BRUSSELS CHIEF UNVEILS EUROPE'S MASTER PLAN TO ENCOURAGE MORE MIGRATION

http://youtu.be/lcdJcnj0wQQ/
03:42
NextNewsNetwork

Is he mad? Brussels chief unveils EU master plan to encourage MORE economic migration
BRUSSELS' migration chief has tonight unveiled jawdropping plans to encourage MORE economic migration to the continent despite the ongoing refugee crisis.



Dmitris Avramopoulos urged EU nations to open up their borders

Dimitris Avramopoulos urged EU nations to open up their borders to more migrants despite the current chaos, which has seen millions of migrants force their way across Europe.

Even though the crisis has pushed the Schengen free movement zone to breaking point and seen asylum applications rocket Brussels is devising plans to take in MORE people.

And the shock plans could have a direct impact on Britain, which may end up being forced to take in its share of the new arrivals.

Today, official recommendations from the EU Commission were revealed showing how bureaucrats want to bring skilled migrants through borders, whilst making member states take set amounts of people.

According to the bombshell document the Dublin Regulation, which allows Britain to send refugees back to the country they first registered in, could also be scrapped.

The report sent to the European Parliament today admits the migrant crisis which has engulfed the main bloc has exposed 'weaknesses' in the current Common European Asylum System.

This has led to a 'disproportionate amount' of refugees arriving certain countries - and Europe wants that to change.

Camps are full with migrants hoping to reach Europe

Dimitris Avramopoulos is head of the commission which has thought up the new plans

The distribution of asylum seekers among Member States based on a distribution key would in parallel ensure a fair sharing of responsibility for their care.

The European Commission

The document - know as a communication - shockingly points out that the EU wants to carve out more legal pathways for migrants to encourage them to come to Europe.

It states: "European countries will continue to stand steadfast in meeting their legal and moral commitment to those who need protection from war and persecution.

"And, as their own demographics evolve, they will need to take advantage of the opportunities and benefits of attracting foreign talents and skills.

"Attracting innovative entrepreneurs to the EU would not only be part of the general approach to soften the impact of the demographic decline."

Two options for the reform of the Dublin Regulation are being considered which could take the decision over migrant influx out of Britain's hands.

The first would be adding a 'corrective fairness mechanism' to the current rules, meaning asylum seekers could be moved to other member states if a country has taken above and beyond the number they can reasonably house.

The second option would mean migrants would be allocated using a 'distribution key' depending on the relative size, wealth and absorption capacities of the member states

Under option two, most applicants would be directly allocated, on the basis of the distribution key, to another member state when they make an application anywhere in the EU.

Another aim is to make the asylum process equal across EU countries so refugees go through the same process wherever they submit their application.

The report states: "This would establish a single and centralised decision-making process, in first instance and in appeal, and would thereby ensure a complete harmonisation of the procedures as well as a consistent evaluation of the protection needs at EU level.

"The distribution of asylum seekers among Member States based on a distribution key would in parallel ensure a fair sharing of responsibility for their care.

"The experience of recent years has shown that, especially in situations of mass influx along specific migratory routes, the current system places responsibility, in law, for the vast majority of asylum seekers on a limited number of individual Member States, a situation which would stretch the capacities of any member state."

European member states will have to share out migrants under new rules

The commission also identified five 'shortcomings' in the current policy, including sharing out the number of migrants among member states.

According to the report Brussels is aiming to ensure "a high degree of solidarity" and a fair sharing of asylum seekers.

The plan to replace "current disparate arrangements" across Europe would mean limits would be set on the time a country has to deal with both asylum applications and any subsequent appeals.

It also suggests 'harmonising' asylum policy right across states and creating a 'list of safe countries' which will determine who can and cannot seek asylum.

There will also be a move to reduce 'secondary movement' across the EU after an asylum seeker has been granted right to remain in a member state.

It is recommended sanctions are brought in for people who do not remain in the state which took them in.

The report states: "The Common European Asylum System is also characterised by differing treatment of asylum seekers, including in terms of the length of asylum procedures or reception conditions across Member States, a situation which in turn encourages secondary movements.

"At the same time, the EU must learn from the present crisis and start addressing its inherent weaknesses for the longer term. Actions are therefore needed to ensure a humane, fair and efficient system for the future."

Europe should be seeking out migrants with skills waiting to enter it has been suggested

The Commission will put forward official proposals after recommendations from the European Parliament are reviewed.

