Topic: why can't we do that? | |
---|---|
My name isn't Alfalfa, or Spanky.....But I'm quite ok with her saying hi 1st and if that seems to go someplace, I'll ask for her number.
|
|
|
|
Not me guess I'm still a bit old fashioned. I could never g o uo to the guy first. Now smile from across the room and be a bit flirtatious yes
|
|
|
|
Old fashioned flirtathiousness is good, coy smile, that glancing flash of interest, and if that fails don't bother asking.
|
|
|
|
That would be such a turn-on and a huge boost for our self-esteem
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sat 07/12/14 07:34 AM
|
|
I always hear that a woman can't go up to a guy and say hi that a guy should be the one to do it or a girl can't give a guy her number the guy has to do it and i ask myself why? why can't us women be able to strike up a convo when we see someone we like? why does it have to be men that always make the first move? there really isnt any law against it, so women can if they choose to many dont choose to and many cultures dont consider it the most appropriate thing,, but its stil an individual choice,,, its just like proposing, in some cultures , it is traditionally expected of the men,,, but it doesnt mean a woman cant make her own rules and do them herself,,,, |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical.
|
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... |
|
|
|
I always hear that a woman can't go up to a guy and say hi that a guy should be the one to do it or a girl can't give a guy her number the guy has to do it and i ask myself why? why can't us women be able to strike up a convo when we see someone we like? why does it have to be men that always make the first move? Whenever I have made the first move, it's never worked out. I don't make moves on anyone anymore lol |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... i read all 3 sentences of it. i bolded what you assumed i was saying which was wrong. that statement is wrong too, and most certainly not even close to what i was saying... |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... i read all 3 sentences of it. i bolded what you assumed i was saying which was wrong. that statement is wrong too, and most certainly not even close to what i was saying... the only assumptions being made here are coming from you. you made bold the part where you think i was talking directly to your response, however it is a separate statement...again, my statement and not attributed to, quoted from or taken from anyone else. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... i read all 3 sentences of it. i bolded what you assumed i was saying which was wrong. that statement is wrong too, and most certainly not even close to what i was saying... the only assumptions being made here are coming from you. you made bold the part where you think i was talking directly to your response, however it is a separate statement...again, my statement and not attributed to, quoted from or taken from anyone else. you know if you're going to analyze to a tee everything someone else says you should do well to be a lot more clear in how you present what you say in response. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... i read all 3 sentences of it. i bolded what you assumed i was saying which was wrong. that statement is wrong too, and most certainly not even close to what i was saying... the only assumptions being made here are coming from you. you made bold the part where you think i was talking directly to your response, however it is a separate statement...again, my statement and not attributed to, quoted from or taken from anyone else. you know if you're going to analyze to a tee everything someone else says you should do well to be a lot more clear in how you present what you say in response. reading comprehension is a lost art. |
|
|
|
Let's be honest, there may be a small group of males attracted to the woman in control initially, the rest are turned off by it still. Seeing a woman do it is like watching a fawn trying to ice skate, though it looks cute it doesn't seem practical. it's not about control, it's about taking initiative, expressing interest. i don't know anyone, male or female, that is turned off by receiving interest. it may not always be returned, but that is to be expected. initially i was talking in the initiative, it always sets the tone for what you can expect. men think of this just as much as a woman does. where did i say people are turned off by interest? i never did. stop putting words in my mouth that aren't there. showing initial control in the beginning is a not a turn off to a small group of guys. a shy group of guys may prefer it. not the guys who know who they are and who they want and wish to do the approaching themselves, as in be the aggressors. wow, paranoid much? i didn't try to put words in your mouth. perhaps you should read what i said again... i did read it. you obviously disregarded what i wrote before. if you read it you clearly didn't understand it. nowhere did i suggest you said people were turned off by interest. i made the statement and did not attribute it to anyone... i read all 3 sentences of it. i bolded what you assumed i was saying which was wrong. that statement is wrong too, and most certainly not even close to what i was saying... the only assumptions being made here are coming from you. you made bold the part where you think i was talking directly to your response, however it is a separate statement...again, my statement and not attributed to, quoted from or taken from anyone else. you know if you're going to analyze to a tee everything someone else says you should do well to be a lot more clear in how you present what you say in response. reading comprehension is a lost art. so is civil correspondence. |
|
|