Topic: TO BE RID OF A PRESIDENT....
SeminoleDavid's photo
Sun 03/10/19 11:42 AM
iT'S A JOKE. THE ECONOMY HAS NEVER BEEN BETTER, THANKS TO DEREGULATION AND SETTING our previous trading bully NATIONS ON AN EVEN KEEL. THE LEFT TRULY HATES AMERICA.........THEY HAVE NOW GONE TO ALLOWING BABIES TO BE BORN, AND THEN OKAYING MURDER RIGHT BEFORE THEIR EYES. The LEFT IS delusional and should be DEPORTED TO THE LAND OF MISFIT MORONS!

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 11:52 AM



There ya golaugh

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:04 PM





Must be on both ends then, seeing the surety of those insisting Hilary or Obama have committed crimes, with not only no DIRECT indictments, but none of those around them other, unlike number 45, who, in spite of allegedly qualify by being such a great businessman seems to really have a knack for surrounding himself with INDICTED individuals.




And he(dingbat donald) only surrounds himself with the best and smartest people .
Manafort is just short of going down for treason yet 45 thinks its unfortunate what happened to such a good man laugh .
They seem to all forget July 27 2016 .....
"RUSSIA IF YOUR LISTENING"
Wont be long before all these wrongs are corrected bigsmile


Manafort accused of sharing 2016 election data with Russians.

"Former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort shared polling data during the 2016 presidential campaign with a business associate accused of having ties to Russian intelligence, and prosecutors say he lied to them about it, according to a court filing".
Manafort as chairman of the campaign shared confidential polling data with Russian government operatives. Just that alone is collusion. Mueller is investigating conspiracies, even though Manafort wasn't tried for in this hearing. collusion, established.


"Collusion: Trump's arrangement that included Don Junior meeting with an agent of the Russian government at Trump Tower, the obtaining of hacked Russian military information on the DNC Chair and Democratic candidate for President, and the application of that information to influence the outcome of the Presidential election.

And now Collusion 2, information courtesy of Erik Prince: Trump's arrangement that included Don meeting at Trump Tower with emissaries of the Saudi Arabian and UAE governments, a deal for political favors in exchange for unreported campaign finance payments, and the application of those payments to influence the outcome of the Presidential election.


You either see it, or you don't. Either way, it's no skin off my nose. Many people are blind to what's right in front of them. All I know, it's quite possible that Trump will find a way to squeak out of this. Either way, collusion has already been shown. Mueller knows it. And has been knowing it. Republicans around Trump know it. The part that makes no sense, why they refuse to acknowledge it? and why they keep trying to protect him.

lol, brick wall my friend. Tunnelvision hides anything but making america great and watchin

g for fake news and rabbit holes.


More like stupid ignorance and fools holes.



If only they would see the writing on the wall whoa


It really doesn't matter. And I don't care. They only make up around 31% of the country. Maybe even a little less by now. They are a minority. That's why I keep saying it's best to just ignore them.


I also found this. The way this reads Trump's true supporters are really somewhere around the 20% mark. So, roughly 80% of the country as a whole doesn't back Trump. You can see some proof of that right here on this thread. Which tells me that many don't follow Trump.

They come here and read what I find and maybe learn a little something. And for the comic relief others provide.

How many Americans actually support Trump?

At this writing,

"If you take CNN's approval rating number and party identification and break it up into segments of the total population, only 20% of the US population over the age of 18 are Republicans who approve of Trump".

Not all Trump supporters are Republicans, which is why his approval rating has been in the mid-30s rather than the mid-20s. Fourteen percent of people in the US are independents who approve of Trump and just 2% are Democrats who approve of him.

http://www.cnn.com/2018/09/26/politics/actual-trump-support/index.html


I wonder how many of that 14% approve of Trump now?


DONALD TRUMP’S APPROVAL DROPS AMONG INDEPENDENTS AS THEY BLAME HIM FOR GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN: POLL

Trump is becoming less popular among independents as more of them blame him for the partial government shutdown, a new poll shows.

