2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14
Topic: I don't believe the official story of 9/11
metalwing's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:14 PM

yes... i was thinking about how the government lied to us about 9-11 and the evil reptilian overlords with their super secret websites that tell us how to build the death ray building destroying weapons, and the dancing Israelis...


What ever you do, don't mention 'burden of proof'!slaphead


Are you sure you spelled that correctly?spock

andrewzooms's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:14 PM
The Government never lies about anything. Everything reported by the media is a fact. The sky is a different color in every 911 video. No cameras are outside The Pentagon. It is very easy to fly 767 into two skyscrapers. It is very easy to fly a 757 to into a 40 ft building at impossible speeds. It is very easy for titanium engines to vaporize after hitting dirt in Shanksville. The Twin Towers could withstand an awful electric fire in 1975, a huge bomb detonated in 1993 but not United 175 which clipped the building. It is very easy for a 700 ft tall building to fall in free fall speeds after being hit by some debris.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:34 PM

The Government never lies about anything. Everything reported by the media is a fact. The sky is a different color in every 911 video. No cameras are outside The Pentagon. It is very easy to fly 767 into two skyscrapers. It is very easy to fly a 757 to into a 40 ft building at impossible speeds. It is very easy for titanium engines to vaporize after hitting dirt in Shanksville. The Twin Towers could withstand an awful electric fire in 1975, a huge bomb detonated in 1993 but not United 175 which clipped the building. It is very easy for a 700 ft tall building to fall in free fall speeds after being hit by some debris.


'Clipped' the building. laugh

andrewzooms's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:36 PM
Stanley Primnath and Brian Clark the plane hit his office. They walked down the stairs and got out before it collapsed. No burns or nothing.

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:40 PM
To give you some kind of idea as to why the "findings" of this commission can NOT be used to back up any talking points on the topic of 9/11, let me remind you what the official task of this commission was. The Kean Commissions was told to document the official story and make national security recommendations based on that story. The only information that was to be included in the official report had to match the official story. If any one member of the committee objected to any testimony or finding, that piece of information was to be left out of the report For some examples of this you can talk to the thousands of people who became 9/11 truthers as a result of their testimony being omitted from and contradicted by the final report.


Absolutely.

The 9-11 commission's job was to create a nice little myth for the sake of history.

All bull crap it is.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:43 PM
'Clipped the building' laugh

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:46 PM



Is it that time again already?


What do you mean? I don't think a month goes by without one of these.


Yep! and we are about to hear all the same ol' explosives, conspiracies, aliens, anti-pancake theories, and maybe a few new evil ray gun approaches (all in the name of "asking questions").

I bet the smoke hid Batman while he threw explosive batarangs!!laugh


As the article in the O.P stated....

You are not qualified to even discuss the events of 9-11.

andrewzooms's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:52 PM
Jet fuel explodes outside the building. Not inside. Not a direct hit.


Not big enough for a 767 hole.


HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:55 PM

Jet fuel explodes outside the building. Not inside. Not a direct hit.


Not big enough for a 767 hole.




So, they were holograms?? laugh

Do you troofers ever wonder why people don't take you seriously?laugh

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:57 PM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 08/20/12 04:58 PM
There is no evidence that can support the official government's conspiracy theory of the events of 9-11.

It holds no more weight or credibility than any of the wildest conspiracy theories you can dig up.




andrewzooms's photo
Mon 08/20/12 04:59 PM
Edited by andrewzooms on Mon 08/20/12 05:00 PM
No it was a missile. No united logos on any footage of second plane I can find. No American logo on first plane. The Brooklyn Bridge Video showing the first plane
has never been released.

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:00 PM
In fact if I were to compare each and every theory of the events of 9-11 side by side the wildest and most ridiculous one of all is the 9-11 commission report which, when I read it made me have to barf. It was mentally painful as it was so phony and full of propaganda.


HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:01 PM

There is no evidence that can support the official government's conspiracy theory of the events of 9-11.

It holds no more weight or credibility than any of the wildest conspiracy theories you can dig up.






I've read some ridiculous sci-fi crap about 9/11. That nutter, Judy Woods springs to mind.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:02 PM
Edited by HotRodDeluxe on Mon 08/20/12 05:04 PM

No it was a missile. No united logos on any footage of second plane I can find. No American logo on first plane. The Brooklyn Bridge Video showing the first plane
has never been released.


So, a plane didn't 'clip' the building, it was a misslie now?laugh

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:03 PM


There is no evidence that can support the official government's conspiracy theory of the events of 9-11.

It holds no more weight or credibility than any of the wildest conspiracy theories you can dig up.






I've read some ridiculous sci-fi crap about 9/11. That nutter, Judy Woods springs to mind.



Judy Wood is right about a lot of things, and she has a lot of questions that no one can answer.

DUST DUST DUST DUST...

MELTED ENGINE BLOCKS in cars that were a long distance from the towers and where there were no fires. ....


no photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:03 PM
Dust from explosions.

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:04 PM



There is no evidence that can support the official government's conspiracy theory of the events of 9-11.

It holds no more weight or credibility than any of the wildest conspiracy theories you can dig up.






I've read some ridiculous sci-fi crap about 9/11. That nutter, Judy Woods springs to mind.



Judy Wood is right about a lot of things, and she has a lot of questions that no one can answer.

DUST DUST DUST DUST...

MELTED ENGINE BLOCKS in cars that were a long distance from the towers and where there were no fires. ....




laugh This is great!

no photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:04 PM
You can't explain it either. laugh laugh laugh

mightymoe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:05 PM

There is no evidence that can support the official government's conspiracy theory of the events of 9-11.

It holds no more weight or credibility than any of the wildest conspiracy theories you can dig up.






lol CT's that someone else digs up? there is that evidence thing again... there none so blind as those who won't see...

HotRodDeluxe's photo
Mon 08/20/12 05:05 PM

You can't explain it either. laugh laugh laugh


I can, but that would be considered against the rules. laugh

2 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14