently misread Durham's report (likely just heard Fox News describe it) and declared that it proves that Hillary spied on him (it doesn't) but Trump said it was "Robert" Durham, so maybe he was talking about some other guy. The crickets we hear from others is the sound of misinformation not being spread. No crickets . We’re just letting you libs blather on about how there is no proof. John Durham is a savvy investigator. He knows how the deep state works to protect the democrats from the corruption that has taken over their party. Of course the dems are gonna act like their is no evidence while they tried to criminalize Trump with fake accusations. This is how these low life scumbags live every second of their life… so I hope Durham will wait till we have reputable representatives in office before revealing all the criminal acts taken and covered up by these scandalous democrats. It may not be immediately but heads will roll. You think political corruption only exists in one party? Absolutely not, but crap we see going on now is coming from the dems. They refuse to admit the obvious and that is the fact that most dems. hate Trump so much that anything he has accomplished or anything to do with Trump is bad for our democracy or against the law. As long as that attitude exists we will never be unified. Fair enough!

Bart Joined Wed 01/06/21 Posts: 1872	Sat 05/21/22 07:08 AM Edited by Bart on Sat 05/21/22 07:10 AM
Hmmmmm, seems as if those made up crimes against Hillary and her staff aren’t so made up. While her campaign lawyer Michael Sussman is on trial for lying to the FBI about info against Trump and where he got it in 2016 and it’s credibility. During testimony Robbie Mook the Clinton campaign manager in 2016 said that Hillary agreed that the fake report that she paid to have made up should be shared with the media. That is conspiracy, it is a crime. But if you only watch the DNC news outlets you won’t see anything about this . Zero seconds of coverage on msnbc, cnn , abc. These networks are not reliable or honest to deliver the truth… Fox News will report the details of this trial if any of you dems. are interested in the truth…The years of corruption that hillary has invested in is about to catch up with her…. Hallelujah !

Poetrywriter Joined Sun 10/14/07 Posts: 22675	Sat 05/21/22 09:13 AM
The years of corruption that hillary has invested in is about to catch up with her…. Hallelujah ! Amen

Douglas Joined Thu 04/21/22 Posts: 359	Sat 05/21/22 10:19 AM
You think political corruption only exists in one party? I am glad somebody said that. If a system enables corruption, then corruption will occur. Not necessarily with every individual and certainly not in the same way but very often the person who is not corrupt when others around them are, is the person who won't be getting anywhere.

Rock Joined Thu 10/09/08 Posts: 21258	Sat 05/21/22 12:33 PM
Lock them all up.

Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Post Reply

Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Boost Your Matches & Safety Share Location!

Unable To Connect

Boost Your Matches & Safety
Share Location!