Close to half, 46 percent, of registered voters who consider themselves political independents in a Hill-HarrisX survey released Tuesday said Trump and GOP members in Congress are the primary ones responsible for the shutdown, a 7-point increase from a survey conducted in the last two days of December. Only 17 percent of independents in the latest survey blamed Democrats in Congress, a 1 percent jump from the earlier survey and the remaining 35 percent blamed both Trump and Republicans as well as Democrats".

http://www.newsweek.com/donald-trumps-approval-drops-among-independents-they-blame-him-government-1301011


Trump supporters are a minority. No way of really knowing the exact percentage. But in the whole picture, they are somewhere around the 20% mark.



Sounds like somebody is a little butthurt that dingbat donald is on his last leg rofl

SeminoleDavid's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:04 PM
Apparently you have not heard Adam Schiff in a fake phone call thinking he had a video and proof of a fake story about Trump hiring prostitutes to urinate on a bed where Obama stayed. This is unbelievable. In more than 2.5 years of a total investigation....there REMAINS NOT A SCINTILLA OF EVIDENCE REGARDING RUSSIAN COLLUSION BETWEEN TRUMP/CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA.....NOT A SCINTILLA......YOU WOULD THINK IN 2.5 YEARS, THE PROOF WOULD BE THERE......BESIDES ALL OF THAT....THE FAKE, PHONY DOSSIER WAS PAID FOR BY HITLERY'S OWN CAMPAIGN......THAT PART IS IRREFUTABLE.....TRY DELETING 3 EMAILS THE COURT DEMANDS OF YOU AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS TO YOU IN COURT? HITLERY DELETED 30,000 EMAILS OF "CHELSEA WEDDING PLANS".....AND "EMAILS TO BILL" EVEN THOUGH BILLIE BOB THE HILLBILLY REDNECK FROM ARKANSAS WHO ADMITTED LAYING DOWN ASTROTURF IN HIS PICKUP TRUCK BECAUSE IT HELPED HIM SCORE MORE WITH THE WOMEN, BY HIS OWN ADMISSION SAID HE DOES NOT EVEN KNOW HOW TO TURN on a COMPUTER. Comey rights an exoneration speech 6 WEEKS BEFORE HE EVER EVEN INTERVIEWED HER AND YOU AND YOUR ILK THINK THE INVESTIGATION IS LEGIT AND ON THE UP-AND UP? ROTF......

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:12 PM
Edited by hardBNhard on Sun 03/10/19 12:13 PM
Propaganda perpetuated via conspiracy theorist with absolutly no proof !
Remember this ?
July27 2016
RUSSIAN IF YOUR LISTENING ! rofl
But thank you for visiting bigsmile
You are caller#6373

no photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:18 PM
More proof of collusion between the Trump campaign and a foreign government.


Ex-Mercenary CEO Erik Prince Admits To Trump Tower Meet With Don Jr., Saudi Emissary



"Erik Prince, former head of mercenary business Blackwater, revealed in a bombshell interview Friday that he attended a meeting in Trump Tower with Donald Trump Jr. and a representative of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to discuss “Iran policy” during the presidential campaign.

The interview marked the first time Prince has publicly acknowledged such a meeting. Prince said in congressional testimony in 2017 that he had no “official” or “unofficial” role in the campaign — other than a “yard sign” and writing “papers” — according to the transcript of his testimony before the House intelligence committee. Nor did he mention the meeting in his testimony, according to transcripts.

The New York Times reported last year that Prince organized the 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Donald Trump’s eldest son and Lebanese-American businessman George Nader. Nader revealed at the meeting that the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia wanted to aid Trump in his bid for the presidency, according to the newspaper".

http://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/ex-mercenary-ceo-erik-prince-074920681.html

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:46 PM

More proof of collusion between the Trump campaign and a foreign government.


Ex-Mercenary CEO Erik Prince Admits To Trump Tower Meet With Don Jr., Saudi Emissary



"Erik Prince, former head of mercenary business Blackwater, revealed in a bombshell interview Friday that he attended a meeting in Trump Tower with Donald Trump Jr. and a representative of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to discuss “Iran policy” during the presidential campaign.

