100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Red Wave Coming? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?  
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. um, maybe because a school would have no way to know one's citizenship status since they are not ALLOWED to ask, because status is not supposed to be a prerequisite for education. smh contact numbers are also not required to provide citizenship status of the number owner, all that is required is a letter from one at the home stating that they reside with them. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Fri 11/02/18 02:32 AM
|
|
The only lies has been the deceitful Leftist At this writing, President Trump has made 4,713 false or misleading claims in 592 days "In the 592 days since he took the oath of office, President Trump has made 4,713 false or misleading claims, according to The Fact Checker's database that analyzes, categorizes and tracks every suspect statement uttered by the president". http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2018/09/04/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-days/ All False statements involving Donald Trump http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/statements/byruling/false/ Trump's demonization of the migrant caravan is nothing more than a cynical ploy for votes – but it's working According to one baseless conspiracy theory doing the rounds, George Soros is supposed to have “funded” the caravan of migrants making its way steadily up Latin America towards the United States. It hardly needs a billionaire philanthropist to finance such an arduous journey, and the idea is inherently absurd. That, however, has not stopped Donald Trump from lending it some credibility – “I wouldn’t be surprised” was his response to reporters. In fact, it would be less of a surprise to learn that Trump himself was encouraging the caravan, such is the political capital he has been able to make out of it. http://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-apos-demonisation-migrant-caravan-181348195.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welfare is encouraging the caravan. We are a country of people checking their foodstamp balance on $800 phones. Section 8 paying for whores to live in gated communities. Welfare recieptients complaining about what the govt doesn't give them while getting their nails done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. um, maybe because a school would have no way to know one's citizenship status since they are not ALLOWED to ask, because status is not supposed to be a prerequisite for education. smh contact numbers are also not required to provide citizenship status of the number owner, all that is required is a letter from one at the home stating that they reside with them. They just ask if they can speak English on at least 5 different documents. What language they speak at home. I write my phone, dad's number, and 3 other contacts for my daughter. Amazing that your child has never brought home any of these form. Liberal dodge.
Liberals are also claiming that these dreamers are gainfully employed. Ice has been to where I work and deported illegals. I've filled out the paperwork and had a background check. These illegals commit crimes using fake ss #. At what point do we consider them criminals? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
tombraider
on
Fri 11/02/18 03:29 AM
|
|
A cynical ploy for votes by Trump..Take a look Trump needed no ploy he has the masses no longer PUPPETS on his side ..You want to know what kind of ploy this is ..it's a last ditch effort by the Deep State and the DNC to take back control and bring about a New World Order.. The MOVEMENT is here the people are AWAKE and we can see..obviously more on the Republican side..Some people really have no clue as to what these elections are really about..Red and Blue..not even close..It's about the American people having control of THEIR country and not someone else's idea of a New World Order and taking away OUR country OUR culture OUR way of life just like they did to France Germany Italy Sweden..just TAKE A LOOK at these countries is this what you want.. Trump is trying to free us all from the control of the Deep State ..he's trying to give the PUPPETS we have been since the beginning the TRUTH..alot of this information can't be given out until after the mid terms..But it's coming and what you are about to hear is going to SHOCK you..as to how your lives have been controlled by some of the sickest people in the world Defend as you will..but Obama and Hillary are going DOWN for various reasons including TREASON ..The Deep State was so close to achieving their agenda and had Hag Hillary made it into office we would be well on