Topic: CNBC EXECTUIVE'S CHILDREN MURDERED --.CNBC REMOVES STORY,
no photo
Mon 10/29/12 12:44 AM


I didn't know about the lawsuit until you brought it up but when reading about how a CNBC executive's two children were murdered by their nanny who then tried to commit suicide, something seemed fishy to me. I think there's definitely more to the story


that Lawsuit is a ludicrous Non-Starter!laugh
So,I doubt that any Illuminaty or non-Illuminaty,or 666th Degree Mason would go and murder Children for it!slaphead


Okay, so why would a nanny murder this CNBC executive's kids? What was her motive?


Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 12:45 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Mon 10/29/12 12:48 AM



I didn't know about the lawsuit until you brought it up but when reading about how a CNBC executive's two children were murdered by their nanny who then tried to commit suicide, something seemed fishy to me. I think there's definitely more to the story


that Lawsuit is a ludicrous Non-Starter!laugh
So,I doubt that any Illuminaty or non-Illuminaty,or 666th Degree Mason would go and murder Children for it!slaphead


Okay, so why would a nanny murder this CNBC executive's kids? What was her motive?


go ask that Loon!
Maybe some Illuminaty-Guy slipped her some Super-LSD or sumthin'.
Or some Braineating nano-Bots!
Can't trust them Guys!
slaphead

no photo
Mon 10/29/12 12:47 AM




I didn't know about the lawsuit until you brought it up but when reading about how a CNBC executive's two children were murdered by their nanny who then tried to commit suicide, something seemed fishy to me. I think there's definitely more to the story


that Lawsuit is a ludicrous Non-Starter!laugh
So,I doubt that any Illuminaty or non-Illuminaty,or 666th Degree Mason would go and murder Children for it!slaphead


Okay, so why would a nanny murder this CNBC executive's kids? What was her motive?


go ask that Loon!
slaphead


Okay, so she's just bat **** crazy. That explains it all away. Nothing more to see here whoa


no photo
Mon 10/29/12 12:54 AM
I know that these kind of things do happen all too often, but in this case, being the man he is in a high position, I don't think it off the wall to question if there is more going on behind the scenes.


Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 12:56 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Mon 10/29/12 01:00 AM

I know that these kind of things do happen all too often, but in this case, being the man he is in a high position, I don't think it off the wall to question if there is more going on behind the scenes.


go look behind the Non-Curtain if that makes you happy!
No one stopping you!laugh
Especially have a look at the ludicrous Lawsuit!
It's a no-Brainer,publicity-Stunt!If it even exists!
Then have a good look at that Spire-Group and the Attorneys behind it!laugh
But if Conspiracies make you happy,be my Guest!

no photo
Mon 10/29/12 01:03 AM


I know that these kind of things do happen all too often, but in this case, being the man he is in a high position, I don't think it off the wall to question if there is more going on behind the scenes.


go look behind the Non-Curtain if that makes you happy!
No one stopping you!laugh
Especially have a look at the ludicrous Lawsuit!
It's a no-Brainer,publicity-Stunt!laugh
But if Conspiracies make you happy,be my Guest!



I just don't see a motive for the nanny. When there's power, money, and influence involved, I think killing a couple of kids wouldn't make those kind of people loose any sleep if it got their point across and their desired outcome. I imagine the father got himself deep into something and what prompted this. It makes more sense to me anyway


Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 02:02 AM
http://beforeitsnews.com/politics/2012/10/cnbc-reports-43-trillion-bankster-lawsuit-cnbc-execs-children-murdered-next-day-2465630.html

yep,BeforeItsNews!
The Site who brought you the News about the Astronauts on the Intenational Spacestation being suffocated by a Helium-Leak,and all have died!

Still try to figure how those Dunces fell for a Story from The Onion!:laughing:


Interesting that THEY didn't do away with the Nanny!
Besides,why target one Executive,when the Story of the Lawsuit is all over the WWW?






no photo
Mon 10/29/12 02:17 AM
Edited by Rawrr_Girl on Mon 10/29/12 02:21 AM

You all really need to do better than stringing a Bunch of unrelated events together,then throwing some Conjecture into the Mixture,and come and post it on Sites as "Facts"!
Then to top it off,getting peeved if you're not taken seriously!
ALL? shocked :P. I just go by whatever evidence is there. I won't go about like some conspiracy theorist, if there's not enough info about said news headline. Sheesh.

