nothing new, white pastors ( in the bible belt) opposed bush when he nearly supported same sex marriage law

not sure if they went as far as threatening impeachment, but that may be to get this group some attention since it seems like they are fairly new to the scene

Isn't it remarkable at how some will go to any lengths to disparage the ones that attack an idiot, especially when in the eyes of the disparager, that idiot can do no wrong.

I mean, white ministers attacking Bush when he was just following the instructions of his owners. Can you imagine the unmitigated gall of those ministers standing up for their rights.

And now we have black pastors after the new generation idiot, Odumbo. And just to make a name for themselves, they want to impeach. Imagine, their cause wouldn't be just if impeachment was not mentioned.

But for the life of me I can't understand the racial undertones presented by some disparagers, white ministers against Bush and black pastors against Odumbo. But being that Odumbo is at best 25% black, does this make it all the more so racist?

I'm pretty sure you are missing the point here, as posted by the OP (that would be you, wouldn't it?)...



I mean Odumbo was mentioned but not as the source of the impeachment, just another of the same ill ilk.

But by what rights do they have to vote on the rights of others? If you don't want to do something, fine, but that does not give you a right to deny another.

Personally I think gays getting married is just pure stupid, didn't they learn anything from the heterosexuals getting married? If anything marriage should be banned as a state institution and be return to the institution of your creator, just as your creator meant.

Not really, here you have a coalition of black pastors that have banded together to proclaim a violation of their beliefs. But as stated the whole thing has been refocused as a "racial" thing, with a heavy accent on the racial.

how can he be only 25% when his dad is LITERALLY west African?

What benefits? Marriage licenses were first instigated in New York to deter interracial marriages, i.e. white women and black men (white men just had there way with black women and walked away so that wasn't the real issue).

But then they came up with a brilliant idea as New York and Illinois are prone to do, why not remove a right, invoke a license and charge a fee, now you had a privilege of being married. And with privileges, you have control and instead of a couple being married in the eyes of their creator, now it was a three party affair, with the third party, the state having all the power.

And I bet that all you boys and girls out there wonder why the state thinks they have a claim on your children.

So again, what benefits?

I'd say save the taxpayer a considerable amount of money and spend $50 or so on some wood and rope and have a ceremony on the the white house lawn, of course after the trial, don't want to deny a lawyer due process.

Can you stick to the thread please, if you need to have genealogy information, I would recommend "google", or "ask" or "yahoo" or "bing".

But being that Odumbo is at best 25% black, does this make it all the more so racist?

YOU MAKE THE CLAIM< YOU PROVE IT< BUT I KNOW YOU CANT

so carry on,,,

There's a pretty good list of laws Holder has not insisted be enforced.

One of the biggest is Immigration Law.

He and butrack have impeded and threatened suits against states that want to help Feds pick up illegals and deport them.

Every time a demand for deportation comes up, the progressives run ad campaigns showing poor little families being ripped apart and deported. Leaving infants and toddlers to starve to death on street corners.

Create jobs. Hire Deportation Drivers

AGAIN!



Prove it, can you prove otherwise?



I mean I'm being generous as some claim as low as 6.25%. But then it is Odumbo and he can do no wrong.

So if you have a friend that is a genealogist and can first get a real copy of his birth certificate and college records, then let's see the data.

And now to return to regular programing.

Yeah, they should have to eat their young before leaving then we wouldn't have that problem.

lol, by that logic no one in America can prove they aren't BLACK,,lol


his father gave him an ARAB name,, making him not really black? seriously

anyway, his father is KENYAN his fathers parents were KENYAN

in America , black is defined as

A person having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "Black, African Am., or Negro"; or report entries such as African American, Kenyan, Nigerian, or Haitian

Barack is an African name meaning blessed (Swahili)

my sons middle name is Obrien, I certainly hope years from now people don't ASSUME he wasn't really black because his MIDDLE Name is IRish,,,lol


this is Obama sr, the Kenyan






by AMERICAN classification, The PResident is AT LEAST 50 percent black (immediate heritage, not ASSUMED ancestral divisions which just about every African American has)

What do you mean,At Least?
Since his Ma was Caucasian,no matter how you look at it he couldn't be more than of 50% African Descent!

And so you are still off topic, this thread has nothing to do with Odumbo's genealogy must less your spin on the customs of another country. They do what they do and are proud of it, so ranting about it will not change a thing.

SO LET'S USE 6.25%, AFTER ALL HE HONORS HIS MUSLIM HERITAGE

still making him 50 percent, so whats the issue?

yep, by going to a Baptist church and fighting for Gay rights and sanctioning war against muslim leaders,,,lol

muslim is a religion, not a race

has NOTHING to do with what his race is, and still does nothing to validate the ridiulous 6.25 percent black claim,,

So can't refute it hey. It's facts against rhetoric, which way should we go? The facts on customs and his father's position or the rhetoric of what someone wishes it would be?

I have a tendency to believe fact.

6.25% seems right after all and here I was giving the benefit of the doubt at 25%

yep, and the jerk BELIEVED He was black

but by the American definition, which acknowledges geographical ancestry and not CULTURE,,

it still didn't make him black