our way to a New World Order... A New World Order of CHAOS like France Germany Italy Sweden..so close and yet now so far..and they are going to do anything to achieve their control and maintain their sick pedophile murderous ways of life..even if it means sending thousands if not millions over OUR borders..from who knows where ..as if they care..and we can see they don't..even from the MOCKINGBIRD media..if you pay attention Who do you think is behind all of this chaos Trump?Thay's what they would have you believe and if you do you would be falling right back into the world we have been confined to all this time..the World of DUPED.. They destroyed the Golden State ..and that's what they have in mind for the rest of US..WAKE UP! UNITED WE STAND ..divided we fall.. WWG1 WGA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welfare is encouraging the caravan. We are a country of people checking their foodstamp balance on $800 phones. Section 8 paying for whores to live in gated communities. Welfare recieptients complaining about what the govt doesn't give them while getting their nails done. lol what an existence. getting 75 bucks a week to feed you and your kid in return for having a phone and decent looking nails .. SIGN ME UP SCOTTY ...lol and what is with the 'whore' obsession? I dont think thats healthy. If a tenant is a good tenant, what do their sexual habits or income source have to do with anything or anyone? Federal law does NOT require everyone accept section 8. some state laws do, but it does not require every section 8 eligible person to be rented to. They get screened like ANYONE else for their history and the type of tenant they are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. um, maybe because a school would have no way to know one's citizenship status since they are not ALLOWED to ask, because status is not supposed to be a prerequisite for education. smh contact numbers are also not required to provide citizenship status of the number owner, all that is required is a letter from one at the home stating that they reside with them. They just ask if they can speak English on at least 5 different documents. What language they speak at home. I write my phone, dad's number, and 3 other contacts for my daughter. Amazing that your child has never brought home any of these form. Liberal dodge.
Liberals are also claiming that these dreamers are gainfully employed. Ice has been to where I work and deported illegals. I've filled out the paperwork and had a background check. These illegals commit crimes using fake ss #. At what point do we consider them criminals? all they have to have is ONE, they cant turn kids away for not having more. and like I said, what is there in a phone number that would reveal one's citizenship status? lying on legal documents should be a crime, and is a crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
tombraider
on
Fri 11/02/18 08:40 AM
|
|
So China now sees itself as the New World Order leaders once the new global government in in place. The ideology of a NEW WORLD ORDER.You do realize this is the whole problem with everything that is going on from the caravan who thinks its their right to clamor over our borders to trying to impeach Trump..As the bleeding hearts think we should just let them in without being checked out..well how about those close to 100 ISIS MEMBERS that Guatemala arrested..TEA THAT'S OK THEY ARE GOOD PEOPLE..or others who think we should just AID AND ABET AND EXPLOIT ILLEGALS who are BREAKING THE LAWS by coming into our country ILLEGALY So what do some stand for BREAKING THE LAWS AND INVITING ISIS IN..plain and simple..and that's the substance of their side of the debate..this is what they stand for..I'm DONE..there is no debate here.. some people really have NO CLUE as to who they are inadvertently helping to overthrow our nation.. or that this is what they are attempting to do to bring about a NEW WORLD ORDER.... DO THE RESEARCH UNITED WE STAND..divided we fall..WWG1 WGA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Easttowest72
on
Fri 11/02/18 09:21 AM
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. um, maybe because a school would have no way to know one's citizenship status since they are not ALLOWED to ask, because status is not supposed to be a prerequisite for education. smh contact numbers are also not required to provide citizenship status of the number owner, all that is required is a letter from one at the home stating that they reside with them. They just ask if they can speak English on at least 5 different documents. What language they speak at home. I write my phone, dad's number, and 3 other contacts for my daughter. Amazing that your child has never brought home any of these form. Liberal dodge.
