Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Previous 1 2 3 Next

Topic: Why do you NEED a gun like an AR-15?
willing2 Joined Sun 06/08/08 Posts: 20221	Sat 12/01/12 03:39 PM


TJN Joined Sun 12/02/07 Posts: 6745	Sat 12/01/12 03:53 PM


sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sat 12/01/12 05:50 PM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast....

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Sat 12/01/12 11:03 PM
the idea behind the second amendment is to give "THE PEOPLE" the power to be able to keep the govt from becoming oppressive an overbearing--- the second amendment gives "THE PEOPLE" the right to by any weapon they choose m1 tank anyone or how about an f-15 or b1 bomber sound like a joke but that is why the second amendment is there

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 12/02/12 02:17 AM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast.... If I assault someone with a Rock,is it an Assault-Weapon? The function of a so-called Assault-Weapon once it is in Civilian Ownership,is no different from any semi-Automatic Firearm!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 12/02/12 02:24 AM
the idea behind the second amendment is to give "THE PEOPLE" the power to be able to keep the govt from becoming oppressive an overbearing--- the second amendment gives "THE PEOPLE" the right to by any weapon they choose m1 tank anyone or how about an f-15 or b1 bomber sound like a joke but that is why the second amendment is there ATF made sure there is only a limited Choice these days! But to stop the Knowledge of HowTo,they'd virtually have to shut down the WWW!

willing2 Joined Sun 06/08/08 Posts: 20221	Sun 12/02/12 03:59 AM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast.... Assault is just a nasty little liberal term tacked onto a weapon used in defense. Like the second amendment states, it's not only American citizens right but, their duty to arm themselves against threats. External as well as internal. If you are called on to serve in that well-armed militia, contributions of arms and ammo are helpful.

boredinaz06 Joined Sun 10/15/06 Posts: 22764	Sun 12/02/12 01:07 PM
Why does anyone need Porsche to go to Circle K for a gallon of milk? We have certain inalienable rights in this country and for some reason there is a cross section of American's who don;t like it.

Peccy Joined Thu 06/28/07 Posts: 17181	Sun 12/02/12 01:15 PM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast.... Assault is just a nasty little liberal term tacked onto a weapon used in defense. Like the second amendment states, it's not only American citizens right but, their duty to arm themselves against threats. External as well as internal. If you are called on to serve in that well-armed militia, contributions of arms and ammo are helpful. and appreciated!

heavenlyboy34 Joined Fri 07/04/08 Posts: 17348	Sun 12/02/12 02:06 PM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast.... Assault is just a nasty little liberal term tacked onto a weapon used in defense. Like the second amendment states, it's not only American citizens right but, their duty to arm themselves against threats. External as well as internal. If you are called on to serve in that well-armed militia, contributions of arms and ammo are helpful. I know a lot of people who own AR's and AK's and various other weaponry, and I'd trust them before the cops any day. It's unfortunate that more people don't understand that the purpose (well, one of them) of the second amendment is to allow citizens to protect themselves from government force foreign and domestic.

