Topic: cop pulls gun on teen, faces felony charges | |
---|---|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 04/19/13 10:00 AM
|
|
Hey Krupa, I was raised baptist dude,,lol and moe, I think EXTREMISTS Are ruining the country extreme liberals who think life should be about doing whatever one wants that doesnt cause 'harm' to another and extreme conservatives who think that the value of human life should be determined by financial or social status and all 'criminals' are subhuman and undeserving of forgiveness or second chances,,, Extreme liberals are the ones trying to ban and restrict guns and do not wish anyone should do what one want as long as it does not cause harm to anyone, in fact they want people dependent on the government. What you described are Libertarians and their is nothing extreme about wanting life, liberty and happiness. As far as thinking oneself is better than those of an lower economic class is true of politicians, not just conservatives. I was pretty specific imho, EXTREME liberals are the ones who want everyone to do whatever they want (That would include owning guns) that doesn't 'harm' others and EXTREME conservatives are the ones who believe life should be valued by earned income and 'criminal' status,,,, politicians fall into a spectrum of one or the other and everything in between,,,, life, liberty, and happiness are vague buzzwords in political discourse, used to broadbrush thngs and shut people up noone would argue with 'life' 'liberty' or 'happiness' ,, in their basic contextual use,,, |
|
|
|
Not exactly sure how "these are the people lib's want to have more guns".....comes into play here. A cop pulls a gun....so what? You say "lib".....like it is a bad thing.... Liberal....liberty....????? Should we just shut our f'n mouths and do what you think is right? If so....that is called "communist"....or "republican" Our founding fathers were liberal.....I tend to think that they had the right idea. Without liberty....we would just be a county of England. Lib's......I vote for liberty. Err hmmm... i'm guessing if that kid would have been you, it still would have been a "so what"?.. liberals are so quick to say things like so what and who cares, till they are on the receiving end of it... so another liberal says so what... how quaint... people should have guns pulled on them while in a line at the drive through, because obviously the cop was more important... and get this... THE KID WAS WAITING LIKE HE WAS! and you wonder why i think liberals are stupid... No...I don't wonder why liberals are stupid. I wonder why people like you have survived as long as you have. Then...I think of dung beetles feeding and thriving on crap...then I understand completely. Good for you. Take a small pile of crap.....make it your mountain. just like a lib... when they can't use their brain, they just start insulting... i usually don't wish this on anyone, but i really hope it's you the next time a cop gets stupid with someone.... |
|
|
|
Excellent example of abuse of power, Cops like that should be, and will be stripped down to the rank of working at the Mcdonalds where he committed the offense for the rest of his life. He damn sure wont be a cop after that trial. Good riddance to bad rubbish. and they say citizens shouldn't be armed, Hell who is gonna protect us from the people who are supposed to protect us. well said... the only thing i will add he shouldn't be getting paid...threatens a kids life and gets a paid vacation, all over a big mac... lol |
|
|
|
Harmony......You are a beautiful and eloquent lady.
This discussion is about douche bags who think that their way of thinking is the only way to think.....like the Moslems. |
|
|
|
When it comes to the question of more Govt. I will quote Tony Montana from the movie "Scarface" "Communists are aleways trying to tell you how to feel, What to think I ain't no stinking communist"
"Who do I trust? Me! That's Who!!" |
|
|
|
Liberals.
The only group that wants to disarm Citizens for the sake of the children. The same group that aborts 3,000 children daily. |
|
|
|
Liberals. The only group that wants to disarm Citizens for the sake of the children. The same group that aborts 3,000 children daily. I wouldnt be so sure about who is aborting babies based upon political beliefs,, alot of those very 'conservative' women and men also choose to not parent the children they create,,,,,, |
|
|
|
Liberals. The only group that wants to disarm Citizens for the sake of the children. The same group that aborts 3,000 children daily. Its not about the children, Its about control. You can't freeze and steal the money in the citizen's bank accounts. When the citizens are armed. So disarm the citizens then steal what they worked all their lives for. Oh i'm sorry did I say "steal" I mean't Redistribution of wealth. Yeah that's what they're calling it. |
|
|
|
income can be earned or unearned
weath, is a different matter,,, |
|
|
|
income can be earned or unearned weath, is a different matter,,, Whats the diff? Its not yours right? Your'e taking it from someone else right? How is that not stealing? |
|
|
|
Go ahead and bang out all the colorful clichés you'd like, Followed by Signs of the times phrases like.. Redistribution of wealth and recirculation of funds. Whatever you'd like to call it. At the end of the day it all boils down to one thing. Stealing someone elses hard earned money and giving it to someone who didn't lift a finger to earn it. That is the essence of communism!
