100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Is it right for a lady to approach you for a serious re | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Anyway Tex, I think you are confusing someone's ability to chat up someone else in order to get a date with just being able to start and hold up their end of a conversation. Women do not have problems talking. Women love to talk. You may not be particularly interested in the things that women like to talk about because while they are rabbiting on all you're thinking about is getting your end away or football but "women don't know how to have a proper conversation" is a rather daft thing to say. That's not what I said. I said women are not good at starting a conversation with a stranger. Yes, women will talk your ear off once they know you. But, they just aren't used to saying hello and introducing themselves. Is this the bit where I give you counterexamples, like my sister who is married to a really shy guy that she initially aproached and you tell me that you are speaking in generalities and the rule is still true even if there are exceptions? If that's the way you want to take. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, so obviously there are exceptions. But, how many women in this thread said they don't or wouldn't ever approach a man and start a conversation? There were one or two that said they would, but the majority said they wouldn't. Women are generally not good at it because they never do it. It's a skill that must be learned and practiced. I used to be shy. But, then one day I decided I was going to solve my woman problems. I made a commitment to talking to 100 different women I'd never spoken with before (something I'd never done even once). I dressed myself up nice, went to the most crowded bars I could find and spoke to 10 women a night, two nights a week, for five weeks. I kept a diary, noting what went well and what didn't. By the end of the first night, starting a conversation was easy. After the second night I was getting phone numbers. After the fourth night, I started getting laid. Before the end, I was having threesomes with very attractive women half my age! I discovered a pattern that got results and all I had to do was go through the steps. Confidence comes from success. I think what the women here actually said was that they wouldn't ask a man out and some of them said that they would, so your argument as usual is spurious. You stated that women are unable to introduce themselves to strangers and conduct a proper conversation, which is just nonsense. You take a topic about flirting and asking people out and somehow insert a troll into it about women having poor social skills. You do make me chuckle with these absurd generalisations and your boasting about your sex life though man. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway Tex, I think you are confusing someone's ability to chat up someone else in order to get a date with just being able to start and hold up their end of a conversation. Women do not have problems talking. Women love to talk. You may not be particularly interested in the things that women like to talk about because while they are rabbiting on all you're thinking about is getting your end away or football but "women don't know how to have a proper conversation" is a rather daft thing to say. That's not what I said. I said women are not good at starting a conversation with a stranger. Yes, women will talk your ear off once they know you. But, they just aren't used to saying hello and introducing themselves. Is this the bit where I give you counterexamples, like my sister who is married to a really shy guy that she initially aproached and you tell me that you are speaking in generalities and the rule is still true even if there are exceptions? If that's the way you want to take. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, so obviously there are exceptions. But, how many women in this thread said they don't or wouldn't ever approach a man and start a conversation? There were one or two that said they would, but the majority said they wouldn't. Women are generally not good at it because they never do it. It's a skill that must be learned and practiced. I used to be shy. But, then one day I decided I was going to solve my woman problems. I made a commitment to talking to 100 different women I'd never spoken with before (something I'd never done even once). I dressed myself up nice, went to the most crowded bars I could find and spoke to 10 women a night, two nights a week, for five weeks. I kept a diary, noting what went well and what didn't. By the end of the first night, starting a conversation was easy. After the second night I was getting phone numbers. After the fourth night, I started getting laid. Before the end, I was having threesomes with very attractive women half my age! I discovered a pattern that got results and all I had to do was go through the steps. Confidence comes from success. I think what the women here actually said was that they wouldn't ask a man out and some of them said that they would, so your argument as usual is spurious. You stated that women are unable to introduce themselves to strangers and conduct a proper conversation, which is just nonsense. You take a topic about flirting and asking people out and somehow insert a troll into it about women having poor social skills. You do make me chuckle with these absurd generalisations and your boasting about your sex life though man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a question only for guys but also for ladies. Just wanna get your insights i wish they would... women seem to think men can read their mind... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anyway Tex, I think you are confusing someone's ability to chat up someone else in order to get a date with just being able to start and hold up their end of a conversation. Women do not have problems talking. Women love to talk. You may not be particularly interested in the things that women like to talk about because while they are rabbiting on all you're thinking about is getting your end away or football but "women don't know how to have a proper conversation" is a rather daft thing to say. That's not what I said. I said women are not good at starting a conversation with a stranger. Yes, women will talk your ear off once they know you. But, they just aren't used to saying hello and introducing themselves. Is this the bit where I give you counterexamples, like my sister who is married to a really shy guy that she initially aproached and you tell me that you are speaking in generalities and the rule is still true even if there are exceptions? If that's the way you want to take. Even a broken clock is right twice a day, so obviously there are exceptions. But, how many women in this thread said they don't or wouldn't ever approach a man and start a conversation? There were one or two that said they would, but the majority said they wouldn't. Women are generally not good at it because they never do it. It's a skill that must be learned and practiced. I used to be shy. But, then one day I decided I was going to solve my woman problems. I made a commitment to talking to 100 different women I'd never spoken with before (something I'd never done even once). I dressed myself up nice, went to the most crowded bars I could find and spoke to 10 women a night, two nights a week, for five weeks. I kept a diary, noting what went well and what didn't. By the end of the first night, starting a conversation was easy. After the second night I was getting phone numbers. After the fourth night, I started getting laid. Before the end, I was having threesomes with very attractive women half my age! I discovered a pattern that got results and all I had to do was go through the steps. Confidence comes from success. This is just wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