adj4u Joined Sun 04/08/07 Posts: 21254	Sun 12/02/12 05:47 PM Edited by adj4u on Sun 12/02/12 05:50 PM
took me awhile to find this but i posted this a long time ago in another gun thread still says it the best i think Mon 05/04/09 04:45 PM http://mingle2.com/topic/show/221917?page=2 ------------------------------------------------------------- IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776 The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world ----------------------------- ****WHO IS GOING TO HOLD THE GOVT ACOUNTABL AND ENFORCE THE DECALRATION OF INDEPENDANCE ENTER THE 2ND AMMENDMENT ---------------------------- U.S. Constitution: Second Amendment Second Amendment - Bearing Arms Amendment Text \| Annotations A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. ---------------------------- DEFINITIONS ----------------------------- Main Entry: in•fringe Pronunciation: in-'frinj Function: verb Inflected Forms: in•fringed; in•fring•ing Etymology: Medieval Latin infringere, from Latin, to break, crush, from in- in + frangere to break transitive verb : to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another <the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed —U.S. Constitution amendment II>; especially : to violate a holder's rights under (a copyright, patent, trademark, or trade name) intransitive verb : ENCROACH —in•fring•er noun Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ to encroach upon in a way that violates law or the rights of another en•croach (n-krch) intr.v. en•croached, en•croach•ing, en•croach•es 1. To take another's possessions or rights gradually or stealthily: encroach on a neighbor's land. 2. To advance beyond proper or former limits: desert encroaching upon grassland. 3. Football To commit encroachment. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ peo•ple (ppl) n. pl. people 1. Humans considered as a group or in indefinite numbers: People were dancing in the street. I met all sorts of people. 2. A body of persons living in the same country under one national government; a nationality. 3. pl. peo•ples A body of persons sharing a common religion, culture, language, or inherited condition of life. 4. Persons with regard to their residence, class, profession, or group: city people. 5. The mass of ordinary persons; the populace. Used with the: "those who fear and distrust the people, and wish to draw all powers from them into the hands of the higher classes" Thomas Jefferson. 6. The citizens of a political unit, such as a nation or state; the electorate. Used with the. 7. Persons subordinate to or loyal to a ruler, superior, or employer: The queen showed great compassion for her people. 8. Family, relatives, or ancestors. 9. Informal Animals or other beings distinct from humans: Rabbits and squirrels are the furry little people of the woods http://www.thefreedictionary.com/people ------------------------------------ SO IF THE GOVT INFRINGES (see DEFINITIONS) THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE (SEE DEFINITIONS) TO BEAR ARMS WHO IS GOING TOENFORCE THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE WHEN THE GOVT BEGINS ABUSING THEIR POWERS ------------------------------------ deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed ------------------------------------ AND BEGIN RESTRICTING THE ------------------------------------ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men ------------------------------------- WHO WILL STEP IN AND REMOVE THE ------------------------------------- That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government ---------------------------------- AND INSTITUTE THE NEW GOVT DO YOU THINK THE GOVT IS GOING TO DO IT IT IS UP TO THE PEOPLE AND TO DO SO THE PEOPLE NEED TO BE ARMED AN UNARMED PEOPLE ARE SLAVE TO THOSE IN POWER AND THE GOVT ARE THE MASTERS WHICH IS NOT WHAT IS WRITTEN IN THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDANCE ------------------------------------- deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,

sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sun 12/02/12 06:02 PM
the idea behind the second amendment is to give "THE PEOPLE" the power to be able to keep the govt from becoming oppressive an overbearing--- the second amendment gives "THE PEOPLE" the right to by any weapon they choose m1 tank anyone or how about an f-15 or b1 bomber sound like a joke but that is why the second amendment is there I don't think I could afford an f-15 unless they were on clearance....and then ya gotta feed it!

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 12/02/12 06:03 PM
Sounds a little paranoid to me.

sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sun 12/02/12 06:03 PM
that's an assault weapon but I bet it could solve the white tailed deer population problem in the northeast.... If I assault someone with a Rock,is it an Assault-Weapon? The function of a so-called Assault-Weapon once it is in Civilian Ownership,is no different from any semi-Automatic Firearm! a rose is nonetheless a......well not a turnip

motowndowntown Joined Wed 11/19/08 Posts: 21824	Sun 12/02/12 06:24 PM
Where's the definition of a "well regulated militia"?

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 12/02/12 06:33 PM
Sounds a little paranoid to me. Sounds a little ignorant to me.

sweetestgirl11 Joined Fri 09/12/08 Posts: 30087	Sun 12/02/12 06:43 PM
Where's the definition of a "well regulated militia"? national guard

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Sun 12/02/12 06:51 PM
Where's the definition of a "well regulated militia"? national guard That isn't possible since the "National Guard" didn't exist when the Constitution was written. The Supreme Court has already ruled that the "right to bear arms" specifically refers to the citizens of the US.

Lpdon Joined Thu 02/25/10 Posts: 18772	Sun 12/02/12 07:33 PM
the idea behind the second amendment is to give "THE PEOPLE" the power to be able to keep the govt from becoming oppressive an overbearing--- the second amendment gives "THE PEOPLE" the right to by any weapon they choose m1 tank anyone or how about an f-15 or b1 bomber sound like a joke but that is why the second amendment is there The American People can't buy an f-15, B1 or B2 or any military grade weapon, even if they can afford it. That is why they government is as powerful as it is, no militia could stand up to the weapons it possesses.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Mon 12/03/12 06:42 AM
Sounds a little paranoid to me. Sounds a little ignorant to me. The picture or me?