The interview marked the first time Prince has publicly acknowledged such a meeting. Prince said in congressional testimony in 2017 that he had no “official” or “unofficial” role in the campaign — other than a “yard sign” and writing “papers” — according to the transcript of his testimony before the House intelligence committee. Nor did he mention the meeting in his testimony, according to transcripts.

The New York Times reported last year that Prince organized the 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Donald Trump’s eldest son and Lebanese-American businessman George Nader. Nader revealed at the meeting that the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia wanted to aid Trump in his bid for the presidency, according to the newspaper".

http://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/ex-mercenary-ceo-erik-prince-074920681.html


And dont forget Kushner's little meetings with the Saudi's . Reasons for his in-eligibility to get a security clearence . The whole family is corrupt . LOCK EM ALL UP laugh

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:47 PM
Edited by hardBNhard on Sun 03/10/19 12:51 PM
oops . Double Post

SeminoleDavid's photo
Sun 03/10/19 12:51 PM
ONCE AGAIN, YOU ARE TRYING SO HARD....YOU KEEP SHOOTING BLANKS.......I CAN "WANT TO AID THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY TO VICTORY IN THE UK......HOW DOES THAT EQUATE TO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA? ARE YOU SERIOUS?

THE BUFFOON NADLER SAID HE WANTS TO CHARGE TRUMP WITH "OBSTRUCTION" BECAUSE HE HAS SAID "WITCH-HUNT" 1500 TIMES.......ARE YOU FRICKIN SERIOUS? ROTF........


TRUE OR FALSE.....THE DOSSIER WAS PAID FOR BY THE DNC/HITLERY'S CAMPAIGN? TRUE OR FALSE?



hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 01:08 PM
Careful now ! Your going to burn out your "ALL CAPS" buttonlaugh

msharmony's photo
Sun 03/10/19 01:09 PM
True or false, there have been 19 indictments of people around Trump so far? Great businessmen dont know who they are doing business with or what business is done under their nose? Not likely.


True or false, there is more damning evidence associating crimes and criminals around Trump, than there is or will be around Hilary or OBama, but extremists will continue their conspiracy theory warnings about how terrible everyone BUT Trump is or would be?

no photo
Sun 03/10/19 02:14 PM
Edited by Charles1962150 on Sun 03/10/19 02:37 PM
There is no yes or no. If you did a little more reading and a little less yelling you might know this.

Allegations That Clinton Campaign Funded Trump-Russia Research Still Pending At Now-Closed FEC

"A complaint that alleges Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee violated campaign finance law by steering money for opposition research through a law firm is still pending with the Federal Election Commission.

The FEC, which is not operating during the government shutdown, has yet to rule on the complaint made by Campaign Legal Center (CLC) that both organizations funneled the cash to Fusion GPS, the group behind a dossier compiled by Christopher Steele – the so-called "Steele dossier".

This link may have to be cop&paste before it will work.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/legalnewsline/2019/01/15/allegations-that-clinton-campaign-funded-trump-russia-research-still-pending-at-now-closed-fec/#1a9e33543d99

Despite Trump's denials, parts of Steele dossier prove true


http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2019/01/07/lead-jim-sciutto-dnt-dossier-two-years-later-jake-tapper.cnn


I'm sure there are parts of this that will never see the light of day. But still, in the end, it shows how corrupt Trump and the people around him are.

This just shows how dumb this man is. He's not going to get 1.5 billion. So let's go ahead and ask for 8.6 billion and see if he can get that. I've never seen a president so determined to get into the taxpayer's pocketbook. Like it's his own personal piggy bank. Some more of that "communist" flavor.

Exclusive: In budget, Trump to ask Congress for $8.6 billion for border wall

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump on Monday will ask the U.S. Congress for an additional $8.6 billion to help pay for his promised wall on the U.S-Mexico border to combat illegal immigration and drug trafficking, officials familiar with his 2020 budget request told Reuters.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-budget-wall-exclusive/exclusive-in-budget-trump-to-ask-congress-for-86-billion-for-border-wall-idUSKBN1QR0CW


If you look at the latest polling on this wall funding. It shows that over 60% of Americans are against the funding. Trump's immigration proposals are also underwater including DACA. This is a losing issue for Republicans generally right now. The question will be how will the public feel about this in October and into 2020?