Liberals are also claiming that these dreamers are gainfully employed. Ice has been to where I work and deported illegals. I've filled out the paperwork and had a background check. These illegals commit crimes using fake ss #. At what point do we consider them criminals? all they have to have is ONE, they cant turn kids away for not having more. and like I said, what is there in a phone number that would reveal one's citizenship status? lying on legal documents should be a crime, and is a crime. My grandson was 3 weeks late starting school because he was waiting on his birth certificate in the mail. American citizens are tired of the liberal b.s. The whores wouldn't get section 8 if they weren't screwing men that wanted them for nothing more. Then the govt has those illegitimate kids to support until they are 18. That doesn't make them good tenants. They are crappy human beings and most care more about a man than their kids. The man who knocks then up is sleeping in a home paid for by tax payers and eating the food from the foodstamps and then into next baby mama. They often have 5 or 6 baby mama's to run between...when they aren't in jail. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We aren't talking about average size of families on welfare. We are talking about illegals getting on welfare. Stick to the subject instead of the usual liberal dodge. when 'liberal dodge' means logic, Im not sure how to not use the 'usual'....lol. case in point: when people are 'undocumented', they have to struggle in America to go undetected. they take jobs under the table. they are NOT eligible for means tested 'welfare'. The idea that in that circumstance they would be just 'popping out dependents' to their household is not just an illogical assumption but one that has no factual basis to support it. How did the dreamers get educated if they were in hiding?
One more time, they spread their damn legs and pop out an anchor baby and then head straight to the welfare office. That's why Trump wants to end illegals popping out citizen. They are using their babies as a check. They've learned well from the undesirables in America and sent word to their families. Look at all that's on their way. one more time, logic is our friend. Unlike means tested programs, the SUPREME COURT ruled that all children regardless of citizenship status have a right to an education. That is how 'dreamers' get educated. one more time, the ridiculously insulting stereotypes about them 'popping out' anchor babies to get on welfare has no basis in fact or evidence. here is a link to the ACTUAL CASE that decided this point : http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/457/202.html your welcome. Try using logic. They can't possibly be in hiding if they signed their kids up for school. Address, phone #. Now liberals want to claim these dreamers are gainfully employed. The ones I saw interviewed have siblings who were born on tax payers dime. um, maybe because a school would have no way to know one's citizenship status since they are not ALLOWED to ask, because status is not supposed to be a prerequisite for education. smh contact numbers are also not required to provide citizenship status of the number owner, all that is required is a letter from one at the home stating that they reside with them. They just ask if they can speak English on at least 5 different documents. What language they speak at home. I write my phone, dad's number, and 3 other contacts for my daughter. Amazing that your child has never brought home any of these form. Liberal dodge.
Liberals are also claiming that these dreamers are gainfully employed. Ice has been to where I work and deported illegals. I've filled out the paperwork and had a background check. These illegals commit crimes using fake ss #. At what point do we consider them criminals? all they have to have is ONE, they cant turn kids away for not having more. and like I said, what is there in a phone number that would reveal one's citizenship status? lying on legal documents should be a crime, and is a crime. My grandson was 3 weeks late starting school because he was waiting on his birth certificate in the mail. American citizens are tired of the liberal b.s. The whores wouldn't get section 8 if they weren't screwing men that wanted them for nothing more. Then the govt has those illegitimate kids to support until they are 18. That doesn't make them good tenants. They are crappy human beings and most care more about a man than their kids. The man who knocks then up is sleeping in a home paid for by tax payers and eating the food from the foodstamps and then into next baby mama. They often have 5 or 6 baby mama's to run between...when they aren't in jail. the hatefulness, pettiness, and bigotry is just BEYOND there is no legal requirement to rent to 'crappy' tenants, regardless of their financial source or sexual habits ...lol but for those interested in facts and logic, here is a board of education link to what is required in the US for public school attendance http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2014/05/08/plylerfact.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bigotry? A person's source of income says a lot about them. Kids not knowing who their dad is because mom has a parade of men but no jobs, says a lot about a person. Having tax payers to pay your rent, doesn't make you a good tenant. Trust me, landlords know the kids will be destroying the property while mom is piled up in bed with whatever man is available that day.
