Topic: Democrats Needing Cheese With Their Whine? | |
---|---|
Why only 30%, John?
It can go higher. |
|
|
|
Why only 30%, John? It can go higher. I just meant those 4 states would be a lock on 30% of the population You're right, it would be higher but 30% is good head start? |
|
|
|
well, maybe they can start on something else first.. for practice
How does the "8 commandments" sound?? Mmmm |
|
|
|
Why only 30%, John? It can go higher. I just meant those 4 states would be a lock on 30% of the population You're right, it would be higher but 30% is good head start? I understand what you mean...could be, eh...All I know so far, is that the people in general and future generations will suffer in the end taking in consideration the situation. The way it is right now. But there's always hope. Hope for the better. I hope so. |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 11/17/16 05:35 PM
|
|
if you do away with electoral college those that live in cities will control the country thus rural America will lose their rights and the cohtry would be run by a few major populated areas thus the college gives the entire country a voice which is the idea behind going to s new land so you have a voice and are not ruled by those in the castle [city] the control will go to the majority,,wherever they have lived which is also not perfect, but more 'united' that is the misconception of this country it is not a democracy it is a republic the majority dous not rule ---- this is the united states not the biggest states each state gets electors passed on the poulation of that state larger states have more electors but larger state do not get to elect the leader of the united states ALL states elect the leader of the united states i think it was Jefferson [but not positive] that said a democracy isbthe wants of the majority trambling the rights of the minorty that is why this REPUBLIC HAS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE ooppp hit cap key lol and a congress it is not more united to give control to the few states united is all states having control |
|
|
|
if you do away with electoral college those that live in cities will control the country thus rural America will lose their rights and the cohtry would be run by a few major populated areas thus the college gives the entire country a voice which is the idea behind going to s new land so you have a voice and are not ruled by those in the castle [city] the control will go to the majority,,wherever they have lived which is also not perfect, but more 'united' that is the misconception of this country it is not a democracy it is a republic the majority dous not rule ---- this is the united states not the biggest states each state gets electors passed on the poulation of that state larger states have more electors but larger state do not get to elect the leader of the united states ALL states elect the leader of the united states i think it was Jefferson [but not positive] that said a democracy isbthe wants of the majority trambling the rights of the minorty that is why this REPUBLIC HAS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE ooppp hit cap key lol and a congress it is not more united to give control to the few states united is all states having control what is is not what always has to be thats why we have something called 'history' |
|
|
|
if you do away with electoral college those that live in cities will control the country thus rural America will lose their rights and the cohtry would be run by a few major populated areas thus the college gives the entire country a voice which is the idea behind going to s new land so you have a voice and are not ruled by those in the castle [city] the control will go to the majority,,wherever they have lived which is also not perfect, but more 'united' that is the misconception of this country it is not a democracy it is a republic the majority dous not rule ---- this is the united states not the biggest states each state gets electors passed on the poulation of that state larger states have more electors but larger state do not get to elect the leader of the united states ALL states elect the leader of the united states i think it was Jefferson [but not positive] that said a democracy isbthe wants of the majority trambling the rights of the minorty that is why this REPUBLIC HAS THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE ooppp hit cap key lol and a congress it is not more united to give control to the few states united is all states having control what is is not what always has to be thats why we have something called 'history' i doubt enough states will sign up for dumping electoral college but ? do i no |
|
|
|
its a start to considering it,,,,,,after Trump,, who knows what may be changed
|
|
|
|
its a start to considering it,,,,,,after Trump,, who knows what may be changed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After Tuesday's election, popular vote tallies show Clinton got 59.8 million votes while Donald Trump got 59.6 million votes, with some ballots still left to be counted. If that lead holds up, Clinton will become the fifth person to lose strictly as a result of the Electoral College.
Listed below are the four previous times such an occurrence has happened. In 1824, Andrew Jackson lost the election to John Quincy Adams despite beating Adams by 38,221 votes nationwide. In 1876, Samuel Tilden lost to Rutherford Hayes despite beating Hayes by 252,666 votes nationwide. In 1888, Grover Cleveland lost to Benjamin Harrison despite beating Harrison by 94,530 votes nationwide. In 2000, Al Gore lost to George W. Bush despite beating Bush by 543,816 votes nationwide. http://www.cd1059.com/news/national/hillary-clinton-joins-list-of-presidential-losers-who-won-popular-vote by the way thats 200,000 not 2 million per this article just some info |
|
|
|
good info, that was as of nov 9
as of nov 16th the numbers are: trump: 61.607,950 clinton: 63.045,266 http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174 |
|
|
|
good info, that was as of nov 9 as of nov 16th the numbers are: trump: 61.607,950 clinton: 63.045,266 http://cookpolitical.com/story/10174 thx |
|
|
|
yw
|
|
|
|
|
|
|