really, u are right
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
TexasScoundrel
on
Fri 02/15/13 02:32 PM
|
|
I think what the women here actually said was that they wouldn't ask a man out and some of them said that they would, so your argument as usual is spurious. You stated that women are unable to introduce themselves to strangers and conduct a proper conversation, which is just nonsense. You take a topic about flirting and asking people out and somehow insert a troll into it about women having poor social skills. You do make me chuckle with these absurd generalisations and your boasting about your sex life though man. Once again, that's not what I said. I never said women have poor social skills. On the contrary, women generally have better social skills than men. Women are better at reading body language, more sensitive to tonal changes in a voice and generally better at reading intentions than are men. However, that doesn't mean they are good at chatting up strangers. Truthfully, men are likely at least as bad at it as women are, which would explain why there are so many sad, lonely nice guys. And I never troll. I post my views on whatever a given topic may be. You are, of course, free to disagree. In fact, I prefer people disagree with me because then we can discuss it and maybe I'll learn something new. Edit: I've just been back through this thread. 12 women have posted. 8 said they would not approach a man for a date. 3 said they would and one was vague. In fairness, one also mentioned she'd approached men in the past, but wouldn't do it again. Since 12 is 50% more than 8 I think it's reasonable to say generally, women don't do it and are therefore not good at it because they don't do it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think what the women here actually said was that they wouldn't ask a man out and some of them said that they would, so your argument as usual is spurious. You stated that women are unable to introduce themselves to strangers and conduct a proper conversation, which is just nonsense. You take a topic about flirting and asking people out and somehow insert a troll into it about women having poor social skills. You do make me chuckle with these absurd generalisations and your boasting about your sex life though man. Once again, that's not what I said. I never said women have poor social skills. On the contrary, women generally have better social skills than men. Women are better at reading body language, more sensitive to tonal changes in a voice and generally better at reading intentions than are men. However, that doesn't mean they are good at chatting up strangers. Truthfully, men are likely at least as bad at it as women are, which would explain why there are so many sad, lonely nice guys. And I never troll. I post my views on whatever a given topic may be. You are, of course, free to disagree. In fact, I prefer people disagree with me because then we can discuss it and maybe I'll learn something new. Edit: I've just been back through this thread. 12 women have posted. 8 said they would not approach a man for a date. 3 said they would and one was vague. In fairness, one also mentioned she'd approached men in the past, but wouldn't do it again. Since 12 is 50% more than 8 I think it's reasonable to say generally, women don't do it and are therefore not good at it because they don't do it. But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. i'm not sure what people are getting upset at here... the way i read it, it's a numbers/confidence type thing, as with anything... the more ladies you talk to, the better the chance of hooking up. the guys should actually pay attention to your post. if these guys think a lady is going to come and tell them, they are sadly mistaken. it will be a long wait, whereas if you at least talk to 3-5 more women a day, your chances of meeting someone increases. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i'm not sure what people are getting upset at here... the way i read it, it's a numbers/confidence type thing, as with anything... the more ladies you talk to, the better the chance of hooking up. the guys should actually pay attention to your post. if these guys think a lady is going to come and tell them, they are sadly mistaken. it will be a long wait, whereas if you at least talk to 3-5 more women a day, your chances of meeting someone increases. Yep, that's basically it. Go out, talk to as many women as you can and don't have an agenda. Don't ever chase the ones that aren't interested in you because that only gives them the creeps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. Well, whether or not you get laid instead of spending Friday night posting on an internet forum is kind of beside the point. I don't care about that. I can't prove that you're talking crap about that and you can't really prove that it's true. It's just a claim that you are making that you can't back up with any proof. That's fine though. It's your opinions that I'm refuting. There's a pattern to all of your arguments. You make a contraversial generalisation (usually something insulting about women) that you can't back up with anything really apart from anecdotal "evidence" or a single research paper or article from the internet. People tell you that it's a load of crap and give you counterexamples to refute it and then you say that there anecdotal evidence is worthless because there are exceptions to every rule. That's why I say you are a terrible debater and it seems like you are trolling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tawt; anyone can get laid as you flash enough money or buy enough drinks; someone will sleep with you. Personally; it takes a real man/woman to actually take the time to build on a relationship. You are correct though that Texas has continually insulted women but I think that is just the way he is. Most of the ladies usually just ignore his comments anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. Well, whether or not you get laid instead of spending Friday night posting on an internet forum is kind of beside the point. I don't care about that. I can't prove that you're talking crap about that and you can't