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 02:30 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Mon 10/29/12 02:33 AM
The News about the "Lawsuit" is all over the WWW,on every Conspiracy-Site,yet we are being told that some Executive had his Family targeted,as retaliation for the publishing of an Article by the News-Organization he is working for!
While every CT-Site is having a Field-Day with the same Story without any repercussions!
Tell that to the Ferryman!

http://www.google.ch/search?q=Spire+Law&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 02:38 AM
I doubt that story ever ran on any major Network!

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 03:30 AM
Apparently CNBC removed the article and nothing is showing about this report that they published. But a smart Blogger called 'Sherrie Questioning All' was smart enough to capture screen shots of the article before it was removed. Take a look at the screen shots and article by Sherrie HERE.



Wow,what presence of mind!surprised spock

Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 03:37 AM
Edited by Conrad_73 on Mon 10/29/12 03:41 AM
http://www.inquisitr.com/376471/cnbc-exec-kevin-krims-children-stabbed-to-death-by-nanny-in-manhattan/

Until we know more,that is all there is!
Anything else is Alu-Foilhat Stuff!
Belongs into the same Bin as this!

http://www.inquisitr.com/379169/morgan-freeman-dead-rumor-he-thinks-its-funny/

soufiehere's photo
Mon 10/29/12 04:55 AM
This thread has been edited of remarks
directed at other Members as opposed to the Topic.

soufie
Site Moderator

no photo
Mon 10/29/12 10:28 AM
Sorry Soufie. I'll behave.


no photo
Mon 10/29/12 11:03 AM
It could all be coincidence of course, as always.

My question is still this:

Why was the article on CNBC if it was not true? (I have a copy of the law suit and the CNBC article) I have not gone to New York and checked the status of the case to see if it was actually filed.

Given that, the question is why was the article removed?

Is it a coincidence that the general manager of digital media (Internet News) had his children murdered and the next day the article disappeared?

Also, who cuts their own throat to commit suicide and why would that nanny stab two children? Does that make any sense?

Also, why keep her in a drug induced coma? How does anyone know what happened if they can't talk to her?

Its way too strange.


Conrad_73's photo
Mon 10/29/12 11:15 AM

It could all be coincidence of course, as always.

My question is still this:

Why was the article on CNBC if it was not true? (I have a copy of the law suit and the CNBC article) I have not gone to New York and checked the status of the case to see if it was actually filed.

Given that, the question is why was the article removed?

Is it a coincidence that the general manager of digital media (Internet News) had his children murdered and the next day the article disappeared?

Also, who cuts their own throat to commit suicide and why would that nanny stab two children? Does that make any sense?

Also, why keep her in a drug induced coma? How does anyone know what happened if they can't talk to her?

Its way too strange.


http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=what-is-a-medically-induced-coma

read the Comments!

no photo
Mon 10/29/12 11:20 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 10/29/12 11:20 AM
Conrad if you have a point to make just make it. Stop sending me on a wild goose chase.


HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 10/29/12 02:59 PM
Bloody Hell! Talk about jumping to irrational conclusions!

no photo
Mon 10/29/12 03:07 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 10/29/12 03:08 PM
No one was actually "talking about" irrational conclusions.

It was probably all just another strange coincidence.

(I still wonder why CNBC removed the article... suddenly.)

(..and I am still in a state of disbelief that a nanny would stab two children then slit her own throat.)

Seriously? I mean, who does that?

If these two events are not related, they each still deserve a very close look.







HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 10/29/12 03:11 PM

No one was actually "talking about" irrational conclusions.

It was probably all just another strange coincidence.

(I still wonder why CNBC removed the article... suddenly.)

(..and I am still in a state of disbelief that a nanny would stab two children then slit her own throat.)

Seriously? I mean, who does that?

If these two events are not related, they each still deserve a very close look.


The OP is clearly based upon an irrational conclusion. I admit, the crime is horrific, but it is more likely that the story was pulled owing to a lack of credibility.