According to the Commission, the safest way to police the borders is to offer people legal ways to enter European nations.

It states: "Reducing irregular flows to and within Europe, and protecting our external borders, can only happen effectively if we look at the migratory phenomenon in a broad and comprehensive perspective: this means that we need at the same time to enhance legal and safe pathways to Europe.

"If we want to improve our way of managing migration, we have to become better at attracting the skills and talents that we will need in the future, and at reaping the benefits of migration by ensuring effective integration and participation into the host society of all - refugees or legal migrants."


Related articles

Rolling Stones' Mick Jagger claims quitting EU 'could be beneficial'

EU boss branded 'desperate' after dragging Thatcher into Brexit row

Record 1.8m illegal migrants entered EU in ONE year

http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/658812/Brussels-chief-unveils-EU-master-plan-MORE-economic-migration/

Poop for Brains!



Solidarity to whom?
Definitely NOT to their own Citizens!

Where exactly, is the Brussels chief encouraging
Europeans to migrate to?

Lower Slobbovia perhaps,or maybe the Steppes of Central Asia!

Everytime I think I've seen the Ultimate Stupidity from those political "Leaders",they surprise me again!

Last Year 1.2 million refugees were comming to my country (germany)!!!!
New yearseve---2300 Sexual harassment/rape cases comittet by refugees, in 2014/15-------- 280 cases in all of Germany (population 81.5 million)---BUT WE HAVE NO PROBLEMS!!!!!!!!!!!

Many of us know the truth

I think he's wrong about Thatcher.

I'm certain she would have looked at what's going on and thought f--k this, let's get out of Dodge.

Then again, we would never have gotten this far into the Brussels meddling if she was still Prime Minister.

to Brussels for me I think

I loved Margret Thatcher.
She had brass ovaries.

Women have so few women to admire. I cried when she passed.

I liked her too.

If you want something said ask a man, if you want something done ask a woman.

I usually make my mind up about someone in 10 seconds, and I very rarely change.

A couple of her famous quotes

Is that the UK and the English channel WTF

Woop hee! Google time! I need more...

I don't know how she accomplished all she did, as a woman, back then.
But from what I read, she was extremely intelligent, assertive, graceful always. But sarcastic with them when necessary, if they talked down to her or were condensing or patronising or assumed she was stupid or tried to manipulate her with flattery. * That will p*** a smart woman off *

The last years of her life were so sad! As if she was forgotten.
.
And her funeral... Ach! Obama did not attend. That did NOT go over well here!

* I would welcome a few million more people to Toronto. The economic growth would be invigorating
* Mind you, I do like Trumps "make-work" wall (my tenders are ready)
* It was not that long ago that the U.S. welcomed the worlds "riff-raff", 1700's and 1800's. Only the "natives" complained and we know what happened to them.

Yep, and then they got pissed of with us because we wanted to tax their tea.

Some people are just ungrateful

1- The USA now needs two walls
2- The majority of my country was built on imigration. I really resent you referring to MOST of our ancestors as RIF RAFF.
Most came legally & worked their as@es off & became naturalized & assimilated & built this country that everyone wants to either get into or destroy.
3- You are behind on the Canadian threads. There are 2 on how YOUR native population is being ignored & forgotten. And if you Goggle you find you'll find Canada has the worst record in that department.

Ck out ' Suicide Tide In Indigenous Communities '
http://m.mingle2.com/topic/show/477990/

------------------------------------------------------------------

* Independence had to do with "New World" wealth (millionaires) and the "boss" (governors) having to pay the King a yearly royalty (taxes). * We in Canada just lived off the Kings welfare dole.

** We can move money anywhere in the world / People should have the same freedom
** Historically the New World was build on the worlds "low-lifes". Mull island, Scotland was our homeland, all thieves.

* SassyEuro2
2- The majority of my country was built on imigration. I really resent you referring to MOST of our ancestors as RIF RAFF.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

OMG haha!
* Each wave of immigrants brought forth enlightened forces of hatred from the citizens just as the "natives were given blankets of smallpox".
** Often the choice was death at home in Europe or the less gloomy risk the New World.

1- No, The USA needs a impenetrable dome.... that should keep it contained too!
2- The violence and hatred originates from somewhere
3- The Conservatives really did a number on the aboriginals, I hope we can reverse this in time, so far so good, we're acting on it now.

actually it was your King who dood it,you Brits!

no worries,Trudy will fix that!