Funny thing is these types wonder why non of those men want to marry them. They think the govt supporting them is independence. The men know they want to go from one source of support to another, with no plans for a job or future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 11/02/18 10:24 AM
|
|
Bigotry? A person's source of income says a lot about them. Kids not knowing who their dad is because mom has a parade of men but no jobs, says a lot about a person. Having tax payers to pay your rent, doesn't make you a good tenant. Trust me, landlords know the kids will be destroying the property while mom is piled up in bed with whatever man is available that day. Funny thing is these types wonder why non of those men want to marry them. They think the govt supporting them is independence. The men know they want to go from one source of support to another, with no plans for a job or future. bigotry: obstinate or intolerant devotion to one's own opinions and prejudices : the state of mind of a bigot obstinate: stubbornly adhering to an opinion, purpose, or course in spite of reason, arguments, or persuasion a person's source of income says alot about what employment was available in a certain area or region which that person could take advantage of. not knowing who the baby's father is something OTHER than the original rhetoric about 'popping out kids' or being a 'whore' merely because the father decided to leave. Not to mention, it is not information one lists on a rental application. being a good tenant is HAVING the rent and taking care of your property and being a good neighbor, who is paying it is NOT,, the renters concern if they get it on time and in full, so long as the source is not illegal unless said renter is a busy body who likes to know and judge everyone else's personal business UNRELATED to their rental status and payments. If landlords have a record of tenancy they can do a search and know if the kids are the type to 'tear things up', if there are evictions, et cetera, and they can rate the potential tenant by the SAME STANDARD of 'good tenant' as anyone else. Men leave for many reasons, its very presumptous to act like one knows what that reason has been for someone else. Dont you have ex's? Should people presume why they left you? RE: welfare (for those who read) http://groundswell.org/7-lies-about-welfare-that-many-people-believe-are-fact/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maxine Waters charged on three counts..one count of corruption.. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Easttowest72
on
Fri 11/02/18 10:48 AM
|
|
The men leave from where? Most of these types get pregnant while living with grandma. They move into section 8 when they have so many kids that grandma puts them out.
I just paid an extra $1000 principal payment toward my mortgage this morning. I filed for divorce. My ex would come walking through my house when he wasn't even supposed to be in the county. When you are a decent person, getting a divorce isn't as easy as those who are always needing something. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Charles1962150
on
Fri 11/02/18 11:10 AM
|
|
U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters charged with 3 ethics violations — back in 2010
"Internet posts claiming that U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., is facing corruption charges neglects to tell readers the incident is seven years old and that the charges were dropped". http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2017/nov/02/blog-posting/us-rep-maxine-waters-charged-3-ethics-violations-b/ Men leave for many reasons, its very presumptous to act like one knows what that reason has been for someone else. Dont you have ex's? Should people presume why they left you?
Sometimes, If you listen to what comes out of a person's mouth, You will get a pretty good idea why people leave them. Racist bigotry is enough to run off most anyone. Unless they are just alike. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The men leave from where? Most of these types get pregnant while living with grandma. They move into section 8 when they have so many kids that grandma puts them out. I just paid an extra $1000 principal payment toward my mortgage this morning. I filed for divorce. My ex would come walking through my house when he wasn't even supposed to be in the county. When you are a decent person, getting a divorce isn't as easy as those who are always needing something. hmm, so amongst the other stereotypes and myths, people actually believe pregnancy can only happen in ones 'own' home? ... interesting ... and sad. must be a strain for such 'decent' women to be left by deadbeats, compared to those who were just 'whores' to begin with ...lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point was these women weren't in a serious enough relationship for the man to leave. Most don't get childsport or even know who dad is. They don't have the mentality to properly raise a child but having a bunch of them. They want gov't support and it should come with condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point was these women weren't in a serious enough relationship for the man to leave. Most don't get childsport or even know who dad is. They don't have the mentality to properly raise a child but having a bunch of them. They want gov't support and it should come with condition. How would you know the status of other people's relationships? lol. good grief. by the way, assistance does have conditions attached. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The judge sets child support when people divorce. The state can't set child support when the mother doesn't know who the dad is or his DNA test revealed he is not the father, or she doesn't know enough about him to have an address or phone number. By conditions, I don't mean she won't work. I mean at baby #2 being born on welfare, the tubes get tied.
|
|
|
|
|
