he probably rode that damn thing barebacked!

I heard that all is not in Putin's family.Every mortal have appointment with death,no exception.I pray,let him not go yet

I think I might know why Putin did not show his face . . . .

This is news to me - Putin is moving to nationalize large companies in Russia, and (if rumor holds) he plans to nationalize the Rothchild owned and controlled central bank. If this ends up being true, he has to use a body double, or he will go the way of Kennedy.
This would explain why a fake so obvious would be used, and people need to get over it, PUTIN DID NOT SHOW YESTERDAY NO IFS OR BUTS, the fake is OBVIOUS and was done in a way that will fool 95 percent of the population while making it obvious to the analysts that it will be pointless to kill anyone. If Putin really is going to take a central bank away from the Rothchilds, then a public body double is the only acceptable way of having a public face.

I TOTALLY disagree with nationalizing private property and companies, (which alone would get Putin killed) and ALL FOR nationalizing the central bank of any country. Having control over the central bank is the only way to keep unscrupulous foreigners from raping a nation.
The only thing standing in the way of the story as far as nationalizing the central bank is a lack of cross checkable references. However, the nationalization of companies and private property is definitely underway (which is a very bad sign) and if that is underway, the central bank would be an obvious no brainer part of the grand scheme. That would get anyone who tried it killed NO IFS OR BUTS.

Putin might be pissed enough about the hypocrisy of America with regard to MH-17 and many other things (not the least of which is Ukraine) not to mention NSA spying (the reasons are numerous) to bring back the cold war Stalinist style Russia. If that be the case, (and it could be, he is former KGB) there could be a bumpy ride ahead.

There are also rumors which are not really "rumors" such as:

"I think you're onto something as I distinctly remember some news about Putin a few weeks ago putting out international arrest warrants for Ziotard archons Jacob Rothschild and George Soros. Putin, being no dummy, knows full well that doing so would put him in extreme danger of having a JFK done on him, and henceforth, the lack of public appearances /possible body doubles."

This would factor in nicely to Russia reclaiming its national bank. And body doubles . . . . .

http://www.jimstone.is/

Extra,Extra,
present Vladimir Putin is a Doppelgaenger of the real Vlad!

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/is-putin-reincarnated-kronprinz-wilhelm-von-preuszen-t16055.html

Hey... Who did Vlad get knocked-up ?

Conrad, it said in the last line of that link, where Putin is right now.

a Female Gymnast thirty-odd years his junior!

If that's the new euphemism for boning a hawt model.

1. The authentic Putin is on the right. Look at the center of his face. The distance from the eyes to the mouth is greater than the new "Putin" on the left, and the mouth is closer to the bottom of the chin on the real Putin. This cannot change regardless of circumstance.

2. The nose is not the same nose, the mouth is not the same mouth, and what about that double chin? The body double is good enough to fool an assassin from a distance, but simply does not cut it for side by side comparison, even with small photos. We did not see Putin today, PERIOD.

As for when the real Putin disappeared, all I can say is LOOK AT THE PHOTO ON THE RIGHT, THAT IS THE REAL PUTIN. If any photo you see does not match, it simply is not Putin.

Here it is again, with more detail:

C.I.A. did it.

and here goes another insane Conspiracy-Theory!
BTW,Medvedev did it!

I had to grab a stick and stir the sh*tpot.

NSA made me do it.

I'll put my money on the journalistic integrity of jimstone.is any day of the week.


But, anyone who disagree's with what I post from the jimstone.is website is free to refute those facts with linked facts of their own.


So far I haven't seen any refutations from anyone (& I can't say I really expect to either).

Haters are gonna hate regardless of the facts presented...& when those haters can't refute the facts I've posted...it makes them hate ( me ) even more.

I understand that. And, accept it.

Facts?
Holy Cow!
That poor Boy has acute Brainrot!
Nuttier even that the Crew at Sott and GlobalResearch!

Yep,NSA and CIA sent a Team to the Kremlin and kidnapped the most guarded Man in Russia,and replaced him with a Doppelganger!

That's an interesting opinion you have in regard to Sott and GlobalResearch; would I be correct in surmising you are unable to refute or rebut the facts used in the articles on those websites? As for your usual posting technique...

Argumentum ad Hominem (abusive and circumstantial): the fallacy of attacking the character or circumstances of an individual who is advancing a statement or an argument instead of trying to disprove the truth of the statement or the soundness of the argument. Often the argument is characterized simply as a personal attack.

The personal attack is also often termed an "ad personem argument": the statement or argument at issue is dropped from consideration or is ignored, and the locutor's character or circumstances are used to influence opinion.

The fallacy draws its appeal from the technique of "getting personal." The assumption is that what the locutor is saying is entirely or partially dictated by his character or special circumstances and so should be disregarded.

http://philosophy.lander.edu/logic/person.html
---------------------------

You are free to refute any of the facts I have posted at any time using facts of your own, you know.

That is what a debate is all about.

It's about using the best facts to present the best argument.

A debate is not about seeing who can post the most or even the best logical fallacies.

Debate Definition
dictionary.search.yahoo.com
v. verb
1. To consider something; deliberate.
2. To engage in argument by discussing opposing points.
3. To engage in a formal discussion or argument.
n. noun
1. A discussion involving opposing points; an argument.
2. Deliberation; consideration.
passed the motion with little debate.
3. A formal contest of argumentation in which two opposing teams defend and attack a given proposition.

Trolling:

In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog) with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)
---------------------------------------------------

See the difference?

ahhhhh He resurfaced on Monday. Derp!

PBS NEWSHOUR PBS NewsHour full episode March 16, 2015

start video @ 3 min. 17 sec.

for your Putin resurfacing in
St. Petersburg, Russia.

Wiki as a source?

Wiki is open to edit by it's readership.
Meaning, anyone can edit anything, on wiki, to make it read whatever they want.