I know that the thrust of this thread is the usual biased political attacks on Clinton. Same repeated exaggerations and false statements and self-serving blather, not worth rehashing.

As for the title question itself, ignoring the anti-Hillary political intention of it, yes there have been many Presidential candidates, and a number of elected Presidents, who had far less preparation, experience, education, and functional competence as a political leader than Mrs Clinton.

George W. Bush had less preparation and experience before becoming President. George H.W. Bush had more. Reagan had much less. Carter had less. Nixon had more. Kennedy had less. Johnson had about the same.

I could go on, but since the point of the thread is the usual "lets have fun pretending that we know that Clinton is bad," that's plenty.

What makes a good President, or a good anything, isn't just what shows up on a resume. Carter had an excellent resume, with military experience, advanced education, and plenty of government experience, but was entirely unprepared to deal with the viciousness of the insiders of the national government at the time he was elected. Abraham Lincoln had a fairly weak resume, but did fairly well at some of the worst times the country went through.

Lobbying AKA influence peddling

Pretty much illegal everywhere else but not in America!

It's strongly encouraged here

Trump.
Too easy.

you libs are in for a surprise come November...hahahahaha ... i can't wait for trump to be prez! first order of business - undo all the dumbazzness the libtards did...