so get a degree Sin - that simple

or graduate HS if u have not done that yet

I will help u if u need help - all ya gotta do is ask

A bit late in the game. Barry has done much damage.
But, if it will keep him off a ballot and we don't have to pay benefits after he's gone, it will be worth it.

Bill Text 112th Congress (2011-2012) H.CON.RES.107.IH


H.CON.RES.107 -- Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high... (Introduced in House - IH)

HCON 107 IH

112th CONGRESS
2d Session

H. CON. RES. 107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 7, 2012

Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary


CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress's exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.CON.RES.107:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=Vuu7ma4B8wY

problem is, no war was declared, and article four doesnt DEFINE what a high crime or misdemeanor is,,,,,


another problem is that army nor navy was used (nor 'states militia'), which under the constitution are the two branches he is EXPLICITLY commmander in chief of

it mentions nothing of the AIR FORCES which accompanied other UN forces,,,,,

I keep hearing this claim. How has THIS PRESIDENT specifically destroyed the Constitution or bill of rights?

How has this president specifically 'claimed' dictatorial power over american citizens? (If mentioning the NDAA, why wasnt the INITIATOR of said power George Bush endited, when he originally imparted that same power to the presidential office with the AUMF?)



Since when is a bow a HIGH OFFENSE (If mentioning Egypt, why would congress consider it a high offense when congress approves Egypts status as an MNNA to receive american military and financial benefit?)


What part of the constitution denies a President any part of the UN council?


,,,if the question is why has it taken so long for congress to be offended by such (longstanding) presidential powers,,,,,,,

I think I know the answer,,,,,,

on with making their 'example' of this President,,,,lol

Actually, as commander in chief all he can do without the approval of congress is position and move the military. He cannot open fire on another or another country......he can return fire if fired upon but not give the okay to fire or make war upon another.....

who did he 'make war' on,,,?

dont military commanders give 'orders' to fire,,,,?

They do but only with congressional approval to give the order to fire upon another......they need approval to give those orders....

..but was the USA in that event, the aggressor or the defender?

If the US openly sought out said engagement; it is an act of "war".

If they defended themselves, then the act of war was done against us.

After all, it's not officially "war" until it is "declared".

what is Jones' legal background

people bring forth futile cases in the judicial system all the time, why would impeachment cases be different?

I get it. He is a hard working man, a longtime politician, and a former vet (of four years)

but I cant find what his NON POLITICAL background is,,,,,in terms of the constitution or the law (Education, experience,,,etc,,)

Here is a little about Jone's moral character and sense of civic duty to the people.

GOP Rep. Walter Jones: Bring troops home instead of cutting school lunch programs

Republican Congressman Walter Jones of North Carolina said Tuesday that all U.S. military forces should be pulled out of Afghanistan now that Osama bin Laden is dead.

“Why this Congress continues to complain about budgets and cuts and deficits and debts — and our young men and women are walking the roads of Afghanistan getting their legs blown off and getting killed — we still sit here in Congress and don’t bring it up as an issue,” he said on the House floor.

Jones added that Afghan President Hamid Karzai was a “corrupt leader,” and that the U.S. was spending billions of dollars every month in the country, yet Congress was eying cuts to school lunch programs for American children and cuts to benefits for American senior citizens.

“More important than the money,” he added, “is the pain of war, and this Congress needs to come together and say to Obama, ‘lets bring em home, this year, next year, not in 2014.’”

rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/05/gop-rep-walter-jones-bring-troops-home-instead-of-cutting-school-lunch-programs/

I believe he probably is a 'good' man

Im from the Anne Frank school of belief that MOST people actually are 'good'

but even good people can be dead wrong,,,,,and even good people can be mistaken, and even good people dont know everything about everything and even less about many things

