and why did this mom take a photo of her letter and post it? yeah

interesting sign of the times,,,

Yep, sure looks like one of those progressive liberals to me...



But then their is nothing like respect from progressive liberals:

lol,,,thank god we haven't elected any college students to office yet

Yeah they are even worse than those three idiots that are already there. Oh I forgot, people aren't responsible for their actions, so just where would the responsible idiots be, the voters?

people are responsible for their actions, they are also able to learn from them,,,, I doubt anyone here is the same type of person , with the same knowledge or outlook as they had in their late teens and young twenties,,,


being that the colleged aged are not quite as mature as say,, 40 somethings developmentally speaking,,,


I think it would generally be worse to elect them to positions of authority over millions


though it is sometimes the more controversial, look how much better I am, approach to just label people forever based upon their behaviors from decades ago,, regardless of how recently or often those behaviors have occurred since,,

In this country, people are not responsible for their actions, they are only held responsible, sometimes, for actions that upset the elitist gentry. Especially irresponsible are the entitlement crowd, by their very nature or they wouldn't be entitled, it is impossible to be both.

And those that are college indoctrinated are of course less than responsible and it does not our of necessity improve with age. A prime example would be an exit poll interview after the 2012 elections in California where a young Odumbo girl claimed she had a degree in Micro biology and knew that GMO was no different than natural. That dumb bimbo will go to her grave with that same irresponsible attitude.

And to think one can elect another to represent them and declare that a position of authority is the most irresponsible act of them all. First, no person has authority over another, ever. Second, you cannot delegate to anther something one doesn't possess. And this does not change with numbers, what one doesn't have, cannot be assumed just because the numbers increase to millions. Any number multiplied by zero is still zero.

And due to the fact that if even one of the axioms used in the argument would be false, then the conclusion would be false but that does increase by the numbers as an increase in false axioms does increase the degree of falsehood in the conclusion. In this case, all of them.

So I take it that except for the areas of that stern rebuttal, there is acceptance of the presentment, from the law axiom, lack of objection is acceptance.

lack of objection is acceptance?....lol



not really


could just be lack of INTEREST in continuing to debate pedantic irrelevant nonsense,,,,

i'm wondering if it's possible for the "entitlement crowd" not be brought up....

But that would mean expecting someone who thinks they already have all the right answers to learn something new...

And clearly it's true what they say "Can't teach an old dog new tricks"

.. politics and Logic.
Hmm..:

Doubt it, the lack of interest that is. But I do understand when one runs out of totally illogical nonsense and has no INTEREST in continuing.

And of course one without a clue would laugh out loud at axioms of law, after all, why understand when you can just laugh off reality.

That would only be possible when the entitlment crowd goes away, so wonder no more, the answer is no.

But I don't think I know the right answers, I verify through research that I have a logical answer supported by reviewing other more qualified people that have completed the research. That is learning something sometimes new and other times just as reinforcement. But then that would be a unaccustomed ideology to the progressive liberal masses that refuse to pursue the truth, the basis of all knowledge, a natural law of which the anti thesis is ignorance. So I can understand at how one can chose to ignore rather than explore, they lack the self esteem and self respect to be anything other than entitled in this world, a member of the entitlement crowd.

And it's not true at all, I have taught an old dog many new tricks, all it takes is to instill a desire to live and learn which even dumb animals seems to understand much better than those of the entitlement crowd.

But I do thank you for this opportunity to further expand upon the true meaning of the entitlement crowd and their embracing the ideology of ignorance, the choice of ignoring truth and acceptance of the false dichotomy that keeps them in slavery.

curious anyone here pass the Bar Exam?....all raise their hands....

"looks around" yep thought so....

I understand the intent you are trying to get across, but if lack of objection is acceptance.....

Then why are men charged with rape when a woman is to passed out drunk....she didn't object so should it be assumed that because she didn't object that she accepted what was going to happen?

Same with rapist who use chloroform....I could just see the defense

"She didn't object your honor....and in my book that is acceptance"

So the mom put a pinhole in the condum?I suspect an agenda