Pure politics. In his meeting with Pelosi and Schumer, Trump admitted he did not have the votes for funding his wall. Now, he comes back with an even larger request. So, what has changed? Nothing. His request will be denied and then he will claim that Democrats are in favor of "open borders" - clearly confusing a wall with a comprehensive overhaul of immigration policy and actual border security. His followers will, of course, believe everything he says (because Trump would NEVER lie - right?).

In March 2017 a report from Trump's own DHS showed that all 8 prototype walls were easily breached. At a cost of up to $70 billion and $150 million in yearly maintenance for something that can be easily breached? The report also stated there are areas along the border where building a wall is impossible.

Test of steel prototype for border wall showed it could be sawed through

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/test-steel-prototype-border-wall-showed-it-could-be-sawed-n956856






















Toodygirl5's photo
Sun 03/10/19 02:31 PM

iT'S A JOKE. THE ECONOMY HAS NEVER BEEN BETTER, THANKS TO DEREGULATION AND SETTING our previous trading bully NATIONS ON AN EVEN KEEL. THE LEFT TRULY HATES AMERICA.........THEY HAVE NOW GONE TO ALLOWING BABIES TO BE BORN, AND THEN OKAYING MURDER RIGHT BEFORE THEIR EYES. The LEFT IS delusional and should be DEPORTED TO THE LAND OF MISFIT MORONS!



:thumbsup:

no photo
Sun 03/10/19 03:02 PM

iT'S A JOKE. THE ECONOMY HAS NEVER BEEN BETTER, THANKS TO DEREGULATION AND SETTING our previous trading bully NATIONS ON AN EVEN KEEL. THE LEFT TRULY HATES AMERICA.........THEY HAVE NOW GONE TO ALLOWING BABIES TO BE BORN, AND THEN OKAYING MURDER RIGHT BEFORE THEIR EYES. The LEFT IS delusional and should be DEPORTED TO THE LAND OF MISFIT MORONS!


This statement and statements like it only prove one thing, How morally bankrupt the right has become. The economy is already showing signs of failing. Deregulation only leads to a failing economy. It always has. Look at the mess Reagan made through his deregulation.

The right, they seem to think they can play God. They want to push there beliefs on everyone else. As far as "dead babies" go, it's not between you, her and God. It's for her to answer. It's between HER and God. The right needs to butt out of Gods business. If they would, we might not have such a corrupt president in office now.

You want to talk about delusions, Trump supporters are the most delusional of them all. All they can talk about is the extra money Trump has put in their pockets. They are so delusional that they can't see they are being robbed. Not only of there money. But also of there morality. You are bought and paid for.

They hoot and holler about dead babies. But they will turn right around and say that a child being turned away at the border and sent back to a place where the child will most likely be sold into sex slavery and die one of the worst deaths a child can die at the hands of some pervert, Is OK.

That is the real sick minded. Not only is it sick minded, but it's also being a hypocrite. And you dare call the kettle black.

FeelYoung's photo
Sun 03/10/19 03:08 PM
the topic is To Be Rid of a President.... and the topic does NOT say how. There are many ways. Dems can talk all they want, but if they are aiming (no pun intended) for assassination, that is treason. As far as I am concerned, I believe their character assassination is treasonous also. Most of them are truly tunnel vision persons who cannot think for themselves. i.e. all the old men standing behind AOC and stupidly nodding their heads. They don't care about their own families, their grandchildren, not even the honor of the country. Even Pelosi was smart enough to say the New Green Deal would cost too much money. Hopefully the american public will wake up before the elections and get rid of some of the Dems who should be term limited Its ridiculous to have 80 year olds running our country.

msharmony's photo
Sun 03/10/19 03:28 PM

the topic is To Be Rid of a President.... and the topic does NOT say how. There are many ways. Dems can talk all they want, but if they are aiming (no pun intended) for assassination, that is treason. As far as I am concerned, I believe their character assassination is treasonous also. Most of them are truly tunnel vision persons who cannot think for themselves. i.e. all the old men standing behind AOC and stupidly nodding their heads. They don't care about their own families, their grandchildren, not even the honor of the country. Even Pelosi was smart enough to say the New Green Deal would cost too much money. Hopefully the american public will wake up before the elections and get rid of some of the Dems who should be term limited Its ridiculous to have 80 year olds running our country.


