Earth Day isn't about America or Americans, it's about the planet.

Earth day is about spreading misery, poverty and sickness throughout the world. The man who co-created Earthday was so concerned about people that he beat his girlfriend to death and left her to rot in a trunk in his closet.

In many poor countries, they have to cook by burning dung, which is more polluting than modern coal fire plants, so Environmentalists encourage people to eat raw food and do without electricity. Wind and solar power generators cost more energy to create than they can generate in their operational lifetime, but Environmentalists push for their use anyway.

Earth day isn't about America or Americans or even the planet, it's about destroying prosperity and happiness where ever it is found.

Earth day is about spreading misery, poverty and sickness throughout the world. The man who co-created Earthday was so concerned about people that he beat his girlfriend to death and left her to rot in a trunk in his closet.

In many poor countries, they have to cook by burning dung, which is more polluting than modern coal fire plants, so Environmentalists encourage people to eat raw food and do without electricity. Wind and solar power generators cost more energy to create than they can generate in their operational lifetime, but Environmentalists push for their use anyway.

Earth day isn't about America or Americans or even the planet, it's about destroying prosperity and happiness where ever it is found.

sorry your feeling miserable, poor and sick today

But that's the point, I'm not. Which is why Earth day is a failure.

The dung they use is cattle dung and is noy way anywhere near what coal fired plants do. Its grass they are burning. Whoever told you that is an idiot.

Burning solid fuels produces extremely high levels of indoor air pollution: typical 24-hour levels of PM10 in biomass-using homes in Africa, Asia or Latin America range from 300 to 3000 micrograms per cubic metre (ìg/m3). Peaks during cooking may be as high as 10 000 ìg/m3. By comparison, the United States Environmental Protection Agency has set the standard for annual mean PM10 levels in outdoor air at 50 ìg/m3; the annual mean PM10 limit agreed by the European Union is 40 ìg/m3. As cooking takes place every day of the year, most people using solid fuels are exposed to levels of small particles many times higher than accepted annual limits for outdoor air pollution (Figure 3). The more time people spend in these highly polluted environments, the more dramatic the consequences for health. Women and children, indoors and in the vicinity of the hearth for many hours a day, are most at risk from harmful indoor air pollution.

The results for the year 2000 unveiled cooking as a dangerous undertaking and indoor air pollution from burning solid fuel as one of the top ten global health risks. The "kitchen killer" turned out to be responsible for 1.6 million deaths and 2.7% of the global burden of disease. In poor developing countries, only malnutrition, unsafe sex and lack of clean water and adequate sanitation were greater health threats than indoor air pollution. This wake-up call placed indoor air pollution on the international public health agenda for the first time. Yet, the most recent and more accurate estimates show practically no change. Globally, 1.5 million people died from diseases caused by indoor air pollution in the year 2002. This figure includes children who died from pneumonia and adults who died from chronic respiratory disease and lung cancer – only those diseases for which current evidence for a link with indoor air pollution is sufficient (see Table 1). What if indoor smoke also turns out to contribute to low birth weight and tuberculosis? Reliance on polluting solid fuels (Figure 4) and inefficient household energy practices varies widely around the world, as does the death toll due to indoor smoke (Figure 5). In 2002, Sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia led with 396 000 and 483 000 deaths due to indoor smoke, respectively. Widespread use of biomass and coal in China plays a key role in chronic respiratory diseases among adults, and was responsible for a large share of the 466 000 deaths in the Western Pacific in 2002. Although the majority of the population in Latin America and the Caribbean, the Eastern Mediterranean and Europe use gas and other cleaner fuels for cooking, the health burden disproportionately falls on the poorest countries in these regions, and on the poorest members of society among whom solid fuel use is still common (see Figure 6 and Trapped by energy poverty).

Earth day is a failure because YOU don't feel bad?

Funny guy.

The environmentalists won't be happy until everyone else is miserable. It's a crying shame, but it's the truth.

But that's the point, I'm not. Which is why Earth day is a failure.

That's strange how you're gauging it's success on you not being miserable.

How is that strange? Earth days purpose is to make people miserable, I'm not miserable, do Earth day isn't very successful.

All you're doing is complaining. Seems kind of miserable to me.

I'm just noticing your b*tching and moaning.

Good and evil are WAAAAAY open to perception.

I'm enjoying earth day at the beach, digging my toes in the sand,
feeling the sun on my face, the breeze rustling through my hair, listening to birds, watching children play in the sand...
just not feeling very evil right now,
but the day is young.