Topic: More Guns, More Mass Shootings—Coincidence? | |
---|---|
More Guns, More Mass Shootings—Coincidence?
America now has 300 million firearms, a barrage of NRA-backed gun laws—and record casualties from mass killers. —By Mark Follman | Updated: Sat Dec. 15, 2012 10:35 PM PST 1561 Update, December 15: Click here for our latest coverage of the Newtown school massacre. This story has been updated to include data from that event. In the fierce debate that always follows the latest mass shooting, it's an argument you hear frequently from gun rights promoters: If only more people were armed, there would be a better chance of stopping these terrible events. This has plausibility problems—what are the odds that, say, a moviegoer with a pack of Twizzlers in one pocket and a Glock in the other would be mentally prepared, properly positioned, and skilled enough to take out a body-armored assailant in a smoke- and panic-filled theater? But whether you believe that would happen is ultimately a matter of theory and speculation. Instead, let's look at some facts gathered in a two-month investigation by Mother Jones. MoJo's map, timeline, and analysis of 30 years of mass shootings in America. In the wake of the slaughters this summer at a Colorado movie theater and a Sikh temple in Wisconsin, we set out to track mass shootings in the United States over the last 30 years. We identified and analyzed 62 of them, and one striking pattern in the data is this: In not a single case was the killing stopped by a civilian using a gun. Moreover, we found that the rate of mass shootings has increased in recent years—at a time when America has been flooded with millions of additional firearms and a barrage of new laws has made it easier than ever to carry them in public. And in recent rampages in which armed civilians attempted to intervene, they not only failed to stop the shooter but also were gravely wounded or killed. America has long been heavily armed relative to other societies, and our arsenal keeps growing. A precise count isn't possible because most guns in the United States aren't registered and the government has scant ability to track them, thanks to a legislative landscape shaped by powerful pro-gun groups such as the National Rifle Association. But through a combination of national surveys and manufacturing and sales data, we know that the increase in firearms has far outpaced population growth. In 1995 there were an estimated 200 million guns in private hands. Today, there are around 300 million—about a 50 percent jump. The US population, now over 314 million, grew by about 20 percent in that period. At this rate, there will be a gun for every man, woman, and child before the decade ends. There is no evidence indicating that arming Americans further will help prevent mass shootings or reduce the carnage, says Dr. Stephen Hargarten, a leading expert on emergency medicine and gun violence at the Medical College of Wisconsin. To the contrary, there appears to be a relationship between the proliferation of firearms and a rise in mass shootings: By our count, there have been two per year on average since 1982. Yet 25 of the 62 cases we examined have occurred since 2006. This year alone there have already been seven mass shootings—and a record number of casualties, with more than 140 people injured and killed. Armed civilians attempting to intervene are actually more likely to increase the bloodshed, says Hargarten, "given that civilian shooters are less likely to hit their targets than police in these circumstances." A chaotic scene in August at the Empire State Building put this starkly into perspective when New York City police officers confronting a gunman wounded nine innocent bystanders. Surveys suggest America's guns may be concentrated in fewer hands today: Approximately 40 percent of households had them in the past decade, versus about 50 percent in the 1980s. But far more relevant is a recent barrage of laws that have rolled back gun restrictions throughout the country. In the past four years, across 37 states, the NRA and its political allies have pushed through 99 laws making guns easier to own, easier to carry in public, and harder for the government to track. The NRA surge: 99 laws rolling back gun controls in 37 states. Among the more striking measures: Eight states now allow firearms in bars. Law-abiding Missourians can carry a gun while intoxicated and even fire it if "acting in self-defense." In Kansas, permit holders can carry concealed weapons inside K-12 schools, and Louisiana allows them in houses of worship. Virginia not only repealed a law requiring handgun vendors to submit sales records, but the state also ordered the destruction of all such previous records. More than two-thirds of these laws were passed by Republican-controlled statehouses, though often with bipartisan support. The laws have caused dramatic changes, including in the two states hit with the recent carnage. Colorado passed its concealed-carry measure in 2003, issuing 9,522 permits that year; by the end of last year the state had handed out a total of just under 120,000, according to data we obtained from the County Sheriffs of Colorado. In March of this year, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled that concealed weapons are legal on the state's college campuses. (It is now the fifth state explicitly allowing them.) If former neuroscience student James Holmes were still