I agree. Regardless of party, aiming for assassination of a POTUS is treason. Did the secret service who allowed imposters into a presidential function convicted of treason? Its probably much harder to PROVE than to claim the 'aim' of an action in terms of treason. it is probably hard to discern Treason from plain ignorance or incompetence. Especially, since 2016.

I dont know if a nod of a head implies the level of care one has for their family, anymore than the willingness to change your child's diaper.

I also agree, regardless of party, with term limits. I would say max of 12 years.

I also agree there should be a max of age to serve, not to exceed the age of retirement for other Americans, which is currently 67. Pelosi will be 79, well past retirement age, and it may just be 'ridiculous' to have 70 somethings running the country (Trump is 72, by the way)


Toodygirl5's photo
Sun 03/10/19 03:35 PM

Trump's fate in 2020 depends on the economy





Actually it depends on if he even runs for second term.

Also what Candidate the Demos have this time around.

Go TRUMP :sunglasses:

msharmony's photo
Sun 03/10/19 03:56 PM
Edited by msharmony on Sun 03/10/19 04:12 PM
Countries are not businesses. They dont distribute 'profits' to anyone.

So I am curious how one is defining a country that has 'prosperity'? I venture to guess that most of the criteria people come up with actually ARE present in countries with higher taxes (and lower taxes) since many factors impact an economy besides JUST tax or debt.


Children are resilient and desperate parents have to choose the worse of two evils sometimes. Parents who want better than death or oppression for their kids MIGHT set out on a journey, however many miles, to give them a better shot.

I do not leave my doors unlocked either. But I also, when a visitor is at the door, do not determine who can come in by what finances they have. Borders and front doors, despite the continued popular analogy, are entirely different things.


And though I do not agree with abortion. I do find the confusion/debate about a woman's body to be more compelling than an argument that an individual can OWN another individual who is already vital and operating on their own. I think that analogy also fails.



FeelYoung's photo
Sun 03/10/19 04:55 PM
the dems will have so many candidates it will look like the Republican 2016. Of course, for US, the best man won. Wonder if it will happen that way for the Dems.

hardBNhard's photo
Sun 03/10/19 05:21 PM


the topic is To Be Rid of a President.... and the topic does NOT say how. There are many ways. Dems can talk all they want, but if they are aiming (no pun intended) for assassination, that is treason. As far as I am concerned, I believe their character assassination is treasonous also. Most of them are truly tunnel vision persons who cannot think for themselves. i.e. all the old men standing behind AOC and stupidly nodding their heads. They don't care about their own families, their grandchildren, not even the honor of the country. Even Pelosi was smart enough to say the New Green Deal would cost too much money. Hopefully the american public will wake up before the elections and get rid of some of the Dems who should be term limited Its ridiculous to have 80 year olds running our country.


I agree. Regardless of party, aiming for assassination of a POTUS is treason. Did the secret service who allowed imposters into a presidential function convicted of treason? Its probably much harder to PROVE than to claim the 'aim' of an action in terms of treason. it is probably hard to discern Treason from plain ignorance or incompetence. Especially, since 2016.

I dont know if a nod of a head implies the level of care one has for their family, anymore than the willingness to change your child's diaper.

I also agree, regardless of party, with term limits. I would say max of 12 years.

I also agree there should be a max of age to serve, not to exceed the age of retirement for other Americans, which is currently 67. Pelosi will be 79, well past retirement age, and it may just be 'ridiculous' to have 70 somethings running the country (Trump is 72, by the way)



I agree:wink: :thumbsup: