Topic: Breaking news: TWA Flight 800 Shot Down? | |
---|---|
But that kind of looks like this photo that was taken by a witness:
|
|
|
|
nice pic, but you know it's worthless as evidence...that could be any sky, anywhere, at any time... no identifying features to go with it...
|
|
|
|
nice pic, but you know it's worthless as evidence...that could be any sky, anywhere, at any time... no identifying features to go with it... Then there is the fact that the rocket in the photo is launched from a stationary site on land. TWA Flight 800 was over water when it was destroyed. |
|
|
|
nice pic, but you know it's worthless as evidence...that could be any sky, anywhere, at any time... no identifying features to go with it... Then there is the fact that the rocket in the photo is launched from a stationary site on land. TWA Flight 800 was over water when it was destroyed. It had just taken off. Rumor says that several of these rockets were launched. I don't know if any of that is true. As far as the pic being "worthless as evidence.." That depends on how well it can be verified along with witness statements. It is not my job to verify evidence. And as I have said, in this day any evidence, including radar reports, can be altered or withheld or changed. Proof and 'evidence' is only good if it is overwhelming and convincing and backed up by other evidence. |
|
|
|
And as I have said, in this day any evidence, including radar reports, can be altered or withheld or changed.
It appears to me that you are promoting a non-falsifiable hypothesis. |
|
|
|
nice pic, but you know it's worthless as evidence...that could be any sky, anywhere, at any time... no identifying features to go with it... So True.. |
|
|
|
And as I have said, in this day any evidence, including radar reports, can be altered or withheld or changed.
It appears to me that you are promoting a non-falsifiable hypothesis. Is that what it looks like to you? Well seems to me the government does that ALL THE TIME. |
|
|