attending the University of Colorado today, the movie theater killer—who had no criminal history and obtained his weapons legally—could've gotten a permit to tote his pair of .40 caliber Glocks straight into the student union. Wisconsin's concealed-carry law went into effect just nine months before the Sikh temple shooting in suburban Milwaukee this August. During that time, the state issued a whopping 122,506 permits, according to data from Wisconsin's Department of Justice. The new law authorizes guns on college campuses, as well as in bars, state parks, and some government buildings. And we're on our way to a situation where the most lax state permitting rules—say, Virginia's, where an online course now qualifies for firearms safety training and has drawn a flood of out-of-state applicants—are in effect national law. Eighty percent of states now recognize handgun permits from at least some other states. And gun rights activists are pushing hard for a federal reciprocity bill—passed in the House late last year, with GOP vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan among its most ardent supporters—that would essentially make any state's permits valid nationwide. Indeed, the country's vast arsenal of handguns—at least 118 million of them as of 2010—is increasingly mobile, with 69 of the 99 new state laws making them easier to carry. A decade ago, seven states and the District of Columbia still prohibited concealed handguns; today, it's down to just Illinois and DC. (And Illinois recently passed an exception cracking the door open to carrying). In the 62 mass shootings we analyzed, 54 of the killers packed handguns—including in all 15 of the mass shootings since the surge of pro-gun laws began in 2009. In a certain sense the law was on their side: nearly 80 percent of the killers in our investigation obtained their weapons legally. We used a conservative set of criteria to build a comprehensive rundown of high-profile attacks in public places—at schools, workplaces, government buildings, shopping malls—though they represent only a small fraction of the nation's overall gun violence. The FBI defines a mass murderer as someone who kills four or more people in a single incident, usually in one location. (As opposed to spree or serial killers, who strike multiple times.) We excluded cases involving armed robberies or gang violence; dropping the number of fatalities by just one, or including those motives, would add many, many more cases. (More about our criteria here.) There was one case in our data set in which an armed civilian played a role. Back in 1982, a man opened fire at a welding shop in Miami, killing eight and wounding three others before fleeing on a bicycle. A civilian who worked nearby pursued the assailant in a car, shooting and killing him a few blocks away (in addition to ramming him with the car). Florida authorities, led by then-state attorney Janet Reno, concluded that the vigilante had used force justifiably, and speculated that he may have prevented additional killings. But even if we were to count that case as a successful armed intervention by a civilian, it would account for just 1.6 percent of the mass shootings in the last 30 years. Advertise on MotherJones.com More broadly, attempts by armed civilians to stop shooting rampages are rare—and successful ones even rarer. There were two school shootings in the late 1990s, in Mississippi and Pennsylvania, in which bystanders with guns ultimately subdued the teen perpetrators, but in both cases it was after the shooting had subsided. Other cases led to tragic results. In 2005, as a rampage unfolded inside a shopping mall in Tacoma, Washington, a civilian named Brendan McKown confronted the assailant with a licensed handgun he was carrying. The assailant pumped several bullets into McKown and wounded six people before eventually surrendering to police after a hostage standoff. (A comatose McKown eventually recovered after weeks in the hospital.) In Tyler, Texas, that same year, a civilian named Mark Wilson fired his licensed handgun at a man on a rampage at the county courthouse. Wilson—who was a firearms instructor—was shot dead by the body-armored assailant, who wielded an AK-47. (None of these cases were included in our mass shootings data set because fewer than four victims died in each.) Appeals to heroism on this subject abound. So does misleading information. Gun rights die-hards frequently credit the end of a rampage in 2002 at the Appalachian School of Law in Virginia to armed "students" who intervened—while failing to disclose that those students were also current and former law enforcement officers, and that the killer, according to police investigators, was out of ammo by the time they got to him. For more..... http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/mass-shootings-investigation?page=2 It is no coincidence. We teach violence to our children as a means of getting what you want through beatings, gun philosophy, war, etc... so give them a way via more guns to get what they believe they want or should happen.... Just tell your loved ones you love them every chance you get because a gun crazy may take them out at any given time or place. |
|
|
|
Just tell your loved ones you love them every chance you get because a gun crazy may take them out at any given time or place. Dont worry, I will. They know to take cover while I try to take the active shooter out.