Oh I think a lot of people would see him impeached and I doubt he has much chance in 2012

for that reason I think the impeachment is a waste - he'll be gone in Nov anyway

the economy, gas prices, jobless and UNDERemployment rates, and questions about his naturalization all will hurt him - not to mention the bail outs and mandatory health insurance which is tyranny - this is the short list Harmony

sorry luv ya & I know how much u like Mr Obama

but I will agree, that as military commander & chief and President he deserves to be discussed with respect. And as military commander in chief (where I NEVER would have put him - no experience) his decisions are just that - he's allowed. that is wht it is so important to have someone in the office who can make those decisions

Oh I think a lot of people would see him impeached and I doubt he has much chance in 2012

for that reason I think the impeachment is a waste - he'll be gone in Nov anyway

the economy, gas prices, jobless and UNDERemployment rates, and questions about his naturalization all will hurt him - not to mention the bail outs and mandatory health insurance which is tyranny - this is the short list Harmony

sorry luv ya & I know how much u like Mr Obama

but I will agree, that as military commander & chief and President he deserves to be discussed with respect. And as military commander in chief (where I NEVER would have put him - no experience) his decisions are just that - he's allowed. that is wht it is so important to have someone in the office who can make those decisions

or someone smart enough to surround themself with those who have the experience to aide him in those decisions

luv you too, and think your short list is mostly propoganda
the naturalization issue is a non issue that isnt and will never be proven without also implying a whole state GOVERNMENT is in a conspiracy

gas prices, that a president has not as much to do with as GLOBAL oil trends do

the 'bailouts' can and have been argued to have stopped things from getting WORSE than they were at the beginning of 2009

the mandatory health insurance will continue to be debated by some as tyrannical and by others as within government authority to control inter state commerce, just as all other western governments do


jobs are picking back up as are employment rates, the economy will follow,,, not as QUICKLY as some were expecting or demanding, but it will happen just the same in part (in my opinion) because of actions taken under this administration


that and the continued polls which show OBAMA pummelling all other republican candidates

,, and I think not everyone is as sure that he will not get reelected

hence, the desperate measures to 'impeach'

,,,

Reasons I cannot support Obama:

1. Unemployment may be dropping, but in my area, such is only due to people being unable to collect anymore; thus still "unemployed" but now I guess they just consider them "jobless".

2. Congress doesn't like him. The reasons for this, I honestly could careless; however, Congress sucks so as it is, but if there's a president they can at least "stand" in the same room; some "progress" can at least be hoped to be achieved.

3. Jobs that opened in this area since this so-called "raise in employment". Half of them are government related, a quarter of them are in construction hardcore manual labor which, people with a bad knee (me) can't even attempt. The other quarter? Good luck getting your foot in the door without a 2-4 year education and a hella good resume to back it up. Hard to get experience when no one gives you a chance.

4. Minimum Wage goes up - our good jobs go overseas. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't his fault. But it literally benefits big businesses to pay the Chinese, etc, to do what we can do for a heck of a lot cheaper. It's sad when you do all your business here and have a 75% more chance of going bankrupt. *shakes head*

5. WTF are his main focuses right now? Every time I see him, something about "war" or such related keeps popping out of his mouth. As if that's our biggest concern.

Now..

Why I won't vote for Mitt, or wtf ever other douche gets nominated:

1. They are all hypocritical flat out lying douche nuggets.

2. I'd rather re-elect Bush for a third term then any of these guys that actually stand a chance to win it.

3. Every time I see them talking, I can literally see their Pinocchio nose growing inch by inch with each word.

4. Spending millions just to degrade the other guys "reputation" with false propaganda is getting REALLY old.

That's MO.

that would be a fair warning from the DAY he was elected, when he became one of the presidents with the MOST assassination threats in the history of presidents,,,,,,


things change, but things remain the same,,,

I have both, don't need your help, but do appreciate the thought.:)

I meant my friends and other people in my area.

I actually just got a call to work IT for TD Bank.

You should look into Loss Prevention. It pays a lot better and is a lot more fun.