We are referred to as "Human Beings" in secular terms.

Do the scriptures use "Human Beings"?... An older translation, not a translation of a translation.

God would not visit us(come to dwell with us ) if He

did not care for us.



This is why cross referencing is good, because it gives us

a deeper and richer meaning of God's Word.






And.....

I am Sorry to hear that you do not think you are a human being.


Nite now....gotta go.....

Very true, but still is not saying the exact words. That difference again done multiple times on a large scale throughout the entire bible could then in fact change the meaning of the original meaning. And yes on this one verse, it doesn't make a WHOLE lot of difference. But still the difference is there.

My God has never referred to me or us as "Human Beings". So what you are saying is God is like a Human being. For we are made in the image of God. When looking at a mirror and you see your "image" or even a picture, do you see a cat? A dog? A robot? What "image" do you see? Because that image you see is the image of God.

We are still ONLY human beings made in The image of God.

We are NOT gods made in the image of God ,as you seem to believe.

And when we become born again, we STILL DO NOT EVER become

gods, as you seem to believe.


This is why one needs The Holy Spirit ,to teach and

help understand God's Word.


You can lie your head on your pillow tonight and ask God to

REVEAL TO YOU ALL HE HAS FOR YOU..and I will be praying here

WITH you, Cowboy.


Nite now....

So what is a "human"? What is the difference between us and our creator besides the flesh we are restricted by?


John 14:12


12Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me, the works that I do shall he do also; and greater works than these shall he do; because I go unto my Father.

And by noooooooooooooo means am I saying we are as great or as powerful as he.

Reason of posting last verse, was could a mere "human" be able to do as Jesus did? And even greater? as he specifically said.

Now Jesus did do something for us all that NO ONE could ever take the place of. He gave his life for us, he died on the cross so we would not have to. No one could EVER do a greater thing then that.

Cowboy...actually the scriptures were trying to be nice....according to the scriptures you're nothing more than dirt

yep not even Jesus ....

can the father create a cross that Jesus can't lift ...of course

can Jesus create a cross that the Father can't lift.. of course not

yep that's the direction that Christianity is going....some christans even claim that a human being named Jesus was God

CowboyGH said:


CowboyGH .
Christians follow Jesus Christ and his teaching ,

Christianity is based on the life and teachings of Jesus

You claimed :



Now we are sure why Jesus raises from the dead - he couldn’t bear anymore
nonsense abt him spreading from ppl like you

Jesus didn't teach "Christianity" in specifics. Or else there couldn't be so many different denominations inside of that one belief.

"Christianity" is a belief system on the way THEY believe Jesus ment what he said and how he said it.. "they" would be involving who ever started the religion "Christianity". God isn't about religion, God is about relationship. A personal relationship at that. It can not be personal when you are told what God wants from a third party. That is why it's personal, the walk itself is personal, and the findings of what God wants personally would then also be personal.

Yes we are told to "congregate", come together. But that is so we can get a better understanding of the scriptures. Not specifically so one man can get up and inform us all of what God wants. But so we could all sit down and give OUR views of certain things God said and how to apply them keeping what is said in context.

If this was done, it would keep self agenda out of it and would give a better understanding from a different view, kind of a "oh didn't think of it that way" kinda way.

Cowboy why are you quoting yourself? Nearly all of the above gray quotes are yours. Nice way to ruin the flow of the page.

However I must classify you as 'they' by your own words...

to Wit...
" "Christianity" is a belief system on the way THEY believe Jesus ment what he said and how he said it.. "they" would be involving who ever started the religion "Christianity"."
-------------------------
From my point of view you fit within the discription of the belief system of 'christianity'.
This makes you part of 'they'.
I have a differing belief structure.

You see Mohammad came after Christ (yet christianity did not see the promised Comforter)... therefore the Word of God is larger then you know.

God raises mankind by steps (as you would raise your child)...

Mohammad was not the last Prophet.

Glory came at the time set by the Witnesses (yet they saw him not for they looked for Jesus whom has ascended).

actually Jesus was teaching Buddhism ....Buddha could have sued Jesus for copyright infringment except for the fact that Buddism was about reincarnation and being born anew in another physical existence and Jesus taught resurrection and rising from the dead in the same existence

Cowboy has conversations with himself....generally someone will create more than one profile to do this, but not Cowboy

I'm being saying it for years that there are Three Cowboys...which I call The Unholy Trinity

THE UNHOLY TRINITY

Cowboy 1 ...The False Gospeler
Cowboy 2....find passages to back up the false Gospel
Cowboy 3...generally admits that the other 2 Cowboys are false gospelers

the Three Cowboys form one God that is called "CowboyGH"

to prove that "CowboyGH" is a God,..."Cowboy 2" will constantly present the bible passage "Ye Are All Gods"

that passage "Ye Are All Gods" actually refers to Judges and Magistrates or to those that place themselves into the role of God and judge others ...but "Cowboy 2" used the passage to back up "Cowboy 1" false gospeling that "CowboyGH" is a real God

Because each quote was a continuation of one another, not necassarily a response.

Those things mentioned of the past, as you continuosly hold over my head were mistakes, they were indeed false. But I have learned since then and no longer state those false things I once stated. What's your point? Do you not learn?