What will you do? Run? Hide? Pray? |
|
|
|
I think these mass shootings will only cause people to go out and purchase more guns feeling that they need to protect themselves.
When you spread fear (terrorize) people with statements like: "..... because a gun crazy may take them out at any given time or place." you are not helping anything, you are just spreading more fear. So what do people tend to do when they are afraid? Give up their guns? Not even close. They go get better guns. Another thing that this will help to promote is a police state. That is if the government has enough money to pay the police. If they don't, then people will just have to start being their own police. Neighborhood watch teams will all be well armed. |
|
|
|
I think these mass shootings will only cause people to go out and purchase more guns feeling that they need to protect themselves. The local gun shops have been packed all day long this week.
|
|
|
|
I think these mass shootings will only cause people to go out and purchase more guns feeling that they need to protect themselves. The local gun shops have been packed all day long this week.
Interesting development. |
|
|
|
Don't ask me why, maybe it's all the news sensationalizing the killings in all the murder sprees of late, but I'm reminded of a song written in the sixties about the Watts Riots.
It seems to me that things really haven't changed much since 1966. Frank Zappa - "Trouble Every Day" Well I'm about to get sick From watchin' my TV Been checkin' out the news Until my eyeballs fail to see I mean to say that every day Is just another rotten mess And when it's gonna change, my friend Is anybody's guess So I'm watchin' and I'm waitin' Hopin' for the best Even think I'll go to prayin' Every time I hear 'em sayin' That there's no way to delay That trouble comin' every day No way to delay That trouble comin' every day Wednesday I watched the riot . . . Seen the cops out on the street Watched 'em throwin' rocks and stuff And chokin' in the heat Listened to reports About the whisky passin' 'round Seen the smoke and fire And the market burnin' down Watched while everybody On his street would take a turn To stomp and smash and bash and crash And slash and bust and burn And I'm watchin' and I'm waitin' Hopin' for the best Even think I'll go to prayin' Every time I hear 'em sayin' That there's no way to delay That trouble comin' every day No way to delay That trouble comin' every day Well, you can cool it, You can heat it . . . 'Cause, baby, I don't need it . . . Take your TV tube and eat it 'N all that phony stuff on sports 'N all the unconfirmed reports You know I watched that rotten box Until my head begin to hurt From checkin' out the way The newsman say they get the dirt Before the guys on channel so-and-so And further they assert That any show they'll interrupt To bring you news if it comes up They say that if the place blows up They will be the first to tell, Because the boys they got downtown Are workin' hard and doin' swell, And if anybody gets the news Before it hits the street, They say that no one blabs it faster Their coverage can't be beat And if another woman driver Gets machine-gunned from her seat They'll send some joker with a brownie And you'll see it all complete So I'm watchin' and I'm waitin' Hopin' for the best Even think I'll go to prayin' Every time I hear 'em sayin' That there's no way to delay That trouble comin' every day No way to delay That trouble comin' every day Hey, you know something people? I'm not black But there's a whole lots a times I wish I could say I'm not white Well, I seen the fires burnin' And the local people turnin' On the merchants and the shops Who used to sell their brooms and mops And every other household item Watched the mob just turn and bite 'em And they say it served 'em right Because a few of them are white, And it's the same across the nation Black and white discrimination Yellin' "You can't understand me!" 'N all that other jazz they hand me In the papers and TV and All that mass stupidity That seems to grow more every day Each time you hear some nitwit say He wants to go and do you in Because the color of your skin Just don't appeal to him (No matter if it's black or white) Because he's out for blood tonight You know we got to sit around at home And watch this thing begin But I bet there won't be many live To see it really end 'Cause the fire in the street Ain't like the fire in the heart And in the eyes of all these people Don't you know that this could start On any street in any town In any state if any clown Decides that now's the time to fight For some ideal he thinks is right And if a million more agree There ain't no Great Society As it applies to you and me Our country isn't free And the law refuses to see If all that you can ever be Is just a lousy janitor Unless your uncle owns a store You know that five in every four Just won't amount to nothin' more Gonna watch the rats go across the floor And make up songs about being poor Blow your harmonica, son! Don't let the MSM news with all it's propaganda reports bamboozle you into thinking guns is the problem. The problem is society itself. |
|
|
|
yep
if you mix soda with a slice of pizza you have a hearty meal if you mix soda with alka seltzer,, not such a good result similarly,, more guns in another culture may not have the same result its the culture we start with that makes such excessive gun ownership dangerous |
|
|
|
Disarm the NOI and NBP first. Then, let's talk regulation.