|
|
|
|
Liberals. The only group that wants to disarm Citizens for the sake of the children. The same group that aborts 3,000 children daily. This country would be better off with more abortions. Especially for people who can't even figure out how to post their own pictures but apparently know every answer to this country's problems.....but...don't got the guts to run for any public office. |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Fri 04/19/13 10:44 AM
|
|
income can be earned or unearned weath, is a different matter,,, Whats the diff? Its not yours right? Your'e taking it from someone else right? How is that not stealing? the difference is that income that is earned, is payment for services or efforts rendered wealth is accumulation of funds derived from others services, or efforts,,,,combined with income, assets, resources,, etc,,, for instance, two people in 'poverty' may both be earning under 18000 per year, but one might still be 'wealthier' if they own their parents home, have a trust fund,,,etc,,, |
|
|
|
income can be earned or unearned weath, is a different matter,,, Whats the diff? Its not yours right? Your'e taking it from someone else right? How is that not stealing? the difference is that income that is earned, is payment for services or efforts rendered wealth is accumulation of funds derived from others services, or efforts,,,,combined with income, assets, resources,, etc,,, for instance, two people in 'poverty' may both be earning under 18000 per year, but one might still be 'wealthier' if they own their parents home, have a trust fund,,,etc,,, |
|
|
|
income can be earned or unearned weath, is a different matter,,, Whats the diff? Its not yours right? Your'e taking it from someone else right? How is that not stealing? the difference is that income that is earned, is payment for services or efforts rendered wealth is accumulation of funds derived from others services, or efforts,,,,combined with income, assets, resources,, etc,,, for instance, two people in 'poverty' may both be earning under 18000 per year, but one might still be 'wealthier' if they own their parents home, have a trust fund,,,etc,,, |
|
|
|
income can be earned or unearned weath, is a different matter,,, Whats the diff? Its not yours right? Your'e taking it from someone else right? How is that not stealing? the difference is that income that is earned, is payment for services or efforts rendered wealth is accumulation of funds derived from others services, or efforts,,,,combined with income, assets, resources,, etc,,, for instance, two people in 'poverty' may both be earning under 18000 per year, but one might still be 'wealthier' if they own their parents home, have a trust fund,,,etc,,, i can answer that... liberals want to redistribute wealth... they don't like it when someone has more money they they do.... |
|
|
|
Okaaaaaaaay
The problem with that theory is.... THIS IS EARTH. |
|
|
|
There really is no such thing as redistribution of wealth, Unless you're referring to money leaving your pocket. Then going to the government's pocket. Then the govt. giving a fixed extremely low salary to even the most educated of professionals. Like they do in china, and cuba, Like 10 dollars a month salary to a doctor.
|
|
|
|
Communism stinks, That stench often precedes someone who believes in that garbage way before they even enter a room. Then it lingers after they are gone. No one can do anything about it, because no one can afford any Lysol. Since even the most educated of professionals only average 10 dollars a month.
|
|
|
|
There really is no such thing as redistribution of wealth, Unless you're referring to money leaving your pocket. Then going to the government's pocket. Then the govt. giving a fixed extremely low salary to even the most educated of professionals. Like they do in china, and cuba, Like 10 dollars a month salary to a doctor. haha, your right... Redistribution of wealth is a PC term for socialism and communism... "the socialist republic of America" |
|
|