100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Long Or short distance relationship | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Short distance is best... no more than 50 miles. After that I feel its just putting too much on someones plate, and the gas prices are a factor also...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whats attract the ladies , all they care is about sex,looks,height WRONG all they care about is alpha attritubes, social value, being teased...lol Hey Cheif! This kids sounds familiar doesn;t he? (from the other thread) You got it ALL straight! Just wish the kid could learn something after being told 100X! 
All I have to say is to the ladies... "bark bark ... cheers and tickle tickle!"  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All I have to say is to the ladies... "bark bark ... cheers and tickle tickle!"
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't imagine someone preferring a long distance relationship unless they wanted to date on the side....
why else would someone prefer not to see their significant other on a regular basis? Here in Los Angeles...anything more than 20-25 miles takes over a hour to get there & the traffic can be hell....so short works best |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I did the LDR for a year and a half, then moved to Oklahoma from Kentucky to be together. What we both found was we didn't get to know each other very well doing the weekend romance thing. Even the times we spent a week together didn't help. We both were on our "best behavior" and never got to see the "day to day" person. Ultimately the relationship ended 10 months after I moved here, but should have ended much sooner!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Either. Would prefer short but long is all good too.
|
|
|
|
|