|
|
|
|
its the culture we start with that makes such excessive gun ownership dangerous What is your definition of "excessive"?…More guns than the criminals will have?…I'd define that as "insufficient", not excessive. |
|
|
|
I have never felt the need for a gun, but if legislators start trying to tell me I can't have one, I will go get one and wear it on my hip.
|
|
|
|
I have never felt the need for a gun, but if legislators start trying to tell me I can't have one, I will go get one and wear it on my hip. I think they are trying to tell you that now. If I were you, I'd get one before the gun store runs out...I hear they've been going like hotcakes lately. |
|
|
|
This has been enough to turn even a moderate gun advocate like myself into an anti gun advocate.
If they do not do something...it is just going to get worse if it isn't too late already. Someone needs to build a gun detector for a person to wear on their person so they can clear the hell out when a gun is within 50 feet or so, that way they have a chance in hell of living out in public. |
|
|
|
"Maybe this is crazy, but I think the right to own a gun is trumped by the right not to be shot by one." - Andy Borowitz
|
|
|
|
"Maybe this is crazy, but I think the right to own a gun is trumped by the right not to be shot by one." - Andy Borowitz It's crazy alright. The same logic can also apply to just about anything that could possibly hurt someone. the right to own a car is trumped by the right not to be run over by one. the right to own a baseball bat is trumped by the right not to be beaten by one. the right to own a dinner fork is trumped by the right not to be stabbed by one. the right to have hands is trumped by the right not to be strangled by them. Someone else's right to life is trumped by my right not to be killed by someone else. I think we're on a slippery slope. Wouldn't you agree? |
|
|
|
This has been enough to turn even a moderate gun advocate like myself into an anti gun advocate. If they do not do something...it is just going to get worse if it isn't too late already. Someone needs to build a gun detector for a person to wear on their person so they can clear the hell out when a gun is within 50 feet or so, that way they have a chance in hell of living out in public. If they do not do something...it is just going to get worse if it isn't too late already.
Who told you that? Or did you come up with that idea all by yourself? There is no such thing as a "gun detector." Metal detectors, yes, but they will detect anything metal. |
|
|
|
Edited by
TJN
on
Tue 12/18/12 04:20 PM
|
|
Your story contradicts itself.
Yes there are more guns, but fewer gun owners as a percentage. So I fail to see how more guns is their reasoning behind the rise in mass shootings because the psychos doing it would actually have less acces to them. I'm sick of all the knee jerk reaction to this. How about trying to find why the shooters do this not their choice of weapon. |
|
|
|
Gun free zones provide killers easy prey.
|
|
|
|
Gun free zones provide killers easy prey. Bump dat! The right to own box cutters gets kids carved on. New Black Panther Party (NBPP) frequently speaks of killing “crackers babies,” “f***ots” and old white women. I have seen the NBP defended by posters here on this forum as having the need to own high power, easy to convert to full-auto weapons. How sick is dat? How many deer are there running the streets of Philadelphia? |
|
|
|
Gun free zones provide killers easy prey. So do gun infused zones as our country shows. Almost all mass shooting have at least one gun toter in the midst that didn't do anything. Gun toters never save the day at one of the mass situations, ever. |
|
|
|
"Maybe this is crazy, but I think the right to own a gun is trumped by the right not to be shot by one." - Andy Borowitz It's crazy alright. The same logic can also apply to just about anything that could possibly hurt someone. the right to own a car is trumped by the right not to be run over by one. the right to own a baseball bat is trumped by the right not to be beaten by one. the right to own a dinner fork is trumped by the right not to be stabbed by one. the right to have hands is trumped by the right not to be strangled by them. Someone else's right to life is trumped by my right not to be killed by someone else. I think we're on a slippery slope. Wouldn't you agree? LOL in the end you said exactly the same thing you were disputing as a slippery slope... to damn funny |
|
|