really prove that it's true. It's just a claim that you are making that you can't back up with any proof. That's fine though. It's your opinions that I'm refuting. There's a pattern to all of your arguments. You make a contraversial generalisation (usually something insulting about women) that you can't back up with anything really apart from anecdotal "evidence" or a single research paper or article from the internet. People tell you that it's a load of crap and give you counterexamples to refute it and then you say that there anecdotal evidence is worthless because there are exceptions to every rule. That's why I say you are a terrible debater and it seems like you are trolling. First of all, I do not ever say anything insulting about women. If I had, I'd have been banned a long time ago. Secondly, I have done a good deal of research (reading books as well as field study) into attraction and what attracts us to one another. I try to share what I've learned and has worked for me. If I can help some guys out, I'm happy to help. If others want to say I'm full of BS, that's fine too. But, it's usually the guys that have no idea how to attract a female that say I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm on the web tonight because I'm working. I assume that you don't know, but I'm an over the road truck driver. That means I stay out on the road, living in my truck for 4 to 6 weeks at a time. Tonight I'm in a roadside park in East Texas. When I woke up this morning I was in central Mississippi. Tomorrow I'm driving almost into Mexico. Proof? How about this? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
TexasScoundrel
on
Fri 02/15/13 04:20 PM
|
|
If you'd prefer I can send you a link to some more explicit photos.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. Well, whether or not you get laid instead of spending Friday night posting on an internet forum is kind of beside the point. I don't care about that. I can't prove that you're talking crap about that and you can't really prove that it's true. It's just a claim that you are making that you can't back up with any proof. That's fine though. It's your opinions that I'm refuting. There's a pattern to all of your arguments. You make a contraversial generalisation (usually something insulting about women) that you can't back up with anything really apart from anecdotal "evidence" or a single research paper or article from the internet. People tell you that it's a load of crap and give you counterexamples to refute it and then you say that there anecdotal evidence is worthless because there are exceptions to every rule. That's why I say you are a terrible debater and it seems like you are trolling. First of all, I do not ever say anything insulting about women. If I had, I'd have been banned a long time ago. Secondly, I have done a good deal of research (reading books as well as field study) into attraction and what attracts us to one another. I try to share what I've learned and has worked for me. If I can help some guys out, I'm happy to help. If others want to say I'm full of BS, that's fine too. But, it's usually the guys that have no idea how to attract a female that say I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm on the web tonight because I'm working. I assume that you don't know, but I'm an over the road truck driver. That means I stay out on the road, living in my truck for 4 to 6 weeks at a time. Tonight I'm in a roadside park in East Texas. When I woke up this morning I was in central Mississippi. Tomorrow I'm driving almost into Mexico. Proof? How about this?
Yeah, you mentioned a few times that you are a truck driver and I read your profile when you posted in the profile rating forum. Listen man, I'm not a mod here and I'm not calling you a liar. I think you are trolling a bit but you get around flaming rules by always saying that you aren't talking about anyone in particular, even when you respond to me saying that you aren't a guy on the internet whining about not being able to get a girlfriend and that you aren't saying that I am. You chuck contraversial stuff out there and a lot of it is about women. We're allowed here to jump in and defend the ladies and sexist threads are flamebait. If a poster on a dating site posts sexist stuff they are trolling really in that they are going to annoy people and be attacked. Whether you are deliberately trying to get people to flame you I can't say but you do have a nack of getting threads revolving about you. I don't just post on dating forums. I'm on a flame forum on another site and it's full of trolls that post flamebait threads. It's cool. Mods don't jump in and we get to exercise free speach. Just because someone posts a troll that doesn't mean that it isn't worth talking about. I think you post trolls but they are funny and you are fun to argue with. Maybe we all learn something from it and a lot of people find it entertaining. If you think you are some sort of love guru and that we can learn from you how to get women that's cool. We are here to talk about dating and relationships. I still think that you are a terrible debater though. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I not a master debater. I'm a cunning linguist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. Well, whether or not you get laid instead of spending Friday night posting on an internet forum is kind of beside the point. I don't care about that. I can't prove that you're talking crap about that and you can't really prove that it's true. It's just a claim that you are making that you can't back up with any proof. That's fine though. It's your opinions that I'm refuting. There's a pattern to all of your arguments. You make a contraversial generalisation (usually something insulting about women) that you can't back up with anything really apart from anecdotal "evidence" or a single research paper or article from the internet. People tell you that it's a load of crap and give you counterexamples to refute it and then you say that there anecdotal evidence is worthless because there are exceptions to every rule. That's why I say you are a terrible debater and it seems like you are trolling. First of all, I do not ever say anything insulting about women. If I had, I'd have been banned a long time ago. Secondly, I have done a good deal of research (reading books as well as field study) into attraction and what attracts us to one another. I try to share what I've learned and has worked for me. If I can help some guys out, I'm happy to help. If others want to say I'm full of BS, that's fine too. But, it's usually the guys that have no idea how to attract a female that say I don't know what I'm talking about. I'm on the web tonight because I'm working. I assume that you don't know, but I'm an over the road truck driver. That means I stay out on the road, living in my truck for 4 to 6 weeks at a time. Tonight I'm in a roadside park in East Texas. When I woke up this morning I was in central Mississippi. Tomorrow I'm driving almost into Mexico. Proof? How about this?
Tex just proved he has lots of money 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not a question only for guys but also for ladies. Just wanna get your insights i wish they would... women seem to think men can read their mind... Omg this again?? Always exaggerating to make a point is dramatic. its not reading minds, its observing and figuring it out. We all use this skill. Use it more it gets easy. women may be better at reading minds though. We are made to figure out whats wrong with a tiny screaming human that cannot speak. Try having this skill and deal with someone who wont even try to be observant enough to read into it a bit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think what the women here actually said was that they wouldn't ask a man out and some of them said that they would, so your argument as usual is spurious. You stated that women are unable to introduce themselves to strangers and conduct a proper conversation, which is just nonsense. You take a topic about flirting and asking people out and somehow insert a troll into it about women having poor social skills. You do make me chuckle with these absurd generalisations and your boasting about your sex life though man. Once again, that's not what I said. I never said women have poor social skills. On the contrary, women generally have better social skills than men. Women are better at reading body language, more sensitive to tonal changes in a voice and generally better at reading intentions than are men. However, that doesn't mean they are good at chatting up strangers. Truthfully, men are likely at least as bad at it as women are, which would explain why there are so many sad, lonely nice guys. And I never troll. I post my views on whatever a given topic may be. You are, of course, free to disagree. In fact, I prefer people disagree with me because then we can discuss it and maybe I'll learn something new. Edit: I've just been back through this thread. 12 women have posted. 8 said they would not approach a man for a date. 3 said they would and one was vague. In fairness, one also mentioned she'd approached men in the past, but wouldn't do it again. Since 12 is 50% more than 8 I think it's reasonable to say generally, women don't do it and are therefore not good at it because they don't do it. Sorry Tex... love you are into statistical viewing of this... but i dont think there has been enough posters here to have a well rounded accurate percentage. Most studies are conducted with hundreds of participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But you have just conceded the point that it isn't that women are bad at introducing themselves to strangers and having conversations with them at all and it is only that women tend not to go up to strange men and chat them up as much as men go up to strange women and do that. Also, you seem to have conceded that men are just as bad at it as women supposedly are, even though men do it more and should be better at it. Your argument boils down to the assertion that you are good at picking up women. A guy on the internet says that he knows how to get laid. Brilliant. I hope your chat up lines are better than your debating skills. If you think I'm back peddling, it's because you didn't understand what I was saying in the first place. That may be my fault. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. Yes, I'm a guy on the internet that knows how to get laid. I'm not a whining nice guy that cries on the internet about not being able to find a girlfriend. I'm not saying you are, I'm saying I'm not. You don't believe I get laid? I don't care. I still get laid whether you believe it or not. Well, whether or not you get laid instead of spending Friday night posting on an internet forum is kind of beside the point. I don't care about that. I can't prove that you're talking crap about that and you can't really prove that it's true. It's just a claim that you are making that you can't back up with any proof. That's fine though. It's your opinions that I'm refuting. There's a pattern to all of your arguments. You make a contraversial generalisation (usually something insulting about women) that you can't back up with anything really apart from anecdotal "evidence" or a single research paper or article from the internet. People tell you that it's a load of crap and give you counterexamples to refute it and then you say that there anecdotal evidence is worthless because there are exceptions to every rule. That's why I say you are a terrible debater and it seems like you are trolling. Tawt, Tex thinks men and women should be the same. We should break it to him that would make him bisexual
|
|
|
|
|
